Skip to main content
Log in

Ant repellent resins of honeybees and stingless bees

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Insectes Sociaux Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We measured the repellent effects of plant resins against the weaver ants, Oecophylla smaragdina. The resins were the sticky bands of the dwarf honeybees, Apis florea and A. andreniformis, propolis of the Western honeybee, A. mellifera and the nest entrance tubes of the stingless bees, Tetrigona apicalis, Lepidotrigona terminata, and Tetragonula collina. A bioassay was developed for testing the effects of these resins in field experiments by placing them along natural foraging pathways of ants’ nests. A repellency index was generated to quantify this bioactivity. The sticky bands of dwarf honeybees and propolis of A. mellifera were significantly more repellent against O. smaragdina than were the entrance tube resins of the stingless bees. Nonetheless, the diverse, viscid and adhesive resins employed by these bees constitute a generally effective first-line of defense against depredations of a formidable adversary, the weaver ants.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Betz O. and Kolsch G. 2004. The role of adhesion in prey capture and predator defense in arthropods. Arthropod Struct. Dev. 33: 3-30

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Burdock G.A. 1998. Review of the biological properties and toxicity of bee propolis (propolis). Food Chem. Toxicol. 36: 347-363

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Duangphakdee O., Koeniger N., Koeniger G., Wongsiri S. and Deowanish S. 2005. Reinforcing a barrier—a specific social defense of the dwarf honeybee (Apis florea) released by the weaver ant (Oecophylla smaragdina). Apidologie 36: 505-511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Debboun M., Frances S.P. and Strickman D. 2006. Insect Repellents: Principles, Methods, and Uses. CRC Press 495 pp

  • Eisner T. 2003. For Love of Insects. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA. 448 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans D.L. and Schmidt J.O. (Eds). 1990. Insect Defenses: Adaptive Mechanisms and Strategies of Prey and Predators. State University of New York Press, Albany, NY. 482 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghisalberti E.L. 1978. Propolis: a review. Bee World 60: 59-84

    Google Scholar 

  • Hermann H.R. and Blum M.S. 1981. Defense mechanisms in the social Hymenoptera. In: Social Insects (Hermann H.R., Ed). Academic Press, NY. pp 77-197

    Google Scholar 

  • Hölldobler B. and Wilson E.O. 1978. The multiple recruitment system of the African weaver ant Oecophylla longinoda (Latreille) (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 3: 19-60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hölldobler B. and Wilson E.O. 1990. The Ants. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA. 732 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard J.J. 1985. Observations on resin collecting by six interacting species of stingless bees (Apidae: Meliponinae). J. Kans. Ent. Soc. 58: 337-345

    Google Scholar 

  • Khoo S.G. and Yong H.S. 1987. Nest structure and colony defense in the stingless bee Trigona terminata Smith. Nature Malaysiana 12: 4-15

    Google Scholar 

  • Leonhardt S.D., Blüthgen N. and Schmitt T. 2009. Smelling like resin: terpenoids account for species-specific cuticular profiles in Southeast-Asian stingless bees. Insect. Soc. 56 (in press)

  • Maidl F. 1934. Die Lebensgewohnheiten und Instinkte der staatenbildenden Insekten, Fritz Wagner, Wien. 823 pp

  • Marcucci M.C. 1995. Propolis: chemical composition, biological properties and therapeutic activity. Apidologie 26: 83-99

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Michener C.D. 1974. The Social Behavior of the Bees: A Comparative Study. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA. 404 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Michener C.D. 2007. The Bees of the World, 2nd Ed. John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore. 953 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Morse R.A. and Flottum K. (Eds). 1997. Honeybees Pests, Predators and Diseases, 3 rd Ed. A.I. Root Co., Medina, OH. 718 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakamura J. and Seeley T.D. 2006. The functional organization of resin work in honeybee colonies. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 60: 339-349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oldroyd B.P. and Wongsiri S. 2006. Asian Honeybees: Biology, Conservation and Human Interactions. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA. 340 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Popova M., Silici S., Kaftanoglu O. and Bankova V. 2005. Antibacterial activity of Turkish propolis and its qualitative and quantitative chemical composition. Phytomedicine 12: 221-8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Punchihewa R.W.K. 1994. Beekeeping for Honey Production in Sri Lanka: Management of Asiatic Hive Honeybee Apis cerana in its Natural Tropical Monsoonal Environment. Sri Lanka Department of Agriculture, Peradeniya Sri Lanka and Canadian International Development Agency, Quebec, Canada. 232 pp

  • Rasmussen C. 2008. Catalog of the Indo-Malayan/Australasian stingless bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae: Meliponini). Zootaxa. 1935: 1-80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roubik D.W. 1989. Ecology and Natural History of Tropical Bees. Cambridge University Press, NY. 514 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Roubik D.W. 2006. Stingless bee nesting biology. Apidologie 37: 124-143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sakagami S.F. 1982. Stingless bees. In: Social Insects (Hermann H.R., Ed). Academic Press, NY. pp 361-432

    Google Scholar 

  • Sakagami S.F, Inoue T., Yamane S. and Salmah S. 1983. Stingless bees. In: Ecological Study on Social Insects in Central Sumatra with Special Reference to Wasps and Bees (Ohgushi R., Ed). Sumatra Nature Study (Entomology), Kanazawa University, Kanazawa, Japan. pp 37-56

  • Seeley T.D. 1983. The ecology of temperate and tropical honeybee societies. Am. Sci. 71: 264-272

    Google Scholar 

  • Seeley T.D. 1985. Honeybee Ecology: A Study of Adaptation in Social Life. Princeton University Press. NJ. 201 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Seeley T.D., Seeley R.H. and Akratanakul P. 1982. Colony defense strategies of the honeybees in Thailand. Ecol. Monogr. 52: 43-63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wongsiri S., Lekprayoon C., Thapa R., Thirakupt K., Rinderer T.E., Sylvester H.A., Oldroyd B.P. and Booncham U. 1996. Comparative biology of Apis andreniformis and Apis florea in Thailand. Bee World 77: 23-35

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Our thanks to Dr. Gudrun Koeniger for her kind support; Prof. Dr. Ulrich Maschwitz for valuable advice; Prof. Chariya Lekprayoon for providing facilities at Chulalongkorn University; Dr. Mananya Phiancharoen for her kind help. The Thailand Research Fund is acknowledged for financial support through the Royal Golden Jubilee Project. Colleen Hepburn kindly reviewed the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to O. Duangphakdee.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Duangphakdee, O., Koeniger, N., Deowanish, S. et al. Ant repellent resins of honeybees and stingless bees. Insect. Soc. 56, 333–339 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00040-009-0027-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00040-009-0027-z

Keywords

Navigation