Summary
¶Epidemiology represents an interesting and unique example of cross-fertilization between social and natural sciences. Epidemiology has evolved from a monocausal to a multicausal concept of the "web of causation", thus mimicking a similar and much earlier shift in the social sciences. However, in comparison with the social sciences epidemiology is both more sensitive to underlying biological models (which condition the interpretation of population findings), and more prone to a simplification of the causal pathways. Paradoxically, epidemiology has developed more sophisticated theoretical models for bias and confounding than the social sciences did, but for the practical purpose of identifying single preventable risk factors. Epidemiology makes use more often of study designs that simulate experimentation, than of surveys in the general population.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
RID="*"
ID="*"Address for correspondence: Prof. Paolo Vineis, Unit of Clinical Epidemiology, Ospedale S. Giovanni Battista, via Santena 7, I-10126 Torino, Phone: +39-011-670-6525, Fax: +39-011-670-6692, e-mail: paolo.vineis@unito.it
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Vineis, P. Causality in epidemiology. Soz.-Präventivmed. 48, 80–87 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00038-003-1029-7
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00038-003-1029-7