Abstract.
Let τ(n) be the minimum number of arithmetic operations required to build the integer \(n \in \mathbb{N}\) from the constants 1 and 2. A sequence x n is said to be “easy to compute” if there exists a polynomial p such that \(\tau (x_n ) \leq p(\log n)\) for all It is natural to conjecture that sequences such as \(\left\lfloor {2^n \ln 2} \right\rfloor \) or n! are not easy to compute. In this paper we show that a proof of this conjecture for the first sequence would imply a superpolynomial lower bound for the arithmetic circuit size of the permanent polynomial. For the second sequence, a proof would imply a superpolynomial lower bound for the permanent or P ≠ PSPACE.
Similar content being viewed by others
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Koiran, P. Valiant’s model and the cost of computing integers. comput. complex. 13, 131–146 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00037-004-0186-2
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00037-004-0186-2