Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Noise Reduction Based on Soft Masks by Incorporating SNR Uncertainty in Frequency Domain

  • Published:
Circuits, Systems, and Signal Processing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The binary mask approach has been studied recently to reduce the background noise and improve the speech intelligibility and quality in the noisy surroundings. This mask is usually applied at the time–frequency illustration of a noisy speech and discards portions of a speech below a signal-to-noise-ratio (SNR) threshold, whereas allowing others to pass over intact. The threshold, however, is normally very low, and considerable residual noise would exist. Moreover, the precise estimate of local instantaneous SNR in practical applications is a difficult task. By modeling the local instantaneous SNR as Fisher–Snedecor distributed random variable, the soft masks for noise reduction are derived by incorporating SNR uncertainty in the frequency domain. Instead of finding a different method to estimate the local instantaneous SNR, the probability of local instantaneous SNR is computed higher than the threshold. The results indicated that soft masks yielded significantly better speech quality in terms of speech distortion and residual noise.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. M.C. Anzalone, L. Calandruccio, K.A. Doherty, L.H. Carney, Determination of the potential benefit of time-frequency gain manipulation. Ear Hear. 27(5), 480 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. M. Berouti, R. Schwartz, J. Makhoul, Enhancement of speech corrupted by acoustic noise, in IEEE International Conference Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, vol. 4, pp. 208–211 (1979)

  3. J.G. Beerends, J.A. Stemerdink, A perceptual speech-quality measure based on a psychoacoustic sound representation. J. Audio Eng. Soc. 42(3), 115–123 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  4. S.F. Boll, Suppression of acoustic noise in speech using spectral subtraction. IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process. 27(2), 113–120 (1979)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. D.S. Brungart, P.S. Chang, B.D. Simpson, D. Wang, Isolating the energetic component of speech-on-speech masking with ideal time-frequency segregation. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 120(6), 4007–4018 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. N. Chatlani, J.J. Soraghan, EMD-based filtering (EMDF) of low-frequency noise for speech enhancement. IEEE Trans. Audio Speech Lang. Process. 20(4), 1158–1166 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. E. Cho, J.O. Smith, B. Widrow, Exploiting the harmonic structure for speech enhancement, in Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), 2012, pp. 4569–4572

  8. I. Cohen, B. Berdugo, Noise estimation by minima controlled recursive averaging for robust speech enhancement. IEEE Signal Process. Lett. 9(1), 12–15 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. M.A. Cooke, Glimpsing model of speech perception in noise. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 119(3), 1562–1573 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. M.A. Cooke, P.D. Green, L. Josifovski, A. Vizinho, Robust automatic speech recognition with missing and unreliable acoustic data. Speech Commun. 34(3), 267–285 (2001)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. M.A. Cooke, P.D. Green, M. Crawford, Handling missing data in speech recognition, in International Conference of Spoken Language Processing (ICSLP) (1994), pp. 1555–1558

  12. E.J. Diethorn, Y. Huang, J. Benesty, Subband noise reduction methods for speech enhancement, in Audio Signal Processing for Next-Generation Multimedia Communication Systems (2004), pp. 91–115

  13. G.H. Ding, T. Huang, B. Xu, Suppression of additive noise using a power spectral density MMSE estimator. IEEE Signal Process. Lett. 11(6), 585–588 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. P. Divenyi, Speech Separation by Humans and Machines (Springer, Berlin, 2004), pp. 13–30

    Google Scholar 

  15. D.L. Donoho, I.M. Johnstone, Adapting to unknown smoothness via wavelet shrinkage. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 90(432), 1200–1224 (1995)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Y. Ephraim, D. Malah, Speech enhancement using a minimum mean-square error log-spectral amplitude estimator. IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process. 33(2), 443–445 (1985)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Y. Ephraim, D. Malah, Speech enhancement using a minimum-mean square error short-time spectral amplitude estimator. IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process. 32(6), 1109–1121 (1984)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. W. Etter, G.S. Moschytz, Noise reduction by noise-adaptive spectral magnitude expansion. J. Audio Eng. Soc. 42(5), 341–349 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  19. C. Faller, J. Chen, Suppressing acoustic echo in a spectral envelope space. IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process. 13(5), 1048–1062 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. B. Gao, W.L. Woo, S.S. Dlay, Unsupervised single-channel separation of nonstationary signals using gammatone filterbank and itakura-saito nonnegative matrix two-dimensional factorizations. IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. 60(3), 662–675 (2013)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. B. Gao, W.L. Woo, S.S. Dlay, Adaptive sparsity non-negative matrix factorization for single-channel source separation. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Signal Process. 5(5), 989–1001 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Y. Hu, P.C. Loizou, Evaluation of objective measures for speech enhancement. IEEE Trans. Audio Speech Lang. Process. 16(1), 229–238 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Y. Hu, P.C. Loizou, Subjective evaluation and comparison of speech enhancement algorithms. Speech Commun. 49, 588–601 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. N. Li, P.C. Loizou, Factors influencing intelligibility of ideal binary-masked speech: implications for noise reduction. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 123(3), 1673–1682 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Y. Li, D. Wang, On the optimality of ideal binary time-frequency masks. Speech Commun. 51(3), 230–239 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  26. P.C. Loizou, Speech Enhancement: Theory and Practice (CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2013)

    Google Scholar 

  27. R. Martin, Noise power spectral density estimation based on optimal smoothing and minimum statistics. IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process. 9(5), 504–512 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. R. McAulay, M. Malpass, Speech enhancement using a soft-decision noise suppression filter. IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process. 28(2), 137–145 (1980)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. S.L. McCabe, M.J. Denham, A model of auditory streaming, in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (1996), pp. 52–58

  30. M.A.B. Messaoud, A. Bouzid, Sparse representations for single channel speech enhancement based on voiced/unvoiced classification. Circuits Syst. Signal Process. 36(5), 1912–1933 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. H. Momeni, H.R. Abutalebi, Generalization of maximum a posteriori amplitude estimator under speech presence uncertainty for speech enhancement. Circuits Syst. Signal Process. 33(8), 2565–2582 (2014)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  32. S. Rangachari, P.C. Loizou, A noise-estimation algorithm for highly non-stationary environments. Speech Commun. 48(2), 220–231 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. A.W. Rix, J.G. Beerends, M.P. Hollier, A.P. Hekstra, Perceptual evaluation of speech quality (PESQ)-a new method for speech quality assessment of telephone networks and codecs, in IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processingvol. 2 (2001), pp. 749–752

  34. N. Roman, D. Wang, Pitch-based monaural segregation of reverberant speech. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 120(1), 458–469 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. N. Roman, D. Wang, G.J. Brown, Speech segregation based on sound localization. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 114(4), 2236–2252 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. N. Saleem, Single channel noise reduction system in low SNR. Int. J. Speech Technol. 20(1), 89–98 (2017)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  37. N. Saleem, M. Shafi, E. Mustafa, A. Nawaz, A novel binary mask estimation based on spectral subtraction gain-induced distortions for improved speech intelligibility and quality. Univ. Eng. Technol. Taxila. Tech. J. 20(4), 36 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  38. N. Saleem, E. Mustafa, A. Nawaz, A. Khan, Ideal binary masking for reducing convolutive noise. Int. J. Speech Technol. 18(4), 547–554 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. P. Scalart, Speech enhancement based on a priori signal to noise estimation, in IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing vol. 2 (1996), pp. 629–632

  40. B.L. Sim, Y.C. Tong, J.S. Chang, C.T. Tan, A parametric formulation of the generalized spectral subtraction method. IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process. 6(4), 328–337 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. S. Srinivasan, Y. Shao, Z. Jin, D. Wang : A computational auditory scene analysis system for robust speech recognition, in International Conference on Spoken Language Processing (2006)

  42. C.H. Taal, R.C. Hendriks, R. Heusdens, J. Jensen, An algorithm for intelligibility prediction of time-frequency weighted noisy speech. IEEE Trans. Audio Speech Lang. Process. 19(7), 2125–2136 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. R. Tavares, R. Coelho, Speech enhancement with nonstationary acoustic noise detection in time domain. IEEE Signal Process. Lett. 23(1), 6–10 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. D. Wang, G.J. Brown, Computational auditory scene analysis: principles, algorithms, and applications (Wiley-IEEE Press, Hoboken, 2006)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  45. D. Wang, Primitive auditory segregation based on oscillatory correlation. Cognitive Sci. 20(3), 409–456 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. L. Zao, R. Coelho, P. Flandrin, Speech enhancement with emd and hurst-based mode selection. IEEE Trans. Audio Speech Lang. Process. 22(5), 899–911 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the editor and the anonymous reviewers for their helpful and constructive comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Electrical Engineering, Gomal University, Dera Ismail Khan, 29050, Pakistan

    Nasir Saleem

  2. Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology, Kohat, 26000, Pakistan

    Muhammad Irfan

Authors
  1. Nasir Saleem
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Muhammad Irfan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nasir Saleem.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Saleem, N., Irfan, M. Noise Reduction Based on Soft Masks by Incorporating SNR Uncertainty in Frequency Domain. Circuits Syst Signal Process 37, 2591–2612 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00034-017-0684-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00034-017-0684-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation