Skip to main content
Log in

PSEUDO-DERIVATIONS AND MODULAR INVARIANT THEORY

  • Published:
Transformation Groups Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Let k be a field of positive characteristic p. We introduce the notion of a pseudo-derivation of a k-algebra A, and give a one-to-one correspondence between the set of all pseudo-derivations of A and the set of all p-unipotent automorphisms of A. We classify p-unipotent triangular automorphisms of a polynomial ring k[x, y, z] in three variables over k up to conjugation of automorphisms of k[x, y, z]. We prove that if a p-cyclic group /pℤ acts triangularly on the polynomial ring k[x, y, z], the modular invariant ring k[x, y, z]/pℤ is a hypersurface ring.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. H. E. A. Campbell, D. L. Wehlau, Modular Invariant Theory, Encyclopaedia of Mathematical Sciences, Vol. 139, Subseries Invariant Theory and Algebraic Transformation Groups, Vol. VIII, Springer, Berlin, 2011.

  2. L. E. Dickson, On Invariants and the Theory of Numbers, The Madison Colloquium (1913, Part 1), Amer. Math. Society, reprinted by Dover, New York, 1966.

  3. S. Maubach, Invariants and conjugacy classes of triangular polynomial maps, J. Pure Appl. Algebra 219 (2015), no. 12, 5206–5224.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. M. Miyanishi, Lectures on Curves on Rational and Unirational Surfaces, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research Lectures on Mathematics and Physics, Vol. 60, Narosa, 1978.

  5. R. J. Shank, S.A.G.B.I. bases for rings of formal modular seminvariants, Comment. Math. Helv. 73 (1998), no. 4, 548–565.

  6. R. J. Shank, Classical covariants and modular invariants, in: Invariant Theory in All Characteristics, CRM Proc. Lecture Notes, Vol. 35, Amer. Math. Society, Providence, RI, 2004, pp. 241–249.

  7. Y. Takeda, Artin-Schreier coverings of algebraic surfaces, J. Math. Soc. Japan 41 (1989), no. 3, 415–435.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. D. L. Wehlau, Invariants for modular representations of a cyclic group of prime order via classical invariant theory, J. Eur. Math. Soc. 15 (2013), no. 3, 775–803.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. W. L. G. Williams, Fundamental systems of formal modular seminvariants of the binary cubic, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 22 (1921), no. 1, 56–79.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. D. Wright, Abelian subgroups of Autk(k[X, Y]) and applications to actions on the affine plane, Illinois J. Math. 23 (1979), no. 4, 579–634.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to RYUJI TANIMOTO.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

TANIMOTO, R. PSEUDO-DERIVATIONS AND MODULAR INVARIANT THEORY. Transformation Groups 23, 271–297 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00031-017-9461-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00031-017-9461-6

Navigation