Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Environmental heterogeneity drives macrophyte beta diversity patterns in permanent and temporary ponds in an agricultural landscape

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Aquatic Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Understanding patterns of beta diversity (heterogeneity) and its components (substitution and subset) is important for managing freshwater ecosystems and the research on these topics has increased over the last decade. However, there has been limited empirical research exploring the drivers of these components of beta diversity in ponds from agricultural landscapes, in which hydroperiod length is often a key structural driver. The purpose of our work was to examine the contribution of substitution (species replacement among sites without changes in richness) and subset (species differences among sites when species-poor sites constitute subsets of those with a greater number of taxa) structuring processes on macrophyte beta diversity patterns of sixteen permanent and ten temporary Mediterranean ponds. We also aimed to test the structuring role of local environmental factors and geographic isolation and to determine whether there are differences in the community heterogeneity and the relative importance of the substitution and subset fractions of beta diversity between permanent and temporary ponds. We found that temporary ponds were environmentally and biologically less heterogeneous and supported lower richness than permanent waterbodies. In both pond types, beta diversity almost entirely reflected patterns of species substitution rather than subsets. Local environmental conditions, and not among-pond distance, were the main drivers of macrophyte community structure. Overall, our results suggest that local environmental variables operating through niche processes were the primary mechanisms driving macrophyte beta diversity patterns, thus highlighting the importance of environmental heterogeneity for maintaining pond community diversity in agricultural landscapes. Accordingly, conservation initiatives and ecosystem management strategies should include permanent and temporary pond clusters comprising wide environmental gradients in their efforts to ensure high levels of regional biodiversity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akasaka M, Takamura N, Mitsuhashi H, Kadono Y (2010) Effects of land use on aquatic macrophyte diversity and water quality of ponds. Freshw Biol 55:909–922

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Alahuhta J (2015) Geographic patterns of lake macrophyte communities and species richness at regional scale. J Veg Sci 26:564–575

    Google Scholar 

  • Alahuhta J, Kosten S, Akasaka M, Auderset D, Azzella M, Bolpagni R, Heino J (2017) Global variation in the beta diversity of lake macrophytes is driven by environmental heterogeneity rather than latitude. J Biogeogr Biogeogr 44:1758–1769

    Google Scholar 

  • Alahuhta J, Rääpysjärvi J, Hellsten S, Kuoppala M, Aroviita J (2015) Species sorting drives variation of boreal lake and river macrophyte communities. Commun Ecol 16:76–85

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson MJ (2001) A new method for non-parametric multivariate analysis of variance. Aust Ecol 26:32–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson MJ, Crist TO, Chase JM, Vellend M, Inouye BD, Freestone AL, Sanders NJ, Cornell HV, Comita LS, Davies KF, Harrison SP, Kraft NJB, Stegen JC, Swenson NG (2011) Navigating the multiple meanings of β diversity: a roadmap for the practicing ecologist. Ecol Lett 14:19–28

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson MJ, Ellingsen KE, McArdle BH (2006) Multivariate dispersion as a measure of beta diversity. Ecol Lett 9:683–693

    Google Scholar 

  • APHA (1989) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 17th edn. American Public Health Association, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson CL, Golladay SW, First MR (2011) Water quality and planktonic microbial assemblages of isolated wetlands in an agricultural landscape. Wetlands 31:885–894

    Google Scholar 

  • Baselga A (2010) Partitioning the turnover and nestedness components of beta diversity. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 19:134–143

    Google Scholar 

  • Baselga A (2013) Separating the two components of abundance-based dissimilarity: balanced changes in abundance vs. abundance gradients. Methods Ecol Evol 4:552–557

    Google Scholar 

  • Baselga A (2017) Partitioning abundance-based multiple-site dissimilarity into components: balanced variation in abundance and abundance gradients. Methods Ecol Evol 8:799–808

    Google Scholar 

  • Baselga A, Orme CDL, Villéger S, De Bortoli J, Leprieur F (2017) betapart: partitioning beta diversity into turnover and nestedness components. R package version 1.4. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=betapart

  • Boschilia SM, de Oliveira EF, Schwarzbold A (2016) Partitioning beta diversity of aquatic macrophyte assemblages in a large subtropical reservoir: prevalence of turnover or nestedness? Aquat Sci 78:615–625

    Google Scholar 

  • Bosiacka B, Pienkowski P (2012) Do biogeographic parameters matter? Plant species richness and distribution of macrophytes in relation to area and isolation of ponds in NW Polish agricultural landscape. Hydrobiologia 689:79–90

    Google Scholar 

  • Castroviejo S et al. (Eds.) (1986–2013) Flora Iberica: Plantas vasculares de la Península Ibérica e Islas Baleares, vols. 1–8, 10–15, 17–18, 20, 21. Real Jardín Botánico C.S.I.C, Madrid, Spain.

  • CEC (1995) Wise use and conservation of wetlands, COM (95) 18 a Final. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg

    Google Scholar 

  • Chase JM (2003) Community assembly: when should history matter? Oecologia 136:489–498

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chase JM (2007) Drought mediates the importance of stochastic community assembly. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:17430–17434

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chase JM, Leibold MA (2003) Ecological niches: linking classical and contemporary approaches. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Cirujano S, Cambra J, Sánchez-Castillo PM, Meco A, Flor-Arnau N (2008) Flora Iberica, Algas Continentales: Carófitos (Characeae). Real Jardín Botánico, CSIC, Madrid, Spain

    Google Scholar 

  • Cirujano S, Meco A, García P, Chirino M (2014) Flora acuática española Hidrófitos vasculares. Real Jardín Botánico, CSIC, Madrid

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke KR, Ainsworth M (1993) A method of linking multivariate community structure to environmental variables. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 92:205–219

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke KR, Warwick RM (2010) Change in marine communities: an approach to Statistical Analysis and Interpretation, 2nd edn. Primer-E Ltd, Plymouth

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronk JK, Fennessy MS (2001) Wetland plants: biology and ecology. Lewis Publisher, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies BR, Biggs J, Williams P, Whitfield M, Nicolet P, Sear D, Bray S, Maund S (2008) Comparative biodiversity of aquatic habitats in the European agricultural landscape. Agr Ecosyst Environ 125:1–8

    Google Scholar 

  • De Meester L, Declerck S, Stoks R, Louette G, Van de Meutter F, de Bie T, Michels E, Brendonck L (2005) Ponds and pools as model systems in conservation biology, ecology and evolutionary biology. Aquatic Conserv Mar Freshw Ecosyst 15:715–725

    Google Scholar 

  • Della Bella V, Bazzanti M, Dowgiallo MG, Iberite M (2008) Macrophyte diversity and physico-chemical characteristics of Tyrrhenian coast ponds in central Italy: implications for conservation. Hydrobiologia 597:85–95

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Escalera-Vázquez LH, Zambrano L (2010) The effect of seasonal variation in abiotic factors on fish community structure in temporary and permanent pools in a tropical wetland. Freshw Biol 55:2557–2569

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernández-Aláez C, Fernández-Aláez M, García-Criado F, García-Girón J (2018) Environmental drivers of aquatic macrophyte assemblages in ponds along an altitudinal gradient. Hydrobiologia 812:79–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernández-Aláez C, Fernández-Aláez M, Santiago NF, Núñez G, Aboal M (2012) ID-tax. Catálogo y claves de identificación de organismos del grupo macrófitos utilizados como elementos de calidad en las redes de control del estado ecológico. Ministerio de Agricultura, Alimentación y Medio Ambiente, Madrid, Spain

  • Florencio M, Serrano L, Gómez-Rodríguez C, Millán A, Díaz-Paniagua C (2009) Inter and intra-annual variations of macroinvertebrate assemblages are related to the hydroperiod in Mediterranean temporary ponds. Hydrobiologia 634:167–183

    Google Scholar 

  • Gioria M, Schaffers A, Bacaro G, Feehan J (2010) The conservation value of farmland ponds: predicting water beetle assemblages using vascular plants as a surrogate group. Biol Cons 143:1125–1133

    Google Scholar 

  • Grillas P, Gauthier P, Yavercovski N, Perennou C (2004) Mediterranean Temporary Pools, Volume 1 Issues relating to conservation, functioning and management. Station biologique de la Tour du Valat, Arles, France

  • Grillas P, Roché J (1997) Vegetation of temporary marshes. Ecology and Management, Station Biologique de la Tour du Valat, Arles, France

    Google Scholar 

  • He F, Legendre P (2002) Species diversity patterns derived from species-area models. Ecology 83:1185–1198

    Google Scholar 

  • Heino J, Tolonen KT (2017) Ecological drivers of multiple facets of beta diversity in a lentic macroinvertebrate metacommunity. Limnol Oceanogr 62:2431–2444

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeffries M (2008) The spatial and temporal heterogeneity of macrophyte communities in thirty small, temporary ponds over a period of ten years. Ecography 31:765–775

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensén S (1977) An objective method for sampling the macrophyte vegetation in lakes. Vegetatio 33:107–118

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeppesen E, Jensen JP, Søndergaard M, Lauridsen T, Landkildehus F (2000) Trophic structure, species richness and biodiversity in Danish lakes: changes along a phosphorus gradient. Freshw Biol 45:201–213

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • de Castilla J, y León, (2010) Plan de Gestión de la Zonas Húmedas del Canal de Castilla. Inventario y diagnóstico. Patrimonio Natural de Castilla y León, Valladolid, Spain, Tomo I

    Google Scholar 

  • Kissoon LTT, Jacob DL, Hanson MA, Herwig BR, Bowe SE, Otte ML (2013) Macophytes in shallow lakes: relationships with water, sediment and watershed characteristics. Aquat Bot 109:39–48

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Legendre P (2014) Interpreting the replacement and richness difference components of beta diversity. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 23:1324–1334

    Google Scholar 

  • Leibold MA, Holyoak M, Mouquet N, Amarasekare P, Chase JM, Hoopes MF, Holt RD, Shurin JB, Law R, Tilman D, Loreau M, Gonzalez A (2004) The metacommunity concept: a framework for multi-scale community ecology. Ecol Lett 7:601–613

    Google Scholar 

  • Lopes PM, Bini LM, Declerck SAJ, Farjalla VF, Vieira LCG, Bonecker CC, Lansac-Toha AA, Esteves FA, Bozelli RL (2014) Correlates of zooplankton beta diversity in tropical lake systems. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0109581

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Lougheed VL, Crosbie B, Chow-Fraser P (2001) Primary determinants of macrophyte community structure in 62 marshes across the Great Lakes basin: latitude, land use, and water quality effects. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 58:1603–1612

    Google Scholar 

  • Maberly SC, Madsen TV (2002) Freshwater angiosperm carbon concentrating mechanisms: processes and patterns. Funct Plant Biol 29:393–405

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Maltchik L, Rolon AS, Schott P (2007) Effects of hydrological variation on the aquatic plant community in a floodplain palustrine wetland of Southern Brasil. Limnology 8:23–28

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Hare MT, Gunn IDM, Chapman DS, Dudley BJ, Purse BV (2012) Impacts of space, local environment and habitat connectivity on macrophyte communities in conservation lakes. Divers Distrib 18:603–614

    Google Scholar 

  • Oertli B, Céréghino R, Hull A, Miracle R (2009) Pond conservation: from science to practice. Hydrobiologia 634:1–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Padial AA, Ceschin F, Declerck AAJ, De Meester L, Boncker CC, Lansac-Tôha FA, Rodrigues L, Rodrigues LC, Train S, Velho LFM, Bini LM (2014) Dispersal ability determines the role of environmental, spatial and temporal drivers of metacommunity structure. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0111227

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Pätzig M, Kaletta T, Glemnitz M, Berger G (2012) What governs macrophyte species richness in kettle hole types? A case study from Northeast Germany. Limnologica 42:340–354

    Google Scholar 

  • Penning WE, Mjelde M, Dudley B, Hellsten S, Hanganu J, Kolada A, van den Berg M, Poikane S, Phillips G, Willby N, Ecke F (2008) Classifying aquatic macrophytes as indicators of eutrophication in European lakes. Aquat Ecol 42:237–251

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rolon AS, Lacerda T, Maltchik L, Guadagnin DL (2008) Influence of area, habitat and water chemistry on richness and composition of macrophyte assemblages in southern Brazilian wetlands. J Veg Sci 19:221–228

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheffer M, Van Geest GJ, Zimmer K, Jeppesen E, Søndergaard M, Butler MG, Hanson MA, Declerck S, De Meester L (2006) Small habitat size and isolation can promote species richness: second-order effects on biodiversity in shallow lakes and ponds. Oikos 112:227–231

    Google Scholar 

  • Socolar JB, Gilroy JJ, Kunin WE, Edwards DP (2016) How should beta-diversity inform biodiversity conservation? Trends Ecol Evol 31:67–80

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Soomers H, Karssenberg D, Soons MB, Verweij PA, Verhoeven JTA, Wassen J (2013) Wind and water dispersal of wetland plants across fragmented landscapes. Ecosystems 16:434–451

    Google Scholar 

  • Soons MB, van der Vlugt C, van Lith B, Heil GW, Klaassen M (2008) Small seed size increases the potential for dispersal of wetland plants by ducks. J Ecol 96:619–627

    Google Scholar 

  • Tonkin JD, Stoll S, Jähnig SC, Haase P (2015) Contrasting metacommunity structure and beta diversity in an aquatic-floodplain system. Oikos 125:686–697

    Google Scholar 

  • Van den Broeck M, Waterkeyn A, Rhazi L, Grillas P, Brendonck L (2015) Assessing the ecological integrity of endorheic wetlands, with focus on Mediterranean temporary ponds. Ecol Ind 54:1–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Geest GJ, Coops H, Roijackers RMM, Buijse AD, Scheffer M (2005) Succession of aquatic vegetation driven by reduced water-level fluctuations in floodplain lakes. J Appl Ecol 42:251–260

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanormelingen P, Cottenie K, Michels E, Muylaert K, Vyverman W, De Meester L (2008) The relative importance of dispersal and local processes in structuring phytoplankton communities in a set of highly interconnected ponds. Freshw Biol 53:2170–2183

    Google Scholar 

  • Vestergaard O, Sand-Jensen K (2000) Aquatic macrophytes richness in danish lakes in relation to alkalinity, transparency, and lake area. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 57:2022–2031

    Google Scholar 

  • Welborn GA, Skelly DK, Werner EE (1996) Mechanisms creating community structure across a freshwater habitat gradient. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 27:337–363

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams P, Whitfield M, Biggs J, Bray S, Fox G, Nicolet P, Sear D (2004) Comparative biodiversity of rivers, streams, ditches and ponds in an agricultural landscape in Southern England. Biol Cons 115:329–341

    Google Scholar 

  • Zokan M, Drake JM (2015) The effect of hydroperiod and predation on the diversity of temporary pond zooplankton communities. Ecol Evolut 5:3066–3074

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Biodiversity and Environmental Management. Section of Ecology, University of León, León, Spain

    Margarita Fernández-Aláez, Francisco García-Criado, Jorge García-Girón & Camino Fernández-Aláez

  2. Department of Agroforestry Sciences, University of Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain

    Felisa Santiago

Authors
  1. Margarita Fernández-Aláez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Francisco García-Criado
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jorge García-Girón
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Felisa Santiago
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Camino Fernández-Aláez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Camino Fernández-Aláez.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fernández-Aláez, M., García-Criado, F., García-Girón, J. et al. Environmental heterogeneity drives macrophyte beta diversity patterns in permanent and temporary ponds in an agricultural landscape. Aquat Sci 82, 20 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00027-020-0694-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00027-020-0694-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation