Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Terrestrial invertebrates of dry river beds are not simply subsets of riparian assemblages

  • Recent Perspectives on Temporary River Ecology
  • Published:
Aquatic Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Dry river beds are common worldwide and are rapidly increasing in extent due to the effects of water management and prolonged drought periods due to climate change. While attention has been given to the responses of aquatic invertebrates to drying rivers, few studies exist on the terrestrial invertebrates colonizing dry river beds. Dry river beds are physically harsh and they often differ substantially in substrate, topography, microclimate and inundation frequency from adjacent riparian zones. Given these differences, we predicted that dry river beds provide a unique habitat for terrestrial invertebrates, and that their assemblage composition differs from that in adjacent riparian zones. Dry river beds and riparian zones in Australia and Italy were sampled for terrestrial invertebrates with pitfall traps. Sites differed in substrate type, climate and flow regime. Dry river beds contained diverse invertebrate assemblages and their composition was consistently different from adjacent riparian zones, irrespective of substrate, climate or hydrology. Although some taxa were shared between dry river beds and riparian zones, 66 of 320 taxa occurred only in dry river beds. Differences were due to species turnover, rather than shifts in abundance, indicating that dry river bed assemblages are not simply subsets of riparian assemblages. Some spatial patterns in invertebrate assemblages were associated with environmental variables (irrespective of habitat type), but these associations were statistically weak. We suggest that dry river beds are unique habitats in their own right. We discuss potential human stressors and management issues regarding dry river beds and provide recommendations for future research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adis J (1986) An “aquatic” millipede from a Central Amazonian inundation forest. Oecologia 68:347–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adis J (1992) How to survive six months in a flooded soil: strategies in Chilopoda and Symphyla from Central Amazonian floodplains. Stud Neotrop Fauna Environ 27:117–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adis J, Junk WJ (2002) Terrestrial invertebrates inhabiting lowland river floodplains of Central Amazonia and Central Europe: a review. Freshw Biol 47:711–731

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balneaves JM, Hughey K (1990) The need for control of exotic weeds in braided river-beds for conservation of wildlife. In: Proceedings of the 9th Australian Weeds Conference, Adelaide, South Australia, 1990, pp 103–108

  • Bastow J, Sabo J, Finlay J, Power M (2002) A basal aquatic–terrestrial trophic link in rivers: algal subsidies via shore-dwelling grasshoppers. Oecologia 131:261–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bates A, Sadler J, Fowles A (2007) Livestock trampling reduces the conservation value of beetle communities on high quality exposed riverine sediments. Biodivers Conserv 16:1491–1509

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batzer DP (2004) Movements of upland invertebrates into drying seasonal woodland ponds in northern Minnesota, USA. Wetlands 24:904–907

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beattie AJ, Oliver I (1994) Taxonomic minimalism. Trends Ecol Evol 9:488–490

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boulton AJ, Lake PS (1992) The ecology of two intermittent streams in Victoria, Australia. II. Comparisons of faunal composition between habitats, rivers and years. Freshw Biol 27:99–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brooks AP, Shellberg JG, Knight J, Spencer J (2009) Alluvial gully erosion: an example from the Mitchell fluvial megafan, Queensland, Australia. Earth Surf Proc Land 34:1951–1969

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cardoso P, Silva I, de Oliveira NG, Serrano ARM (2004) Higher taxa surrogates of spider (Araneae) diversity and their efficiency in conservation. Biol Conserv 117:453–459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chevaldonné P, Fisher CR, Childress JJ, Desbruyeres D, Jollivet D, Zal F, Toulmond A (2000) Thermotolerance and the ‘Pompeii worms’. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 208:293–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiew FHS, McMahon TA (2002) Modelling the impacts of climate change on Australian streamflow. Hydrol Process 16:1235–1245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke K, Gorley R (2006) PRIMER v6: User Manual/Tutorial. PRIMER-E, Plymouth

  • Clarke K, Gorley R (2007) PRIMER-6. 6.1.10 edn. PRIMER-E Ltd, Plymouth

  • Clarke KR, Warwick RM (1994) Change in marine communities: an approach to statistical analysis and interpretation. Plymouth Marine Laboratory, Plymouth

  • Colwell RK (2006) EstimateS: statistical estimation of species richness and shared species from samples (software and user’s guide), 8th edn. http://purl.oclc.org/estimates

  • Cummins KW (1962) An evaluation of some techniques for the collection and analysis of benthic samples with special emphasis on lotic waters. Am Midl Nat 67:477–504

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Döring M, Uehlinger U, Rotach A, Schläpfer DR, Tockner K (2007) Ecosystem expansion and contraction dynamics along a large Alpine alluvial corridor (Tagliamento River, Northeast Italy). Earth Surf Proc Land 32:1693–1704

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2000) Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy. Off J Eur Commun 327:1–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregory SV, Swanson FJ, McKee WA, Cummins KW (1991) An ecosystem perspective of riparian zones. Bioscience 41:540–551

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hering D, Plachter H (1997) Riparian ground beetles (Coleoptera, Carabidae) preying on aquatic invertebrates: a feeding strategy in alpine floodplains. Oecologia 111:261–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hickey DA, Singer GAC (2004) Genomic and proteomic adaptations to growth at high temperature. Genome Biol 5:117

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson RB, Carpenter SR, Dahm CN, McKnight DM, Naiman RJ, Postel SL, Running SW (2001) Water in a changing world. Ecol Appl 11:1027–1045

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins KM, Boulton AJ (2007) Detecting impacts and setting restoration targets in arid-zone rivers: aquatic micro-invertebrate responses to reduced floodplain inundation. J Appl Ecol 44:823–832

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kennard MJ, Pusey BJ, Olden JD, Mackay SJ, Stein JL, Marsh N (2010) Classification of natural flow regimes in Australia to support environmental flow management. Freshw Biol 55:171–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lalley JS, Viles HA, Henschel JR, Lalley V (2006) Lichen-dominated soil crusts as arthropod habitat in warm deserts. J Arid Environ 67:579–593

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larned S, Datry T, Robinson C (2007) Invertebrate and microbial responses to inundation in an ephemeral river reach in New Zealand: effects of preceding dry periods. Aquat Sci 69:554–567

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larned ST, Datry T, Arscott DB, Tockner K (2010) Emerging concepts in temporary-river ecology. Freshw Biol 55:717–738

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lehner B, Doell P, Alcamo J, Henrichs T, Kaspar F (2006) Estimating the impact of global change on flood and drought risks in Europe: a continental, integrated analysis. Clim Change 75:273–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall JC, Steward AL, Harch BD (2006) Taxonomic resolution and quantification of freshwater macroinvertebrate samples from an Australian dryland river: the benefits and costs of using species abundance data. Hydrobiologia 572:171–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meehl GA, Stocker TF, Collins WD, Friedlingstein P, Gaye AT, Gregory JM, Kitoh A, Knutti R, Murphy JM, Noda A, Raper SCB, Watterson IG, Weaver AJ, Zhao ZC (2007) Global climate projections. In: Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M et al (eds) Climate change 2007: the physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 747–845

  • Moring JB, Stewart KW (1994) Habitat partitioning by the wolf spider (Araneae, Lycosidae) guild in streamside and riparian vegetation zones of the Conejos River, Colorado. J Arachnol 22:205–217

    Google Scholar 

  • Naiman RJ, Decamps H (1997) The ecology of interfaces: riparian zones. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 28:621–658

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nilsson C, Reidy CA, Dynesius M, Revenga C (2005) Fragmentation and flow regulation of the world’s large river systems. Science 308:405

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver I, Beattie AJ (1996) Invertebrate morphospecies as surrogates for species: a case study. Conserv Biol 10:99–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paetzold A, Schubert CJ, Tockner K (2005) Aquatic terrestrial linkages along a braided-river: riparian arthropods feeding on aquatic insects. Ecosystems 8:748–759

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pik AJ, Oliver I, Beattie AJ (1999) Taxonomic sufficiency in ecological studies of terrestrial invertebrates. Aust J Ecol 24:555–562

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Queensland Department of Environment and Resource Management (2010) http://www.derm.qld.gov.au/water/monitoring/index.html (Accessed 11 October, 2010)

  • Sadler JP, Bates AJ (2008) The ecohydrology of invertebrates associated with exposed riverine sediments. In: Wood PJ, Hannah DM, Sadler JP (eds) Hydroecology and ecohydrology. Wiley, pp 37–56

  • Stanley EH, Buschman DL, Boulton AJ, Grimm NB, Fisher SG (1994) Invertebrate resistance and resilience to intermittency in a desert stream. Am Midl Nat 131:288–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanley EH, Fisher SG, Grimm NB (1997) Ecosystem expansion and contraction in streams. Bioscience 47:427–435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stark LR, McLetchie DN, Roberts SP (2009) Gender differences and a new adult eukaryotic record for upper thermal tolerance in the desert moss Syntrichia caninervis. J Therm Biol 34:131–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tansey MR, Brock TD (1972) The upper temperature limit for eukaryotic organisms. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 69:2426

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tockner K, Ward JV, Arscott DB, Edwards PJ, Kollmann J, Gurnell AM, Petts GE, Maiolini B (2003) The Tagliamento River: a model ecosystem of European importance. Aquat Sci 65:239–253

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tonolla D, Acuña V, Uehlinger U, Frank T, Tockner K (2010) Thermal heterogeneity in river floodplains. Ecosystems 13:727–740

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tooth S (2000) Process, form and change in dryland rivers: a review of recent research. Earth Sci Rev 51:67–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward JV, Tockner K, Edwards PJ, Kollmann J, Bretschko G, Gurnell AM, Petts GE, Rossaro B (1999) A reference river system for the Alps: the ‘Fiume Tagliamento’. Regul Rivers Res Manage 15:63–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams G (1959) The seasonal and diurnal activity of the fauna sampled by pitfall traps in different habitats. J Anim Ecol 28:1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wishart MJ (2000) The terrestrial invertebrate fauna of a temporary stream in southern Africa. Afr Zool 35:193–200

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood PJ, Armitage PD (1997) Biological effects of fine sediment in the lotic environment. Environ Manage 21:203–217

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

AS was funded by the Queensland Department of Environment and Resource Management (DERM) and TRaCK (Tropical Rivers and Coastal Knowledge, http://www.track.gov.au). TRaCK received major funding for its research through the Australian Government’s Commonwealth Environment Research Facilities initiative; the Australian Government’s Raising National Water Standards Programme; Land and Water Australia and the Queensland Government’s Smart State Innovation Fund. Additional support was provided from the European Union through the Mediterranean Intermittent River ManAGEment (MIRAGE) project (ref: FP7 ENV 2007 1, http://www.mirage-project.eu). We acknowledge DERM for supplying the flow data for the Australian rivers, and IGB for supplying the flow data for the Tagliamento River. Diego Tonolla and Daniel von Schiller assisted with providing Tagliamento River GIS data. Many thanks to the field volunteers: in Australia—Jon and Jo Blessing, Sara Clifford, Ceaira Cottle, Werner Ehrsam, Jimmy Fawcett, Laurisse Frampton, Jess Haxen, Dean Holloway, Barry Kenway, Jaye Lobegeiger, Kate Masci, Morag McKinnon, Courtenay Mills, Annette Ritchie, Rob Rolls, Michael Rooke, Emily Saeck, Bill Senior, Suzanne Sippel, Ilva Sporne, Hamish Sutherland, Kenn Tews, Dominic Valdez, Ben Woodward, Belinda Young and Farah Zavahir; and in Italy—Claudio Cruciat and Brigitte Zoller. Thanks to Rob Rolls and Ben Stewart-Koster for providing statistical advice. We also wish to thank the landowners, particularly Neil and Helen Peddle. We thank the Australian Rivers Institute’s Aquatic Ecology Discussion Group (‘Dregs’) for providing comments on the manuscript. We thank Thibault Datry and the Guest Editor of this issue Dave Arscott. Finally we thank two anonymous referees for providing valuable criticism and excellent suggestions that greatly improved this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Australian Rivers Institute, Griffith University, 170 Kessels Road, Nathan, Brisbane, QLD, 4111, Australia

    Alisha L. Steward, Fran Sheldon & Stuart E. Bunn

  2. Queensland Department of Environment and Resource Management, Ecosciences Precinct, 41 Boggo Road, Dutton Park, Brisbane, QLD, 4102, Australia

    Jonathan C. Marshall & Satish Choy

  3. CSIRO Mathematics, Informatics and Statistics, Ecosciences Precinct, 41 Boggo Road, Dutton Park, Brisbane, QLD, 4102, Australia

    Bronwyn Harch

  4. Leibniz-Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries (IGB), and Institute of Biology, Freie Universität Berlin, Mueggelseedamm 310, 12587, Berlin, Germany

    Klement Tockner

Authors
  1. Alisha L. Steward
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jonathan C. Marshall
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Fran Sheldon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Bronwyn Harch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Satish Choy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Stuart E. Bunn
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Klement Tockner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alisha L. Steward.

Additional information

This article belongs to the Special Issue “Recent Perspectives on Temporary River Ecology”.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Steward, A.L., Marshall, J.C., Sheldon, F. et al. Terrestrial invertebrates of dry river beds are not simply subsets of riparian assemblages. Aquat Sci 73, 551–566 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00027-011-0217-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00027-011-0217-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation