Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Estimation of Hypocentral Parameters of Regional Earthquakes Using a Fuzzy Logic Approach

  • Published:
Pure and Applied Geophysics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study presents improvements on the hypocentral location method using the fuzzy logic approach proposed by Lin and Sanford (Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 91:82–93, 2001) in resolving regional earthquakes location. In addition to trying to determine epicentral parameters of the earthquake, focal depths are also attempted utilizing this method in a three-dimensional (3D) space. In this study, instead of P- and S- wave models, a trapezoidal membership function constructed by the direct use of travel time difference between the two stations for P- and S- arrival times was utilized. In this procedure, it is not necessary to precisely know the velocity structure of the studied area in order to map the uncertainties in arrival-times into the fuzzy logic space. The location determination process was performed with the defuzzification of only the grid points having the membership value of 1 obtained by normalizing all the maximum fuzzy output values of the highest values which gives more reliable epicentral locations for both real and synthetic earthquakes. The results show that this method for epicentral estimation works well if the depth of the earthquake is sufficiently shallow and according to the distance between the event and seismic network. In this method of hypocenter determination, firstly, epicenter coordinates are determined, then the hypocenter location is found by considering only the epicentral area in 3D. In the case of very shallow events (e.g., h < 10 km), the estimation of the focal depth using this method seems to fail, causing faulty results in the hypocenter coordinates; however, the estimation of epicentral coordinates is successful in giving a more reasonable epicentral location. Otherwise, the obtained results would be reversed. Consequently, the deeper the focal depth, the better the hypocenter location, but a worse epicenter determination. This method is only valid in the hypocentral location of the earthquake occurring in the upper crust because only primarily the arrivals of Pg and Sg on the seismograms and a half-space velocity model are used. The hypocenter locations of some selected shallow earthquakes that occurred in the south east of the Aegean Sea have been determined by this method with results that are highly comparable with those obtained by other seismic agencies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. International Association of Seismology and Physics of the Earth's Interior.

  2. Kandilli Observatory and Earthquake Research Institute, Istanbul, Turkey.

  3. Disaster and Emergency Management Presidency Earthquake Department, Turkey.

  4. Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Dept. of Geophysics, Greece.

  5. National Observatory of Athens, Greece.

References

  • Bodur, K. (2012). Fuzzy logic approach on earthquake locations. Master Thesis, The Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, Karadeniz Technical University.

  • Bratt, S. R., & Bache, T. C. (1988). Locating events with sparse network of regional arrays. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America,78, 780–798.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gökalp, H. (2018). Improvements to earthquake location with a fuzzy logic approach. Pure and Applied Geophysics,175(1), 341–363. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-017-1688-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartse, H. E. (1991). Simultaneous hypocenter and velocity model estimation using direct and reflected phases from micro earthquakes recorded within the central Rio Grande rift. Ph. D. Dissertation, New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology, Sorocco, New Mexico, p. 251.

  • Havskov, J., & Ottemöller, L. (2010). Routine data processing in earthquake seismology (p. 347). Berlin: Springer. (ISBN 978 90 481 8696 9).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Herrmann, R. B. (1979). FASTHYPO-A hypocentre location program. Earthq Notes,50, 25–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • IEC. (1997a). Fuzzy control programming. Technical report (p. 1997). London: International Electro technical Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • IEC. (1997b). Fuzzy control programming (Part 2). International Electrotechnical Commission, Technical Committee No. 65. Industrial Process measurement and Control, IEC 11131-7 CD1.

  • Jannis, M., & Papoulia, J. (2014). Crustal structure of the Cyclades, central Aegean Sea, revealed from deep seismic soundings. In Conference paper in passive margins and petroleum systems, Royal Holloway University of London, Abstract Volume, p. 44.

  • Klein, F. W. (1978). Hypocenter location program HYPOINVERSE, 1: User’s guide to versions 1, 2, 3, 4 (pp. 78–694). Washington: USGS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Konstantinou, K. L. (2018). Estimation of optimum velocity model and precise earthquake locations in NE Aegean: Implications for seismotectonics and seismic hazard. Journal of Geodynamics,121(2018), 143–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jog.2018.07.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lahr, J. C. (1989). Hypoellipse/version 2.0: A computer program for determining local earthquake hypocentral parameters, magnitude, and first motion pattern. U.S. Geol. Surv., Open-File Report, 89/116.

  • Lee, W. H. K., & Lahr, J. C. (1975). HYPO71 (revised): A computer program for determining hypocenter, magnitude, and first motion pattern of local earthquakes. U. S. Geol. Surv. Open file Rept. 75-311.

  • Lienert, B. R. (1997). Assessment of earthquake location accuracy and confidence region estimates using known nuclear tests. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America,87, 1150–1157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lienert, B. R., Berg, E., & Frazer, L. N. (1986). HYPOCENTER: An earthquake location method using centered, scaled, and adaptively least squares. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America,76, 771–783.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, K., & Sanford, R. A. (2001). Improving regional earthquake using a modified G matrix and fuzz logic. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America,91, 82–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Makris, J., Papoulia, J., & Yegorova, T. (2013). A 3-D density model of Greece constrained by gravity and seismic data. Geophysical Journal International,194, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggt059.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Makris, J., & Papoulla, J. (2014). Crustal structure of the Cyclades, central Aegean Sea revealed from deep seismic soundings. In Conference Paper, Symposium in Honour of Professor David Roberts, April 2014. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/276086406. Accessed 12 Dec 2019.

  • Mendel, J. (1995). Fuzzy logic systems for engineering: a tutorial. Proceedings of the IEEE,83(3), 345–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palvis, G. (1992). Appraising relative earthquake location errors. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America,82, 836–859.

    Google Scholar 

  • Şaroğlu, F., Emre, Ö., & Kuşçu, I. (1992). Active fault map of Turkey. Ankara: General Directorate of Mineral Research and Exploration.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schweitzer, J. (2001). An enhanced routine to locate seismic events. Pure and Applied Geophysics,158, 277–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wessel, P., & Smith, W. H. F. (1998). New, improved version of the generic mapping tools released. Eos Transactions American Geophysical Union,79, 579. https://doi.org/10.1029/98EO00426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh, L. A. (1965). Fuzzy sets. Information and Control,8, 338–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author would like to thank Dr. Tahir Serkan Irmak and anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments that led to the improvement of the manuscript. This work was supported by Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK), Project no. 118Y518. The figures were generated by using Generic Mapping Tools (Wessel and Smith 1998).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Geophysics, Karadeniz Technical University, 61080, Trabzon, Turkey

    Hüseyin Gökalp

Authors
  1. Hüseyin Gökalp
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hüseyin Gökalp.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gökalp, H. Estimation of Hypocentral Parameters of Regional Earthquakes Using a Fuzzy Logic Approach. Pure Appl. Geophys. 177, 3135–3160 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-019-02392-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-019-02392-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation