Abstract
Magnetization vector inversion is an useful approach to invert for magnetic anomaly in the presence of significant remanent magnetization and self-demagnetization. However, magnetizations are usually obtained in many different directions under the influences of geophysical non-uniqueness. We propose an iteration algorithm of magnetization vector inversion (M-IDI) that one couple of magnetization direction is iteratively computed after the magnetization intensity is recovered from the magnitude magnetic anomaly. And we compare it with previous methods of (1) three orthogonal components inversion of total magnetization vector at Cartesian framework (MMM), (2) intensity, inclination and declination inversion at spherical framework (MID), (3) directly recovering the magnetization inclination and declination (M-IDCG) and (4) estimating the magnetization direction using correlation method (M-IDC) at the sequential inversion frameworks. The synthetic examples indicate that MMM returns multiply magnetization directions and MID results are strongly dependent on initial model and parameter weights. M-IDI computes faster than M-IDC and achieves a constant magnetization direction compared with M-IDCG. Additional priori information constraints can improve the results of MMM, MID and M-IDCG. Obtaining one magnetization direction, M-IDC and M-IDI are suitable for single and isolated anomaly. Finally, M-IDI and M-IDC are used to invert and interpret the magnetic anomaly of the Galinge iron-ore deposit (NW China) and the results are verified by information from drillholes and physical properties measurements of ore and rock samples. Magnetization vector inversion provides a comprehensive way to evaluate and investigate the remanent magnetization and self-demagnetization.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bilim, F., & Ates, A. (2004). An enhanced method for estimation of body magnetization direction from pseudogravity and gravity data. Computers and Geosciences, 30, 161–171.
Dannemiller, N., & Li, Y. (2006). A new method for determination of magnetization direction. Geophysics, 71, L69–L73.
Ellis, R.G., de Wet, B., and Macleod, I.N. (2012). Inversion of magnetic data for remanent and induced sources, 22nd ASEG International Geophysical Conference and Exhibition Extended Abstracts, 1–4.
Gerovska, D., & Araúzo-bravo, M. J. (2006). Calculation of magnitude magnetic transforms with high centricity and low dependence on the magnetization vector direction. Geophysics, 71, I21–I30.
Gerovska, D., Araúzo-bravo, M. J., & Stavrev, P. (2009). Estimating the magnetization direction of sources from southeast Bulgaria through correlation between reduced-to-the-pole and total magnitude anomalies. Geophysical Prospecting, 57, 491–505.
Guo, W., Dentith, M. C., Bird, R. T., & Clark, D. A. (2001). Systematic error analysis of demagnetization and implications for magnetic interpretation. Geophysics, 66, 562–570.
Guo, Z., Guan, Z., & Xiong, S. (2004). Cuboid ΔΤ and its gradient forward theoretical expressions without analytic odd points. Chinese Jounral of Geophysics, 47, 1131–1138. (in Chinese with English abstract).
Guo, L., Meng, X., & Zhang, G. (2014). Three-dimensional correlation imaging for total amplitude magnetic anomaly and normalized source strength in the presence of strong remanent magnetization. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 111, 121–128.
Krahenbuhl, R. A. & Li, Y. (2017). Investigation of magnetic inversion methods in highly magnetic environments under strong selfdemagnetization effect. Geophysics. doi:10.1190/geo2016-0676.1.
Lelièvre, P. G., & Oldenburg, D. W. (2006). Magnetic forward modelling and inversion for high susceptibility. Geophysical Journal International, 166, 76–90.
Lelièvre, P. G., & Oldenburg, D. W. (2009). A 3D total magnetization inversion applicable when significant, complicated remanence is present. Geophysics, 74, L21–L30.
Li, S., & Li, Y. (2014). Inversion of magnetic anomaly on rugged observation surface in the presence of strong remanent magnetization. Geophysics, 79, J11–J19.
Li, Y., & Oldenburg, D. W. (1996). 3-D inversion of magnetic data. Geophysics, 61, 394–408.
Li, Y., Shearer, S. E., Haney, M. M., & Dannemiller, N. (2010). Comprehensive approaches to 3D inversion of magnetic data affected by remanent magnetization. Geophysics, 75, L1–L11.
Li, J., Zhang, Y., Yin, G., Fan, H., & Li, Z. (2017). An approach for estimating the magnetization direction of magnetic anomalies. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 137, 1–7.
Liu, S., Hu, X., Liu, T., Feng, J., Gao, W., & Qiu, L. (2013). Magnetization vector imaging for borehole magnetic data based on magnitude magnetic anomaly. Geophysics, 78, D429–D444.
Liu, S., Hu, X., Xi, Y., Liu, T., & Xu, S. (2015). 2D sequential inversion of total magnitude and total magnetic anomaly data affected by remanent magnetization. Geophysics, 80, K1–K12.
Luo, Y., & Yao, C. (2007). Theoretical study on cuboid magnetic field and its gradient expression without analytic singular point. Oil Geophysical Prospecting, 42, 714–719. (in Chinese with English abstract).
Nicolosi, I., Blanco-Montenegro, I., Pignatelli, A., & Chiappini, M. (2006). Estimating the magnetization direction of crustal structures by means of an equivalent source algorithm. Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors, 155, 163–169.
Phillips, J. D. (2005). Can we estimate total magnetization directions from aeromagnetic data using Helbig’s integrals? Earth Planets Space, 57, 681–689.
Pilkington, M. (1997). 3-D magnetic imaging using conjugate gradients. Geophysics, 62, 1132–1142.
Pilkington, M., & Beiki, M. (2013). Mitigating remanent magnetization effects in magnetic data using the normalized source strength. Geophysics, 78, J25–J32.
Qi, J., Ye, J., & Bao, S. (2010). Analysis of the geological features and genesis of the ga linge railmult-imetal deposits. Journal Qinghai University, 28, 42–46. (in Chinese with English abstract).
Shearer, S., and Li, Y. (2004). 3D inversion of magnetic total gradient data in the presence of remanent magnetization. 74th SEG Annual Meeting Expanded Abstracts, 774–777.
Stavrev, P., & Gerovska, D. (2000). Magnetic field transforms with low sensitivity to the direction of source magnetization and high centricity. Geophysical Prospecting, 48, 317–340.
Thurston, J. (2001). Mapping remanent magnetization using the local phase. Geophysics, 66, 1082–1089.
Wang, M., Di, Q., Xu, K., & Wang, R. (2004). Magnetization vector inversion equations and 2D forward and inversed model study. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 47, 528–534. (in Chinese with English abstract).
Yu, M. (2016). Geochemistry and zonation of the Galinge iron deposit, Qinghai province, Master Degree Thesis: China University of Geosciences (Beijing).
Yu, M., Feng, C., Liu, H., Li, D., Zhao, Y., Li, D., et al. (2015). 40Ar-39Ar geochronology of the Galinge large skarn iron deposit in Qinghai province and geological significance. Acta Geologica Sinica, 89, 510–521. (in Chinese with English abstract).
Zhou, J., Meng, X., Guo, L., Zhang, S. (2015). Three-dimensional cross-gradient joint inversion of gravity and normalized magnetic source strength data in the presence of remanent magnetization. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 119, 51–60.
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to editor Dr. Valéria C. F. Barbosa, the reviewer Dr. Peter Lelièvre and another anonymous reviewer for their constructive comments and suggestions, which significantly improved the manuscript. We also thank for Prof. Rixiang Zhu for his supervisions and comments. This study was financially supported by the National Natural Sciences Foundation of China (41604087, 41630317), the opening foundation of the State Key Laboratory of Lithospheric Evolution, Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences (KAI-201601), the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2016M590132), and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, China University of Geosciences (Wuhan) (CUGL170407, CUG160609).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Liu, S., Hu, X., Zhang, H. et al. 3D Magnetization Vector Inversion of Magnetic Data: Improving and Comparing Methods. Pure Appl. Geophys. 174, 4421–4444 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-017-1654-3
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-017-1654-3