Abstract
In this short note, I comment on the research of Pisarenko et al. (Pure Appl. Geophys 171:1599–1624, 2014) regarding the extreme value theory and statistics in the case of earthquake magnitudes. The link between the generalized extreme value distribution (GEVD) as an asymptotic model for the block maxima of a random variable and the generalized Pareto distribution (GPD) as a model for the peaks over threshold (POT) of the same random variable is presented more clearly. Inappropriately, Pisarenko et al. (Pure Appl. Geophys 171:1599–1624, 2014) have neglected to note that the approximations by GEVD and GPD work only asymptotically in most cases. This is particularly the case with truncated exponential distribution (TED), a popular distribution model for earthquake magnitudes. I explain why the classical models and methods of the extreme value theory and statistics do not work well for truncated exponential distributions. Consequently, these classical methods should be used for the estimation of the upper bound magnitude and corresponding parameters. Furthermore, I comment on various issues of statistical inference in Pisarenko et al. and propose alternatives. I argue why GPD and GEVD would work for various types of stochastic earthquake processes in time, and not only for the homogeneous (stationary) Poisson process as assumed by Pisarenko et al. (Pure Appl. Geophys 171:1599–1624, 2014). The crucial point of earthquake magnitudes is the poor convergence of their tail distribution to the GPD, and not the earthquake process over time.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
Beirlant, J., Goegebeur, Y., Segers, J., and Teugels, J. (2004a), Statistics of Extremes—Theory and Application, Wiley series in probability and statistics, John Wiley, Chichester.
Beirlant, J., Goegebeur, Y., Segers, J., and Teugels, J. (2004b), Statistics of Extremes—Theory and Application, http://lstat.kuleuven.be/Wiley, accessed Dec 2009.
Coles, S. (2001), An Introduction to Statistical Modeling of Extreme Values, Springer, London, 208 pages.
Cosentino, P., Ficarra, V., and, Luzio, D. (1977), Truncated Exponential Frequency-Magnitude Relationship in Earthquake Statistics, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 67, 1615–1623.
DasGupta, A. (2008), Asymptotic theory of statistics and probability, Springer Texts in Statistics, Springer, New York, 461–492.
de Haan, L., and Ferreira, A. (2006), Extreme Value Theory: An Introduction, Springer series in operations research and financial engineering, Springer, USA.
Falk, M., Hüsler, J., and Reiss, R.-D. (2011), Laws of small numbers: extremes and rare events, 3rd Ed. Birkhäuser, Basel.
Fischer, R.A., and Tippett, L.H.C. (1928), Limiting forms of the frequency distribution of the largest and smallest member of a sample, Proc. Cambridge Philosophical Society 24, 180–190.
Gnedenko, B.V. (1943), Sur la distribution limite du terme maximum d’une serie aleatoire, Annals of Mathematics 44, 423–453.
Goegebeur, Y., Beirlant, J., and de Wet, T. (2008), Linking Pareto-tail kernel goodness-of-fit statistics with tail index at optimal threshold and second order estimation, REVSTAT—Statistical Journal 6, 51–69.
Grimshaw, S. (1993), Computing maximum likelihood estimates for the generalized Pareto distribution, Technometrics 35, 185–191.
Hannon, P.M., and Dahiya, R.C. (1999), Estimation of Parameters for the Truncated Exponential Distribution, Commun Stat Theory Methods, 28, 2591–2612.
Hosking, J.R.M., Wallis, J.R., and Wood, E.F. (1985), Estimation of the Generalized Extreme-Value Distribution by the Method of Probability-Weighted Moments, Technometrics 29, 339–349.
Hüsler, J., Li, D., and Raschke, M. (2011), Estimation for the Generalized Pareto Distribution Using Maximum Likelihood and Goodness-of-fit, Communication in Statistics—Theory and Methods 40, 2500–2510.
Hüsler, J., Li, D., and Raschke, M. (2014), Extreme value index estimator using maximum likelihood and moment estimation, Communication in Statistics—Theory and Methods (accepted).
Johnson, N.L., Kotz, S. and Balakrishnan, N. (1994), Continuous Univariate Distributions, Vol. 1, Wiley Series in probability and mathematical statistics, Wiley, New York.
Kijko, A., and Graham, G. (1998), Parametric-historic Procedure for Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analysis Part I: Estimation of Maximum Regional Magnitude m max , Pure Appl Geophys 152, 413–442.
Leadbetter, M.R., Lindgren, G., and Rootzén, H. (1983), Extremes and Related Properties of Random Sequences and Processes, Springer, New York.
Pisarenko, V.F., Lyubushin, A.A., Lysenko, V.B., and Golubeva, T.V. (1996), Statistical Estimation of Seismic Hazard Parameters: Maximum Possible Magnitude and Related Parameters, Bul. Seismol. Soc. Am. 86: 691–700.
Pisarenko, V.F., Sornette, A., Sornette, D., and Rodkin, M. (2008), New Approach to the Characterization of Mmax and of the Tail of the Distribution of Earthquake Magnitudes, Pure Appl. Geophys. 165, 847–888.
Pisarenko, V.F., Sornette,A., Sornette, D., and Rodkin, M.V. (2014), Characterization of the Tail of the Distribution of Earthquake Magnitudes by Combining the GEV and GPD Descriptions of Extreme Value Theory, Pure Appl. Geophys. 171, 1599–1624.
Raschke, M. (2012), Inference for the Truncated Exponential Distribution, Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment 26, 127–138.
Raschke, M. (2013a), Parameter Estimation for the Tail Distribution of a Random Sequence, Communication in Statistics—Simulation and Computation 42, 1013–1043.
Raschke, M. (2013b), Statistical Modelling of Ground Motion Relations for Seismic Hazard Analysis, Journal of Seismology 17, 1157–1182.
Raschke, M. (2014), Modeling of Magnitude Distributions by the Generalized Truncated Exponential Distribution, Journal of Seismology (accepted).
SHARE (2014), Seismic Hazard Harmonization in Europe, scientific project, www.share-eu.org (last accessed October 2014).
Zöller, G., Holschneider, M., and Hainzl, S. (2014), The Largest Expected Earthquake Magnitudes in Japan: The Statistical Perspective, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 104, 769–779.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Raschke, M. Comment on Pisarenko et al., “Characterization of the Tail of the Distribution of Earthquake Magnitudes by Combining the GEV and GPD Descriptions of Extreme Value Theory”. Pure Appl. Geophys. 173, 701–707 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-015-1031-z
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-015-1031-z