Skip to main content
Log in

The Battle of the Astronomers: Johann Adam Schall von Bell and Ferdinand Verbiest at the Court of the Celestial Emperors (1660–1670)

  • Published:
Physics in Perspective Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The paper is focused on the two most outstanding figures among the Jesuit missionaries in seventeenth-century China: Johann Adam Schall von Bell and Ferdinand Verbiest. Schall aimed to introduce the telescope into Chinese astronomy, which was traditionally based on naked-eye observation and calculation. With the advent of the Qing dynasty, he became head of the Mathematical Board and director of the Imperial Observatory. Verbiest was called upon in 1660 to assist Schall in his project of reforming the Chinese traditional calendar. The political situation changed in 1661, with the Empire ruled by a regency hostile to the Jesuits, as were most of the mandarins at the observatory. This was the difficult context of the famous dispute between Yang Guangxian, Wu Mingxuan, and the two Jesuit mathematicians to compare the merits of Western and Chinese astronomy, which lasted from 1664 to 1669. What happened was more than a scientific contest and a court conspiracy: it was a cultural confrontation between the Jesuits and the traditionalist side of the ruling elite, which regarded the Europeans and their increasing influence as a threat for the Empire.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Credit: Courtesy of the Smithsonian Libraries

Fig. 2

Credit: Wikimedia Commons

Fig. 3

Credit: Boston College Libraries

Fig. 4

Credit: Wikimedia Commons

Fig. 5

Credit: Royal Academy of Arts, London, via Wikimedia Commons

Fig. 6

Credit: Wikimedia Commons

Fig. 7

Credit: Wikimedia Commons

Fig. 8

Credit: Wikimedia Commons

Fig. 9

Credit: Wikimedia Commons

Fig. 10

Credit: Wikimedia Commons

Fig. 11

Credit: Wikimedia Commons

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. With the term “sextant” I refer to the astronomical sextant (mural or frame-based), a traditional device known from the Middle Ages and developed in late-tenth-century Abbasid Iran, depicting a sixth of a circle and used to calculate the elevation angle of a celestial body above the horizon. It was introduced in China by Uighur and Muslim astronomers and must not be confused with the maritime sextant, a doubly reflecting navigation instrument that was developed in early eighteenth-century Britain.

  2. This was the traditional European device; the Chinese only used equatorial armillas.

References

  1. Franz Daxecker, “The Astronomer Christoph Grienberger and the Galilei Trial,” Acta Historica Astronomiae18 (2003), 34–39; Michael J. Gorman, Mathematics and Modesty in the Society of Jesus: The Problems of Christoph Grienberger (1564–1636) (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2002).

  2. Christophorus Clavius, Corrispondenza, ed. Ugo Baldini and Pier Daniele Napolitani, 7 vols. (Pisa: Edizioni del Dipartimento di Matematica dell’Università di Pisa, 1992); Vincent Cronin, The Wise Man from the West: Matteo Ricci and His Mission to China (London: R. Hart-Davis, 1955); Jacques Gernet, “Della Entrata della Compagnia di Giesù e Cristianità nella Cina de Matteo Ricci (1609) et les remaniements de sa traduction latine (1615),” Académie des Inscriptions et Belles Lettres. Comptes Rendus147, no. 1 (2003), 61–84; James M. Lattis, Between Copernicus and Galileo: Christoph Clavius and the Collapse of Ptolemaic Cosmology (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1994); Jonathan D. Spence, The Memory Palace of Matteo Ricci (New York: Penguin Books, 1985).

  3. Luca Fezzi, “Osservazioni sul De Christiana Expeditione apud Sinas Suscepta ab Societate Jesu di Nicolas Trigault,” Rivista di Storia e Letteratura Religiosa35 (1999), 541–66; Edmond Lamalle, “La propagande du P. Nicolas Trigault en faveur des missions de Chine (1616),” Archivium Historicum Societatis Jesu9 (1940), 49–120; Roman Malek, ed., Western Learning and Christianity in China. The Contribution and Impact of Johann Adam Schall von Bell, S. J. (1592–1666) (Nettetal: Steyler-Verlag, 2001).

  4. Michael J. Gorman, “A Matter of Faith?: Christoph Scheiner, Jesuit Censorship and the Trial of Galileo,” Perspectives on Science4 (1996), 283–320.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Rainer K. Langner, Kopernikus in der Verbotenen Stadt. Wie der Jesuit Johannes Schreck das Wissen der Ketzer nach China brachte (Frankfurt: Fischer-Verlag, 2007); Ronnie Po-Chia Xia, “The Catholic Mission and Translations in China, 1583–1700,” in Peter Burke, R. Po-Chia Xia, eds., Cultural Translation in Early Modern Europe (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007), 39–51.

  6. Agostino Ramelli, Le diverse et artificiose machine del Capitano Agostino Ramelli Dal Ponte della Tresia, Ingegnero del Re Christianissimo di Francia et di Pollonia (A Parigi: in casa del Autore, 1588).

  7. Galileo Galilei, Sidereus Nuncius: magna longeque admirabilia spectacula pandens suspiciendaque proponens unicuique, praesertim vero Philosophis atque Astronomis (In Venetiis: apud Thomam Baglionum, 1610).

  8. Mario Biagioli, “Picturing Objects in the Making: Scheiner, Galilei and the Discovery of Sunspots,” in Wolfgang Detel, Klaus Zittel, eds., Ideals and Cultures of Knowledge in Early Modern Europe (Berlin: Akademie-Verlag, 2002), 39–95; Deng Yinke, Ancient Chinese Inventions, translated by Wang Pingxing (Beijing: China Intercontinental Press, 2005); Albert van Helden, “Galileo and Scheiner on Sunspots: A Case Study in the Visual Language of Astronomy,” Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society140, no. 3 (1996), 358–96; William R. Shea, “Galileo, Scheiner, and the Interpretation of Sunspots,” Isis61, no. 4 (1970), 498–519.

  9. Patrick Hanan, The Invention of Li Yu (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Myron E. Sharpe, ed., Coming out of the Middle Ages: Comparative Reflections on China and the West (Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe Inc., 1990); Robert Temple, The Genius of China: 3,000 Years of Science, Discovery, and Invention, with a forward by Joseph Needham (New York: Simon & Schuster Inc., 1986).

  11. Song Yingxing, T’ien-Kung K’ai-Wu: Chinese Technology in the Seventeenth Century, trans. Sun E-tu Zen and Sun Shiou-chuan (University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 1966).

  12. Catherine Jami, “Introduction: Science in Early Modern East Asia: State Patronage, Circulation, and the Production of Books,” Early Science and Medicine8 (2003), 81–87; Catherine Jami, Peter M. Engelfriet, Gregory Blue, eds., Statecraft and Intellectual Renewal in Late Ming China: The Cross-Cultural Synthesis of Xu Guangqi (1562–1633) (Leiden: Koninklijke Brill, 2001).

  13. Bamber Gascoigne, The Dynasties of China: A History (New York: Carroll & Graf Publishers, 2003); Ann Paludan, Chronicle of the China Emperors (London: Thames & Hudson, 1988); Peter C. Perdue, “Culture, History, and Imperial Chinese Strategy: Legacies of the Qing Conquests,” in Hans van de Ven, ed., Warfare in Chinese History (Leiden: Koninklijke Brill, 2000), 252–87.

  14. Catherine Jami, Patrick Petitjean, Anne-Marie Moulin, eds., Science and Empires. Historical Studies about Scientific Development and European Expansion, Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 136) (Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1992); Catherine Jami, Luís Saraiva, eds., The Jesuits, the Padroado, and East Asian Science (1552–1773) (History of the Mathematical Sciences: Portugal and East Asia, 3) (Singapore: World Scientific, 2008).

  15. Alfons Väth, Johann Adam Schall von Bell S. J.: Missionar in China, kaiserlicher Astronom und Ratgeber am Hofe von Peking (1592–1666) (Nettetal: Steyler-Verlag, 1991); Catherine Jami, “Pékin au début de la dynastie Qing: capitale des savoirs impériaux et relais de l’Académie Royale des Sciences,” Revue d’histoire moderne et contemporaine55 (2008), 43–69.

  16. Catherine Jami, “Scholars and Mathematical Knowledge in the Late Ming and Early Qing,” Historia Scientiarum42 (1991), 99–109; “Rencontre entre arithmétiques chinoise et occidentale au XVIIe siècle,” in Paul Benoît, Karine Chemla, Jim Ritter, eds., Histoire de Fractions, Fractions d’histoire (Basel-Boston-Berlin: Birkhaüser, 1992), 351–73; “Sur l’organisation du champ des mathématiques chinoises,” Extrême-Orient Extrême-Occident10 (1998), 45–59.

  17. Huang Chun-chieh, Erik Zürcher, eds., Time and Space in Chinese Culture (Leiden: Koninklijke Brill, 1995); Isaia Iannaccone, Misurare il cielo. L’antica astronomia cinese (Naples: Istituto Universitario Orientale, 1993).

  18. Jean-Claude Martzloff, Astronomy and Calendars. The Other Chinese Mathematics (104 BC – AD 1644) (Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 2016).

  19. Catherine Jami, Keizô Hashimoto, and Lowell Skar, eds., East Asian Science: Tradition and Beyond, papers from the 7th International Conference on the History of Science in East Asia, Kyoto, 2–7 August 1993 (Osaka: Kansai University Press, 1995).

  20. Agustín Udías, Searching the Heavens and the Earth: The History of Jesuit Observatories (Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2003), 44.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Isabelle Ang, Pierre-Étienne Will, eds., Nombres, astres, plantes et viscères. Sept essais sur l’histoire des sciences en Asie orientale (Mémoires de l’Institut des Hautes Études Chinoises, 35) (Paris: Collège de France, 1994).

  22. Benno van Dalen, Edward S. Kennedy, Mustafa K. Saiyid, “The Chinese-Uighur Calendar in Tusi’s Zij-i Ilkhani,” Zeitschrift für Geschichte der Arabisch-Islamischen Wissenschaften11 (1997), 111–51; Jonathan Lipman, Familiar Strangers: A History of Muslims in Northwest China (Seattle: University of Washington Press, 1998); Joseph Needham, Science and Civilization in China, vol. 3, Mathematics and the Sciences of the Heavens and the Earth (Taipei: Caves Books, 1986).

  23. Catherine Jami, The Emperor’s New Mathematics: Western Learning and Imperial Authority in China during the Kangxi Reign (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011), 40.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Agustín Udías, Searching the Heavens and the Earth (ref. 20), 46.

  25. Mark C. Elliot, The Manchu Way: The Eight Banners and Ethnic Identity in Late Imperial China (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2001); George H. C. Wong, “China’s Opposition to Western Science during Late Ming and Early Ch’ing,” Isis54 (1963), 29–49.

  26. Henri Bosmans, “Ferdinand Verbiest, directeur de l’observatoire de Péking,” Revue des questions scientifiques21 (1912), 195–273; 375–464. see in particular 221–24.

  27. Bosmans, “Ferdinand Verbiest” (ref. 26), 227–29.

  28. Chu Pingyi, “Scientific Dispute in the Imperial Court: The 1664 Calendar Case,” Chinese Science14 (1997), 7–34.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Jacques Gernet, China and the Christian Impact. A Conflict of Cultures (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Jonathan D. Spence, Emperor of China: Self-Portrait of K’ang-hsi (New York: Vintage Books, 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Catherine Jami, “Western Learning and Imperial Scholarship: The Kangxi Emperor’s Study,” East Asian Science, Technology, and Medicine27 (2007), 144–70.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Catherine Jami, “Revisiting the Calendar Case (1664–1669): Science, Religion, and Politics in Early Qing Beijing,” Korean Journal of History of Science37, no. 2 (2015), 459–77.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Andrea Argoli, Ephemerides exactissimae caelestium motuum ad longitudinem almae urbis et Tychonis Brahe hypotheses (Lugduni: sumptibus Ioannis Antonii Huguetan & Marci Antonii Rauaud, 1659).

  34. Johannes Kepler, Tabulae Rudolphinae: quibus astronomicae scientiae temporum longinquitate collapsae restauratio continetur (Ulmae: Joanne Saurii, 1627).

  35. Henri Bosmans, “Ferdinand Verbiest” (ref. 26), 235–47.

  36. Michel Villermaules, Anecdotes sur l’état de la réligion dans la Chine, 7 vols (À Paris: aux dépenses de la Société, 1733–1740).

  37. Henri Bosmans, “Ferdinand Verbiest” (ref. 26), 247–52; N. Golvers, Ferdinand Verbiest, S. J. (1623–1688) and the Chinese Heaven (Louvain (Leuven): Louvain (Leuven) University Press, 2003).

  38. Michael G. Chang, A Court on Horseback: Imperial Touring and the Construction of Qing Rule, 1680–1785 (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2007); Arthur Cotterell, The Imperial Capitals of China: An Inside View of the Celestial Empire (London: Pimlico, 2007); Catherine Jami, “L’empereur Kangxi et les sciences: réflexion sur l’histoire comparée,” Études chinoises25 (2006), 13–42; David E. Mungello, Curious Land: Jesuit Accommodation and the Origins of Sinology (Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press, 1989).

  39. Ferdinand Verbiest, Liber Organicus Astronomiae Europaeae apud Sinas restitutae sub Imperatore Tartaro Sinico Càm Hy’ appellato (In Regia Pekinensi, 1668).

  40. Ferdinand Verbiest, Astronomia Perpetua Imperatoris Kam Hi (In Regia Pekinensi, 1683).

  41. Udías, Searching the Heavens and the Earth (ref. 20), 47; Jesuit Contribution to Science: A History (Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 2014), 92.

  42. Ferdinand Verbiest, De Theoria, Usu et Fabrica Instrumentorum Astronomicorum et Mechanicorum (In Regia Pekinensi, 1673).

  43. Peter M. Engelfriet, Euclid in China: the Genesis of the First Translation of Euclid’s Elements in 1607 and Its Reception Up to 1723 (Leiden: Koninklijke Brill, 1998); Catherine Jami, “Teachers of Mathematics in China: The Jesuits and Their Textbooks (1580–1723),” Archives internationales d’histoire des sciences52 (2002), 159–175.

  44. Joseph Needham, Science and Civilization in China, vol. 5, Chemistry and Chemical Technology. Part 7: Military Technology. The Gunpowder Epic (Taipei: Caves Books Ltd, 1986).

  45. Bosmans, “Ferdinand Verbiest” (ref. 26), 252–73.

  46. Ferdinand Verbiest, Astronomia Europaea sub Imperatore Tartaro Sinico Càm Hy’ appellato (Dilingae: typis & sumptibus Joannis Caspari Bencard bibliopolae academici, per Joannem Federle, 1687); Noël Golvers, ed., The ‘Astronomia Europaea’ of Ferdinand Verbiest, S.J. (Dillingen, 1687). Text, translation, notes, and commentary (Nettetal: Steyler-Verlag, 1993).

  47. Udías, Searching the Heavens and the Earth (ref. 20), 48

  48. Bosmans, “Ferdinand Verbiest” (ref. 26), 437–61; Udías, Searching the Heavens and the Earth (ref. 20), 50–53.

  49. Catherine Jami, Han Qi, “The Reconstruction of Imperial Mathematics in China During the Kangxi Reign (1662–1722),” Early Science and Medicine8 (2003), 89–110; John W. Witek, ed., Ferdinand Verbiest. Jesuit Missionary, Scientist, Engineer, and Diplomat (Nettetal: Steyler-Verlag, 1994); Zhang Xiping, Following the Steps of Matteo Ricci to China, trans. Ding Deshu and Ye Jinping (Beijing: China International Press, 2006).

  50. Noël Golvers, ed., The Christian Mission in China in the Verbiest Era: Some Aspects of the Missionary Approach (Louvain (Leuven): Louvain (Leuven) University Press, 1999); Catherine Jami, “Imperial Control and Western Learning: The Kangxi Emperor’s (1662–1722) Performance,” Late Imperial China23 (2002), 28–49.

  51. Liam M. Brockey, Journey to the East: The Jesuit Mission to China, 1579–1724 (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2007); Joseph Dehergne, Répertoire des Jésuites de Chine de 1552 à 1800 (Rome: Institutum Historicum Societatis Jesu, 1973); Catherine Jami, Hubert Delahaye, eds., L’Europe en Chine. Interactions scientifiques, religieuses et culturelles aux XVIIeet XVIIIesiècles. Actes du colloque de la Fondation Hugot, 14–17 octobre 1991, Mémoires de l’Institut des Hautes Études Chinoises 24 (Paris: Collège de France, 1993); David E. Mungello, ed., The Chinese Rites Controversy: Its History and Meaning (Nettetal: Steyler, 1994); David E. Mungello, The Great Encounter of China and the West, 1500–1800 (New York: Rowman & Littlefield, 1999).

  52. Joseph Needham, Science and Civilization in China, vol. 4, Physics and Physical Technology. Part 2: Mechanical Engineering (Taipei: Caves Books Ltd., 1986); Science and Civilization in China, vol. 4, Physics and Physical Technology. Part 3: Civil Engineering and Nautics (Taipei: Caves Books Ltd., 1986).

  53. Michael J. Gorman, The Scientific Counter-Revolution. Mathematics, Natural Philosophy, and Experimentalism in Jesuit Culture (1580–c.1670), PhD Dissertation, European University Institute, 1998; John W. O’Malley, Akexander B. Gauvin, Steven J. Harris, and Thomas F. Kennedy, The Jesuits: Cultures, Sciences, and the Arts (1540–1773) (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1999); Federico Masini, ed., Western Humanistic Culture Presented to China by Jesuit Missionaries (17th–18thcenturies) (Rome: Institutum Historicum Societatis Jesu, 1996).

  54. Jami, The Emperor’s New Mathematics (ref. 23), 80–81.

  55. Benjamin A. Elman, On Their Own Terms: Science in China 1550–1900 (Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press, 2005); Benjamin A. Elman, Alexander Woodside, eds., Education and Society in Late Imperial China 1600–1900 (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1994); Catherine Jami, “L’évolution des sciences, 1600–1850: Renouveau de la tradition scientifique chinoise et influence européenne.” Historiens & Géographes340 (1993), 71–79; “ʻEuropean Science in China’ or ‘Western Learning’?: Representations of Cross-Cultural Transmission, 1600–1800,” Science in Context12 (1999), 413–34; “Representations and Uses of ʻEuropean Science’ in China (1582–1722),” Zeitschrift für Historische Forschung34 (2005), 197–213; Wu Xiaoxin, ed., Dialogues and Encounters: Changing Perspectives on the Chinese-Western Exchanges from the Sixteenth to Eighteenth Centuries (Sankt-Augustin: Steyler-Verlag, 2005).

Download references

Acknowledgements

My first interests in the scientific, cultural, and political contest between Chinese and Jesuit astronomers at the court of the early Qing emperors Shunzhi and Kangxi were raised by an international conference on Galileo in China, which took place at Palazzo Strozzi in Florence on November 17, 2009. Aim of the workshop was to discuss the transfer of scientific and technical knowledge from Europe to China by means of the Jesuit missionary network in the Far East, in particular the circulation of Galilean astronomy and mechanics in the Celestial Empire from the 1610s to the 1760s.

Special thanks to Miao Tian (Institute for History of Natural Science of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing), for having introduced me to what I called the “battle of the astronomers,” as well as for her reflections upon the pragmatic attitude of the Chinese scholars of the time toward Western science and technology, compared with their disregard for its philosophical-religious background and implications. I want to thank also Iwo Amelung (Goethe-Universität and China-Institut, Frankfurt am Main) for his extremely reach and fascinating talk on Chinese traditional optics and glass-making before and after the introduction of the modern telescope in the late 1610s.

I cannot forget the intense discussions on the notion of “enculturation” I had with my friends and colleagues at the Niels Stensen Institute in Florence, while working at a seminar on Europe and China 1610–2010 to celebrate the fourth centennial of Matteo Ricci’s death: father Ennio Brovedani S. J., Dario De Santis (University of Milan “Bicocca”), Stefano Miniati (University of Siena), Diego Varini (University of Parma), and Davide Zanichelli (Foundation Palazzo Magnani, Reggio Emilia).

I am also in debt to Catherine Jami (CNRS and EHESS, Centre d’Études sur la Chine Moderne et Contemporaine, Paris), for her precious suggestions before, during, and after my presentation at the 4th International Conference of the European Society for the History of Science (Barcelona, November 18–20, 2010, http://4eshs.iec.cat/); Antonella Romano (EHSS, Centre Alexandre Koyré, Paris), whom I had the pleasure to meet for the first time at the symposium Within Europe and Beyond Europe: The Jesuits as Circulators of Science, during the same conference; and my friend and colleague Pietro Daniel Omodeo (Department of Philosophy and Cultural Heritage, University “Ca’ Foscari” of Venice), for the stimulating discussions we had in Barcelona.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stefano Salvia.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Stefano Salvia, PhD, is a research assistant in History of Science, Department of Civilizations and Forms of Knowledge, University of Pisa and a collaborator at the Galileo Museum – Institute and Museum of History of Science, Florence.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Salvia, S. The Battle of the Astronomers: Johann Adam Schall von Bell and Ferdinand Verbiest at the Court of the Celestial Emperors (1660–1670). Phys. Perspect. 22, 81–109 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00016-020-00254-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00016-020-00254-0

Keywords

Navigation