Skip to main content
Log in

Extinction-Induced Resurgence: Preliminary Investigations And Possible Applications

  • Published:
The Psychological Record Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

When recently reinforced behavior is no longer effective, previously reinforced behavior often recurs. Though the phenomenon has been described from time to time in both the experimental and clinical literatures, it has never been stringently investigated. Its robustness is suggested, however, by both formal and informal observations of humans and other animals. Applications in both theoretical and practical domains are suggested, among them problem solving, schedules of reinforcement, foraging theory, and psychotherapy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • AMSEL, A. (1958). The role of frustrative nonreward in noncontinuous reward situations. Psychological Bulletin, 55, 102–119.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • ANTONITIS, J. J. (1951). Response variability in the white rat during conditioning, extinction, and reconditioning. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 42, 273–281.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • AU, R., & EPSTEIN, R. (1982). Problem solving in the pigeon. Paper presented at the 62nd annual meeting of the Western Psychological Association, Sacramento, April.

    Google Scholar 

  • BARKER, R. G., DEMBO, T., & LEWIN, K. (1941). Studies in topological and vector psychology. No. 2. Experiments on regression and frustration. Iowa City: Iowa University.

    Google Scholar 

  • BOWER, G., & HILGARD, E. (1981). Theories of learning (5th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • CATANIA, A. C. (1979). Learning. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • CATANIA, A. C., & KELLER, K. (1981). Contingency, contiguity, correlation, and the concept of causation. In P. Harzern & M. D. Zeiler (Eds.), Advances in the analysis of behavior, Vol 2: Predictability, correlation, and contiguity. New York: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • CHANCE, M. R. A. (1960). Köhler’s chimpanzees—How did they perform? Man, 60, 130–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DONAHOE, J. W., & WESSELLS, M. G. (1980). Learning, language, and memory. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • DUNHAM, P. J., & GRANTMYRE, J. (1982). Changes in a multiple-response repertoire during response-contingent punishment and response restriction: Sequential relationships. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 37, 123–133.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • ENKEMA, S., SLAVIN, R., SPAETH, C., & NEURINGER, A. (1972). Extinction in the presence of free food. Psychonomic Science, 26, 267–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EPSTEIN, R. (1981). On pigeons and people: A preliminary look at the Columban Simulation Project. The Behavior Analyst, 4(1), 43–55.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • EPSTEIN, R. (1983a). Resurgence of previously reinforced behavior during extinction. Behaviour Analysis Letters, 3, 391–397.

    Google Scholar 

  • EPSTEIN, R. (1983b). An experimental analysis of “cognition.” Paper presented at the 63rd annual meeting of the Western Psychological Association, San Francisco, April.

    Google Scholar 

  • EPSTEIN, R. (in press-a). Simulation research in the analysis of behavior. In A. Poling, R. W. Fuqua, & R. Ulrich (Eds.), Research methodology in the analysis of behavior. New York: Plenum. (Preprinted in Behaviorism, 1984, Vol. 12).

    Google Scholar 

  • EPSTEIN, R. (in press-b). Bringing cognition and creativity into the behavioral laboratory. In T. J. Knapp & L. Robertson (Eds.), Contemporary views of cognition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

  • EPSTEIN, R., KIRSHNIT, C., LANZA, R. P., & RUBIN, L. (1984). “Insight” in the pigeon: Antecedents and determinants of an intelligent performance. Nature, 308, 1 March, 61–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • EPSTEIN, R., & MEDALIE, S. D. (1983). The spontaneous use of a tool by a pigeon. Behaviour Analysis Letters, 3, 241–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • EPSTEIN, R., & SKINNER, B. F. (1980). Resurgence of responding after the cessation of response-independent reinforcement. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, U.S.A., 11, 6251–6253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EPSTEIN, R., & SKINNER, B. F. (1981). The spontaneous use of a memoranda by pigeons. Behaviour Analysis Letters, 1, 241–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • EVERALL, E. E. (1935). Perservation in the rat. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 19, 343–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FANTINO, E., & LOGAN, C. (1979). The experimental analysis of behavior: A biological perspective. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • FERSTER, C. B., CULBERTSON, S., & BOREN, M. C. P. (1975). Behavior principles (Rev. ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • FREUD, S. (1920). A general introduction to psychoanalysis. New York: Boni & Liveright.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • FREUD, S. (1966). Introductory lectures on psychoanalysis. New York: W. W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • HAMILTON, J. A., & KRECHEVSKY, I. (1933). Studies in the effect of shock upon behavior plasticity in the rat. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 16, 237–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • HENTON, W. W., & IVERSEN, I. H. (1978). Classical conditioning and operant conditioning: A response pattern analysis. New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • HERBERT, E., PINKSTON, E., HAYDEN, M., SAJWAJ, T., PINKSTON, S., CORDUA, G., & JACKSON, C. (1973). Adverse effects of differential parental attention. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 6, 15–30.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • HEYMAN, G. M. (1979). A Markov model description of changeover probabilities on concurrent variable-interval schedules. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 31, 41–51.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • HINTZMAN, D. L. (1978). The psychology oflearning and memory. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • HULL, C. L. (1934). The rat’s speed-of-locomotion gradient in the approach to food. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 17, 393–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • HULL, C. L. (1935). The mechanism of the assembly of behavior segments in novel combinations suitable for problem solving. The Psychological Review, 42, 219–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • JOST, A. (1897). Die Associationsfestigkeit in ihrer Abhängigkeit von der Verteilung der Wiederholungen. Zeitschrift der Psychologie, 14, 436–472.

    Google Scholar 

  • KAREN, R. L. (1974). An introduction to behavior theory and its applications. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • KAZDIN, A. E. (1982). Symptom substitution, generalization, and response covariation: Implications for psychotherapy outcome. Psychological Bulletin, 91, 349–365.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • KÖHLER, W. (1925). The mentality of apes. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • KREBS, J. R. (1978). Optimal foraging: Decision rules of predators. In J. R. Krebs & N. B. Davies, Behavioral ecology. Sunderland, Ma: Sinauer Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • LEA, S. E. G. (1979). Foraging and reinforcement schedules in the pigeon: Optimal and non-optimal aspects of choice. Animal Behaviour, 27, 875–886.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LEITENBERG, H., RAWSON, R. A., & BATH, K. (1970). Reinforcement of competing behavior during extinction. Science, 169, 301–303.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • LINDBLOM, L. L., & JENKINS, H. M. (1981). Responses eliminated by noncontingent or negatively contingent reinforcement recover in extinction. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 7, 175–190.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • MALTZMAN, I. (1955). Thinking: From a behavioristic point of view. Psychological Review, 62, 275–286.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • MARTIN, R. F. (1940). “Native” traits and regression in rats. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 30, 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MASSERMAN, J. H. (1943). Behavior and neurosis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • MCDOWELL, J. J. (1982). The importance of Herrnstein’s mathematical statement of the law of effect for behavior therapy. American Psychologist, 37, 771–779.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • MILLER, N. E., & MILES, W. R. (1936). Alcohol and removal of reward: An analytical study of rodent maze behavior. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 21, 179–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MINSKY, M. (1975). A framework for representing knowledge. In P. H. Winston (Ed.), The psychology of computer vision. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • MOWRER, O. H. (1940). An experimental analogue of “regression” with incidental observations on “reaction-formation.” Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 35, 56–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NOTTERMAN, M. (1970). Behavior: A systematic approach. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’KELLEY, L. I. (1940a). An experimental study of regression. I. Behavioral characteristics of the regressive response. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 30, 41–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’KELLEY, L. I. (1940b). An experimental study of regression. II. Some motivational determinants of regression and perseveration. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 30, 55–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’LEARY, K. D., & WILSON, G. T. (1975). Behavior therapy: Application and outcome. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • PRYOR, K. W., HAAG, R., & O’REILLY, J. (1969). The creative porpoise: Training for novel behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 12, 653–661.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • RACHLIN, H. (1976). Behavior and learning. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • RAWSON, R. A., LEITENBERG, H., MULICK, J. A., & LEFEBVRE, M. F. (1977). Recovery of extinction responding in rats following discontinuation of reinforcement of alternative behavior: A test of two explanations. Animal Learning and Behavior, 5, 415–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • REYNOLDS, G. S. (1975). A primer of operant conditioning (Rev. ed.). Glenview, Il: Scott, Foresman.

    Google Scholar 

  • SAJWAJ, T., TWARDOSZ, S., & BURKE, M. (1972). Side effects of extinction procedures in a remedial school. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 5, 163–175.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • SANDERS, M. J. (1937). An experimental demonstration of regression in the rat. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 21, 493–510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SEARS, R. R. (1941). Non-aggressive reactions to frustration. Psychological Review, 48, 343–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SEARS, R. R. (1943). Survey of objective studies of psychoanalytic concepts. New York: Social Science Research Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • STADDON, J. E. R., & SIMMELHAG, V. L. (1971). The ‘superstition’ experiment: A reexamination of its implications for the principles of adaptive behavior. Psychological Review, 78, 3–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • YATES, A. J. (1958). Symptoms and symptom substitution. Psychological Review, 55, 371–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • YATES, A. J. (1970). Behavior therapy. New York: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • ZWAARDEMAKER, H. (1930). An intellectual history of a physiologist with psychological aspirations. In C. Murchison (Ed.), A history of psychology in autobiography (Vol. 1, pp. 491–516). Worcester, Ma: Clark University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Preparation of the paper was supported in part by NIH Grant MH32628 to the Foundation for Research on the Nervous System and by a Sigma Xi Grant-in-Aid of Research.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Epstein, R. Extinction-Induced Resurgence: Preliminary Investigations And Possible Applications. Psychol Rec 35, 143–153 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03394918

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03394918

Navigation