Skip to main content
Log in

A descriptive analysis of family discussions about everyday problems and decisions

  • Published:
The Analysis of Verbal Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Skinner’s Verbal Behavior (1957) and “An operant analysis of problem solving” (1966) were used to develop a coding system to analyze the relationships between verbal behaviors in family problem solving discussions. Taking solution statements as a target behavior, sequential relationships were examined with both subsequent and antecedent verbal behaviors, comparing families with higher and lower rates of solution statements. Results indicated that two categories of verbal behavior occurred both subsequent and antecedent to solution statements more frequently in families with higher frequencies of solution statements: Agreements and contingency statements. Results are discussed in terms of an operant theory of problem solving in which agreements may serve as reinforcers for solutions and contingency statements may serve as discriminative stimuli.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Atwater, J. B., & Morris, E. K. (1988). Instructions and children’s compliance in preschool classrooms: A descriptive analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 21, 157–167.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Bakeman, R., & Gottman, J. M. (1986). Observing interaction: An introduction to sequential analysis. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruning, J. L., & Kintz, B. L. (1977). Computational handbook of statistics. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Catania, A. C. (1979). Learning. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Catania, A. C., Matthews, B. A., & Shimoff, E. (1982). Instructional vs. shaped human verbal behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 38, 233–248.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Cerutti, D. T. (1989). Discrimination theory of rule-governed behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 51, 259–276.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • D’Zurilla, T. J. (1986). Problem solving therapy. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ericsson, A. K., & Simon, H. A. (1984). Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, D.M. (1989). Problem solving in families: A descriptive analysis of solution statements in relation to other verbal behaviors. Unpublished master’s thesis, Rutgers — The State University of New Jersey.

  • Greenspoon, J. (1955). The reinforcing effect of two spoken words on the frequency of two responses. American Journal of Psychology, 68, 409–416.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Holland, J. H., Holyoak, K. J., Nisbett, R. E., & Thagard, P. R. (1986). Induction: Processes of inference, learning, and discovery. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • House, A. E., House, B. J., & Campbell, M. B. (1981). Measures of interobserver agreement: Calculation formulas and distribution effects. Journal of Behavioral Assessment, 3, 37–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kreckel, M. (1981). Communicative acts and shared knowledge in natural discourse. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowe, C. F. (1979). Determinants of human operant behavior. In M.D. Zeiler & P. Harzem (Eds.). Reinforcement and the organization of behavior (pp. 159–192). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowe, C. F., Beasty, A., & Bentall, R. P. (1983). The role of verbal behavior in human learning: Infant performance on fixed interval schedules. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 39, 157–164.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Lowe, C. F., Harzem, P., & Hughes, S. (1978). Determinants of operant behavior in humans: Some differences from animals. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 30, 373–386.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Luria, A. (1961). The role of speech in the regulation of normal and abnormal behaviors. New York: Liveright.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mace, F. C., Lalli, J. S., & Pinter-Lalli, E. (1991). Functional analysis and treatment of aberrant behavior. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 12, 155–180.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, B. A., Catania, A. C., & Shimoff, E. (1985). Effects of uninstructed verbal behavior on nonverbal responding: Contingency descriptions versus performance descriptions. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 43, 155–164.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, B. A., Shimoff, E., & Catania, A. C. (1987). Saying and doing: A contingency space analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 20, 69–76.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, B. A., Shimoff, E., Catania, A. C., & Sagvolden, T. (1977). Uninstructed human responding: Sensitivity to ratio and interval contingencies. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 27, 453–468.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Meichenbaum, D. (1977). Cognitive-behavior modification. New York: Plenum.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Meichenbaum, D., & Goodman, J. (1969). The developmental control of operant motor responding by verbal operants. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 7, 553–565.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Meichenbaum, D., & Goodman, J. (1971). Training impulsive children to talk to themselves: A means of developing self-control. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 77, 115–126.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Meichenbaum, D., & Goodman, J. (1979). Clinical uses of private speech and central questions about its study in natural settings. In G. Zivin (Ed.). The development of self-regulation through private speech (pp. 325–346). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, G. R., Ray, R. S., Shaw, D. A., & Cobb, J. A. (1969). Manual for coding family interactions. Microfiche Publications, 440 Park Avenue South, New York, New York, 10016.

  • Place, U.T. (1988). Contingency analysis of naturally occurring verbal interactions. Unpublished manuscript. University College of North Wales.

  • Prinz, R. J., Foster, S. L., Kent, R. N., & O’Leary, K. D. (1970). Multi-variate assessment of conflict in distressed and nondistressed mother-adolescent dyads. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 12, 691–700.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raush, H. L. (1965). Interaction sequences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2, 487–499.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Robin, A. L., & Foster, S. L. (1988). Parent-adolescent problem solving and communication. New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robin, A. L., & Fox, M. (1979). Parent adolescent interaction coding system (PAICS). Unpublished manuscript. University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD.

  • Rosenfeld, H. M. (1966). Approval-seeking and approval-inducing functions of verbal and nonverbal responses in the dyad. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4, 597–605.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shimoff, E., Catania, A. C., & Matthews, B. A. (1985). Human operant performance: Sensitivity and pseudo-sensitivity to contingencies. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 46, 149–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F. (1957) Verbal behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F. (1966). An operant analysis of problem solving. In B. Kleinmuntz, (Ed.). Problem solving: Research, method, and theory (pp. 225–257. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spivack, G., Platt, J. R., & Shure, M. B. (1976). The problem-solving approach to adjustment. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tweney, R. D., Doherty, M. E., & Mynatt, C. R. (Eds.). (1981). On scientific thinking. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vyse, S., Mulick, J.A., & Thayer, B.M. (1984). An ecobehavioral assessment of a special education classroom. Applied Research in Mental Retardation, 5, 395–408.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Warren, S. C. (1986). Comparing cohesion and adaptability in clinic and non-clinic families with adolescents using observational and self-report methods. Unpublished master’s thesis, Rutgers — The State University of New Jersey.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This research was partially funded by National Institute on Drug Abuse Grant DA 05112-01 and was submitted as the first author’s Master’s Thesis at Rutgers University under the direction of the second author. Portions of this study were presented at the annual convention of the Association for Behavior Analysis in Philadelphia, May, 1988. The authors would like to thank Karen Krinsley, Shirley Brown, and Elizabeth Turk for their assistance in data analysis.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Greene, D.M., Bry, B.H. A descriptive analysis of family discussions about everyday problems and decisions. Analysis Verbal Behav 9, 29–39 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03392858

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03392858

Navigation