Skip to main content
Log in

Values and the scientific culture of behavior analysis

  • Published:
The Behavior Analyst Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

As scientists and practitioners, behavior analysts must make frequent decisions that affect many lives. Scientific principles have been our guide as we work to promote effective action across a broad spectrum of cultural practices. Yet scientific principles alone may not be sufficient to guide our decision making in cases with potentially conflicting outcomes. In such cases, values function as guides to work through ethical conflicts. We will examine two ethical systems, radical behaviorism and functional contextualism, from which to consider the role of values in behavior analysis, and discuss potential concerns. Finally, we propose philosophical pragmatism, focusing on John Dewey’s notions of community and dialogue, as a tradition that can help behavior analysts to integrate talk about values and scientific practices in ethical decision making.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barnes, D., & Roche, B. (1994). Mechanistic ontology and contextualistic epistemology: A contradiction in terms for behavior analysis. The Behavior Analyst, 7, 165–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, D., & Roche, B. (1997). A behavior-analytic approach to behavioral reflexivity. The Psychological Record, 47, 543–572.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes-Holmes, D. (2000). Behavioral pragmatism: No place for reality and truth. The Behavior Analyst, 23, 191–202.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Barnes-Holmes, D., & Barnes-Holmes, Y. (2000). Explaining complex behavior: Two perspectives on the concept of generalized operant classes. The Psychological Record, 50, 251–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baum, W. M. (1994). Understanding behaviorism: Science, behavior and culture. New York: HarperCollins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Day, W. F. (1977). Ethical philosophy and the thought of B. F. Skinner. In S. Leigland (Ed.), Radical behaviorism: Willard Day on psychology and philosophy (pp. 199–208). Reno, NV: Context Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Day, W. F., & Moore, J. (1995). On certain relations between contemporary philosophy and radical behaviorism. In J. T. Todd & E. K. Morris (Eds.), Modern perspectives on B. F. Skinner and contemporary behaviorism(pp. 75–84). Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1958). Experience and nature. New York: Dover.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fawcett, S. B. (1991). Some values guiding community research and action. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 24, 621–636.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Fawcett, S. B., Fletcher, R. K., & Mathews, R. M. (1980). Applications of behavior analysis in community education. In D. Glenwick & L. Jason (Eds.), Behavioral community psychology: Progress and prospects (pp. 108–142). New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fawcett, S. B., Francisco, V. T., & Schultz, J. A. (2004). Understanding and improving the work of community health and development. In J. Burgos & E. Ribes (Eds.), Theory, basic and applied research, and technological application in behavior science(pp. 209–242). Guadalajara, Mexico: Universidad de Guadalajara.

  • Glenn, S. S. (1988). Contingencies and meta-contingencies: Toward a synthesis of behavior analysis and cultural materialism. The Behavior Analyst, 11, 161–180.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, S. C. (1993). Analytic goals and the varieties of scientific contextualism. In S. C. Hayes, L. J. Hayes, H. W. Reese, & T. R. Sarbin (Eds.), Varieties of scientific contextualism (pp. 11–27). Reno, NV: Context Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, S. C., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Roche, B. (Eds.). (2001). Relational frame theory: A post-Skinnerian account of human language and cognition New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, S. C., & Brownstein, A. J. (1986). Mentalism, behavior-behavior relations and a behavior analytic view of the purposes of science. The Behavior Analyst, 9, 175–190.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, S. C., Hayes, L. J., & Reese, H. W. (1988). Finding the philosophical core: A review of Stephen C. Pepper’s World Hypotheses. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 50, 97–111.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, S. C., Strosahl, K. D., & Wilson, K. G. (1999). Acceptance and commitment therapy: An experiential approach to behavior change.New York: Guilford.

  • Heldke, L. (1987). John Dewey and Evelyn Fox Keller: A shared epistemological tradition. Hypatia, 2, 129–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jason, L. A., & Glenwick, D. S. (1980). An overview of behavioral community psychology. In D. Glenwick & L. Jason (Eds.), Behavioral community psychology: Progress and prospects (pp. 4–37). New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, R. P., & Geller, E. S. (1980). Community mental health center programs. In D. Glenwick & L. Jason (Eds.), Behavioral community psychology: Progress and prospects (pp. 147–174). New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamal, P. A. (1983). A cogent critique of epistemology leaves radical behaviorism unscathed. Behaviorism, 11, 103–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leigland, S. (1993). Discussion of S. C. Hayes: Scientific goals and the context of justification. In S. C. Hayes, L. J. Hayes, H. W. Reese, & T. R. Sarbin (Eds.), Varieties of scientific contextualism (pp. 28–33). Reno, NV: Context Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leigland, S. (2003). Is a new version of philosophical pragmatism necessary? A reply to Barnes-Holmes. The Behavior Analyst, 26, 297–304.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Longino, H. E. (1989). Can there be a feminist science? In N. Tuana (Ed.), Feminism and science (pp. 44–57). Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Longino, H. E., & Doell, R. (1983). Body, bias and behavior. Signs, 9, 206–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Machiavelli, N. (1947). The prince (T. G. Bergin, Trans.). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts. (Original work published 1515)

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, E. K. (1993). Behavior analysis and mechanism: One is not the other. The Behavior Analyst, 16, 25–43.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Morris, E. K. (1998). Contextualism: The world view of behavior analysis. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 46, 289–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pepper, S. C. (1942). World hypotheses: A study in evidence. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Potter, E. (1988). Modeling the gender politics in science. Hypatia, 3, 19–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prilleltensky, I. (1997). Values, assumptions, and practices: Assessing the moral implications of psychological discourse and action. American Psychologist, 52, 517–535.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, H., & Putnam, R. A. (1990). Epistemology as hypothesis. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, 26, 407–433.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roche, B., & Barnes-Holmes, D. (2003). Behavior analysis and social constructionism: Some points of contact and departure. The Behavior Analyst, 26, 215–231.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Rorty, R. (1982). Consequences of pragmatism. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorty, R. (1999). Philosophy and social hope. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz, M. R. (1995). B. F. Skinner’s radical behaviorism: Historical misconstructions and grounds for feminist reconstructions. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 19, 161–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz, M. R. (1998). Personal agency in feminist theory: Evicting the illusive dweller. The Behavior Analyst, 21, 179–192.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz, M. R. (2001, November). The feminist critique of science and radical behaviorism. Paper presented at the first international meeting of the Association for Behavior Analysis, Venice, Italy.

  • Schneider, S. M. (1997). Back to our philosophical roots: A journal review of Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society. The Behavior Analyst, 20, 17–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F. (1953). Science and human behavior. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F. (1956). Some issues concerning the control of human behavior. Science, 124. (Reprinted in Cumulative Record, pp. 25–38. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts)

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F. (1961). The design of cultures. Daedalus, 90. (Reprinted in Cumulative Record, pp. 39–50. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts)

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F. (1971). Beyond freedom and dignity. New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F. (1990). To know the future. The Behavior Analyst, 13, 103–106.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, Q. (1996). Machiavelli: A very short introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Staddon, J. E. R. (2004). Scientific imperialism and behaviorist epistemology. Behavior and Philosophy, 32, 231–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winter, G. (2001, July 29). Death benefit. New York Times, p. 2.

  • Zuriff, G. E. (1985). Behaviorism: A conceptual reconstruction. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuriff, G. (1987). Naturalistic ethics. In S. Modgil & C. Modgil (Eds.), B. F. Skinner: Consensus and controversy (pp. 309–318). London: Falmer.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This is an expanded version of a paper presented in a symposium entitledScience and Human Values (M. R. Ruiz, chair) at the annual meeting of the Association for Behavior Analysis, in Boston, 2004. The first author thanks Margaret McLaren of the philosophy department at Rollins College for insights and engaging conversation on John Dewey.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ruiz, M.R., Roche, B. Values and the scientific culture of behavior analysis. BEHAV ANALYST 30, 1–16 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03392139

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03392139

Key words

Navigation