Skip to main content
Log in

Socioeconomic status, hostility, and risk factor clustering in the normative aging study: Any help from the concept of allostatic load?

  • Empirical Articles
  • Published:
Annals of Behavioral Medicine

Abstract

Objective

To examine the relationships between socioeconomic status (SES), psychosocial vulnerability (hostility), and allostatic load. Allostatic load refers to the cumulative physiological cost of adaptation to stress.

Method

We examined the relationships, between SES (as measured by educational attainment), hostility, and allostatic load in the Normative Aging Study, a longitudinal study of community-dwelling men aged 21 to 80 years and free of known chronic medical conditions at entry in the 1960s. In 1986, the revised Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory was administered by mail, from which a hostility measure was derived by summing the scores from three Cook-Medley subscales: Hostile Affect, Hostile Attribution, Aggressive Responding. An index of allostatic load was constructed from data collected during physical exams conducted between 1987 and 1990 (i.e. measures reflecting “wear and tear” on the cardiovascular, endocrine, and metabolic systems). Cross-sectional relationships between education, hostility, and allostatic load were examined in 818 men.

Results

Separate linear regression analyses indicated that lower levels of educational attainment and greater hostility were both associated with higher allostatic load scores (p<.05 andp<.01, respectively). Less education was also associated with higher hostility (p<.001). When allostatic load was regressed simultaneously on education and hostility, the effect of education was attenuated, while hostility (p<.05) maintained an independent affect.

Conclusions

Our findings suggest that lower levels of education and greater hostility are associated with greater “wear and tear” on the body. The effects of education on allostatic load may be mediated by hostility.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gissing G:New Grub Street. Hertfordshire UK: Wordsworth Classics, 1996 (1891).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Adler NE, Boyce T, Chesney MA, et al: Socioeconomic status and health: The challenge of the gradient.American Psychologist. 1994,49:15–24.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Marmot MG, Shipley MJ, Rose G: Inequalities in death: Specific explanations of a general pattern?Lancet. 1984,1:1003–1006.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Pappas G, Queen S, Hadden W, Fisher G: The increasing disparity in mortality between socioeconomic groups in the United States 1960 and 1986.New England Journal of Medicine. 1993,329:103–109.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Susser M, Watson W, Hopper K:Sociology in Medicine (3rd Ed.). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Davey Smith G, Blane D, Bartley M: Explanations for socioeconomic differentials in mortality. Evidence from Britain and elsewhere.European Journal of Public. Health. 1994,4:131–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Townsend P, Davidson N, Whitehead M (eds):Inequalities in Health: The Black Report and the Health Divide. New York: Penguin, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  8. McLeod JD, Kessler RC: Socioeconomic status differences in vulnerability to undesirable life events.Journal of Health and Social Behavior. 1990,31:162–172.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Cohen S, Tyrrell DAJ, Smith AP: Negative life events, perceived stress, negative affect, and susceptibility to the common cold.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1993.,64:131–140.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Cohen S, Tyrrell DAJ, Smith AP: Psychological stress in humans and susceptibility to the common cold.New England Journal of Medicine. 1980,42: 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Byne DG, Whyte HM: Life events and myocardial infarction revisited: The role of measures of individual impact.Psychosomatic Medicine. 1980.42:1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Cohen S, Williamson GM: Stress and infectious disease.Psychological Bulletin. 1991,109(1):5–24.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Norris FH: Chronic stress as a mediator of acute stress: The case of Hurricane Hugo.Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 1993,23(16):1263–1284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Taylor SE, Repetti RL, Seeman T: Health psychology: What is an unhealthy environment and how does it get under the skin?Annual Review of Psychology. 1997,48:411–447.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Pincus T, Callahan LF: What explains the association between socioeconomic status and health: Primarily access or medical, care or mind-body variables?Advances: The Journal of Mind-Body Health. 1995,11:4–36.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Scherwitz L, Perkins L, Chesney M, Hughes G: Cook-Medley Hostility Scale and subsets: Relationship to demographic and psychosocial characteristics in young adults in the CARDIA study.Psychosomatic Medicine. 1991,53:36–49.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Matthews KA: Coronary heart disease and Type A behaviors: Update on and alternative to the Booth-Kewley and Friedman (1987) quantitative review.Psychological Bulletin. 1988,104:373–380.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Barefoot JC, Peterson BL, Dahlstrom WG, et al: Hostility patterns and health implications: Correlates of Cook-Medley Hostility Scale scores in a national survey.Health Psychology. 1991,10(1):18–24.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Smith TW: Concepts and methods in the study of anger, hostility, and health. In Siegman W, Smith TW (eds),Anger, Hostility and the Heart. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1994, 23–42.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Siegler IC, Peterson BI, Barefoot JC, et al: Hostility during late adolescence predicts coronary risk factors at mid-life.American Journal of Epidemiology. 1992,136: 146–154.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Barefoot JC, Dahlstrom WG, Williams Jr RB: Hostility, CHD incidence, and total mortality: A 25-year follow-up study of 255 physicians.Psychosomatic Medicine. 1983,45(1): 59–63.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Barefoot JC, Larsen S, von der Lieth L, Schroll M: Hostility, incidence of acute myocardial infarction, and mortality in a sample of older Danish men and women.American Journal of Epidemiology. 1995,142(5): 477–484.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Dembroski TM, MacDougall JM, Costa PTJ, Grandits GA: Components of hostility as predictors of sudden death and myocardial infarction in the Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial.Psychosomatic Medicine. 1989,51: 514–522.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Miller TQ, Smith TW, Turner CW, Guijarro ML, Hallet AJ: A meta-analytic review of research on hostility and physical health.Psychological Bulletin. 1996,119(2): 322–348.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. McEwen BS: Protective and damaging effects of stress mediators.New England Journal of Medicine. 1998,338(3): 171–179.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. McEwen BS, Stellar E: Stress and the individual Mechanisms leading to disease.Archives of Internal Medicine. 1993,153(18): 2093–2101.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Selye H:The Physiology and Pathology of Exposure to Stress. Montreal, Canada: Acta, 1950.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Seeman TE, Singer BH, Rowe JW, Horwitz RI, McEwen BS: The price of adaptation. Allostatic load and its health consequences: MacArthur Studies of Successful Aging.Archives of Internal Medicine. 1997,157: 2259–2268.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Miller TQ: A test of the psychosocial vulnerability and health behavior models of hostility: Results from an 11-year follow-up study of Mexican American.Psychosomatic Medicine. 1995,57(6): 572–581.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Bell B, Rose CI, Damon A: The Normative Aging Study: An interdisciplinary and longitudinal study of health and aging.International Journal of Aging and Human Development. 1972,3: 5–17.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Haan MN, Kaplan GA, Syme AL. Socioeconomic position and health: Old observations and new thoughts. In Bunker JP, Gomby DS, Kehrer BH (eds),Pathways to Health. Menlo Park, CA: The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  32. House JS, Kessler RC, Herzog AR, et al.: Age, socioeconomic status, and health.The Milbank Quarterly. 1990,68: 383–411.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Butcher JN, Dahlstrom WG, Graham JR, Tellegen A, Kaemmer B:MMPI-2: Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2. Manual for Administration and Scoring. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Barefoot JC, Dodge KA, Peterson BL, Dahlstrom WG, Williams Jr. RB: The Cook-Medley Hostility Scale: Item content and ability to predict survivalPsychosomatic Medicine. 1989,51(1): 46–57.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Cook W, Medley D: Proposed hostility and-pharisaic-virtue scales for the MMPI.Journal of Applied Psychology. 1954,238: 414–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Troxler RG, Sprague EA, Albanese RA, Fuchs R, Thompson AJ: The association of elevated plasma cortisol and early atherosclerosis as demonstrated by coronary angiography.Atherosclerosis. 1977,26: 151–162.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Sapolsky RM:Stress, the Aging Brain, and the Mechanisms of Neuron Death. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Brindley D, Rolland Y: Possible connections between stress, diabetes, obesity, hypertension, and altered lipoprotein metabolism that may result in atherosclerosis.Clinical Science. 1989,77: 453–461.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Bjorntorp P: The associations between obesity, adipose tissue distribution, and diseaseActa Medica Scandinavica. 1987,723(Suppl.): 121–134.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Friedwald WT, Levey RI, Fredrickson DS: Estimation of the concentration of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in plasma, without use of the preparative ultracentrifuge.Clinical Chemistry. 1972,18: 449–452.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Smedes F, Kraak JC, Poppe H: Simple and fast solvent extraction system for selective and quantitative isolation of adrenaline, noradrenaline, and dopamine from plasma and urine.Journal of Chromatography. 1982,231: 25–39.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. MacDonald IA, Lake DM: An improved technique for extracting catecholamines from body fluids.Journal of Neuroscience Methods. 1985,13: 239–248.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Leon LP, Chu DK, Stasiw RP, et al: New more specific methods for the SMA 12/60 multichannel biochemical analyzer. InAdvances in Automated Analysis Technicon International Congress, 1976. Tarrytown, NY: Mediad, Inc., 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  44. SAS Institute:SAS/STAT User's Guide. Version 6 4th Ed.). Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc., 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Baron RM, Kenny DA: The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1986,31(6): 1173–1182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Pope MK, Smith TW: Cortisol excretion in high and low cynically hostile men.Psychosomatic Medicine. 1991,53(4): 386–392.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Wing RR, Matthews KA, Kuller LH, Meilahn EN, Plantinga P: Waist to hip ratio in middle-aged women. Associations with behavioral and psychosocial factors and with changes in cardiovascular risk factorsArteriosclerosis and Thrombosis. 1991,11(5): 1250–1257.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Keltikangas-Jarvinen L, Raikkonen K, Hautanen, A, Adlercreutz H: Vital exhaustion, anger expression, and pituitary and adrenocortical hormones: Implications for the insulin resistance syndrome.Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology. 1996,16(2): 275–280.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Klem L: Path analysis. In Grimm LG, Yarnold PR (eds),Reading and Understanding Multivariate Statistics. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 1995, 65–98.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Preparation of this manuscript was supported in part by Grants HL 54098 and AG02287. The Normative Aging Study is supported by the Cooperative Studies Program/ERIC of the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, and is a component of the Massachusetts Veterans Epidemiology Research and Information Center (MAVERIC). Dr. Sparrow is an Associate Research. Center Scientist of the Medical Research Service of the Department of Veterans Affairs. Dr. Kawachi is supported by a Career Development Award from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, and by the MacArthur Foundation Network on Socioeconomic Status and Health.

About this article

Cite this article

Kubzansky, L.D., Kawachi, I. & Sparrow, D. Socioeconomic status, hostility, and risk factor clustering in the normative aging study: Any help from the concept of allostatic load?. ann. behav. med. 21, 330–338 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02895966

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02895966

Keywords

Navigation