Abstract
Missing plants in potato crops can be caused by diseases and other factors, and can result from non-emergence or from plants incapacitated at any time during the growing season. Field experiments were conducted to simulate missing plants and to estimate the resulting yield losses by removing different percentages of plants at random from plots at emergence and/or later stages. The recorded yield losses were not proportional to the percentage of missing plants. Two surveys of fields of table stock and seed stock of the cultivar Netted Gem in New Brunswick in 1972 showed that approximately 25% of the plants were missing at emergence, probably causing around8% loss in total tuber yield. Assuming all cultivars have similar levels of misses, the yield loss clue to missing plants at emergence in New Brunswick in 1972 was equivalent to a financial loss of approximately $1 1/2 million.
Similar content being viewed by others
Literature Cited
Akeley, R. W., F. J. Stevenson and C. E. Bunningham. 1955. Potato variety yields, total solids, and cooking quality as affected by date of vine killing. Amer. Potato J. 32: 304–313.
Andrew, William T. 1968. Plant stands in potato fields. Proc. Alberta Potato Commission: 4–7.
Andrew, William T. and T. A. Preston. 1969. Factors affecting plant stands in potato fields. Proc. Alberta Potato Commission: 11–15.
Andrew, William T., I. Soliman and T. A. Preston. 1970. The influence of simulated gaps on yield of potatoes. Proc. Alberta Potato Commission: 96–104.
Berindei, M., H. Bredt and Lucia Tanasescu Eugenia Dragomir. 1969. Influenta asupra productiei de cartof si asupra erorii in tehnica experimentala (Effect of empty spaces on potato yield and on error in experimental technique). Analele I.C.C.S. Brasov 1: 205–217.
Blodgett, F. M. 1941. A method for the determination of losses due to diseased or missing plants. Amer. Potato J. 18: 132–135.
Cannon, H. B. and N. M. Parks. 1950. The effect of missing hills on yield of adjacent hills of potatoes. Prog. Rep. Hort. Div. C.E.F., Canada 1934-1948: 94–95.
Cross, V. S. and R. E Ohms. 1967. Better potato stands. Idaho Agricultural Extension Service Bull. 486.
Hagberg, A. 1948. Ett försök till uppskattning av skördeminskningen i ett luckigt potatisbestand. Sv. Utsadesf. Tidskr. 58: 265–269.
Hirst, J. M., G. A. Hide, R. L. Griffith and O. J. Stedman. 1970. Improving the health of seed potatoes. Jour. R.A.S.E. London, England 131: 87–106.
Hirst, J. M., G. A. Hide, O. J. Stedman and R. L. Griffith. Yield compensation in gappy potato crops and methods to measure effects of fungi pathogenic on seed tubers. Ann. Appl. Biol. 73: 143–150.
James, W. C., L. C. Callbeck, W. A. Hodgson and C. S. Shih. 1971. Evaluation of a method used to estimate loss in yield of potatoes caused by late blight. Phytopathology 61: 1471–1476.
Kirkpatrick, H. C. and F. M. Blodgett. 1943. Yield losses caused by leaf roll of potatoes. Amer. Potato J. 20: 53–56.
Livermore, J. R. 1927. A critical study of some of the factors concerned in measuring the effect of selection in the potato. Jour. Am. Soc. Agron. 19(10): 857–895.
Stewart, F. C. 1919. Missing hills in potato fields: their effect upon yield. N. Y. Agr. Exp. Sta. (Geneva) Bull. 459: 45–69.
Stewart, F. C. 1921. Further studies on the effect of missing hills in potato fields and the variation in the yield of potato plants from halves of the same seed tuber. N. Y. Agr. Exp. Sta. Bull. 489.
Tuthill, C. S. and P. Decker. 1941. Losses in yield caused by leaf roll potatoes. Amer. Potato J. 20: 53–56.
Werner, M. O. and T. A. Kiesselbach. 1930. The effects of vacant hills and of plot competition upon the yield of potatoes in field experiments. Potato Assoc. Amer. Proc. 16: 109–120.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Contribution No. 358, Ottawa Research Station, Ottawa K1A OC6 Canada.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
James, W.C., Lawrence, C.H. & Shih, C.S. Yield losses due to missing plants in potato crops. American Potato Journal 50, 345–352 (1973). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02851889
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02851889