Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The effect of sea-water submergence on rhizome bud viability of the introducedAmmophila arenaria and the nativeLeymus mollis in California

  • Published:
Journal of Coastal Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Ammophila arenaria, an invasive European beach grass, dominates most United States Pacific coast beaches north of San Francisco Bay, and it appears to severely reduce opportunities for regeneration of native plant species, including American beach grass,Leymus mollis. The knowledge of how longAmmophila rhizomes can survive in sea-water is important for long-tern management strategies, which must consider the probability of reinvasion of areas whereAmmophila has been eradicated. The bud viability of bothAmmophila arenaria andLeymus mollis remained high following submergence in sea-water for 7 days, andLeymus bud viability was still high after 13 days submergence. In fact,Leymus bud viability appears to be enhanced slightly by submergence for 7 days in sea-water. SinceAmmophila rhizomes retain a mean bud viability of >50% following submergence for 7 days, there is clearly the potential for long distance dispersal to other beaches. Even after 13 days of submergence,Ammophila rhizomes still had a mean bud viability of 8.5%. Assuming near-shore current speeds of 5–45 cm/sec, viableAmmophila rhizomes can be transported up to 505 km in 13 days.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anon. 1981.Ecological characterization of the central and northern California coastal region, Vol. 1. Basic ecological concepts. Fish and Wildlife Service, U.S. Department of the Interior FWS/OBS-80/45, Washington, DC.

  • Anon. 1988.Northern foredune grassland element stewardship abstract. Intern. rep. The Nature Conservancy, Arcata, CA.

  • Barbour, M.G. 1978. Salt spray as a microenvironmental factor in the distribution of beach plants at Point Reyes, California.Oecologia (Berl.) 32: 213–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barbour, M.G. & Johnson, A.F. 1977. Beach and Dune, In: Barbour, M.G. & Major, J. (eds.)Terrestrial vegetation of California, pp. 223–262. John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbour, M.G., De Jong, T.M. & Johnson, A.F. 1976. Synecology of beach vegetation along the Pacific Coast of the United States of America: a first approximation.J. Biogeogr. 3: 55–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benecke, W. 1930. Zur Biologie der Strand- und DŸnenflora, 1. Vergleichende Versuche Ÿber die Salztoleranz vonAmmophila arenaria Link,Elymus arenarius L. undAgropyrum junceum L.Ber. Dtsch. Bot. Ges. 48: 127–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bond, T.E.T. 1952. Biological flora of the British Isles:Elymus L.J. Ecol. 40: 217–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, R.S. 1992. The influence ofAmmophila arenaria on foredune plant microdistributions at Point Reyes National Seashore, CA.Madroño 39: 67–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breckon, G.J. & Barbour, M.G. 1974. Review of North American Pacific Coast vegetation.Madroño 22: 333–360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buell, A.C., Pickart, A.J. & Stuart, J.D. 1995. Introduction history and invasion patterns ofAmmophila arenaria on the north coast of California.Conserv. Biol. 9: 1587–1593.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, V.J. 1976.Coastal vegetation. Pergamon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, W.S. 1958. Coastal sand dunes of Oregon and Washington.Geol. Soc. Am. Mem. 72: 1–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, W.S. 1967. Coastal sand dunes of California.Geol. Soc. Am. Memoir 104: 1–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danin, A., Rae, S. Barbour, M., Jurjavcic, N., Connors, P. & Uhlinger, E. 1999. Early primary succession on dunes at Bodega Head, California.Madroño.

  • Doing, H. 1985. Coastal fore-dune zonation and succession in various parts of the world.Vegetatio 61: 65–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gemmell, A.R., Greig-Smith, P. & Gimingham, C.H. 1953. A note on the behaviour ofAmmophila arenaria (L.) Link in relation to sand dune formation.Proc. Bot. Soc. Edinb. 36: 132–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greig-Smith, P. 1961. Data on pattern within plant communities II.Ammophila arenaria (L.) Link.J. Ecol. 49: 703–708.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greig-Smith, P., Gemmell, A.R. & Gimingham, C.H. 1947. Tussock formation inAmmophila arenaria (L.) Link.New Phytol. 46: 262–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, D. & Davy, A.J. 1986a. Strandline colonization byElymus farctus in relation to sand mobility and rabbit grazing.J. Ecol. 74: 1045–1056.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, D. & Davy, A.J. 1986b. Regenerative potential ofElymus farctus from rhizome fragments and seed.J. Ecol. 74: 1057–1067.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hertling, U.M. 1997.Ammophila arenaria (L.) Link (marram grass) in South Africa and its potential invasiveness. Ph. D. Dissertation, Rhodes University, Gahamstown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hewett, D.G. 1970. The colonization of sand dunes after stabilization with marram grass (Ammophila arenaria).J. Ecol. 58: 653–668.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heyligers, P.C. 1985. The impact of introduced plants on foredune formation in south-eastern Australia.Proc. Ecol. Soc. Aust. 14: 23–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hickman, J.C. (ed.) 1993.The Jepson Manual. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobbs, R.J., Gimingham, C.H. & Band, W.T. 1983. The effects of planting technique on the growth ofAmmophila arenaria (L.) Link andLeymus arenarius (L.) Hochst.J. Appl. Ecol. 20: 659–672.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsu, J.C. 1996.Multiple comparisons. Chapman & Hall, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hulten, E. & Fries, M. 1986.Atlas of northern European vascular plants north of the Tropic of Cancer. Koeltz Scientific Books, Kšnigstein.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huiskes, A.H.L. 1977. The natural establishment ofAmmophila arenaria from seed.Oikos 29: 133–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huiskes, A.H.L. 1979. Biological flora of the British Isles:Ammophila arenaria (L.) Link.J. Ecol. 67: 363–382.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, P.H. 1982. Naturalized plants in Southwest South Island, New Zealand.N. Z. J. Bot. 20: 131–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Largier, J.L., Magnell, B.A. & Winant, C.D. 1993. Subtidal circulation over the Northern California shelf.J. Geophys. Res. 98: 147–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lentz, S.J. & Chapman, D.C. 1989. Seasonal differences in the current and temperature variability over the Northern California shelf during the coastal ocean dynamics experiment.J. Geophys. Res. 94: 571–592.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lubke, R.A. & Hertling, U.M. 1995. IsAmmophila arenaria (marram grass) a threat to South African dunefields?J. Coastal Conserv. 1: 103–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maser, C. & Sedell, J.R. 1994.From the forest to the sea: the ecology of wood in streams, rivers, estuaries, and oceans. St. Lucie Press, Delray Beach, FL.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAdam, J.H. 1980. Uncontrolled grazing and vegetation removal in the Falkland Islands.Environ. Conserv. 7: 201–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pavlik, B.M. 1983. Nutrient and productivity relations of the dune grassesAmmophila arenaria andElymus mollis. III. Spatial aspects of clonal expansion with reference to rhizome growth and the dispersal of buds.Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 110: 271–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pickart, A. 1988. Dune restoration in California: a beginning.Restor. Manage. Notes 6(1): 8–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickart, A.J. & Sawyer, J.O. 1998.Ecology and restoration of northern California coastal dunes. California Native Plant Society. Sacramento, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pitts, W.D. & Barbour, M.G. 1979. The microdistribution and feeding preferences ofPeromyscus maniculatus in the stand at Point Reyes National Seashore, California.Am. Midl. Nat. 101: 38–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ranwell, D. 1972.Ecology of salt marches and sand dunes. Chapman and Hall, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rejm‡nek, M. 1999. Invasive plant species and invasible ecosystems. In: Sandlund, O.T., Schei, P.J. & Viken, •. (eds.)Invasive species and biodiversity management, pp. 79–102. Kluwer Academic, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salisbury, E. 1952.Downs and dunes. G. Bell and Sons, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slobodchikoff, C.N. & Doyden, J.T. 1977. Effects ofAmmophila arenaria on sand dune arthropod communities.Ecology 58: 1171–1175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sykes, M.T. & Wilson, J.B. 1989. The effect of salinity on the growth of some New Zealand sand dune species.Acta. Bot. Neerl. 38: 173–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsuriell, D.E. 1974. Sand dune stabilization in Israel.Intern. J. Biometeorol. 18: 89–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van der Laan D, van Tongeren, O.F.R., van der Putten, W.H. & Veenbaas, G. 1997. Vegetation development in coastal foredunes in relation to methods of establishing marram grass (Ammophila arenaria).J. Coastal Conserv. 3: 179–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van der Putten, W.H. 1990. Establishment ofAmmophila arenaria (marram grass) from culms, seeds, and rhizomes.J. Appl. Ecol. 27: 188–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Hook, S.S. 1983.A study of European Beachgrass, Ammophila arenaria (L.) Link: Control methods and a management plan for the Lanphere-Christensen Dunes Preserve. Intern. rep. The Nature Conservancy, Arcata, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • WallŽn, B. 1980. Changes in structure and function ofAmmophila during primary succession.Oikos 34: 227–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiedemann, A.M. 1987.The ecology of European beach-grass (Ammophila arenaria (L.) Link): a review of the literature. Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, Nongame Wildlife Program. Technical report #87-1-01.

  • Wiedemann, A.M. & Pickart, A. 1996. TheAmmophila problem on the Northwest coast of North America.Landscape Urb. Plann. 34: 287–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiedemann, A.M., Dennis, J. & Smith, F.S. 1974.Plants of the Oregon coastal dunes. Oregon State University Bookstores, Corvallis, OR.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Section of Evolution and Ecology, University of California, 95616, Davis, CA, USA

    Aptekar Rachel & Rejmánek Marcel

Authors
  1. Aptekar Rachel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Rejmánek Marcel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rachel, A., Marcel, R. The effect of sea-water submergence on rhizome bud viability of the introducedAmmophila arenaria and the nativeLeymus mollis in California. J Coast Conserv 6, 107–111 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02730474

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02730474

Keywords

Nomenclature

Search

Navigation