Abstract
We consider latent variable models for an infinite sequence (or universe) of manifest (observable) variables that may be discrete, continuous or some combination of these. The main theorem is a general characterization by empirical conditions of when it is possible to construct latent variable models that satisfy unidimensionality, monotonicity, conditional independence, andtail-measurability. Tail-measurability means that the latent variable can be estimated consistently from the sequence of manifest variables even though an arbitrary finite subsequence has been removed. The characterizing,necessary and sufficient, conditions that the manifest variables must satisfy for these models are conditional association and vanishing conditional dependence (as one conditions upon successively more other manifest variables). Our main theorem considerably generalizes and sharpens earlier results of Ellis and van den Wollenberg (1993), Holland and Rosenbaum (1986), and Junker (1993). It is also related to the work of Stout (1990).
The main theorem is preceded by many results for latent variable modelsin general—not necessarily unidimensional and monotone. They pertain to the uniqueness of latent variables and are connected with the conditional independence theorem of Suppes and Zanotti (1981). We discuss new definitions of the concepts of “true-score” and “subpopulation,” which generalize these notions from the “stochastic subject,” “random sampling,” and “domain sampling” formulations of latent variable models (e.g., Holland, 1990; Lord & Novick, 1968). These definitions do not require the a priori specification of a latent variable model.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Andrich, D. (1978). A rating formulation for ordered response categories.Psychometrika, 43, 561–573.
Billingsley, P. (1986).Probability and measure. New York: Wiley.
Byrne, B. M. (1989). Multigroup comparisons and the assessment of equivalent construct validity across groups: Methodological and substantive issues.Multivariate Behavioral Research, 24, 503–523.
Cronbach, L. J., Gleser, G. C., Nanda, H., & Rajaratnam, N. (1972).The dependability of behavioral measurements: Theory of generalizability for scores and profiles. New York: Wiley.
Ellis, J. L. (1993). Subpopulation invariance of patterns in covariance matrices.British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 46, 231–254.
Ellis, J. L., & van den Wollenberg, A. L. (1993). Local homogeneity in latent trait models. A characterization of the homogeneous monotone IRT model.Psychometrika, 58, 417–429.
Esary, J. D., Proschan, F., & Walkup, D. W. (1967). Association of random variables, with applications.Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 38, 1466–1474.
Fischer, G. H. (1974).Einfuhrung in die Theorie psychologischer Tests [Introduction to mental test theory]. Bern: Huber.
Fischer, G. H. (1987). Applying the principles of specific objectivity and of generalizability to the measurement of change.Psychometrika, 52, 565–587.
Fischer, G. H. (1995). Derivations of the Rasch model. In G. H. Fischer & I. W. Molenaar, (Eds.),Rasch models. Foundations, recent developments and applications (pp. 15–38). New York: Springer-Verlag.
Grayson, D. A. (1988). Two-group classification in latent trait theory: Scores with monotone likelihood ratio.Psychometrika, 53, 383–392.
Grayson, D. A. (1990). Selection effects and unidimensionality in item response theory.British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 43, 207–216.
Guttman, L. (1945). A basis for analyzing test-retest reliability.Psychometrika, 10, 255–282.
Guttman, L. (1953). Image theory for the structure of quantitative variates.Psychometrika, 18, 227–296.
Holland, P. W. (1981). When are item response models consistent with observed data?Psychometrika, 46, 79–92.
Holland, P. W. (1990). On the sampling theory foundations of item response theory models.Psychometrika, 55, 577–601.
Holland, P. W., & Rosenbaum, P. R. (1986). Conditional association and unidimensionality in monotonc latent variable models.The Annals of Statistics, 14, 1523–1543.
Junker, B. W. (1991). Essential independence and likelihood-based ability estimation for polytomous items.Psychometrika, 56, 255–278.
Junker, B. W. (1993). Conditional association, essential independence, and monotone unidimensional item response models.Annals of Statistics, 21, 1359–1378.
Junker, B. W., & Ellis, J. L. (1997).A characterization of monotone unidimensional latent variable models.Annals of Statistics, 25, 1327–1343.
Kaiser, H., & Caffrey, J. (1965). Alpha factor analysis.Psychometrika, 30, 1–14.
Kingman, J. F. C. (1978). Uses of exchangeability.Annals of Probability, 6, 183–197.
Lazarsfeld, P. F. (1959). Latent structure analysis. In S. Koch (Ed.),Psychology: A study of science, Vol. 3 (pp. 476–543). New York: McGraw Hill.
Lazarsfeld, P. F., & Henry, N. W. (1968).Latent structure analysis. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Lehmann, E. L. (1986).Testing statistical hypotheses. New York: Wiley.
Lord, F. M. (1980).Applications of item response theory to practical testing problems. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Lord, F. M., & Novick, M. R. (1968).Statistical theories of mental test scores. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
McDonald, R. P. (1977). The indeterminacy of components and the definition of common factors.British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 30, 165–176.
McDonald, R. P. (1981). The dimensionality of tests and items.British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 34, 100–117.
McDonald, R. P., & Mulaik, S. A. (1979). Determinacy of common factors: A nontechnical review.Psychological Bulletin, 86, 297–306.
Mellenbergh, G. J. (1989). Item bias and item response theory.International Journal of Educational Research, 13, 127–143.
Meredith, W., & Millsap, R. E. (1992). On the misuse of manifest variables in the detection of measurement bias.Psychometrika, 57, 289–311.
Mokken, R. J. (1971).A theory and procedure of scale-analysis. The Hague: Mouton.
Mood, A. M., Graybill, F. A., & Boes, D. C. (1974).Introduction to the theory of statistics. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Mulaik, S. A., & McDonald, R. P. (1978). The effect of additional variables on factor indeterminacy in models with a single common factor.Psychometrika, 43, 177–192.
Ramsay, J. O. (1991). Kernel smoothing approaches to nonparametric item characteristic curve estimation.Psychometrika, 56, 611–630.
Rasch, G. (1960).Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests. Copenhagen: Nielson & Lydiche.
Rasch, G. (1977). On specific objectivity: An attempt at formalizing the request for generality and validity of scientific statements. In M. Blegvad (Ed.),The Danish yearbook of philosophy. Copenhagen: Munksgaard.
Rosenbaum, P. R. (1984). Testing the conditional independence and monotonicity assumptions of item response theory.Psychometrika, 49, 425–435.
Roskam, E. E., & Jansen, P. G. W. (1984). A new derivation of the Rasch model. In E. Degreef & J. Van Buggenhaut (Eds),Trends in mathematical psychology. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Rozenboom, W. W. (1988). Factor indeterminacy: The saga continues.British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 41, 209–226.
Schervish, M. J. (1995).Theory of statistics. New York: Springer-Verlag.
Shepard, R. N., & Metzler, J. (1971). Mental rotation of three-dimensional objects.Science, 171, 701–703.
Sijtsma, K. (1988).Contributions to Mokken's nonparametric item response theory. Amsterdam: Free University Press.
Steiger, J. H. (1979). Factor indeterminacy in the 1930's and the 1970's some interesting parallels.Psychometrika, 44, 157–167.
Stout, W. (1990). A new item response theory modeling approach with applications to unidimensionality assessment and ability estimation.Psychometrika, 55, 293–325.
Suppes, P., & Zanotti, M. (1981). When are probabilistic explanations possible?Synthese, 48, 191–199.
Thurstone, L. L. (1957).Multiple-factor analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Tucker, L. R. (1966). Some mathematical notes on three-mode factor analysis.Psychometrika, 31, 279–311.
Warm, T. A. (1989). Weighted likelihood estimation of ability in item response theory.Psychometrika, 54, 427–250.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
The authors made equivalent contributions to the results of this article. Ellis' research was supported by the Dutch Interuniversitary Graduate School of Psychometrics and Sociometrics. Junker's research was supported by ONR Grant N00014-87-K-0277, NIMH Grant MH15758, and a Carnegie Mellon University Faculty Development Grant. In addition Junker would like to acknowledge the hospitality of the Nijmegen Institute for Cognition and Information during his visit to the University of Nijmegen in August 5–10, 1993.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ellis, J.L., Junker, B.W. Tail-measurability in monotone latent variable models. Psychometrika 62, 495–523 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02294640
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02294640