Skip to main content
Log in

Principles and strategies in breeding for higher salt tolerance

  • Crop Production with Saline Water
  • Published:
Plant and Soil Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Salinity is an environmental component that usually reduces yield. Recent advances in the understanding of salt effects on plants have not revealed a reliable physiological or biochemical marker that can be used to rapidly screen for salt tolerance. The necessity of measuring salt tolerance based upon growth in saline relative to non-saline environments makes salt tolerance measurements and selection for tolerance difficult. Additionally, high variability in soil salinity and environmental interactions makes it questionable whether breeding should be conducted for tolerance or for high yield. Genetic techniques can be used to identify the components of variation attributable to genotype and environment, and the extent of genetic variation in saline and nonsaline environments can be used to estimate the potential for improving salt tolerance. Absolute salt tolerance can be improved best by increasing both absolute yield and relative salt tolerance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abel G H 1963 Inheritance of the capacity for chloride inclusion and chloride exclusion in soybeans. Crop Sci. 9, 697–698.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Akbar M and Yabuno T 1977 Breeding for saline-resistant varieties of rice. IV. Inheritance of delayed-type panicle sterility induced by salinity. Jap J. Breed. 27, 237–240.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Epstein E, Norlyn J D, Rush D W, Kingsbury R W, Kelly D B, Cunningham, G A and Wrona A W 1980 Saline culture of crops: a genetic approach. Science 210, 399–404.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Falconer D S 1952 The problem of environment and selection. Am. Nat. 86, 293–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Finlay K W and Wilkinson G N 1963 The analysis of adaptation in a plant breeding programme. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 14, 742–754.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Flowers T J, Troke P F and Yeo A R 1977 The mechanism of salt tolerance in halophytes. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 28, 89–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Frey K J 1964 Adaptation reaction of oat strains selected under stress and non-stress environmental conditions. Crop Sci. 4, 55–58.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Greenway H and Munns R 1980 Mechanisms of salt tolerance in non-halophytes. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 31, 149–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Johnson G R and Frey K J 1967 Heritabilities of the quantitative attributes of oats (Avena sp.) at varying levels of environmental stress. Crop Sci. 7, 43–46.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Maas E V 1985 Salt tolerance of plants.In Handbook of Plant Science in Agriculture. Ed. B R Christie, CRC Press Inc., Boca Raton, Florida (In press).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Maas E V and Hoffman G J 1977 Crop salt tolerance—current assessment. J. Irrig. Drainage Div., ASCE 103(IR2), 115–134.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Maas E V and Nieman R H 1978 Physiology of plant tolerance to salinity.In Crop Tolerance to Suboptimal Land Conditions. Ed. G A Jung. pp 277–299. Am. Soc. Agron. Spec. Publ. 32. Madison, WI.

  13. Mederski H J and Jeffers D L 1973 Yield response of soybean varieties grown at two soil moisture stress levels. Agron. J. 65, 410–412.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Norlyn J D 1980 Breeding salt-tolerant crop plants.In Genetic Engineering of Osmoregulation—Impact on Plant Productivity for Food Chemicals and Energy. Basic Life Sciences. Vol 14. Eds. D W Rains, R C Valentine and A Hollaender. pp 293–309. Plenum Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Pasternak D, Twersky M, and De Malach Y 1979 Salt resistance in agricultural crops.In Stress Physiology in Crop Plants. Eds. H W Mussell and R C Staples. pp 127–142. Wiley Interscience, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ream C L and Furr J D 1976 Salt tolerance of some Citrus species, relatives, and hybrids tested as rootstocks. J. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. 101, 265–267.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Richards R A 1983 Should selection for yield in saline regions be made on saline or nonsaline soils? Euphytica 32, 431–438.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Rosielle A A and Hamblin J 1981 Theoretical aspects of selection for yield in stress and non-stress environments. Crop Sci. 21, 943–946.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Rush D W and Epstein E 1976 Genotypic responses to salinity. Differences between saltsensitive and salt-tolerant genotypes of tomato. Plant Physiol. 57, 162–166.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Rush D W and Epstein E 1981 Comparative studies on the sodium, potassium, and chloride relations of a wild halophytic and a domestic salt-sensitive tomato species. Plant Physiol. 68, 1308–1313.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Sacher R F, Staples R C and Robinson R W 1982 Salt tolerance in hybrids ofLycopersicon esculentum×Solanum pennellii and selected breeding lines.In Biosaline Research: A Look to the Future. Ed. A San Pietro, pp 325–336. Plenum Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Sacher R F, Staples R C and Robinson R W 1983 Ion regulation and response of tomato to sodium chloride: a homeostatic system. J. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. 108, 566–569.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Shannon M C 1978 Testing salt tolerance variability among tall wheatgrass lines. Agron. J. 70, 719–722.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Shannon M C 1982 Genetics of salt tolerance: new challenges.In Biosaline Research. A Look to the Future. Ed. A San Pietro, pp 271–282. Plenum Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Shannon M C 1984 Breeding, selection and the genetics of salt tolerance.In Salinity Tolerance in Plants—Strategies for Crop Improvement. Eds. R C Staples and G H Toenniessen. pp 313–331. Wiley International, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Shannon M C, McCreight and Draper J H 1983 Screening tests for salt tolerance in lettuce. J. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. 108, 225–230.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shannon, M.C. Principles and strategies in breeding for higher salt tolerance. Plant Soil 89, 227–241 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02182244

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02182244

Key words

Navigation