Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of Micro-ID with API 20E for identification ofSalmonella, Shigella andYersinia species

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Micro-ID is a new kit system for the identification ofEnterobacteriaceae in 4 h. It consists of 15 biochemical tests with paper discs. A study was conducted to compare the accuracy of the Micro-ID system with that of the API 20E system for identification ofSalmonella, Shigella andYersinia species. Both systems correctly identified 57 out of 59 (97%)Shigella strains. Micro-ID correctly identified twoSalmonella typhi strains, whereas API 20E incorrectly identified one. Of 138Salmonella strains of other serotypes, 135 (98%) were correctly identified by Micro-ID and 130 (94 %) by API 20E. The respective figures for theYersinia strains were 40 out of 45 (89 %) and 30 out of 45 (66 %). It is concluded that Micro-ID is at least equal to API 20E in its ability to identifySalmonella, Shigella andYersinia species.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Barry A. L., Badal, R. E.: Rapid identification ofEnterobacteriaceae with the Micro-ID system versus API 20E and conventional media. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1979, 10: 293–298.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Buesching, W. J., Rhoden, D. L., Esaias, A. O., Smith, P. B., Washington II, J. A.: Evaluation of the modified Micro-ID system for identification ofEnterobacteriaceae. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1979, 10: 454–458.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Cox, N. A., Mercuri, A. J., Carson, M. O., Tanner, D. A.: Comparative study of Micro-ID, Minitek and conventional methods withEnterobacteriaceae freshly isolated from foods. Journal of Food Protection 1979, 42: 735–738.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Edberg, S. C., Atkinson, B., Chambers, C., Moore, M. H., Palumbo, L., Zorzon, C. F., Singer, J. M.: Clinical evaluation of the Micro-ID, API 20E, and conventional media systems for identification ofEnterobacteriaceae. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1979, 10: 161–167.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kelly, M. T., Latimer, J. M.: Comparison of the AutoMicrobic System with API, Enterotube, Micro-ID, Micro-Media systems, and conventional methods for identification ofEnterobacteriaceae. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1980, 12: 659–662.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kelly, M. T., Hale, D. C., Matsen, J. M.: Rapid identification by the Micro-ID system ofEnterobacteriaceae detected by urine screening. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1981, 14: 295–297.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Edwards, P. R., Ewing, W. H.: Identification ofEnterobacteriaceae. Burgess Publishing, Minneapolis, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kauffmann, F.:Enterobacteriaceae. Ejnar Munksgaard, Copenhagen, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Burdash, N. M., West, M. E.: Effect of refrigeration on inoculated Micro-Id strips. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1981, 14: 350–351.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ekwall, E., Dimander, M. Comparison of Micro-ID with API 20E for identification ofSalmonella, Shigella andYersinia species. Eur. J, Clin. Microbiol. 1, 134–137 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02019612

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02019612

Keywords

Navigation