Abstract
This study sought to understand factors that might enhance suicide prevention programs by investigating the responses of adolescents to potentially suicidal peers in analogue situations embodying variables from the social psychological research on bystander intervention. 314 high school students were randomly assigned one of four vignettes about a troubled peer under conditions of high or low diffusion of responsibility (respondent was alone or one of a group) and high or low ambiguity (confronted by a troubled peer or heard an essay written by a peer). Students' statements concerning the likelihood of suicide and their level of concern in the situation provided evidence for the internal validity of the vignettes. Results included significant main effects of ambiguity (more likely to tell an adult than simply talk to the peer in low vs high ambiguous conditions) for males and females, and of diffusion (more likely to ignore or do nothing than talk or tell in high vs low diffuse situations) for males. Students' estimates of how other students would respond corresponded with findings from social comparison research and suggested the operation of an erroneously perceived social norm of no response to a troubled peer by those who indicated that they would ignore the peer. The results have implications for the application of social psychological models to social influence-based prevention efforts to enhance adolescents' roles in the prevention of youth suicidal behavior.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Boggs, C. (1986).Project Lifesaver: Child and adolescent suicide prevention in two school systems. Dayton, OH: Suicide Prevention Center, Inc.
Bowers, C. & Gilbert, J. (1987).Survey of effectiveness of suicide education program in Richmond schools. Richmond, VA: Crisis Center.
Brown, J. D. (1986). Evaluations of self and others: Self-enhancement biases in social judgments.Social Cognition, 4, 353–376.
Cauce, A. M. & Srebnik, D. S. (1989). Peer networks and social support: A focus for preventive efforts with youths. In L. A. Bond & B. E. Compas (Eds.)Primary prevention and promotion in the schools. (pp. 235–254). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
Clark, R. D., III & Word, L. E. (1972). Why don't bystanders help? Because of ambiguity?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 24, 392–400.
Compas, B. E. & Wagner, B. M. (1991). Psychosocial stress during adolescence: Intrapersonal and interpersonal processes. In M. E. Colten & S. Gore (Eds.)Adolescent stress: Causes and consequences. (pp. 67–86). New York: Aldine De Gruyter.
Felner, R. D. & Felner, T. Y. (1989). Primary prevention programs in the educational context: A transactional-ecological framework and analysis. In L. A. Bond & B. E. Compas (Eds.)Primary prevention and promotion in the schools. (pp. 13–49) Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
Garland, A., Whittle, B., Shaffer, D. (1989). A national survey of school-based adolescent suicide prevention programs.Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 28, 931–934.
Harkavy-Friedman, J. M., Asnis, G. M., Boeck, M. & DiFiore, J. (1987). Prevalence of specific suicidal behaviors in a high school sample.American Journal of Psychiatry, 144 1203–1206.
Johnson, C. A., Pentz, M. A., Weber, M. D., Dwyer, J. H., Baer, N., MacKinnon, D. P. & Hansen, W. B. (1990). Relative effectiveness of comprehensive community programming for drug abuse prevention with high-risk and low-risk adolescents.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 58, 447–456.
Kalafat, J. & Elias, M. (In Press). Adolescents' experience with and response to suicidal peers.Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior.
Kalafat, J. & Elias, M. (1991). Evaluation of school-based interventions. In A. A. Leenaars & S. Wenckstern (Eds.)Suicide prevention in schools. (pp. 231–241). New York: Hemisphere Publishing Corp.
Latané, B. & Darley, J. M. (1969). Bystander apathy.American Scientist, 57, 224–268.
Latané, B. & Rodin, J. (1969). A lady in distress: Inhibiting effects of friends and strangers on bystander intervention.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 5, 189–202.
MacKinnon, D. P., Johnson, C. A., Pentz, M. A., Dwyer, J. H., Hansen, W. B., Flay, B. R. & Wang, E. Y. I. (In Press). Mediating mechanisms in a school-based drug prevention program: First year effects of the Mid-Western Prevention Project.Health Psychology.
Meeks, J. (1986).The fragile alliance. Malverne, FLA: Kruger.
National Center for Health Statistics (1988). Mortality Statistics Branch, Division of Vital Statistics.
Overholser, J. C., Hemstreet, A. H., Spirito, A. & Vyse, S. (1989). Suicide awareness programs in the schools: Effects of gender and personal experience.Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 28, 925–930.
Parker, J. G. & Asher, S. R. (1987). Peer relationships and later personal adjustment: Are low-accepted children at risk?Psychological Bulletin, 102, 357–389.
Ritter, D. (1990). Adolescent suicide: Social competence and problem behavior of youth at high risk and low risk for suicide.School Psychology Review, 19, 83–95.
Robinson, S. M. (1979). Identification of suicidal persons at a suicide prevention center based on their initial contact data. Unpublished Masters thesis,California School of Professional Psychology.
Ross, C. P. (1985). Teaching children the facts of life and death: Suicide prevention in the schools. In M. L. Peck, N. L. Farberow & R. E. Litman (Eds.)Youth Suicide. (pp. 147–169). New York: Springer Publishing Co.
Shaffer, D., Garland, A. & Whittle, B. (1988). An evaluation of yough suicide prevention programs.New Jersey adolescent suicide prevention project: Final project report. Trenton, N.J. New Jersey Division of Mental Health and Hospitals.
Shafii, M., Whittinghill, J. R., Dolen, D. C., Pearson, V. D., Derrick, A. & Carrington, S. (1984). Psychological reconstruction of completed suicide in childhood and adolescence. In H. S. Sudak, A. B. Ford & N. B. Rushforth (Eds.)Suicide in the young. (pp. 271–294). Boston: John Wright-PSG, Inc.
Smith, K. & Crawford, S. (1986) Suicidal behavior among “normal” high school students.Suicide and life threatening behavior, 3, 313–325.
Smith, K., Eyman, J. J., Dick, R. & Ryerson, D. (1987, October),Report of the school suicide programs questionnaire. Albuquerque, NM: The Menninger Clinic.
Spirito, A., Brown, L., Overholser, J. & Fritz, G. (1989). Attempted suicide in adolescence: A review and critique of the literature.Clinical Psychology Review, 9, 335–363.
Svenson, O. (1981). Are we less risky and more skilled than our fellow drivers?Acta Psychologica, 47, 143–148.
Trautman, P. D. (1989). Specific treatment modalities for adolescent suicide attempters.Report of the secretary's task force on youth suicide Volume 3: DHHS Pub. No. (ADM)89-1623 Washington, D.C. Supt. of Docs., U.S. Govt. Print Off.
Wellman, M. M. & Wellman, R. J. (1986). Sex differences in peer responsiveness to suicide ideation.Suicide & Life-Threatening Behavior, 3, 360–378.
Wylie, R. C. (1979).The self-concept (Vol. 2): Theory and research on selected topics. Lincoln, Neb.: University of Nebraska Press.
Youniss, J. (1980).Parents and peers in social development. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kalafat, J., Elias, M. & Gara, M.A. The relationship of bystander intervention variables to adolescents' responses to suicidal peers. J Primary Prevent 13, 231–244 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01324560
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01324560