Skip to main content
Log in

The cost of selfing inEncyclia cochleata (Orchidaceae)

  • Published:
Plant Systematics and Evolution Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To determine whether inbreeding depression accounts for the maintenance of outcrossing in populations of the self-compatible orchidEncyclia cochleata, the estimated selective advantage of selfing was compared to a measure of inbreeding depression. Individuals from three populations ofE. cochleata and some of their progeny were phenotyped using isozyme analysis. The electrophoretic data were used to estimate the outcrossing rate and the theoretical cost of outcrossing. Inbreeding depression was estimated by comparing the fitness of the progeny resulting from both types of pollinations. The seeds from outcrossed and selfed hand-pollinations and naturally pollinated seeds from a population of the triandrous form ofE. cochleata were grown aseptically on culture media, and their development over the next three years recorded. Inbreeding was common, particularly in one population (outcrossing rate 40%). However, the level of inbreeding depression was only 1–2%, considerably less inbreeding depression than expected.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ackerman J. D. (1995) An orchid flora of Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands. Memoirs of the New York Botanical Garden 73: 1–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ågren J., Schemske D. W. (1993) Outcrossing rate and inbreeding depression in two annual monoecious herbs,Begonia hirsuta andB. semiovata. Evolution 47: 125–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Antonovics J. (1968) Evolution of closely adjacent plant populations. V. Evolution of self-fertility. Heredity 23: 219–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey R. J., Rees H., Jones L. M. (1976) Interchange heterozygotes versus homozygotes. Heredity 37: 109–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown A. H. D., Allard R. W. (1970) Estimation of the mating system in open-pollinated maize populations using isozyme polymorphisms. Genetics 66: 133–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown A. H. D., Matheson A. C., Eldridge K. G. (1975) Estimation of the mating system ofEucalyptus obliqua L'Herit by using allozyme polymorphisms. Australian Journal of Botany 23: 931–949.

    Google Scholar 

  • Catling P. (1990) Auto-pollination in the Orchidaceae. In: Arditti J. (ed.) Orchid Biology, Reviews and Perspectives, vol. 5. Timber Press, Portland, Oregon, pp. 121–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charlesworth B., Charlesworth D., Morgan M. T. (1990) Genetic loads and estimates of mutation rates in highly inbred plant populations. Nature 347: 380–382.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charlesworth D., Charlesworth B. (1987) Inbreeding depression and its evolutionary consequences. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 18: 237–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin C. (1885) On the Various Contrivances by which Orchids are Fertilised by Insects, 2nd edn. John Murray, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dudash M. R. (1990) Relative fitness of selfed and outcrossed progeny in a self-compatible, protandrous species,Sabatia angularis L. (Gentianaceae): a comparison in three environments. Evolution 44: 1129–1139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher R. A. (1941) Average excess and average effect of a gene substitution. Annals of Eugenetics 11: 53–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton M. B., Mitchell-Olds T. (1994) The mating system and relative performance of selfed and outcrossed progeny inArabis fecunda (Brassicaceae). American Journal of Botany 81: 1252–1256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamrick J. L., Godt M. J. W. (1989) Allozyme diversity in plant species. In: Brown A. H. D., Clegg M. T., Kahler A. L., Wier B. S. (eds.) Plant population genetics, breeding, and germplasm resources. Sinauer Assoc. Inc., Sunderland, Massachusetts, pp. 43–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartl D. L., Clark A. G. (1989) Principles of population genetics, second edition. Sinauer Assoc. Inc., Sunderland, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holtsford T. P., Ellstrand N. C. (1990) Inbreeding effects inClarkia temblorensis (Onagraceae) populations with different natural outcrossing rates. Evolution 44: 2031–2049.

    Google Scholar 

  • Husband B. C., Schemske D. W. (1996) Evolution of the magnitude and timing of inbreeding depression in plants. Evolution 50: 54–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jain S. K. (1976) The evolution of inbreeding in plants. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 7: 469–495.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarne P., Charlesworth D. (1993) The evolution of the selfing rate in functionally hermaphrodite plants and animals. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 24: 441–466.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston M. O. (1992) Effects of cross and self-fertilization on progeny fitness inLobelia cardinalis andL. siphilitica. Evolution 46: 688–702.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalisz S. (1989) Fitness consequences of mating system, seed weight, and emergence date in a winter annual,Collinsia verna. Evolution 43: 1263–1227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karron J. D. (1989) Breeding systems and levels of inbreeding depression in geographically restricted and widespread species ofAstragalus (Fabaceae). American Journal of Botany 76: 331–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohn J. R. (1988) Why be female? Nature 335: 431–433.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lande R., Schemske D. W. (1985) The evolution of self-fertilization and inbreeding depression in plants. I. Genetic models. Evolution 39: 24–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd D. G. (1979) Some reproductive factors affecting the selection of self-fertilization in plants. American Naturalist 113: 67–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd D. G. (1980) Demographic factors and mating patterns in angiosperms. In: Solbrig O. T. (ed.) Demography and Evolution in Plant Populations. Blackwell, London, pp. 67–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maynard Smith J. (1978) The Evolution of sex. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell-Olds T., Waller D. M. (1985) Relative performance of selfed and outcrossed progeny inImpatiens capensis. Evolution 39: 533–544.

    Google Scholar 

  • Molina-Freaner F., Jain S. K. (1993) Inbreeding effects in a gynodioecious population of the colonizing speciesTrifolium hirtum All. Evolution 47: 1472–1479.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montalov A. M. (1994) Inbreeding depression and maternal effects inAquilegia caerulea, a partially selfing plant. Ecology 75: 2395–2409.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritland K. (1983) Estimation of plant mating systems. In: Tanksley S. D., Orton T. J. (eds.) Isozymes in Plant Genetics and Breeding, Part A. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 289–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritland K. (1990) A series of Fortran computer programs for estimating plant mating systems. Journal of Heredity 81: 235–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schemske D. W (1983) Breeding System and habitat effects on fitness components in three neotropicalCostus (Zingiberaceae). Evolution 37: 523–539.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoen D. J. (1983) Relative fitnesses of selfed and outcrossed progeny inGilia achilleifolia (Polemoniaceae). Evolution 37: 292–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt J., Ehrhardt D. W. (1990) Enhancement of inbreeding depression by dominance and suppression inImpatiens capensis. Evolution 44: 269–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soltis D. E., Haufler C. H., Darrow D. C., Gastony G. J. (1983) Starch gel electrophoresis of ferns: a compilation of grinding buffers, gel and electrode buffers, and staining schedules. American Fern Journal 73: 9–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stort M. N. S., Galdino G. L. (1984) Self- and cross-pollination in some species of the genusLaelia Lindl. (Orchidaceae). Brazilian Journal of Genetics 7: 671–676.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uyenoyama M. K. (1984) On the evolution of parthenogenesis: a genetic representation of the “cost of meiosis”. Evolution 38: 87–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uyenoyama M. K. (1984) Inbreeding and the cost of meiosis: the evolution of selfing in populations practicing biparental inbreeding. Evolution. 40: 388–404.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valdeyron G., Dommée B., Vernet P. (1977) Self-fertilization in male-fertile plants of a gynodioecious species:Thymus vulgaris. Heredity 39: 243–249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells H. (1979) Self-fertilization: advantageous or deleterious? Evolution 33: 252–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams G. C. (1971) Group Selection. Aldine-Atherton Inc. Chicago, Illinois.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willis J. H. (1992) Genetic analysis of inbreeding depression caused by chlorophyll-deficient lethals inMimulus guttatus. Heredity 69: 562–572.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ortiz-Barney, E., Ackerman, J.D. The cost of selfing inEncyclia cochleata (Orchidaceae). Pl Syst Evol 219, 55–64 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01090299

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01090299

Key words

Navigation