Skip to main content
Log in

Botanical composition and models of metabolizable energy availability from undergrowth in oil palm plantations for ruminant production

  • Published:
Agroforestry Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The availability of undergrowth is essential for integrating ruminant animals into oil palm plantations. This is because undergrowth can be used as a feed resource for ruminants. This type of production system has the advantage of diversifying income and controlling weeds in the plantation. At least fve botanical groups of herbage can be found in oil palm plantations, namely, grasses, broad leaved plants, legumes, ferns and palms. Grasses were found in abundant through all palm ages. Most grasses are tolerant to higher light intensity and some are shade-tolerant. This study showed that in the early stages of oil palm crop development, sun-loving species tend to dominate the field, mostly broad leaves and legumes, but they will gradually be replaced by shade-tolerant plants when the canopies close. Concentration of metabolizable energy in herbage on offer was 4.6 to 7.0 MJ/kg dry matter. Crude protein content of grasses, broad leaves, legumes, ferns and palms are 11.5%, 15.4%, 16.3%, 12.5% and 12.0%, respectively. Ruminant animals preferred broad leaved plants more than other botanical groups found in oil palm plantation. This paper showed that metabolizable energy available (MEA) models can be used for predicting available energy (MJ/ha/day) from the system for grazing ruminants. This is because MEA model was developed based on both quality and quantity of herbage present in the ecosystem.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anway JC (1978) A mammalian consumer model for grassland. In: Innis George S, ed, Grassland Simulation Model. Ecology Studies 26, pp 91–126. Springer-Verlag, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Arope Ani (1987) The roles of plantation sector in expanding livestock development in Malaysia. In: Proceedings 11th Annual Confcerence of Malaysian Society of Animal Production, Kuala Lumpur

  • Azli AMY (1988) Rumpai-Panduan Berilustrasi. Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 219 pp

  • Black CC (1971) Ecological implications of dividing plants into groups with distinct photosynthetic production capacity. Adv Ecol Res 7: 87–114

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen CP, Wong HK and Dahlan I (1991) Herbivores and the plantations. In: Ho YW et al., eds, Recent Advances on the Nutrition of Herbivores, pp 71–81. Malaysian Society of Animal Production

  • Dahlan I (1989) Modeling and simulation of herbage and cattle production systems under oil palm plantations in Malaysia. PhD dissertation, Kyoto Univ, 230 pp

  • Dahlan I, Mahyuddin MD, Yamada Y, Ahmad S and Izham A (1990) Modeling and Simulation of herbage production under oil palm plantation in Malaysia. In: Resource Utilization for Livestock Production in Malaysia. Proceedings of 13th MSAP Ann Conf, pp 1–8

  • Dahlan I, Yamada Y, Mahyuddin MD and Shahar MZ (1991) Application of modelling and expert system for livestock-crops integration. In: Ho YW et al., eds, Recent Advances on the Nutrition of Herbivores, pp 253–267. Malaysian Society of Animal Production

  • Goto I and Minson DJ (1977) Prediction of the dry matter digestibility of tropical grasses using a pepsincellulase assay. Animal Feed Science and Technology 2: 247–253

    Google Scholar 

  • Kira T and Kumura A (1983) Dry matter production and efficiency in various types of plant canopies. In: Huxley PA, ed, Plant Research and Agroforestry, pp 347–364. ICRAF, Nairobi, Kenya

    Google Scholar 

  • Lane, IR (1984) Natural forage for ruminants. In: Vijchulata P, BOngso TA, eds, Animal Production in Malaysia, pp 89–103. Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, Univ Pertanian Malaysia, Serdang, Selangor

    Google Scholar 

  • MAFF (Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries, and Food) (1975) Energy Allowances and Feeding Systems for Ruminants. Technical bull no 33, 79 pp

  • MAFF (Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries, and Food) (1984) Energy Allowances and Feeding Systems for Ruminants. Technical bull no 433, 85 pp

  • Minson DJ and Milford R (1966) The energy value and nutritive value indices ofDigitaria decumbens, Sorghum almum, andPhaseolus atropurpureus. Aust J Agric Res 17: 411–423

    Google Scholar 

  • SAS (Statistical Analysis System) (1988) SAS User's Guide: Statistics. SAS Inst Inc Cary, North Carolina, 585 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Tieszen LL (1970) Photosynthetic properties of some grasses in Western South Dakota. In: Proceedings South Dakota Academy of Science 49: 78–89

  • Tieszen LL (1983) Photosynthetic systems: Implications for agroforestry. In: Huxley PA, ed, Plant Research and Agroforestry, pp 323–346. ICRAF, Nairobi, Kenya

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong CC, Rahim H and Mohd Sharudin MA (1985) Shade tolerance potential of some tropical forage for integration with plantations. 1. Grasses. MARDI Res Bull 13(3): 225–247

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dahlan, I., Yamada, Y. & Mahyuddin, M.D. Botanical composition and models of metabolizable energy availability from undergrowth in oil palm plantations for ruminant production. Agroforest Syst 24, 233–246 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00705624

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00705624

Key words

Navigation