Skip to main content
Log in

Weighted serum pools in comparison to the trapezoidal rule for estimating AUCs for ethinyl estradiol

The relationship of the variance of the determination to the interindividual variance

  • Originals
  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The concept of a weighted pool for estimating the area under the curve (AUC) is presented and set in relationship to the trapezoidal rule. An example from a pharmacokinetic study on ethinyl estradiol is used to demonstrate the use of variance component analysis for relating the intraindividual variance of the AUC, trapezoidal rule and weighted pool to the variance of the determination process. Depending on the sampling times, the theoretical variance of the weighted pool is greater than the theoretical variance of the trapezoidal rule. In the example presented, it was shown that this difference is of no importance in relation to the interindividual variance of the AUC, which dominates the total variance. In the example study, routine quality control samples were also determined in each assay, which allowed independent confirmation of the discussed results on the intraindividual variance of the AUCs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dibbelt L, Knuppen R, Juetting G, Heimann S, Klipping C, Parikka-Olexik H (1991) Group comparison of serum ethinyl estradiol, SHBG and CBG levels in 83 women using two low-dose combination oral contraceptives for three months. Contraception 43: 1–21

    Google Scholar 

  2. Jung-Hoffmann C, Kuhl H (1989) Interaction with the pharmacokinetics of ethinylestradiol and progestrogens contained in oral contraceptives. Contraception 40: 299–312

    Google Scholar 

  3. Huempel M, Taeuber U, Kuhnz W, Pfeffer M, Brill K, Heithecker R, Louton T, Steinberg B (1990) Comparison of serum ethinyl estradiol, sex-hormone-binding globulin, corticoid-binding globulin and cortisol levels in women using two low-dose combined oral contraceptives. Horm Res 33: 35–39

    Google Scholar 

  4. Scheffé H (1959) The analysis of variance. Wiley, New New

    Google Scholar 

  5. Yeh K C, Kwan KC (1978) A comparison of numerical integrating algorithms by trapezoidal, Lagrange, and spline approximation. J Pharmacokinet Biopharm 6: 79–98

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bailer AJ, Piegorsch WW (1990) Estimating integrals using quadrature methods with an application in pharmacokinetics. Biometrics 46: 1201–1211

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gallicaano KD, Mc Gilveray IJ, Qureshi S, Nitchuk W, Chakraborty B, Boyd C (1991) Situation paper: comparative bioavailability of oral contraceptive products. Clin Biochem 24: 107–111

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kuhnz W, Hümpel M, Schütt B, Louton T, Steinberg B, Gansau C (1990) Relative bioavailability of ethinyl estradiol from two different oral contraceptive formulations after single oral administration to 18 women in an intraindividual cross-over design. Horm Res 33: 40–44

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Louton, T., Kuhnz, W., Dibbelt, L. et al. Weighted serum pools in comparison to the trapezoidal rule for estimating AUCs for ethinyl estradiol. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 46, 77–81 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00195920

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00195920

Key words

Navigation