Skip to main content

Aircraft Air Quality Incidents, Symptoms, Exposures and Possible Solutions

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Air Quality in Airplane Cabins and Similar Enclosed Spaces

Part of the book series: The Handbook of Environmental Chemistry ((HEC4,volume 4H))

Abstract

Although air quality incidents in aircraft occur at low frequencies, ranging from 1 per 10000 flights to 3.8 per 1000 flights depending on aircraft type, these are not rare events considering there are close to 30000 flights per day in the USA alone. An analysis of the reports by pilots and flight attendants indicates that the majority of reported symptoms fall into the category of central nervous system impairment, followed by problems with the respiratory system. In addition, the majority of mechanical problems that were identified as the cause of these incidents were associated with oil contamination of the air compressor stages of the engine and the auxiliary power unit (APU). In addition, in some aircraft types, hydraulic fluid contamination of the APU air intake was also frequently reported. Analysis of jet engine lubrication oils and hydraulic fluids indicates these agents can be a source of carbon monoxide and tricresyl phosphates. Exposure to either of these agents has been linked to central nervous system impairment. Identification of contaminants released into the air during such incidents is virtually non-existent as it would require a large number of air quality monitors to be placed on aircraft in order to capture these rare events. As a solution to this problem a small inexpensive air sampler has been developed that is self-contained and can be activated by anyone. This sampler also has a direct-reading CO monitor that can be used to provide an objective criterion for triggering the air sampler during an event. The exposed sampler can then be forwarded to the laboratory for analysis of oil contaminants using gas chromatography--mass spectrometry (GC-MS). In this fashion a data base can be accumulated that provides an objective measure of exposures during these incidents and whether these exposures can be linked to the symptoms that have been reported by flight crew personnel. A GC-MS analysis has the additional benefit of identifying potential synergistic agents, such as the pesticides used to disinsect aircraft.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Abbreviations

ACGIH:

American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists

APU:

Auxiliary Power Unit

ATC:

Air traffic controller

CAS no.:

Chemical Abstracts identification number

COHb:

Carboxyhaemoglobin

NAS:

National Academy of Sciences

ppm:

Parts per million on a volume/volume basis

STEL:

Short-term exposure level

TCP:

Tricresyl phosphate

TWA:

Time-weighted average

References

  1. Hocking MB (2002) Rev Environ Health 17(1):1–49

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. TLVs and BEIs (2004) Threshold limit values of chemical substances and physical agents and biological exposure indices. American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists, Cincinnati, OH

    Google Scholar 

  3. Gromer N (1999) The Bromma and Malmö incident. Braathens Malmö Aviation

    Google Scholar 

  4. UK mandatory occurrence reporting system (2004) Safety Investigation Group occurrence number 200008363

    Google Scholar 

  5. Medina H (2004) It was the scariest experience in my life. Santa Barbara News-Press

    Google Scholar 

  6. van Netten C, Brands RHS, Hoption-Cann S, Lentino V (2001) Descriptive epidemiology of air quality incidents experienced in aircraft from three airline companies. Report to the National Academy of Sciences (unpublished)

    Google Scholar 

  7. National Research Council (2002) The airliner cabin environment and the health of passengers and crew. National Academy Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  8. Alaska Airlines arbitration hearings (2002) Association of flight attendants vs Alaska Airlines, Seattle

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lorengo D, Porter A (1989) Federal Aviation Administration, US Department of Transportation

    Google Scholar 

  10. van Netten C, Leung V (2000) J Appl Occup Environ Hyg 15(3):277–283

    Google Scholar 

  11. van Netten C, Leung V (2001) Arch Environ Health 56(2)

    Google Scholar 

  12. van Netten C (2000) In: Nagda N (ed) Air quality and comfort in airliner cabins. STP 1393AST, West Conchohocken, PA, pp 61–75

    Google Scholar 

  13. van Netten C (2000) Flight attendants personal stealth monitoring observation

    Google Scholar 

  14. van Netten C, Hilliard NB (1998) J Appl Occup Environ Hyg 13(10):733–739

    Google Scholar 

  15. Laboratory analytical methods (1989) Workers' Compensation Board of British Columbia. Richmond, BC, Canada

    Google Scholar 

  16. van Netten C (2001) Personal and environmental air sampling apparatus. US Patent application no 20040045376, March 11, 2004

    Google Scholar 

  17. Roach SA (1966) AIHA J 1–12

    Google Scholar 

  18. Salzman BE (1970) J Air Pollut Assoc 20:10:660–665AIHA

    Google Scholar 

  19. Amdur MO, Doull J, Klaassen CD (1991) Casarett and Doull's the basic science of poison, 4th edn. Pergamon Press, New York, p 268

    Google Scholar 

  20. Rom WN (1992) Environmental and occupational medicine, 2nd edn. Little Brown and Company, Boston, p 1229

    Google Scholar 

  21. van Netten C (2002) Analysis and implications of aircraft disinsectants. Sci Total Environ 239(1–3):257–262

    Google Scholar 

  22. Abou-Donia MB, Wilmarth KR, Jensen KF (1996) J Toxicol Environ Health 48:35–56

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Abou-Donia MB (2003) Arch Environ Health 58(8):484–497

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. US Air Traffic Control (2003) Federal Aviation Administration, Washington, DC, October 2003

    Google Scholar 

  25. Anonymous (2004) Aircraft technology engineering and maintenance. Flug Rev 8:30

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chris van Netten .

Editor information

Martin Hocking

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

van Netten, C. Aircraft Air Quality Incidents, Symptoms, Exposures and Possible Solutions . In: Hocking, M. (eds) Air Quality in Airplane Cabins and Similar Enclosed Spaces. The Handbook of Environmental Chemistry, vol 4H. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/b107244

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics