Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Using the Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure (IRAP) as a Measure of Reaction to Perceived Failure and the Effects of a Defusion Intervention in this Context

  • Original Article
  • Published:
The Psychological Record Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A key aspect of self-forgiveness is that one needs to acknowledge one’s failings and their consequences. The present study used the Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure (IRAP) and an explicit IRAP analog measure to examine (1) responding to perceived failure following exposure to an insoluble task, and (2) the effect of a defusion intervention on responding in this context. Participants (n = 29) were first assessed for baseline performance on an IRAP and IRAP analog that assessed participants in terms of perceived relations between performance (success vs. failure) and feelings (positive vs. negative). They were then exposed to the insoluble task, after which they were asked to report on their performance and their feelings in relation to the task. They were subsequently assigned to hear either a defusion (n = 14) or control (n = 15) audio recording and were reexposed to the implicit and explicit measures. IRAP results showed significant denial of failure as leading to positive feelings for both groups following the insoluble task, whereas the explicit (IRAP analog) measure failed to show any comparable effect of this task. As regards the defusion intervention, no effect was seen at the implicit level whereas effects at the explicit level were ambiguous. Results and future directions are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barnes-Holmes, D., Barnes-Holmes, Y., Stewart, I., & Boles, S. (2010). A sketch of the Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure (IRAP) and the Relational Elaboration and Coherence (REC) model. The Psychological Record, 60(3), 527.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bast, D. F., & Barnes-Holmes, D. (2014). A first test of the implicit relational assessment procedure as a measure of forgiveness of self and others. The Psychological Record, 64(2), 253–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bast, D. F., & Barnes-Holmes, D. (2015a). Developing the implicit relational assessment procedure (IRAP) as a measure of self-forgiveness related to failing and succeeding behaviors. The Psychological Record, 65(1), 189–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bast, D. F., & Barnes-Holmes, D. (2015b). Priming thoughts of failing versus succeeding and performance on the Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure (IRAP) as a measure of self-forgiveness. The Psychological Record, 65(4), 667–678.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bast, D. F., Linares, I. M. P., Gomes, C., Kovac, R., & Barnes-Holmes, D. (2016). The implicit relational assessment procedure (IRAP) as a measure of self-forgiveness: The impact of a training history in clinical behavior analysis. The Psychological Record, 66(1), 177–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berens, N. M., & Hayes, S. C. (2007). Arbitrarily applicable comparative relations: Experimental evidence for relational operants. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 40, 45–71.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Bodner, E., & Mikulincer, M. (1998). Learned helplessness and the occurrence of depressive-like and paranoid-like responses: The role of attentional focus. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 74(4), 1010–1023.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryan, A. O., Theriault, J. L., & Bryan, C. J. (2015). Self-forgiveness, posttraumatic stress, and suicide attempts among military personnel and veterans. Traumatology, 21(1), 40–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassidy, S., Roche, B., & Hayes, S. C. (2011). A relational frame training intervention to raise intelligence quotients: A pilot study. The Psychological Record, 61(2), 173–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crowne, D. P., & Marlowe, D. (1960). A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 24(4), 349–354.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cullen, C., Barnes-Holmes, D., Barnes-Holmes, Y. & Stewart, I. (2009). The implicit relational assessment procedure (IRAP) and the malleability of ageist attitudes. The Psychological Record, 59, 591-620.

  • Diener, E., Suh, E. M., Lucas, R. E., & Smith, H. L. (1999). Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 276–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellett, L., & Chadwick, P. (2007). Paranoid cognitions, failure, and focus of attention in college students. Cognition & Emotion, 21(3), 558–576. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930600758155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finn, M., Barnes-Holmes, P. M., & McEnteggart, C. (2018). Exploring the single-trial-type-dominance-effect in the IRAP: Developing a differential arbitrarily applicable relational responding effects (DAARRE) model. The Psychological Record, 68(1), 11–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foody, M., Barnes-Holmes, Y., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Luciano, C. (2013). An empirical investigation of hierarchical versus distinction relations in a self-based ACT exercise. International Journal of Psychology & Psychological Therapy, 13(3), 373–388.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenwald, A. G., McGhee, D. E., & Schwartz, J. K. L. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 74, 1464–1480.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenwald, A. G., Nosek, B. A., & Banaji, M. R. (2003). Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: I. An improved scoring algorithm. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 85(2), 197–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gueta, K. (2013). Self-forgiveness in the recovery of Israeli drug-addicted mothers: A qualitative exploration. Journal of Drug Issues, 21(1), 33–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, J. H., & Fincham, F. D. (2005). Self-forgiveness: The stepchild of forgiveness research. Journal of Social & Clinical Psychology, 24(5), 621–637.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, S. C., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Roche, B. (2001). Relational frame theory: A Post-Skinnerian account of human language and cognition. New York, NY: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, S. C., Strosahl, K. D., & Wilson, K. G. (2011). Acceptance and commitment therapy: The process and practice of mindful change. New York, NY: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Healy, O., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Smeets, P. M. (2001). Derived relational responding as generalized operant behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 74, 207–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hiroto, D. S., & Seligman, M. E. (1975). Generality of learned helplessness in man. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 31(2), 311–327.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoyt, W. T., & McCullough, M. E. (2005). Issues in the multimodal measurement of forgiveness. In E. L. Worthington Jr. (Ed.), Handbook of forgiveness (pp. 109–124). New York, NY: Brunner-Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, S., & Barnes-Holmes, D. (2016). Relational Frame Theory: The basic account. In S. Hayes, D. Barnes-Holmes, R. Zettle, & T. Biglan (Eds.), Handbook of contextual behavioral science. New York, NY: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, S., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Vahey, N. (2012). Holding on to our functional roots when exploring new intellectual islands: A voyage through implicit cognition research. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 1(1–2), 17–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hussey, I., Thompson, M., McEnteggart, C., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Barnes-Holmes, Y. (2015). Interpreting and inverting with less cursing: A guide to interpreting IRAP data. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 4(3), 157–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, E. E., & Sigall, H. (1971). The bogus pipeline: A new paradigm for measuring affect and attitude. Psychological Bulletin, 76(5), 349–364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kishita, N., Muto, T., Otsuki, T., & Barnes-Holmes, D. (2014). Measuring the effect of cognitive defusion using the Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure: An experimental analysis with a highly socially anxious sample. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 3(1), 8–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcbs.2013.12.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luciano, C., Ruiz, F. J., Vizcaíno-Torres, R. M., Sánchez-Martín, V., Gutiérrez-Martínez, O., & López-López, J. C. (2011). A relational frame analysis of defusion interactions in Acceptance and Commitment Therapy. A preliminary and quasi-experimental study with at-risk adolescents. International Journal of Psychology & Psychological Therapy, 11, 165–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luoma, J. B., Hayes, S. C., & Walser, R. D. (2007). Learning ACT: An Acceptance & Commitment Therapy skills-training manual for therapists. Oakland, CA: New Harbinger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macaskill, A. (2012). Differentiating dispositional self-forgiveness from other-forgiveness: Associations with mental health and life satisfaction. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 31, 1, 28-50.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGaffin, B. J., Lyons, G. C., & Deane, F. P. (2013). Self-forgiveness, shame, and guilt in recovery from drug and alcohol problems. Substance Abuse, 34(4), 396–404.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mudgal, S., & Tiwari, G. K. (2015). Self-forgiveness and life satisfaction in people living with HIV/AIDS. International Journal of Indian Psychology, 3(110), 2348–5396.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, S. R., Kendall, A. C., Matters, K. G., Wrobel, T. A., & Rye, M. S. (2004). A personological examination of self- and other-forgiveness in the five-factor model. Journal of Personality Assessment, 2, 207–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternthal, M. J., Williams, D. R., Musick, M. A., & Buck, A. C. (2010). Depression, anxiety, and religious life: A search for mediators. Journal of Health & Social Behavior, 51(3), 343–359.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, I. (2016). The fruits of a functional approach for psychological science. International Journal of Psychology, 51(1), 15–27.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, I., & Roche, B. (2013). Relational Frame Theory: An overview. In S. Dymond & B. Roche (Eds.), Advances in relational frame theory: Research and application. Oakland, CA: New Harbinger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Takaku, S. (2001). The effects of apology and perspective-taking on interpersonal forgiveness: A dissonance-attribution model of interpersonal forgiveness. Journal of Social Psychology, 141(4), 494–508.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vahey, N. A., Barnes-Holmes, D., Barnes-Holmes, Y., & Stewart, I. (2009). A first test of the Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure (IRAP) as a measure of self-esteem: Irish prisoner groups and university students. The Psychological Record, 59, 371–388.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenzel, M., Woodyatt, L., & Heydrick, K. (2012). No genuine self-forgiveness without accepting responsibility: Value reaffirmation as a key to maintaining positive self-regard. European Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 617–627.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, T., Milosevic, A., Carroll, M., Hart, K., & Hibbard, S. (2008). Physical health status in relation to self-forgiveness and other-forgiveness in healthy college students. Journal of Health Psychology, 13(6), 798–803.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, T. D., & Dunn, E. W. (2004). Self- knowledge: Its limits, value, and potential for improvement. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 493–518.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Woodyatt, L., Everett, L., Worthington, M. W., & Griffin, B. J. (2017). Orientation to the psychology of self-forgiveness. In L. Woodyatt, E. L. Worthington, M. Wenzel, & B. J. Griffin (Eds.), Handbook of the psychology of self-forgiveness. New York, NY: Springer International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodyatt, L., Worthington, M. W., Wenzel, M., & Griffin, B. J. (2017). Handbook of the psychology of self-forgiveness. New York, NY: Springer International.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Psychology, National University of Ireland, Galway, Republic of Ireland

    Diana Ferroni-Bast & Jane Fitzpatrick

  2. Federal University of São Carlos, São Carlos, Brazil

    Celso Goyos

Authors
  1. Diana Ferroni-Bast
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jane Fitzpatrick
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ian Stewart
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Celso Goyos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Diana Ferroni-Bast.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This paper was written with the aid of a FAPESP (Sao Paulo Research Foundation) grant awarded to the first author.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ferroni-Bast, D., Fitzpatrick, J., Stewart, I. et al. Using the Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure (IRAP) as a Measure of Reaction to Perceived Failure and the Effects of a Defusion Intervention in this Context. Psychol Rec 69, 551–563 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40732-019-00349-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40732-019-00349-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation