Skip to main content
Log in

Low-grade serous ovarian cancer: a unique disease

  • Published:
Current Oncology Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Low-grade serous carcinomas represent approximately 10% of all serous ovarian carcinomas. A growing body of research has demonstrated several important differences between the clinical and molecular characteristics of these tumors and those of high-grade serous ovarian carcinomas. Patients with low-grade serous ovarian tumors are diagnosed at a younger age, have a longer overall survival, and have lower response rates to conventional chemotherapy. In addition, low-grade serous ovarian carcinomas have pathologic and molecular characteristics distinct from high-grade serous carcinomas, yet similar to serous tumors of low malignant potential. This suggests a common pathogenesis and a continuum of disease from serous tumors of low malignant potential to low-grade serous carcinomas. Further study, focusing specifically on low-grade serous carcinomas, is needed to determine the role of other chemotherapeutic agents, hormonal therapy, or targeted biologic agents in the treatment of this disease.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References and Recommended Reading

  1. Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, et al.: Cancer statistics, 2008. CA Cancer J Clin 2008, 58:71–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Baak JP, Langley FA, Talerman A, Delemarre JF: Interpathologist and intrapathologist disagreement in ovarian tumor grading and typing. Anal Quant Cytol Histol 1986, 8:354–357.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Stalsberg H, Abeler V, Blom GP, et al.: Observer variation in histologic classification of malignant and borderline ovarian tumors. Hum Pathol 1988, 19:1030–1035.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Bichel P, Jakobsen A: A new histologic grading index in ovarian carcinoma. Int J Gynecol Pathol 1989, 8:147–155.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Shimizu Y, Kamoi S, Amada S, et al.: Toward the development of a universal grading system for ovarian epithelial carcinoma. I. Prognostic significance of histopathologic features—problems involved in the architectural grading system. Gynecol Oncol 1998, 70:2–12.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Silverberg SG: Histopathologic grading of ovarian carcinoma: a review and proposal. Int J Gynecol Pathol 2000, 19:7–15.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Malpica A, Deavers MT, Lu K, et al.: Grading ovarian serous carcinoma using a two-tier system. Am J Surg Pathol 2004, 28:496–504.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Shimizu Y, Kamoi S, Amada S, et al.: Toward the development of a universal grading system for ovarian epithelial carcinoma: testing of a proposed system in a series of 461 patients with uniform treatment and follow-up. Cancer 1998, 82:893–901.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Staging classifications and clinical practice guidelines of gynecologic cancers by the FIGO Committee on Gynecologic Oncology. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2000, 70:207–312.

  10. Seidman JD, Horkayne-Szakaly I, Cosin JA, et al.: Testing of two binary grading systems for FIGO stage III serous carcinoma of the ovary and peritoneum. Gynecol Oncol 2006, 103:703–708.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Singer G, Shih IeM, Truskinovsky A, et al.: Mutational analysis of K-ras segregates ovarian serous carcinomas into two types: invasive MPSC (low-grade tumor) and conventional serous carcinoma (high-grade tumor). Int J Gynecol Pathol 2003, 22:37–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Singer G, Oldt R III, Cohen Y, et al.: Mutations in BRAF and KRAS characterize the development of low-grade ovarian serous carcinoma. J Natl Cancer Inst 2003, 95:484–486.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Gilks CB: Subclassification of ovarian surface epithelial tumors based on correlation of histologic and molecular pathologic data. Int J Gynecol Pathol 2004, 23:200–205.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hsu CY, Bristow R, Cha MS, et al.: Characterization of active mitogen-activated protein kinase in ovarian serous carcinomas. Clin Cancer Res 2004, 10:6432–6436.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Singer G, Stohr R, Cope L, et al.: Patterns of p53 mutations separate ovarian serous borderline tumors and low-and high-grade carcinomas and provide support for a new model of ovarian carcinogenesis: a mutational analysis with immunohistochemical correlation. Am J Surg Pathol 2005, 29:218–224.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Shih IeM, Kurman RJ: Molecular pathogenesis of ovarian borderline tumors: new insights and old challenges. Clin Cancer Res 2005, 11:7273–7279.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Bonome T, Lee JY, Park DC, et al.: Expression profiling of serous low malignant potential, low-grade, and high-grade tumors of the ovary. Cancer Res 2005, 65:10602–10612.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Jazaeri AA, Lu K, Schmandt R, et al.: Molecular determinants of tumor differentiation in papillary serous ovarian carcinoma. Mol Carcinog 2003, 36:53–59.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Meinhold-Heerlein I, Bauerschlag D, Hilpert F, et al.: Molecular and prognostic distinction between serous ovarian carcinomas of varying grade and malignant potential. Oncogene 2005, 24:1053–1065.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Gershenson DM, Sun CC, Lu KH, et al.: Clinical behavior of stage II-IV low-grade serous carcinoma of the ovary. Obstet Gynecol 2006, 108:361–368.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Schmeler KM, Sun CC, Bodurka DC, et al.: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for low-grade serous carcinoma of the ovary or peritoneum. Gynecol Oncol 2008, 108:510–514.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Gershenson DM, Sun CC, Bodurka DC, et al.: Recurrent low-grade serous carcinoma of the ovary is relatively chemoresistant [abstract]. Gynecologic Oncology 2008, 108:7.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Shvartsman HS, Sun CC, Bodurka DC, et al.: Comparison of the clinical behavior of newly diagnosed stages II–IV low-grade serous carcinoma of the ovary with that of serous ovarian tumors of low malignant potential that recur as lowgrade serous carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol 2007, 105:625–629.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Singer G, Kurman RJ, Chang HW, et al.: Diverse tumorigenic pathways in ovarian serous carcinoma. Am J Pathol 2002, 160:1223–1228.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. O’Neill CJ, McBride HA, Connolly LE, et al.: High-grade ovarian serous carcinoma exhibits significantly higher p16 expression than low-grade serous carcinoma and serous borderline tumour. Histopathology 2007, 50:773–779.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. O’Neill CJ, Deavers MT, Malpica A, et al.: An immunohistochemical comparison between low-grade and high-grade ovarian serous carcinomas: significantly higher expression of p53, MIB1, BCL2, HER-2/neu, and C-KIT in high-grade neoplasms. Am J Surg Pathol 2005, 29:1034–1041.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Wong KK, Lu KH, Malpica A, et al.: Significantly greater expression of ER, PR, and ECAD in advanced-stage low-grade ovarian serous carcinoma as revealed by immunohistochemical analysis. Int J Gynecol Pathol 2007, 26:404–409.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Crispens MA, Bodurka D, Deavers M, et al.: Response and survival in patients with progressive or recurrent serous ovarian tumors of low malignant potential. Obstet Gynecol 2002, 99:3–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Gilks CB, Bell DA, Scully RE: Serous psammocarcinoma of the ovary and peritoneum. Int J Gynecol Pathol 1990, 9:110–121.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Rettenmaier MA, Goldstein BH, Epstein HD, et al.: Serous psammocarcinoma of the ovary: an unusual finding. Gynecol Oncol 2005, 99:510–511.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Giordano G, Gnetti L, Milione M, et al.: Serous psammocarcinoma of the ovary: a case report and review of literature. Gynecol Oncol 2005, 96:259–262.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Akbulut M, Kelten C, Bir F, et al.: Primary peritoneal serous psammocarcinoma with recurrent disease and metastasis: a case report and review of the literature. Gynecol Oncol 2007, 105:248–251.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Ansquer Y, Leblanc E, Clough K, et al.: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for unresectable ovarian carcinoma: a French multicenter study. Cancer 2001, 91:2329–2334.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Mazzeo F, Berliere M, Kerger J, et al.: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with primarily unresectable, advanced-stage ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2003, 90:163–169.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Santillan A, Kim YW, Zahurak ML, et al.: Differences of chemoresistance assay between invasive micropapillary/low-grade serous ovarian carcinoma and high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2007, 17:601–606.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David M. Gershenson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schmeler, K.M., Gershenson, D.M. Low-grade serous ovarian cancer: a unique disease. Curr Oncol Rep 10, 519–523 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11912-008-0078-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11912-008-0078-8

Keywords

Navigation