Abstract
Low-grade serous carcinomas represent approximately 10% of all serous ovarian carcinomas. A growing body of research has demonstrated several important differences between the clinical and molecular characteristics of these tumors and those of high-grade serous ovarian carcinomas. Patients with low-grade serous ovarian tumors are diagnosed at a younger age, have a longer overall survival, and have lower response rates to conventional chemotherapy. In addition, low-grade serous ovarian carcinomas have pathologic and molecular characteristics distinct from high-grade serous carcinomas, yet similar to serous tumors of low malignant potential. This suggests a common pathogenesis and a continuum of disease from serous tumors of low malignant potential to low-grade serous carcinomas. Further study, focusing specifically on low-grade serous carcinomas, is needed to determine the role of other chemotherapeutic agents, hormonal therapy, or targeted biologic agents in the treatment of this disease.
Similar content being viewed by others
References and Recommended Reading
Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, et al.: Cancer statistics, 2008. CA Cancer J Clin 2008, 58:71–96.
Baak JP, Langley FA, Talerman A, Delemarre JF: Interpathologist and intrapathologist disagreement in ovarian tumor grading and typing. Anal Quant Cytol Histol 1986, 8:354–357.
Stalsberg H, Abeler V, Blom GP, et al.: Observer variation in histologic classification of malignant and borderline ovarian tumors. Hum Pathol 1988, 19:1030–1035.
Bichel P, Jakobsen A: A new histologic grading index in ovarian carcinoma. Int J Gynecol Pathol 1989, 8:147–155.
Shimizu Y, Kamoi S, Amada S, et al.: Toward the development of a universal grading system for ovarian epithelial carcinoma. I. Prognostic significance of histopathologic features—problems involved in the architectural grading system. Gynecol Oncol 1998, 70:2–12.
Silverberg SG: Histopathologic grading of ovarian carcinoma: a review and proposal. Int J Gynecol Pathol 2000, 19:7–15.
Malpica A, Deavers MT, Lu K, et al.: Grading ovarian serous carcinoma using a two-tier system. Am J Surg Pathol 2004, 28:496–504.
Shimizu Y, Kamoi S, Amada S, et al.: Toward the development of a universal grading system for ovarian epithelial carcinoma: testing of a proposed system in a series of 461 patients with uniform treatment and follow-up. Cancer 1998, 82:893–901.
Staging classifications and clinical practice guidelines of gynecologic cancers by the FIGO Committee on Gynecologic Oncology. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2000, 70:207–312.
Seidman JD, Horkayne-Szakaly I, Cosin JA, et al.: Testing of two binary grading systems for FIGO stage III serous carcinoma of the ovary and peritoneum. Gynecol Oncol 2006, 103:703–708.
Singer G, Shih IeM, Truskinovsky A, et al.: Mutational analysis of K-ras segregates ovarian serous carcinomas into two types: invasive MPSC (low-grade tumor) and conventional serous carcinoma (high-grade tumor). Int J Gynecol Pathol 2003, 22:37–41.
Singer G, Oldt R III, Cohen Y, et al.: Mutations in BRAF and KRAS characterize the development of low-grade ovarian serous carcinoma. J Natl Cancer Inst 2003, 95:484–486.
Gilks CB: Subclassification of ovarian surface epithelial tumors based on correlation of histologic and molecular pathologic data. Int J Gynecol Pathol 2004, 23:200–205.
Hsu CY, Bristow R, Cha MS, et al.: Characterization of active mitogen-activated protein kinase in ovarian serous carcinomas. Clin Cancer Res 2004, 10:6432–6436.
Singer G, Stohr R, Cope L, et al.: Patterns of p53 mutations separate ovarian serous borderline tumors and low-and high-grade carcinomas and provide support for a new model of ovarian carcinogenesis: a mutational analysis with immunohistochemical correlation. Am J Surg Pathol 2005, 29:218–224.
Shih IeM, Kurman RJ: Molecular pathogenesis of ovarian borderline tumors: new insights and old challenges. Clin Cancer Res 2005, 11:7273–7279.
Bonome T, Lee JY, Park DC, et al.: Expression profiling of serous low malignant potential, low-grade, and high-grade tumors of the ovary. Cancer Res 2005, 65:10602–10612.
Jazaeri AA, Lu K, Schmandt R, et al.: Molecular determinants of tumor differentiation in papillary serous ovarian carcinoma. Mol Carcinog 2003, 36:53–59.
Meinhold-Heerlein I, Bauerschlag D, Hilpert F, et al.: Molecular and prognostic distinction between serous ovarian carcinomas of varying grade and malignant potential. Oncogene 2005, 24:1053–1065.
Gershenson DM, Sun CC, Lu KH, et al.: Clinical behavior of stage II-IV low-grade serous carcinoma of the ovary. Obstet Gynecol 2006, 108:361–368.
Schmeler KM, Sun CC, Bodurka DC, et al.: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for low-grade serous carcinoma of the ovary or peritoneum. Gynecol Oncol 2008, 108:510–514.
Gershenson DM, Sun CC, Bodurka DC, et al.: Recurrent low-grade serous carcinoma of the ovary is relatively chemoresistant [abstract]. Gynecologic Oncology 2008, 108:7.
Shvartsman HS, Sun CC, Bodurka DC, et al.: Comparison of the clinical behavior of newly diagnosed stages II–IV low-grade serous carcinoma of the ovary with that of serous ovarian tumors of low malignant potential that recur as lowgrade serous carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol 2007, 105:625–629.
Singer G, Kurman RJ, Chang HW, et al.: Diverse tumorigenic pathways in ovarian serous carcinoma. Am J Pathol 2002, 160:1223–1228.
O’Neill CJ, McBride HA, Connolly LE, et al.: High-grade ovarian serous carcinoma exhibits significantly higher p16 expression than low-grade serous carcinoma and serous borderline tumour. Histopathology 2007, 50:773–779.
O’Neill CJ, Deavers MT, Malpica A, et al.: An immunohistochemical comparison between low-grade and high-grade ovarian serous carcinomas: significantly higher expression of p53, MIB1, BCL2, HER-2/neu, and C-KIT in high-grade neoplasms. Am J Surg Pathol 2005, 29:1034–1041.
Wong KK, Lu KH, Malpica A, et al.: Significantly greater expression of ER, PR, and ECAD in advanced-stage low-grade ovarian serous carcinoma as revealed by immunohistochemical analysis. Int J Gynecol Pathol 2007, 26:404–409.
Crispens MA, Bodurka D, Deavers M, et al.: Response and survival in patients with progressive or recurrent serous ovarian tumors of low malignant potential. Obstet Gynecol 2002, 99:3–10.
Gilks CB, Bell DA, Scully RE: Serous psammocarcinoma of the ovary and peritoneum. Int J Gynecol Pathol 1990, 9:110–121.
Rettenmaier MA, Goldstein BH, Epstein HD, et al.: Serous psammocarcinoma of the ovary: an unusual finding. Gynecol Oncol 2005, 99:510–511.
Giordano G, Gnetti L, Milione M, et al.: Serous psammocarcinoma of the ovary: a case report and review of literature. Gynecol Oncol 2005, 96:259–262.
Akbulut M, Kelten C, Bir F, et al.: Primary peritoneal serous psammocarcinoma with recurrent disease and metastasis: a case report and review of the literature. Gynecol Oncol 2007, 105:248–251.
Ansquer Y, Leblanc E, Clough K, et al.: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for unresectable ovarian carcinoma: a French multicenter study. Cancer 2001, 91:2329–2334.
Mazzeo F, Berliere M, Kerger J, et al.: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with primarily unresectable, advanced-stage ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2003, 90:163–169.
Santillan A, Kim YW, Zahurak ML, et al.: Differences of chemoresistance assay between invasive micropapillary/low-grade serous ovarian carcinoma and high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2007, 17:601–606.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Schmeler, K.M., Gershenson, D.M. Low-grade serous ovarian cancer: a unique disease. Curr Oncol Rep 10, 519–523 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11912-008-0078-8
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11912-008-0078-8