Skip to main content
Log in

Cardiovascular Risk Factors After Single Anastomosis Duodeno-Ileal Bypass with Sleeve Gastrectomy (SADI-S): a New Effective Therapeutic Approach?

  • Lipid and Metabolic Effects of Gastrointestinal Surgery (R. Cohen, Section Editor)
  • Published:
Current Atherosclerosis Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Obesity and its associated comorbidities entail a significantly increased cardiovascular mortality. Therefore, approaching obesity control must include among its aims the reduction of the associated comorbidities and the higher cardiovascular mortality risk and not only weight loss. Many observational studies indicate that bariatric surgery (BS) is associated with a better long-term survival than standard care. Furthermore, in general, these epidemiological studies included patients who underwent gastric bypass (GB), not biliopancreatic diversion/duodenal switch (BPD/DS), so the potential additional benefit of this latter technique remains unknown. In this regard, in theory, derivative techniques are usually associated to a higher rate of long-term improvement of metabolic comorbidities, so their potential impact on cardiovascular morbidity and mortality could be even greater than what has been published up to date. In 2007, our group proposed a simplification of the bariatric technique based on the duodenal switch, which we termed “single anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy” or SADI-S. In this review, and 10 years later, we describe some of the main results of those patients who underwent this procedure, specifically regarding their outcome on metabolic comorbidities and cardiovascular risk. Considering the findings presented in this review, in which a significant improvement of all metabolic comorbidities was observed, we may confidently suggest that SADI-S seems comparable to a BPD/DS procedure in the mid-term outcome. After all, the SADI-S procedure was conceived as a simplified version of the BPD/DS technique and not necessarily intended to maximize the improvement of cardiovascular and metabolic comorbidities, which is already sufficiently optimal. In this regard, in our experience, we have encountered a new satisfactory result, which combines more pros than cons. In fact, as we have seen, after a follow-up of 3 years, the outcomes of weight loss and improvement of blood pressure, lipid profile, and insulin resistance seem to be better with SADI-S than with Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), and this difference may be probably still relevant in the long-term evaluation. Summary: Mid-term follow-up of patients who underwent SADI-S has proven that this procedure seems, at least, as effective as other malabsorptive techniques such as BPD/DS and significantly reduces the four main cardiovascular risk factors to a higher extent than RYGB. One of the main advantages inherent to this intervention modality is that it truly simplifies any of the prior derivative procedures and that it may be specifically adapted and individualized to each patient, according to his BMI and associated metabolic comorbidities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. The Global Burden of Metabolic Risk Factors for Chronic Diseases Collaboration. Cardiovascular disease, chronic kidney disease, and diabetes mortality burden of cardiometabolic risk factors from 1980 to 2010: a comparative risk assessment. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2014;2:634–47.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Lyall DM; Celis-Morales C, Ward J, Iliodromiti S, Anderson JJ, Gill JMR, et al. Association of body mass index with cardiometabolic disease in the UK Biobank. A Mendelian Randomization Study. JAMA Cardiol. 2017;2(8):882–889. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamacardio.2016.5804.

  3. • Lee SW, Son JY, Kim JM, Hwang SS, Han JS, Heo NJ. Body fat distribution is more predictive of all-cause mortality than overall adiposity. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2017 Jul 3. https://doi.org/10.1111/dom.13050. [Epub ahead of print]. This study deal with the importance of body fat distribution as a prognostic factor after bariatric surgery

  4. Buchwald H, Avidor Y, Braunwald E, Jensen MD, Pories W, Fahrbach K, et al. Bariatric surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2004;292:1724–37.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Sjöström L, Narbro K, Sjöström CD, Karason K, Larsson B, Wedel H, et al. Effects of bariatric surgery on mortality in Swedish Obese Subjects. New Engl J Med. 2007;357:741–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Christou NV, Sampalis JS, Liberman M, Look D, Auger S, McLean AP, et al. Surgery decreases long-term mortality, morbidity, and health care use in morbidly obese patients. Ann Surg. 2004;240:416–23.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Adams TD, Gress RE, Smith SC, Halverson RC, Simper SC, Rosamond WD, et al. Long-term mortality after gastric bypass surgery. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:753–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Arterburn DE, Olsen MK, Smith VA, Livingston EH, Van Scoyoc L, Yancy WS Jr, et al. Association between bariatric surgery and long-term survival. JAMA. 2015;313:62–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Sjöström L, Peltonen M, Jacobson P, Sjöström CD, Karason K, Wedel H, et al. Bariatric surgery and long-term cardiovascular events. JAMA. 2012;307:56–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Sánchez-Pernaute A, Rubio Herrera MA, Pérez-Aguirre E, et al. Proximal duodenal-ileal end-to-side bypass with sleeve gastrectomy: proposed technique. Obes Surg. 2007;17:1614–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Sánchez-Pernaute A, Rubio Herrera MA, Pérez-Aguirre ME, et al. Single anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy(SADI-S). One to three-year follow-up. Obes Surg. 2010;20(12):1720–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. •• Sánchez-Pernaute A, Rubio MA, Pérez Aguirre E, Barabash A, Cabrerizo L, Torres A. Single-anastomosis duodeno ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy: metabolic improvement and weight loss in first 100 patients. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2013;9(5):731–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2012.07.018. This paper shows the relevant results in the first 100 patients submitted to SADIS´s procedure, regarding weight loss and metabolic results

  13. Buse JB, Caprio S, Cefalu WT, et al. How do we define cure for diabetes? Diabetes Care. 2009;32:2133–5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Stone NJ, Robinson JG, Lichtenstein AH, et al. ACC/AHA guideline on the treatment of blood cholesterol to reduce atherosclerotic cardiovascular risk in adults: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation 2014. 2013;129((25) (suppl 2)):S1–S45.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. •• Piepoli MF, Hoes AW, Agewall S, Albus C, Brotons C, Catapano AL, et al. European guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice: the Sixth Joint Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and Other Societies on Cardiovascular Disease Prevention in Clinical Practice (constituted by representatives of 10 societies and by invited experts) developed with the special contribution of the European Association for Cardiovascular Prevention & Rehabilitation (EACPR). Eur Heart J. 2016;37:2315–81. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehw106. In this guidelines the European Association for Cardiovascular prevention & Rehabilitation (EACPR) points out that the levels of LDL-c, but not necessarily those of HDL-c or triglycerides, shroud be the target for cardiovascular prevention

  16. Ference BA, Ginsberg HN, Graham I, et al. Low-density lipoproteins cause atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. 1. Evidence from genetic, epidemiologic, and clinical studies. A consensus statement fromthe European Atherosclerosis Society Consensus Panel. Eur Heart J 2017 24. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehx144.

  17. Silverman MG, Ference BA, Im K, et al. Association between lowering LDL-C and cardiovascular risk reduction among different therapeutic interventions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2016;316:1289–97.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Bays H, Kothari SN, Azagury DE, et al. Lipids and bariatric procedures part 2 of 2: scientific statement from the American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery (ASMBS), the National Lipid Association (NLA), and Obesity Medicine Association (OMA). Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2016;12:468–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Auclair A, Martin J, Bastien M, et al. Is there a role for visceral adiposity in inducing type 2 diabetes remission in severely obese patients following biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch surgery? Obes Surg. 2016;26:1717–27.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Sjöholm K, Sjöoström E, Carlsson LMS, Peltonen M. Weight change–adjusted effects of gastric bypass surgery on glucose metabolism: 2- and 10-year results from the Swedish Obese Subjects (SOS) study. Diabetes Care. 2016;39:625–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Rubino F, Nathan DM, Eckel RH, et al. Delegates of the 2nd Diabetes Surgery Summit. Metabolic surgery in the treatment algorithm for type 2 diabetes: a joint statement by international diabetes organizations. Diabetes Care. 2016;39:861–77.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Batterham RL, Cummings DE. Mechanisms of diabetes improvement following bariatric/metabolic surgery. Diabetes Care. 2016;39:893–901.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. •• Sánchez-Pernaute A, Rubio MÁ, Cabrerizo L, Ramos-Levi A, Pérez-Aguirre E, Torres A. Single-anastomosis duodenoileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy (SADI-S) for obese diabetic patients. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2015;11:1092–8. This investigation deals with the results after SADIS un obese diabetic patientsI hope that this information can fulfil your needs. Please, do not hesitate to contact me if you have any other problem Warmest regards

  24. Scopinaro N, Marinari GM, Camerini GB, Papadia FS, Adami GF. Specific effects of biliopancreatic diversion on the major components of metabolic syndrome: a long-term follow-up study. Diabetes Care. 2005;28:2406–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Ramos-Levi AM, Sanchez-Pernaute A, Cabrerizo L, et al. Remission of type 2 diabetes mellitus should not be the foremost goal after bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2013;23:2020–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care in diabetes 2016. Diabetes Care. 2016;39(Suppl. 1):S1–S109.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Ramos-Leví AM, Rubio MA. Comment on Rubino et al. metabolic surgery in the treatment algorithm for type 2 diabetes: a joint statement by international diabetes organizations. Diabetes Care. 2017;40:e90–1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Angrisani L, Santonicola A, Iovino P, et al. Bariatric surgery worldwide 2013. Obes Surg. 2015;25:1822–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Strain GW, Torghabeh MH, Gagner M, Ebel F, Dakin GF, Abelson JS, et al. The impact of biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch (BPD/DS) over 9 years. Obes Surg. 2017 Mar;27(3):787–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Kim J, American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Clinical Issues Committee. American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery statement on single-anastomosis duodenal switch. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2016;12:944–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Antonio Torres.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

Antonio Torres, Miguel A. Rubio, Ana M. Ramos-Leví, and Andrés Sánchez-Pernaute declare no conflict of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Lipid and Metabolic Effects of Gastrointestinal Surgery

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Torres, A., Rubio, M.A., Ramos-Leví, A.M. et al. Cardiovascular Risk Factors After Single Anastomosis Duodeno-Ileal Bypass with Sleeve Gastrectomy (SADI-S): a New Effective Therapeutic Approach?. Curr Atheroscler Rep 19, 58 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11883-017-0688-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11883-017-0688-4

Keywords

Navigation