Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A survey on exergy, energy and environmental analysis of sulfur recovery unit in case of five intensified configurations

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Chemical Papers Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study, a combination of energy and exergy analysis is applied for the industrial sulfur recovery unit (SRU) in commercial simulation software. The data of energy and exergy are obtained from the simulator and Excel (for physical and chemical exergy), respectively. In doing so, five intensified SRU configurations namely: (1) hot gas bypass (2) acid gas bypass (3) inlet stream preheating (4) acid gas enrichment and (5) oxygen (air) enrichment are compared in terms of energy production, reaction furnace temperature, sulfur recovery and pollutant emission into environment. Then, irreversibility in these five arrangements is compared and all the proposed methods show higher useful exergy comparing to the design case while the preheating method was the highest. Eventually, the main contributors and sources of exergy destruction are first incinerator (about 29–36%), then reaction furnace and waste heat boiler.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • I. Dincer, M.A. Rosen, Exergy, energy, environment and sustainable development, 2nd edition, Elsevier Ltd, 2013.

  • D. Flórez-Orrego, S. de Oliveira Junior, exergy assessment of single and dual pressure industrial ammonia synthesis units, Energ. 2017, DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2017.06.139.

  • S. Ibrahim, R.K. Rahman, A. Raj, Effects of H2O in the feed of sulfur recovery unit on sulfur production and aromatics emission from Claus furnace, Ind. Eng, Chem. Res. 2017, DOI: 10.1021/acs.iecr.7b02553.

  • R.K. Rahman, A. Raj, S. Ibrahim, M.I. Khan, N.O. Al Muhairi, Reduction in natural gas consumption in sulfur recovery units through kinetic simulation using a detailed reaction mechanism, Ind. Eng, Chem. Res. 2018, DOI: 10.1021/acs.iecr.7b04667.

  • Samavati M, Santarelli M, Martin A, Nemanova V (2018) Production of synthetic Fischer-Tropsch diesel from renewables: Thermoeconomic and environmental analysis. Energy Fuel 32:1744–1753

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • N. Sato, Chemical energy and exergy: an introduction to chemical thermodynamics for engineers, Elsevier science and technology books, 2004.

  • Sharifzadeh M, Ghazikhani M, Niazmand H (2017) Temporal exergy analysis of adsorption cooling system by developing non-flow exergy function. Appl. Therm. Eng. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2017.12.128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • T.J Kotas, The exergy method of thermal plant analysis, Butterworths, 1985.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yadollah Tavan.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rostami, A., Tavan, Y. A survey on exergy, energy and environmental analysis of sulfur recovery unit in case of five intensified configurations. Chem. Pap. 73, 1529–1539 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11696-019-00705-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11696-019-00705-0

Keywords

Navigation