Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Technological innovation, financialization, and ecological footprint: evidence from BEM economies

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Despite the growing interest in researches on the impact of technological development on carbon emissions, the effect of technological innovation on the other indicators of environmental degradation is of little interest. In order to close this gap, the aim of this study is to determine the effects of technological innovation on both carbon emission and ecological footprint for big emerging markets (BEM) countries. In doing so, the environmental impacts of the financialization process are also explored, in line with the fact that these countries face constraints in financing technological developments. In this context, the effects of technological development, financialization, renewable energy consumption, and non-renewable energy consumption on environmental degradation are examined through the second-generation panel data methods for the period 1995–2016. The findings indicate that technological innovation is effective in reducing carbon emissions, but does not have a significant impact on the ecological footprint, namely a 1% increase in technological innovations reduces carbon emission by 0.082–0.088%. Moreover, it is found that financialization harms environmental quality for both indicators of the environment because a 1% increase in financialization increases carbon emissions by 0.203–0.222% and increases ecological footprint by 0.069–0.071%.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  • Ahmad M, Khan Z, Ur Rahman Z, Khan S (2018) Does financial development asymmetrically affect CO2 emissions in China? An application of the nonlinear autoregressive distributed lag (NARDL) model. Carbon Management 9(6):631–644

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmed Z, Wang Z (2019) Investigating the impact of human capital on the ecological footprint in India: an empirical analysis. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26(26):26782–26796

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmed A, Uddin GS, Sohag K (2016) Biomass energy, technological progress and the environmental Kuznets curve: evidence from selected European countries. Biomass Bioenergy 90:202–208

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmed Z, Wang Z, Mahmood F, Hafeez M, Ali N (2019) Does globalization increase the ecological footprint? Empirical evidence from Malaysia. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26(18):18565–18582

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ali W, Abdullah A, Azam M (2016) The dynamic linkage between technological innovation and carbon dioxide emissions in Malaysia: an autoregressive distributed lagged bound approach. Int J Energy Econ Policy 6(3):389–400

    Google Scholar 

  • Ali HS, Law SH, Lin WL, Yusop Z, Chin L, Bare UAA (2019) Financial development and carbon dioxide emissions in Nigeria: evidence from the ARDL bounds approach. GeoJournal 84(3):641–655

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ali M, Raza SA, Khamis B (2020) Environmental degradation, economic growth, and energy innovation: evidence from European countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int

  • Al-Mulali U, Sab CNBC (2012) The impact of energy consumption and CO2 emission on the economic growth and financial development in the Sub Saharan African countries. Energy 39(1):180–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alola AA, Bekun FV, Sarkodie SA (2019) Dynamic impact of trade policy, economic growth, fertility rate, renewable and non-renewable energy consumption on ecological footprint in Europe. Sci Total Environ 685:702–709

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Asumadu-Sarkodie S, Owusu PA (2017) The causal effect of carbon dioxide emissions, electricity consumption, economic growth, and industrialization in Sierra Leone. Energy Sources, Part B: Economics, Planning, and Policy 12(1):32–39

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Awan AM, Azam M, Saeed IU, Bakhtyar B (2020) Does globalization and financial sector development affect environmental quality? A panel data investigation for the Middle East and North African countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res:1–14

  • Bai J, Kao C (2006) On the estimation and inference of a panel cointegration model with cross-sectional dependence. Contributions to economic analysis 274:3–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bai J, Kao C, Ng S (2009) Panel cointegration with global stochastic trends. J Econ 149(1):82–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baloch MA, Zhang J, Iqbal K, Iqbal Z (2019) The effect of financial development on ecological footprint in BRI countries: evidence from panel data estimation. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26(6):6199–6208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balsalobre-Lorente D, Driha OM, Shahbaz M, Sinha A (2020) The effects of tourism and globalization over environmental degradation in developed countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27(7):7130–7144

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bayar Y, Maxim A (2020) Financial development and CO2 emissions in post-transition European Union countries. Sustainability 12(7):2640

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bekun FV, Alola AA, Sarkodie SA (2019) Toward a sustainable environment: Nexus between CO2 emissions, resource rent, renewable and nonrenewable energy in 16-EU countries. Sci Total Environ 657:1023–1029

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bilgili F, Ulucak R, Koçak E, İlkay SÇ (2020) Does globalization matter for environmental sustainability? Empirical investigation for Turkey by Markov regime switching models. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27(1):1087–1100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boutabba MA (2014) The impact of financial development, income, energy and trade on carbon emissions: evidence from the Indian economy. Econ Model 40:33–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BP (2019) British petroleum statistical review of world energy. London: British Petroleum Corporate Communications Services

  • Chen S, Saud S, Saleem N, Bari MW (2019) Nexus between financial development, energy consumption, income level, and ecological footprint in CEE countries: do human capital and biocapacity matter? Environ Sci Pollut Res 26(31):31856–31872

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Claessens S, Feijen E (2007) Financial sector development and the millennium development goals. The World Bank

  • Destek MA (2019a) Financial development and environmental degradation in emerging economies. In: Energy and Environmental Strategies in the Era of Globalization. Springer, Cham, pp 115–132

  • Destek MA (2019b) Investigation on the role of economic, social, and political globalization on environment: evidence from CEECs. Environ Sci Pollut Res:1–14

  • Destek MA, Aslan A (2020) Disaggregated renewable energy consumptio and environmental pollution nexus in G-7 countries. Renew Energy 151:1298–1306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Destek MA, Sarkodie SA (2019) Investigation of environmental Kuznets curve for ecological footprint: the role of energy and financial development. Sci Total Environ 650:2483–2489

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Destek MA, Sinha A (2020) Renewable, non-renewable energy consumption, economic growth, trade openness and ecological footprint: evidence from organisation for economic co-operation and development countries. J Clean Prod 242:118537

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Destek MA, Ulucak R, Dogan E (2018) Analyzing the environmental Kuznets curve for the EU countries: the role of ecological footprint. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25(29):29387–29396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dietz T, Rosa EA (1994) Rethinking the environmental impacts of population, affluence and technology. Hum Ecol Rev 1(2):277–300

    Google Scholar 

  • Dietz T, Rosa EA (1997) Environmental impacts of population and consumption. Environmentally significant consumption: Research directions:92–99

  • Dinda S (2004) Environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis: a survey. Ecol Econ 49(4):431–455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dogan E, Seker F (2016) The influence of real output, renewable and non-renewable energy, trade and financial development on carbon emissions in the top renewable energy countries. Renew Sust Energ Rev 60:1074–1085

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dong F, Wang Y, Su B, Hua Y, Zhang Y (2019) The process of peak CO2 emissions in developed economies: a perspective of industrialization and urbanization. Resour Conserv Recycl 141:61–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehrlich PR, Holdren JP (1971) Impact of population growth. Science 171(3977):1212–1217

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Erdogan S, Okumus I, Guzel AE (2020) Revisiting the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis in OECD countries: the role of renewable, non-renewable energy, and oil prices. Environ Sci Pollut Res:1–9

  • Fan H, Hossain MI (2018) Technological innovation, trade openness, CO2 emission and economic growth: comparative analysis between China and India. Int J Energy Econ Policy 8(6):240

    Google Scholar 

  • Fei Q, Rasiah R, Shen LJ (2014) The clean energy-growth nexus with CO2 emissions and technological innovation in Norway and New Zealand. Energy & environment 25(8):1323–1344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilfillan D, Marland G, Boden T, Andres R (2019) Global, regional, and national fossil-fuel CO2 emissions. Available at https://energy.appstate.edu/CDIAC

  • Grossman GM, Krueger AB (1991) Environmental impacts of a North American free trade agreement. National Bureau of Economic Research (no. w3914)

  • Hang G, Yuan-Sheng J (2011) The relationship between CO2 emissions, economic scale, technology, income and population in China. Procedia Environ Sci 11:1183–1188

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hashmi R, Alam K (2019) Dynamic relationship among environmental regulation, innovation, CO2 emissions, population, and economic growth in OECD countries: a panel investigation. J Clean Prod 231:1100–1109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ibrahiem DM (2020) Do technological innovations and financial development improve environmental quality in Egypt? Environ Sci Pollut Res:1–13

  • Irandoust M (2016) The renewable energy-growth nexus with carbon emissions and technological innovation: evidence from the Nordic countries. Ecol Indic 69(118):125

    Google Scholar 

  • Islam F, Shahbaz M, Ahmed AU, Alam MM (2013) Financial development and energy consumption nexus in Malaysia: a multivariate time series analysis. Econ Model 30:435–441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jalil A, Feridun M (2011) The impact of growth, energy and financial development on the environment in China: a cointegration analysis. Energy Econ 33(2):284–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen AL (1996) Beverton and Holt life history invariants result from optimal trade-off of reproduction and survival. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 53(4):820–822

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khan D, Ulucak R (2020) How do environmental technologies affect green growth? Evidence from BRICS economies. Sci Total Environ 136504

  • Khan MTI, Yaseen MR, Ali Q (2019) Nexus between financial development, tourism, renewable energy, and greenhouse gas emission in high-income countries: a continent-wise analysis. Energy Econ 83:293–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khattak SI, Ahmad M, Khan ZU, Khan A (2020) Exploring the impact of innovation, renewable energy consumption, and income on CO2 emissions: new evidence from the BRICS economies. Environ Sci Pollut Res:1–16

  • Kiefer NM, Vogelsang TJ (2002) Heteroskedasticity-autocorrelation robust standard errors using the Bartlett kernel without truncation. Econometrica 70(5):2093–2095

  • Kuznets S (1955) Economic growth and income inequality. Am Econ Rev 45(1):1–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin B, Omoju OE, Nwakeze NM, Okonkwo JU, Megbowon ET (2016) Is the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis a sound basis for environmental policy in Africa? J Clean Prod 133:712–724

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu X, Bae J (2018) Urbanization and industrialization impact of CO2 emissions in China. J Clean Prod 172:178–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu H, Song Y (2020) Financial development and carbon emissions in China since the recent world financial crisis: evidence from a spatial-temporal analysis and a spatial Durbin model. Sci Total Environ 715:136771

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Moghadam HE, Lotfalipour MR (2014) Impact of financial development on the environmental quality in Iran. Chinese Business Review 13(9):537–551

    Google Scholar 

  • Muntean M, Guizzardi D, Schaaf E, Crippa M, Solazzo E, Olivier J, Vignati E (2018) Fossil CO2 emissions of all world countries. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg

    Google Scholar 

  • Nasir MA, Huynh TLD, Tram HTX (2019) Role of financial development, economic growth & foreign direct investment in driving climate change: a case of emerging ASEAN. J Environ Manag 242:131–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ozturk I, Acaravci A (2013) The long-run and causal analysis of energy, growth, openness and financial development on carbon emissions in Turkey. Energy Econ 36:262–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pesaran HM (2004) General diagnostic tests for cross-sectional dependence in panels. University of Cambridge, Cambridge Working Papers in Economics, p 435

  • Pesaran MH (2007) A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross-section dependence. J Appl Econ 22(2):265–312

  • Rafindadi AA, Usman O (2019) Globalization, energy use, and environmental degradation in South Africa: startling empirical evidence from the Maki-cointegration test. J Environ Manag 244:265–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salahuddin M, Ali MI, Vink N, Gow J (2019) The effects of urbanization and globalization on CO 2 emissions: evidence from the Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26(3):2699–2709

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Samargandi N (2017) Sector value addition, technology and CO2 emissions in Saudi Arabia. Renew Sust Energ Rev 78:868–877

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarkodie SA, Adams S, Owusu PA, Leirvik T, Ozturk I (2020) Mitigating degradation and emissions in China: the role of environmental sustainability, human capital and renewable energy. Sci Total Environ 137530

  • Shafik N, Bandyopadhyay S (1992) Economic growth and environmental quality: time-series and cross-country evidence. World Development Report Working Paper WPS 904, The World Bank, Washington, DC

  • Shahbaz M, Solarin SA, Mahmood H, Arouri M (2013a) Does financial development reduce CO2 emissions in Malaysian economy? A time series analysis. Econ Model 35:145–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shahbaz M, Tiwari AK, Nasir M (2013b) The effects of financial development, economic growth, coal consumption and trade openness on CO2 emissions in South Africa. Energy Policy 61:1452–1459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shahbaz M, Mallick H, Mahalik MK, Loganathan N (2015) Does globalization impede environmental quality in India? Ecol Indic 52:379–393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shahbaz M, Shahzad SJH, Ahmad N, Alam S (2016) Financial development and environmental quality: the way forward. Energy Policy 98:353–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shahbaz M, Destek MA, Polemis ML (2018a) Do foreign capital and financial development affect clean energy consumption and carbon emissions? Evidence from BRICS and Next-11 countries. SPOUDAI-Journal of Economics and Business 68(4):20–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Shahbaz M, Nasir MA, Roubaud D (2018b) Environmental degradation in France: the effects of FDI, financial development, and energy innovations. Energy Econ 74:843–857

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shahbaz M, Haouas I, Sohag K, Ozturk I (2020) The financial development-environmental degradation nexus in the United Arab Emirates: the importance of growth, globalization and structural breaks. Environ Sci Pollut Res:1–15

  • Sharif A, Baris-Tuzemen O, Uzuner G, Ozturk I, Sinha A (2020) Revisiting the role of renewable and non-renewable energy consumption on Turkey’s ecological footprint: evidence from Quantile ARDL approach. Sustain Cities Soc 102138

  • Sinha A, Sengupta T, Alvarado R (2020) Interplay between technological innovation and environmental quality: formulating the SDG policies for next 11 economies. J Clean Prod 242:118549

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tamazian A, Chousa JP, Vadlamannati KC (2009) Does higher economic and financial development lead to environmental degradation: evidence from BRIC countries. Energy Policy 37(1):246–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toda HY, Yamamoto T (1995) Statistical inference in vector autoregressions with possibly integrated processes. J Econ 66(1–2):225–250

  • Torras M, Boyce JK (1998) Income, inequality, and pollution: a reassessment of the environmental Kuznets curve. Ecol Econ 25(2):147–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ulucak R, Khan SUD (2020) Determinants of the ecological footprint: role of renewable energy, natural resources, and urbanization. Sustain Cities Soc 54:101996

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNFCCC (2019) United nations climate change database

  • Vukina T, Beghin JC, Solakoglu EG (1999) Transition to markets and the environment: effects of the change in the composition of manufacturing output. Environ Dev Econ 4(582):598

    Google Scholar 

  • Wackernagel M, Rees W (1996) Our ecological footprint: reducing human impact on the earth, vol 9. New society publishers

  • Wang Q, Su M (2019) The effects of urbanization and industrialization on decoupling economic growth from carbon emission–a case study of China. Sustain Cities Soc 51:101758

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Z, Rasool Y, Asghar MM, Wang B (2019) Dynamic linkages among CO 2 emissions, human development, financial development, and globalization: empirical evidence based on PMG long-run panel estimation. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26(36):36248–36263

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Z, Rasool Y, Zhang B, Ahmed Z, Wang B (2020) Dynamic linkage among industrialisation, urbanisation, and CO2 emissions in APEC realms: evidence based on DSUR estimation. Struct Chang Econ Dyn 52:382–389

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Westerlund J (2007) Testing for error correction in panel data. Oxf Bull Econ Stat 69(6):709–748

  • Yii KJ, Geetha C (2017) The nexus between technology innovation and CO2 emissions in Malaysia: evidence from granger causality test. Energy Procedia 105:3118–3124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin J, Zheng M, Chen J (2015) The effects of environmental regulation and technical progress on CO2 Kuznets curve: an evidence from China. Energy Policy 77:97–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu Y, Du Y (2019) Impact of technological innovation on CO2 emissions and emissions trend prediction on ‘New Normal’economy in China. Atmospheric Pollution Research 10(1):152–161

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zafar MW, Zaidi SAH, Sinha A, Gedikli A, Hou F (2019) The role of stock market and banking sector development, and renewable energy consumption in carbon emissions: insights from G-7 and N-11 countries. Res Policy 62:427–436

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zafar MW, Shahbaz M, Sinha A, Sengupta T, Qin Q (2020) How renewable energy consumption contribute to environmental quality? The role of education in OECD countries. J Clean Prod 122149

  • Zhang YJ (2011) The impact of financial development on carbon emissions: an empirical analysis in China. Energy Policy 39(4):2197–2203

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

MAD initiated and designed the study. MM reviewed the literature and collected the dataset. MAD carried out the empirical analysis. MAD and MM have jointly interpreted the empirical findings, and revised and completed the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mehmet Akif Destek.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval and consent to participate

Not applicable

Consent to publish

Not applicable

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Eyup Dogan

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Destek, M.A., Manga, M. Technological innovation, financialization, and ecological footprint: evidence from BEM economies. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28, 21991–22001 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-11845-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-11845-2

Keywords

Navigation