Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Effect of Natural Zeolite and Cement Additive on the Strength of Sand

  • Original paper
  • Published:
Geotechnical and Geological Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It is widely known and well emphasized that the cemented sand is one of economic and environmental topics in soil stabilization. In some instances, a blend of sand, cement and other materials such as fiber, glass, nano particle and zeolite can commercially be available and effectively used in soil stabilization especially in road construction. In regard to zeolite, its influence and effectiveness on the properties of cemented sands systems has not been completely explored. Hence, in this study, based on an experimental program, it has been tried to investigate the potential of a zeolite stabilizer known as additive material to improve the properties of cemented sands. A total number of 216 unconfined compression tests were carried out on cured samples in 7, 28 and 90 days. Results show unconfined compression strength and failure properties improvements of cement sand specimens when cement replaced by zeolite at optimum proportions of 30 % after 28 days due to pozzolanic reaction. The rate of strength improvement is approximately 20–78 and 20–60 % for 28 and 90 days curing times respectively. The efficiency of using zeolite has been enhanced by increasing the cement content and porosity of the compacted mixture. The replacement of cement by natural zeolite led to an increase of the pH after 14 days. Chemical oxygen demand (COD) tests demonstrate that the materials with the zeolite mixture reveal stronger adsorptive capacity of COD in compare to cemented mixture. Scanning electron microscope images show that adding zeolite in cemented sand changes the microstructure (filling large porosity and pozzolanic reaction) that results in increasing strength.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arabani M, Sharafi H, Habibi MR, Haghshenas E (2015) Laboratory evaluation of cement stabilized crushed glass-sand blends. Electron J Geotech Eng 17:1777–1792

    Google Scholar 

  • ASTM C 150 (2007) Standard specification for Portland cement. American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  • ASTM D 2166 (2000) Standard test method for unconfined compressive strength of cohesive soil. American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhatmagar A, Minocha AK (2006) Conventional and non-conventional adsorbents for removal of pollutants from water-a review. Indian J Chem Tech 13(3):203–217

    Google Scholar 

  • Canpolat F, Yılmaz K, Kose MM, Sumer M, Yurdusev MA (2004) Use of zeolite, coal bottom ash and fly ash as replacement materials in cement production. Cem Concr Res 34(5):731–735

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choobbasti AJ, Vafaei A, Kutanaei SS (2015) Mechanical properties of sandy soil improved with cement and nanosilica. Open Eng 5(1):111–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clough GW, Sitar N, Bachus RC, Rad NS (1981) Cemented sands under static loading. J Geotech Eng Div 107(6):799–817

    Google Scholar 

  • Consoli NC, Foppa D (2014) Porosity/cement ratio controlling initial bulk modulus and incremental yield stress of an artificially cemented soil cured under stress. Géotech Lett 4:22–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Consoli NC, Prietto PDM, Ulbrich LA (1998) Influence of fiber and cement addition on behavior of sandy soil. J Geotech Geoenviron 124(12):1211–1214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Consoli NC, Rotta GV, Prietto PDM (2000) The influence of curing under stress on the triaxial response of cemented soils. Géotechnique 50(1):99–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Consoli NC, Rotta GV, Prietto PDM (2006) Yielding-compressibility–strength relationship for an artificially cemented soil cured under stress. Géotechnique 56(1):69–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Consoli NC, Foppa D, Festugato L, Heineck KS (2007) Key parameters for strength control of artificially cemented soils. J Geotech Geoenviron 133(2):197–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Consoli NC, Lopes LS Jr, Foppa D, Heineck KS (2009) Key parameters dictating strength of lime/cement-treated soil. Proc Inst Civ Eng Geotech Eng 162(2):111–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Consoli NC, Festugato L, da Rocha CG, Cruz RC (2013a) Key parameters for strength control of rammed sand–cement mixtures: influence of types of Portland cement. Constr Build Mater 49:591–597

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Consoli NC, Consoli BS, Festugato L (2013b) A practical methodology for the determination of failure envelopes of fiber-reinforced cemented sands. Geotext Geomembr 41:50–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coop MR, Atkinson JH (1993) The mechanics of cemented carbonate sands. Geotechnique 43(1):53–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dalla Rosa F, Consoli NC, Baudet BA (2008) An experimental investigation of the behaviour of artificially cemented soil cured under stress. Geotechnique 58(8):675–679

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feng NQ, Li GZ, Zang XW (1990) High strength and flowing concrete with a zeolite mineral admixture. Cem Concr Aggreg ASTM 12:61–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horpibulsuk S, Suddeepong A, Suksiripattanapong C, Chinkulkijniwat A, Arulrajah A, Disfani MM (2014) Water-void to cement ratio identity of lightweight cellular-cemented material. J Mater Civ Eng 26(10):06014021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang JT, Airey D (1998) Properties of artificially cemented carbonate sand. J Geotech Geoenviron 124(6):492–499

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ladd RS (1978) Preparing test specimens using under compaction. Geotech Test J 1(1):16–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Napia C, Sinsiri T, Jaturapitakkul C, Chindaprasirt P (2012) Leaching of heavy metals from solidified waste using Portland cement and zeolite as a binder. Waste Manag 32(7):1459–1467

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perraki T, Kakali G, Kontoleon F (2003) The effect of natural zeolites on the early hydration of Portland cement. Micropor Mesopor Mat 61(1):205–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pino LFM, Baudet BA (2015) The effect of the particle size distribution on the mechanics of fibre-reinforced sands under one-dimensional compression. Geotext Geomembr 43(3):250–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poon CS, Lam L, Kou SC, Lin ZS (1999) A study on the hydration rate of natural zeolite blended cement pastes. Constr Build Mater 13(8):427–432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shi JX (2012) The applications of zeolite in sustainable binders for soil stabilization. Appl Mec Mater 256:112–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shi C, Day RL (2000) Pozzolanic reaction in the presence of chemical activators: Part II—reaction products and mechanis. Cem Concr Res 30(4):607–613

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomé A, Donato M, Consoli NC, Graham J (2005) Circular footings on a cemented layer above weak foundation soil. Can Geotec J 42(6):1569–1584

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yilmaz E, Belem T, Benzaazoua M (2015) Specimen size effect on strength behavior of cemented paste backfills subjected to different placement conditions. Eng Geol 185:52–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yılmaz B, Ucar A, Oteyaka B, Uz V (2007) Properties of zeolitic tuff (clinoptilolite) blended portland cement. Build Environ 42(11):3808–3815

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Civil Engineering, Babol University of Technology (BUT), Babol, Iran

    Hossein Mola-Abasi

  2. National Iranian Oil Company (NIOC), Mahmoodabad Complex, Mahmoodabad, Iran

    Behrouz Kordtabar

  3. Department of Civil Engineering, Imam Khomeini International University, Qazvin, Iran

    Afshin Kordnaeij

Authors
  1. Hossein Mola-Abasi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Behrouz Kordtabar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Afshin Kordnaeij
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hossein Mola-Abasi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mola-Abasi, H., Kordtabar, B. & Kordnaeij, A. Effect of Natural Zeolite and Cement Additive on the Strength of Sand. Geotech Geol Eng 34, 1539–1551 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-016-0060-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-016-0060-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation