Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Identifying potential environmental impacts of waste handling strategies in textile industry

  • Published:
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Waste management is a successful instrument to minimize generated waste and improve environmental conditions. In spite of the large share of developing countries in the textile industry, limited information is available concerning the waste management strategies implemented for textiles on those countries and their environmental impacts. In the current study, two waste management approaches for hazardous solid waste treatment of acrylic fibers (landfill and incineration) were investigated. The main research questions were: What are the different impacts of each waste management strategy? Which waste management strategy is more ecofriendly? Life cycle assessment was employed in order to model the environmental impacts of each waste streaming approach separately then compare them together. Results revealed that incineration was the more ecofriendly approach. Highest impacts of both approaches were on ecotoxicity and carcinogenic potentials due to release of metals from pigment wastes. Landfill had an impact of 46.8 % on human health as compared to 28 % by incineration. Incineration impact on ecosystem quality was higher than landfill impact (68.4 and 51.3 %, respectively). As for resources category, incineration had a higher impact than landfill (3.5 and 2.0 %, respectively). Those impacts could be mitigated if state-of-the-art landfill or incinerator were used and could be reduced by applying waste to energy approaches for both management systems In conclusion, shifting waste treatment from landfill to incineration would decrease the overall environmental impacts and allow energy recovery. The potential of waste to energy approach by incineration with heat recovery could be considered in further studies. Future research is needed in order to assess the implementation of waste management systems and the preferable waste management strategies in the textile industry on developing countries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ali, A. A. M., Negm, A. M., Bady, A. F., & Ibrahim, A. G. (2014). Moving towards an Egyptian national life cycle inventory database. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 19, 1551–1558.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arena, U., Mastellone, M. L., & Perugini, F. (2003). The environmental performance of alternative solid waste management options: a life cycle assessment study. Chemical Engineering Journal, 96(1–3), 207–222.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Assamoi, B., & Lawryshyn, Y. (2012). The environmental comparison of landfilling vs. incineration of MSW accounting for waste diversion. Waste Management, 32(1), 1019–1030.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Badania, Z., Ait-Amara, H., Si-Salahb, A., Brikc, M., & Fuchs, W. (2005). Treatment of textile waste water by membrane bioreactor and reuse. Desalination, 185(1), 411–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker, J.W., Lepech, M.D. (2009). Treatment of uncertainties in life cycle assessment. In Intl. Congress on Structral Safety and Reliability.

  • Barclay, S., Buckley, C. (2000) Waste minimisation guide for the textile industry: a step towards cleaner production, volume II. Water Research Commission of South Africa. University of Natal, Durban, South Africa.

  • Beton, A., Debora, D., Laura, F., Thomas, G., Yannick, L., Marie, D., Anne, P., Ines, B., Oliver, W., Jiannis, K., Mauro, C., Nicholas, D. (2014) Environmental improvement potential of textiles (IMPRO textiles). European Commission Joint Research Centre Institute for Prospective Technological Studies (IPTS).

  • Briga-Sá, A., Nascimento, D., Teixeira, N., Pinto, J., Caldeira, F., Varum, H., & Paiva, A. (2013). Textile waste as an alternative thermal insulation building material solution. Construction and Building Materials, 38(1), 155–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brito, M. P. D., Carbone, V., & Blanquart, C. M. (2008). Towards a sustainable fashion retail supply chain in Europe: organization and performance. International Journal of Production Economics, 114(2), 534–553.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buonanno, G., Ficco, G., & Stabile, L. (2008). Size distribution and number of particles at the stack of a municipal waste incinerator. Waste Management, 29(2), 749–755.

  • CAPMAS (2015). Egypt in figures report. 2015. Central Agency for Public Mobilization and Statistics, (March 2015).

  • Chaya, W., & Gheewala, S. H. (2007). Life cycle assessment of MSW to energy schemes in Thailand. Journal of Cleaner Production, 15(15), 1463–1468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cherubini, F., Bargigli, S., & Ulgiati, S. (2009). Life cycle assessment (LCA) of waste management strategies: landfilling, sorting plant and incineration. Journal of Energy, 34, 2116–2123.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Denison, R. (1996). Environmental life-cycle comparisons of recycling, landfilling, and incineration: a review of recent studies. Annual Review of Energy and the Environment, 21, 191–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doka, G. (2003) Life cycle inventories of waste treatment services. Ecoinvent Report No. 13. In Swiss Centre for Life Cycle Inventories. Dübendorf, Switzerland.

  • ECE, European Commission for Environment (2003). Preparing a waste management plan, A methodological guidance note. European Commission, Directorate-General Environment, Umweltbundesamt GmbH, Vienna, BiPRO GmbH, Munich, Ekotoxikologické Centrum, Bratislava.

  • EEAA, Egyptian Environmental Affairs Agency (1994). The Environmental Law, 4 of 1994. Egypt: Ministry of State for Environmental Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • El-Raey, M. (2007). Environmental impact assessment study for acrylic fibers plant extension. Alexandria: ENVIRO-INFO CONSULTANTS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekvall, T., Assefab, G., Björklundc, A., Erikssond, O., & Finnvedenc, G. (2007). What life-cycle assessment does and does not do in assessments of waste management. International Journal of Integrated Waste Management, Science and Technology, 27(8), 989–996.

  • European Environment Agency (1997). Life-cycle assessment (LCA)—a guide to approaches, experiences and information sources. Copenhagen, Denmark

  • Finnveden, G., & Ekvall, T. (1998). Life cycle assessment as a decision support tool—the case of recycling vs. incineration of paper. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 24, 235–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finnveden, G., Johansson, J., Lind, P., & Moberg, A. (2000). Life cycle assessments of energy from solid waste. Sweden: Stockholms Universitet.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finnveden, G., Johansson, J., Per, L., & Moberg, G. (2005). Life cycle assessment of energy from solid waste—part 1: general methodology and results. Journal of Cleaner Production, 13, 213–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frischkneckt R, Jughbluth N, Althaus H-J, Bauer C, Doka G, Dones R, Nemecek T (2007) Implementation of life cycle assessment methods. Ecoinvent Report Vol. 2. In Swiss Centre for Life Cycle Inventories. Dübendorf, Switzerland

  • Goedkoop M, Spriensma R, (2000) Eco-indicator 99 methodology report: PRé Consultants. The Netherlands.

  • Goedkoop M, Schryver A, Oele M, (2008) Introduction to LCA with SimaPro 7: PRé Consultants. The Netherlands.

  • Hassan, M. N., Awang, M., Chong, T. L., Zakaria, Z., Lay, L. B., Yusoff, N., et al. (1999). The application of a life cycle inventory (LCI) model for solid waste disposal systems in Malaysia. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 4, 188–190.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • HSRC (2006) Hazardous Substance Research Centers. Environmental hazards of the textile industry. Environmental Update 24. South & Southwest Outreach Program. Washington, USA.

  • IPPC, Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control (2001). Reference document on best available techniques for the textiles industry. European Commission, Institute for Prospective Technological Studies, Technologies for Sustainable Development, European IPPC Bureau. Seville – Spain.

  • Knackmuss, H. J. (1996). Basic knowledge and perspectives of bioelimination of xenobiotics compounds. Journal of Biotechnology, 287–295.

  • Kolekar YM (2010) Isolation characterization and evaluation of dye degradation potential of the novel bacterial species Alishewanella soli. University of Pune

  • Laing, G. I. (1991). The impact of effluent regulations on the dyeing industry. Colouration, 12, 56–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Law-wai E, (2001) Mobilization and transport of arsenic by landfill leachates and contamination of groundwater at Winthrop, Maine. Master of Science in Earth Resources Engineering, Columbia University, USA.

  • Lawrence, R. D. (1996). Pollution prevention in the textile industry. Dallas: U.S. EPA. Pollution prevention work group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lettieri P, Evangelisti S, Borello D, Clift, Rd (2014) Life cycle assessment of energy from waste via anaerobic digestion: a UK case study. Journal of Waste Management 34: 226–237.

  • Lo, C. K. Y., Yeung, A. C. L., & Cheng, T. C. E. (2012). The impact of environmental management systems on financial performance in fashion and textiles industries. International Journal of Production Economics, 135, 561–567.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melnyk, S. A., Sroufe, R. P., & Calantone, R. (2003). Assessing the impact of environmental management systems on corporate and environmental performance. Journal of Operations Management, 21(3), 329–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mendes, M. R., Aramak, T., & Hanaki, K. (2004). Comparison of the environmental impact of incineration and landfilling in São Paulo city as determined by LCA. Journal of Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 41(1), 47–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nakamura, S., & Kondo, Y. (2002). Input-output analysis of waste management. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 6(1), 39–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Research and Markets (2011) Textiles: global industry guide. http://www.researchandmarkets.com/research/6eb45b/textiles_global_i

  • Ren, X. (2000). Development of environmental performance indicators for textile process and product. Journal of Cleaner Production, 8, 473–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shenai, V. V. (2001). Non-ecofriendly textile chemicals and their probable substitutes—an overview Indian. Indian Journal of Fiber and Textile Research, 26, 50–54.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Slokar, Y. M., & Marechal, M. A. L. (1998). Methods of decoloration of textile wastewaters. Dyes and Pigments, 37, 335–356.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Udo de Haes, H. A., & Heijungs, R. (2007). Life cycle assessment for energy analysis and management. Journal of Applied Energy, 84, 817–827.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • UNCTAD (2015). World investment report 2015: reforming international investment governance. Geneva: United Nations Publication, United Nations.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Velden, N. M., Martin, K. P., & Vogtländer, J. G. (2014). LCA benchmarking study on textiles made of cotton, polyester, nylon, acrylic, or elastane. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 19, 331–356.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vandevivere, P. C., Bianchi, R., & Verstraete, W. (1998). Treatment and reuse of waste water from the textile wet processing industry: review of emerging technologies. Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology, 72(4), 289–302.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Michaud JC, Farrant L, Jan O, Kjær B, Bakas I (2010) The environmental benefits of recycling. Waste & Resources Action Program (WRAP). Oxon, United Kingdom.

  • White PR, Franke M, Hindle P (1999) Integrated solid waste management—a life cycle inventory. Gaithersburg, MD, USA: Aspen Publishers Inc. (New York: Chapman & Hall; 1995).

  • World Bank (2005). Environmental impact assessment for Al Hamman landfill. Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodard, F. (2001). Industrial waste treatment handbook. USA: Butterworth–Heinemann Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yacout, D. M. M., Abd El-Kawi, M. A., & Hassouna, M. S. (2015). Applying waste management in textile industry: case study an Egyptian plant. Open Conference Proceedings Journal, 6, 35–40.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yacout, D. M. M., Abd El-Kawi, M. A., & Hassouna, M. S. (2016). Cradle to gate environmental impact assessment of acrylic fiber manufacturing. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 21(3), 326–336.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zakaria, A., & Labib, O. (2003). Evaluation of emissions from medical waste incinerators in Alexandria. The Journal of the Egyptian Public Health Association, 78(3–4), 225–244.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dalia M. M. Yacout.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yacout, D.M.M., Hassouna, M.S. Identifying potential environmental impacts of waste handling strategies in textile industry. Environ Monit Assess 188, 445 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-016-5443-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-016-5443-8

Keywords

Navigation