Skip to main content
Log in

Use of single-protoplast isolates in the study of the mating phenomena of Rhizoctonia solani (Thanatephorus cucumeris) AG-1 IC and IA

  • Full Paper
  • Published:
Mycoscience

Abstract

This study evaluates the effectiveness of using single-protoplast isolates (SPIs) to study the mating phenomena of Rhizoctonia solani AG-1 IC and IA. SPIs obtained from three field isolates (F-1, Rh28, and RO2) of AG-1 IC were paired with representative single-basidiospore isolate (SBI)-M1/-M2 testers, each from their own field isolates, or paired in all possible combinations. Tufts were formed between SPIs and SBI-M1/-M2 testers and between SPIs-M1 and -M2. The separation ratios of SPIs-M1 and -M2 were approximately 1:1, which were similar to the results obtained with SBIs. SPIs obtained from three isolates (GNSD, R59, and Tr8) of AG-1 IA, which failed to form basidiospores, were paired in all possible combinations. Although no tufts formed among SPIs from Tr8 and R59, tufts did form between SPIs from GNSD. SPIs from GNSD were separated into homokaryotic (-M1 or -M2) and heterokaryotic isolates, and the separation ratio of -M1 and -M2 was also around 1:1. Amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) phenotypes of the tuft isolates formed between GNSD SPIs-M1 and -M2 suggested that these tuft isolates were all heterokaryotic. These results indicate that all three isolates of AG-1 IC and one isolate GNSD of AG-1 IA are heterokaryotic, and that the other two isolates of Tr8 and R59 of AG-1 IA are homokaryotic. Single-protoplast isolates are effective for studies of the mating phenomena of isolates belonging to different AGs of R. solani that could not form a perfect stage.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams GC (1988) Thanatephorus cucumeris (Rhizoctonia solani), a species complex of wide host range. In: Ingram DS, Williams PH (eds) Advances in plant pathology, vol 6: Genetics of plant pathogenic fungi. Academic Press, London, pp 535–552

    Google Scholar 

  • Adams GC, Butler EE (1982) A re-interpretation of the sexuality of Thanatephorus cucumeris anastomosis group four. Mycologia 74:793–800

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson NA (1982) The genetics and pathology of Rhizoctonia solani. Annu Rev Phytopathol 20:329–347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson NA, Stretton HM, Groth JV, Flentje NT (1972) Genetics of heterokaryosis in Thanatephorus cucumeris. Phytopathology 62:1057–1065

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carling DE (1996) Grouping in Rhizoctonia solani by hyphal anastomosis reaction. In: Sneh B, Jabaji-Hare S, Neate S, Dijst G (eds) Rhizoctonia species: taxonomy, molecular biology, ecology, pathology and disease control. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 37–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Carling DE, Kuninaga S (1990) DNA based-sequence homology in Rhizoctonia solani Kuhn: inter-and intra-group relatedness of anastomosis group-9. Phytopathology 80:1362–1364

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Carling DE, Pope EJ, Brainard KA, Carter DA (1999) Characterization of mycorrhizal isolates of Rhizoctonia solani from an orchard, including AG-12, a new anastomosis group. Phytopathology 89:942–946

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Carling DE, Baird RE, Gitaitis RD, Brainard KA, Kuninaga S (2002) Characterization of AG-13, a newly reported anastomosis group of Rhizoctonia solani. Phytopathology 92:893–899

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carling DE, Kuninaga S, Brainard KA (2003) Hyphal anastomosis reactions, rDNA-internal transcribed spacers, and virulence levels among subsets of Rhizoctonia solani anastomosis group-2 (AG-2) and AG-BI. Phytopathology 92:43–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cubeta MA, Vilgalys RJ (1997) Population biology of the Rhizoctonia solani complex. Phytopathology 87:480–484

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hashiba T, Yamada M (1982) Formation and purification of protoplasts from Rhizoctonia solani. Phytopathology 72:849–853

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Julian MC, Debets F, Keijer J (1996) Independence of sexual and vegetative incompatibility mechanisms of Thanatephorus cucumeris (Rhizoctonia solani) anastomosis group 1. Phytopathology 86:566–574

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Julian MC, Dullemans AM, Silfhout C, Keijer J (1997) Nuclear behavior in homokaryotic and heterokaryotic fruiting of Thanatephorus cucumeris (Rhizoctonia solani) anastomosis group 1, subgroup IC. Mycologia 89:361–374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Julian MC, Acero J, Salazar O, Keijer J, Rubio V (1999) Mating typecorrelated molecular markers and demonstration of heterokaryosis in the phytopathogenic fungus Thanatephorus cucumeris (Rhizoctonia solani) AG 1-IC by AFLP DNA fingerprinting analysis. J Biotechnol 67:49–56

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ogoshi A (1972) On the perfect stage of anastomosis group 2 of Rhizoctonia solani Kuhn. Ann Phytopathol Soc Jpn 13:285–293

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogoshi A (1976) Studies on the grouping of Rhizoctonia solani Kuhn with hyphal anastomosis, and on the perfect stage of groups. Bulletin Series C, No. 3. National Institute of Agricultural Science, Tokyo

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogoshi A (1987) Ecology and pathogenicity of anastomosis and intraspecific groups of Rhizoctonia solani Kuhn. Annu Rev Phytopathol 25:125–143

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips AJL (1993) The use of protoplasts for the preparation of homokaryons from heterokaryotic isolates of Rhizoctonia solani. Mycol Res 97:456–460

    Google Scholar 

  • Peberdy JF (1980) Protoplast fusion: a tool for genetic manipulation and breeding in industrial microorganisms. Enzyme Microb Technol 2:23–29

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sneh B, Burpee L, Ogoshi A (1991) Identification of Rhizoctonia species. American Phytopathological Society, St. Paul

    Google Scholar 

  • Sneh B, Jabaji-Hare S, Neate S, Dijst G (1996) Rhizoctonia species: taxonomy, molecular biology, ecology, pathology and disease control. Kluwer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Stretton HM, Flentje NT, McKenzie AR (1967) Homothallism in Thanatephorus cucumeris. Aust J Biol Sci 20:103–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Toda T, Hyakumachi M (2006) Heterokaryon formation in Thanatephorus cucumeris anastomosis group 2-2 IV. Mycologia 98:726–736

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vos P, Hogers R, Bleeker M, Reijans M, van de Lee T, Frijters A, Pot J, Peleman J, Kuiper M, Zabeau M (1995) AFLP: a new technique for DNA finger printing. Nucleic Acids Res 23:4407–4414

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Whitney HS, Parmeter JR Jr (1963) Synthesis of heterokaryons in Rhizoctonia solani Kuhn. Can J Bot 41:879–886

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang HA, Tommerup IC, Sivasithamparam K, O’Brien PA (1992) Heterokaryon formation with homokaryons derived from protoplasts of Rhizoctonia solani anastomosis group eight. Exp Mycol 16:268–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yoder OC (1988) Cochliobolus heterostrophus cause of southern corm leaf blight. In: Sidhu GS (ed) Advances in plant pathology, vol 6. Genetics of plant pathogenic fungi. Academic Press, London, pp 93–122

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mitsuro Hyakumachi.

About this article

Cite this article

Qu, P., Aratani, A., Syoji, T. et al. Use of single-protoplast isolates in the study of the mating phenomena of Rhizoctonia solani (Thanatephorus cucumeris) AG-1 IC and IA. Mycoscience 49, 132–137 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10267-007-0400-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10267-007-0400-6

Key words

Navigation