Skip to main content
Log in

CAD/tolerancing integration: a new approach for tolerance analysis of non-rigid parts assemblies

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The tolerancing integration in CAD model is among the major interests of most mechanical manufacturers. Several researches have been established approaches considering the geometrical and dimensional tolerances on the CAD modelers. However, the hypothesis of rigid parts is adopted in the digital mock-up. Thus, several physical factors are neglected; especially the deformations. In this regard, this paper presents a model for considering both tolerances and deformations in CAD model. The dimensional and geometrical tolerances are taken into account by the determination of assemblies configurations with defects basing on the worst case tolerancing. The finite elements (FE) computations are realized with realistic models. A method for modeling the realistic mating constraints, between rigid and non-rigid parts, is developed. Planar and cylindrical joints are considered. The proposed tolerance analysis method is highlighted throughout two cases study: the first comprises planar joints and the second comprises cylindrical parts in motion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Tsai JC (2007) Stiffness variation of compliant devices due to geometric tolerancing, in Proceedings of CIRP conference on computer aided Tolerancing , Erlange,Germany

  2. Benichou S, Anselmetti B (2011) Thermal dilatation in functional tolerancing. J Mech Mach Theory 16:1575–1587

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Tlija M, Louhichi B, Benamara A (2013) A new method for tolerance integration in CAD model. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Control Engineering and Information Technology, Sousse,Tunisia, pp. 46–51

  4. Pino L (2000) Modeling and kinematic analysis of geometric tolerances for the assembly of mechanical systems, Ph.D Thesis, The Central school of Nantes ,France

  5. Sobh TM, Henderson TC, Zana F (1999) Tolerance representation and analysis in industrial inspection. Journal of Intelligent Robot System Theory Appl 24:387–401

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Sellakh R, Sellem E, Riviere A (2000) Specification and simulation of geometric imperfections in CAD/CAM. Mech Ind 1:365–372

    Google Scholar 

  7. Davidson JK, Shah JJ (2013) Using Tolerance-Maps® to represent material condition on both a feature and a datum, The 8th International CIRP Seminar on Computer Aided Tolerancing , Charlotte, North Carolina ,USA , , pp 92–101

  8. Franciosa P (2009) Modelling and simulation of variational rigid and compliant assembly for tolerance analysis, Ph.D Thesis, The university Naples Federico II ,Italia

  9. Louhichi B, Tlija M, BenAmara A, Tahan A (2015) An algorithm for CAD tolerancing integration: generation of assembly configurations according to dimensional and geometrical tolerances. Comput Aided Des 62:259–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Shen Z, Ameta G, Shah JJ, Davidson JK (2005) A comparative study of tolerance analysis methods. J Inf Sci Eng 5:247–256

    Google Scholar 

  11. Prisco U, Giorleo G (2002) Overview of current CAT systems: review article. Integr Comput-Aid E 9:373–387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Schleich B, Anwer N, Zhu Z, Qiao L, Mathieu L, Wartzack S (2014) Comparative study on tolerance analysis approaches. The International Symposium on Robust Design, Copenhagen, pp 29–39

    Google Scholar 

  13. Zhu Z, Qiao L, Anwer N (2016) An improved tolerance analysis method based on skin model shapes of planar parts. The 9th CIRP conference on Digital Enterprise Technology - Intelligent Manufacturing in the Knowledge Economy Era, Nanjing, China, pp 237–242

  14. Anselmetti B (2006) Generation of functional tolerancing based on positioning features. Comput Aided Des 38:902–919

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Dantan JY, Qureshi AJ (2009) Worst-case and statistical tolerance analysis based on quantified constraint satisfaction problems and Monte Carlo simulation. Comput Aided Des 41:1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Tlija M, Louhichi B, BenAmara A (2013) Evaluating the effect of tolerances on the functional requirements of assemblies. Mech Ind 14:191–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Jbira I, Tlija M, Louhichi B, Tahan A (2017) CAD/tolerancing integration: mechanical assembly with form defects. Adv Eng Softw 114:312–324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Liu SC, Hu SJ, Woo TC (2007) Tolerance analysis for sheet metal assemblies. J Mech Des 118:62–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Camelio J, Hu SJ, Ceglarek D (2003) Modeling variation propagation of multi-station assembly systems with compliant parts. J Mech Des 125:759–790

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Hu SJ, Camelio J, Arbor A (2006) Modeling and control of compliant assembly systems. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 55(1):19–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Söderberg R, Wärmefjord K, Lindkvist L, Berlin R (2012) The influence of spot weld position variation on geometrical quality. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 61(1):13–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Rosenqvist M, Falck A, Lindkvist L, Söderberg R (2014) Geometrical robustness analysis considering manual assembly complexity. The 5th CIRP Conference on Assembly Technologies and Systems, Dresden, Germany, pp 98–103

  23. RD&T webpage 2013–10–09. [Online]. Available: http://www.rdnt.se

  24. Wärmefjord K, Carlson JS, Söderberg R (2016) Controlling geometrical variation caused by assembly fixtures. J Comput Inf Sci Eng 16(1):11007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Lee J, Choi W, Kang M, Chung H (2015) Tolerance analysis and diagnosis model of compliant block assembly considering welding deformation. World Maritime Technology Conference, Korea

  26. Hermansson T, Carlson J, Björkenstam S, Söderberg R (2012) Geometric variation simulation and robust design for flexible cables and hoses, In Proceedings of 12th CIRP Conference on Computer Aided Tolerancing, Huddersfield, UK

  27. Samper S, Giordan M (1998) Taking into account elastic displacements in 3D tolerancing: models and applications. J Mater Process Technol 78:156–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Mazur M, Leary M, Subic A (2011) Computer aided tolerancing (CAT) platform for the design of assemblies under external and internal forces. Comput Aided Des 43:707–719

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Mazur M, Leary M, Subic A (2015) Application of polynomial chaos expansion to tolerance analysis and synthesis in compliant assemblies subject to loading, J Mech Des vol. 137, Paper No: MD-14-300, https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4029283

  30. Geetha K, Ravindron D, Siva Kumar M, Islam MN (2013) Multi-objective optimization for optimum tolerance synthesis with process and machine selection using a genetic algorithm. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 67:2439–2457

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Stuppy J, Meerkamm H (2009) Tolerance analysis of a crank mechanism by taking into account different kinds of deviations. In: Proceedings of the 11th CIRP international seminar on computer aided tolerancing , Annecy, France, pp 26–27

  32. Jeang A, Hwan CL, Chen TK (2002) A statistical dimension and tolerance design for mechanical assembly under thermal impact. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 20:907–915

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Pierre L, Teissandier D, Nadeau JP (2009) Integration of thermo-mechanical strains into tolerancing analysis. Int J Interact Des Manuf 3:247–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Irfan AM, Neal PJ (2004) Framework of an integrated tolerance synthesis model and using FE simulation as a virtual tool for tolerance allocation in assembly design. J Mater Process Technol 150:182–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Jayaprakash G, Thilak M, Sivakumar K (2014) Optimal tolerance design for mechanical assembly considering thermal impact. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 73:859–873

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Benichou S, Anselmetti B (2011) Thermal dilatation in functional tolerancing. Mech Mach Theory 46:1575–1587

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Ting L, Yanlong C, Jing W, Jiangxin Y (2016) Assembly error calculation with consideration of part deformation. The 14th CIRP Conference on Computer Aided Design, Gothenburg, Sweden, pp 58–63

  38. Guo J, Li B, Liu Z, Hong J, Wu X (2016) Integration of geometric variation and part deformation into variation propagation of 3-D assemblies. Int J Prod Res 54:5708–5721

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Sivasankar S, Jeyapaul R, Kolappan S, Shaahid N (2012) Procedural study for roughness, roundness and waviness measurement of EDM drilled holes using image processing technology. Comput Model New Technol 16:49–63

    Google Scholar 

  40. Srinivasan V (2001) An integrated view of geometrical product specification and verification. In Proceedings of the 7th CIRP Intenational seminars on computer aided tolerancing, Cachan, France, pp. 1–11

  41. Jacquelin J (2011) 3-D Linear Regression [Online]. Available: https://fr.scribd.com/doc/31477970/Regressions-et-trajectoires-3D

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Korbi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Korbi, A., Tlija, M., Louhichi, B. et al. CAD/tolerancing integration: a new approach for tolerance analysis of non-rigid parts assemblies. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 98, 2003–2013 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-018-2347-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-018-2347-5

Keywords

Navigation