Skip to main content
Log in

Oral meloxicam is effective in acute sciatica: two randomised, double-blind trials versus placebo or diclofenac

  • Published:
Inflammation Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract:

Objective: Two randomised, double-blind, double-dummy trials evaluated the efficacy and tolerability of meloxicam compared with placebo or diclofenac in patients with acute sciatica.¶Subjects: 1021 patients with acute sciatica.¶Treatment and methods: In the first study, 532 patients received meloxicam 7.5 mg, meloxicam 15 mg, or placebo for 7 days. The second study randomised 489 patients to meloxicam 7.5 mg, meloxicam 15 mg, or diclofenac 150 mg for 14 days.¶Results: Meloxicam 7.5 mg and 15 mg significantly improved overall pain between baseline and day 7 (p<0.05) compared with placebo. Furthermore, both meloxicam doses showed similar improvements on all primary and secondary efficacy endpoints compared with diclofenac 150 mg. No significant differences in tolerability were observed between any of the treatment groups in either study.¶Conclusions: Meloxicam (7.5 mg or 15 mg) was well tolerated and was more effective than placebo, and as effective as diclofenac, in acute sciatica.¶

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Received 21 March 2000; accepted 22 March 2000

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dreiser, RL., Le Parc, J., Vélicitat, P. et al. Oral meloxicam is effective in acute sciatica: two randomised, double-blind trials versus placebo or diclofenac. Inflamm. res. 50 (Suppl 1), 17–23 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00022375

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00022375

Navigation