Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of Outcomes following Transhiatal or Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy for Esophageal Carcinoma

  • Published:
World Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

p

= 0.05); if two surgeons operated concurrently, THO could be performed 40 minutes quicker than THO or ILO performed by a single surgeon (p= 0.018). The mean initial intensive care unit stay was 2.9 days for ILO versus 1.7 days for THO (p= 0.014). The 30-day mortality was 5.1%; total in-hospital mortality was 7.1% with no difference for operation type. There were similar morbidity rates for the procedures. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis indicated no significant effect of surgical technique; there were no apparent advantages for either operation when patients were compared by tumor type or matched for stage. Hence THO is a valid alternative to ILO, particularly for stage II and III cancer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gluch, L., Smith, R., Bambach, C. et al. Comparison of Outcomes following Transhiatal or Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy for Esophageal Carcinoma. World J. Surg. 23, 271–276 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00013184

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00013184

Keywords

Navigation