Skip to main content
Log in

Optimal law enforcement when victims are rational players

  • Original papers
  • Published:
Economics of Governance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract.

The economic analysis of crime usually views a victim as a passive party whose role is limited to suffering harm. In this paper, we extend the economic theory of law enforcement by modeling victims as an active party in criminal deterrence. First, they may take some precautions to avoid victimization. Second, they may or may not report their victimization.

The lack of reporting weakens law enforcement and criminal deterrence by reducing detection rates. This suggests that victims could be encouraged to report by being paid a compensation. Nevertheless, compensating victims certainly reduces precaution. We argue that such effect never offsets the gains obtained in terms of criminal detection and apprehension.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Received: December 1998 / Accepted: January 2000

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Garoupa, N. Optimal law enforcement when victims are rational players. Econ Gov 2, 231–242 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00011027

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00011027

Navigation