Abstract
Wing and Kristofferson (1973) have shown that temporal precision in self-paced tapping is limited by variability in a central timekeeper and by variability arising in the peripheral motor system. Here we test an extension of the Wing–Kristofferson model to synchronization with periodic external events that was proposed by Vorberg and Wing (1994). In addition to the timekeeper and motor components, a linear phase correction mechanism is assumed which is triggered by the last or the last two synchronization errors. The model is tested in an experiment that contrasts synchronized and self-paced trapping, with response periods ranging from 200–640 ms. The variances of timekeeper and motor delays and the error correction parameters were estimated from the auto-covariance functions of the inter-response intervals in continuation and the asynchronies in synchronization. Plausible estimates for all parameters were obtained when equal motor variance was assumed for synchronization and continuation. Timekeeper variance increased with metronome period, but more steeply during continuation than during synchronization, suggesting that internal timekeeping processes are stabilized by periodic external signals. First-order error correction became more important as the metronome period increased, whereas the contribution of second-order error correction decreased. It is concluded that the extended two-level model accounts well for both synchronization and continuation performance.
Similar content being viewed by others
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Received: 16 November 1998 / Accepted: 21 April 1999
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Semjen, A., Schulze, HH. & Vorberg, D. Timing precision in continuation and synchronization tapping. Psychological Research Psychologische Forschung 63, 137–147 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00008172
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00008172