Abstract
We investigate the causal hierarchy in various modified theories of gravity. In general relativity the standard causal hierarchy, (key elements of which are chronology, causality, strong causality, stable causality, and global hyperbolicity), is well-established. In modified theories of gravity there is typically considerable extra structure, (such as: multiple metrics, aether fields, modified dispersion relations, Hořava-like gravity, parabolic propagation, etcetera), requiring a reassessment and rephrasing of the usual causal hierarchy. We shall show that in this extended framework suitable causal hierarchies can indeed be established, and discuss the implications for the interplay between “superluminal” propagation and causality. The key distinguishing feature is whether the signal velocity is finite or infinite. Preserving even minimal notions of causality in the presence of infinite signal velocity requires the aether field to be both unique and hypersurface orthogonal, leading us to introduce the notion of global parabolicity.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
S.W. Hawking and G.F.R. Ellis, The large scale structure of spacetime, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K. (1973) [ISBN-13:978-0521099066] [ISBN-10:0521099064].
R.K. Sachs and H.H. Wu, General relativity for mathematicians, Springer graduate texts in mathematics 48, Springer-Verlag, New York, NY, U.S.A. (1977) [ISBN-13:978-1461299059] [ISBN-10:1461299055] [e-ISBN:978-1-4612-9903-5].
R.M. Wald, General relativity, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, U.S.A. (1984) [ISBN-10:0-226-87032-4] [ISBN-10:0-226-87033-2] [INSPIRE].
Causal structure Wikipedia page, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Causal_structure.
Causality conditions Wikipedia page, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Causality_conditions.
Convex hull Wikipedia page, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Convex_hull.
R. Penrose, Techniques of differential topology in relativity, SIAM, Bristol, U.K. (1972) [ISBN-10:0-89871-005-7] [INSPIRE].
S.W. Hawking and R.K. Sachs, Causally continuous space-times, Commun. Math. Phys. 35 (1974) 287 [INSPIRE].
Globally hyperbolic manifold Wikipedia page, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Globally_hyperbolic_manifold.
A.N. Bernal and M. Sanchez, On smooth Cauchy hypersurfaces and Geroch’s splitting theorem, Commun. Math. Phys. 243 (2003) 461 [gr-qc/0306108] [INSPIRE].
A.N. Bernal and M. Sanchez, Smoothness of time functions and the metric splitting of globally hyperbolic space-times, Commun. Math. Phys. 257 (2005) 43 [gr-qc/0401112] [INSPIRE].
A.N. Bernal and M. Sanchez, Smooth globally hyperbolic splittings and temporal functions, in 2nd international meeting on Lorentzian geometry, (2004) [gr-qc/0404084] [INSPIRE].
M. Sanchez, Causal hierarchy of spacetimes, temporal functions and smoothness of Geroch’s splitting. A revision, in 13th school of differential geometry: dedicated to the memory of Jose Fernando Escobar, (2004) [gr-qc/0411143] [INSPIRE].
E. Minguzzi and M. Sanchez, The causal hierarchy of spacetimes, in Recent developments in pseudo-Riemannian geometry, H. Baum and D. Alekseevsky eds., EMS Pub. House, Zurich, Switzerland (2008), pg. 299 [gr-qc/0609119] [INSPIRE].
G.A. Benford, D.L. Book and W.A. Newcomb, The tachyonic antitelephone, Phys. Rev. D 2 (1970) 263 [INSPIRE].
S. Liberati, S. Sonego and M. Visser, Scharnhorst effect at oblique incidence, Phys. Rev. D 63 (2001) 085003 [quant-ph/0010055] [INSPIRE].
S. Liberati, S. Sonego and M. Visser, Faster than c signals, special relativity, and causality, Annals Phys. 298 (2002) 167 [gr-qc/0107091] [INSPIRE].
C. Barceló, S. Liberati, S. Sonego and M. Visser, Causal structure of acoustic spacetimes, New J. Phys. 6 (2004) 186 [gr-qc/0408022] [INSPIRE].
J.-P. Bruneton, On causality and superluminal behavior in classical field theories: applications to k-essence theories and MOND-like theories of gravity, Phys. Rev. D 75 (2007) 085013 [gr-qc/0607055] [INSPIRE].
C. Cheung and G.N. Remmen, Infrared consistency and the weak gravity conjecture, JHEP 12 (2014) 087 [arXiv:1407.7865] [INSPIRE].
S. Deser and A. Waldron, Acausality of massive gravity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 (2013) 111101 [arXiv:1212.5835] [INSPIRE].
S. Deser, K. Izumi, Y.C. Ong and A. Waldron, Massive gravity acausality redux, Phys. Lett. B 726 (2013) 544 [arXiv:1306.5457] [INSPIRE].
S. Deser, K. Izumi, Y.C. Ong and A. Waldron, Superluminal propagation and acausality of nonlinear massive gravity, in Conference in honor of the 90th birthday of Freeman Dyson, World Scientific, Singapore (2014), pg. 430 [arXiv:1312.1115] [INSPIRE].
S. Deser, K. Izumi, Y.C. Ong and A. Waldron, Problems of massive gravities, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 30 (2015) 1540006 [arXiv:1410.2289] [INSPIRE].
J. Bhattacharyya, M. Colombo and T.P. Sotiriou, Causality and black holes in spacetimes with a preferred foliation, Class. Quant. Grav. 33 (2016) 235003 [arXiv:1509.01558] [INSPIRE].
C. Barceló, S. Liberati and M. Visser, Analog gravity from field theory normal modes?, Class. Quant. Grav. 18 (2001) 3595 [gr-qc/0104001] [INSPIRE].
C. Barceló, S. Liberati and M. Visser, Refringence, field theory, and normal modes, Class. Quant. Grav. 19 (2002) 2961 [gr-qc/0111059] [INSPIRE].
M. Visser and S. Weinfurtner, Analogue spacetimes: toy models for “quantum gravity”, PoS(QG-PH)042 (2007) [arXiv:0712.0427] [INSPIRE].
J. Skakala and M. Visser, Birefringence in pseudo-Finsler spacetimes, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 189 (2009) 012037 [arXiv:0810.4376] [INSPIRE].
J. Skakala and M. Visser, Pseudo-Finslerian spacetimes and multi-refringence, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 19 (2010) 1119 [arXiv:0806.0950] [INSPIRE].
J. Skakala and M. Visser, Bi-metric pseudo-Finslerian spacetimes, J. Geom. Phys. 61 (2011) 1396 [arXiv:1008.0689] [INSPIRE].
C. Barcelo, S. Liberati and M. Visser, Analogue gravity, Living Rev. Rel. 8 (2005) 12 [Living Rev. Rel. 14 (2011) 3] [gr-qc/0505065] [INSPIRE].
M. Visser, C. Barcelo, S. Liberati and S. Sonego, Small, dark, and heavy: but is it a black hole?, PoS(BHGRS)010 (2008) [arXiv:0902.0346] [INSPIRE].
R. Carballo-Rubio, F. Di Filippo, S. Liberati, C. Pacilio and M. Visser, On the viability of regular black holes, JHEP 07 (2018) 023 [arXiv:1805.02675] [INSPIRE].
R. Carballo-Rubio, F. Di Filippo, S. Liberati and M. Visser, Phenomenological aspects of black holes beyond general relativity, Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018) 124009 [arXiv:1809.08238] [INSPIRE].
R. Carballo-Rubio, F. Di Filippo, S. Liberati and M. Visser, Opening the Pandora’s box at the core of black holes, Class. Quant. Grav. 37 (2020) 145005 [arXiv:1908.03261] [INSPIRE].
R. Carballo-Rubio, F. Di Filippo, S. Liberati and M. Visser, Geodesically complete black holes, Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020) 084047 [arXiv:1911.11200] [INSPIRE].
E. Barausse et al., Prospects for fundamental physics with LISA, Gen. Rel. Grav. 52 (2020) 81 [arXiv:2001.09793] [INSPIRE].
A. Zulianello, R. Carballo-Rubio, S. Liberati and S. Ansoldi, Electromagnetic tests of horizonless rotating black hole mimickers, arXiv:2005.01837 [INSPIRE].
C. de Rham and G. Gabadadze, Generalization of the Fierz-Pauli action, Phys. Rev. D 82 (2010) 044020 [arXiv:1007.0443] [INSPIRE].
C. de Rham, G. Gabadadze and A.J. Tolley, Resummation of massive gravity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106 (2011) 231101 [arXiv:1011.1232] [INSPIRE].
V. Baccetti, P. Martín-Moruno and M. Visser, Massive gravity from bimetric gravity, Class. Quant. Grav. 30 (2013) 015004 [arXiv:1205.2158] [INSPIRE].
V. Baccetti, P. Martín-Moruno and M. Visser, Gordon and Kerr-Schild ansatze in massive and bimetric gravity, JHEP 08 (2012) 108 [arXiv:1206.4720] [INSPIRE].
P. Martín-Moruno, V. Baccetti and M. Visser, Massive gravity as a limit of bimetric gravity, in 13th Marcel Grossmann meeting on recent developments in theoretical and experimental general relativity, astrophysics and relativistic field theories, World Scientific, Singapore (2015), pg. 1270 [arXiv:1302.2687] [INSPIRE].
P. Martín-Moruno and M. Visser, Is there vacuum when there is mass? Vacuum and non-vacuum solutions for massive gravity, Class. Quant. Grav. 30 (2013) 155021 [arXiv:1301.2334] [INSPIRE].
M. Visser, Mass for the graviton, Gen. Rel. Grav. 30 (1998) 1717 [gr-qc/9705051] [INSPIRE].
T.P. Sotiriou, M. Visser and S. Weinfurtner, From dispersion relations to spectral dimension — and back again, Phys. Rev. D 84 (2011) 104018 [arXiv:1105.6098] [INSPIRE].
D. Mattingly, Modern tests of Lorentz invariance, Living Rev. Rel. 8 (2005) 5 [gr-qc/0502097] [INSPIRE].
L. Brillouin, Wave propagation and group velocity, Academic Press, New York, NY, U.S.A. (1960) [INSPIRE].
T. Jacobson and D. Mattingly, Gravity with a dynamical preferred frame, Phys. Rev. D 64 (2001) 024028 [gr-qc/0007031] [INSPIRE].
T. Jacobson and D. Mattingly, Einstein-aether waves, Phys. Rev. D 70 (2004) 024003 [gr-qc/0402005] [INSPIRE].
T. Jacobson, Einstein-aether gravity: a status report, PoS(QG-PH)020 (2007) [arXiv:0801.1547] [INSPIRE].
P. Hořava, Quantum gravity at a Lifshitz point, Phys. Rev. D 79 (2009) 084008 [arXiv:0901.3775] [INSPIRE].
P. Hořava, Spectral dimension of the universe in quantum gravity at a Lifshitz point, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102 (2009) 161301 [arXiv:0902.3657] [INSPIRE].
P. Hořava and C.M. Melby-Thompson, General covariance in quantum gravity at a Lifshitz point, Phys. Rev. D 82 (2010) 064027 [arXiv:1007.2410] [INSPIRE].
P. Hořava, General covariance in gravity at a Lifshitz point, Class. Quant. Grav. 28 (2011) 114012 [arXiv:1101.1081] [INSPIRE].
T.P. Sotiriou, M. Visser and S. Weinfurtner, Quantum gravity without Lorentz invariance, JHEP 10 (2009) 033 [arXiv:0905.2798] [INSPIRE].
T.P. Sotiriou, M. Visser and S. Weinfurtner, Phenomenologically viable Lorentz-violating quantum gravity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102 (2009) 251601 [arXiv:0904.4464] [INSPIRE].
S. Weinfurtner, T.P. Sotiriou and M. Visser, Projectable Hořava-Lifshitz gravity in a nutshell, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 222 (2010) 012054 [arXiv:1002.0308] [INSPIRE].
M. Visser, Status of Hořava gravity: a personal perspective, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 314 (2011) 012002 [arXiv:1103.5587] [INSPIRE].
M. Visser, Lorentz symmetry breaking as a quantum field theory regulator, Phys. Rev. D 80 (2009) 025011 [arXiv:0902.0590] [INSPIRE].
M. Visser, Power-counting renormalizability of generalized Hořava gravity, arXiv:0912.4757 [INSPIRE].
S. Fagnocchi, S. Finazzi, S. Liberati, M. Kormos and A. Trombettoni, Relativistic Bose-Einstein condensates: a new system for analogue models of gravity, New J. Phys. 12 (2010) 095012 [arXiv:1001.1044] [INSPIRE].
B. Cropp, S. Liberati, A. Mohd and M. Visser, Ray tracing Einstein-aether black holes: universal versus Killing horizons, Phys. Rev. D 89 (2014) 064061 [arXiv:1312.0405] [INSPIRE].
T. Jacobson, Extended Hořava gravity and Einstein-aether theory, Phys. Rev. D 81 (2010) 101502 [Erratum ibid. 82 (2010) 129901] [arXiv:1001.4823] [INSPIRE].
C. Eling and T. Jacobson, Black holes in Einstein-aether theory, Class. Quant. Grav. 23 (2006) 5643 [Erratum ibid. 27 (2010) 049801] [Erratum ibid. 27 (2010) 049802] [gr-qc/0604088] [INSPIRE].
D. Blas and S. Sibiryakov, Hořava gravity versus thermodynamics: the black hole case, Phys. Rev. D 84 (2011) 124043 [arXiv:1110.2195] [INSPIRE].
E. Barausse, T. Jacobson and T.P. Sotiriou, Black holes in Einstein-aether and Hořava-Lifshitz gravity, Phys. Rev. D 83 (2011) 124043 [arXiv:1104.2889] [INSPIRE].
E. Barausse and T.P. Sotiriou, Slowly rotating black holes in Hořava-Lifshitz gravity, Phys. Rev. D 87 (2013) 087504 [arXiv:1212.1334] [INSPIRE].
S.W. Hawking, The chronology protection conjecture, Phys. Rev. D 46 (1992) 603 [INSPIRE].
S.W. Hawking, The chronology protection conjecture, in Recent developments in theoretical and experimental general relativity, gravitation and relativistic field theories, Kyoto, Japan (1991) [INSPIRE].
S.W. Hawking, Chronology protection: making the world safe for historians, in The future of spacetime, S.W. Hawking et al. eds., (2002), pg. 87 [INSPIRE].
M. Visser, The quantum physics of chronology protection, in Workshop on conference on the future of theoretical physics and cosmology in honor of Steven Hawking’s 60th birthday, (2002), pg. 161 [gr-qc/0204022] [INSPIRE].
M. Visser, From wormhole to time machine: comments on Hawking’s chronology protection conjecture, Phys. Rev. D 47 (1993) 554 [hep-th/9202090] [INSPIRE].
C. Pfeifer and M.N.R. Wohlfarth, Causal structure and electrodynamics on Finsler spacetimes, Phys. Rev. D 84 (2011) 044039 [arXiv:1104.1079] [INSPIRE].
C. Pfeifer, Finsler spacetime geometry in physics, Int. J. Geom. Meth. Mod. Phys. 16 (2019) 1941004 [arXiv:1903.10185] [INSPIRE].
A. Bernal, M.Á. Javaloyes and M. Sánchez, Foundations of Finsler spacetimes from the observers’ viewpoint, Universe 6 (2020) 55 [arXiv:2003.00455] [INSPIRE].
M.A. Javaloyes and M. Sánchez, On the definition and examples of cones and Finsler spacetimes, Rev. Real Acad. Ciencias Exactas Fís. Natur. A 114 (2019) 30 [arXiv:1805.06978] [INSPIRE].
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
ArXiv ePrint: 2005.08533
Rights and permissions
Open Access . This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
About this article
Cite this article
Carballo-Rubio, R., Di Filippo, F., Liberati, S. et al. Causal hierarchy in modified gravity. J. High Energ. Phys. 2020, 55 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP12(2020)055
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP12(2020)055