Abstract
We consider Carroll-invariant limits of Lorentz-invariant field theories. We show that just as in the case of electromagnetism, there are two inequivalent limits, one “electric” and the other “magnetic”. Each can be obtained from the corresponding Lorentz-invariant theory written in Hamiltonian form through the same “contraction” procedure of taking the ultrarelativistic limit c → 0 where c is the speed of light, but with two different consistent rescalings of the canonical variables. This procedure can be applied to general Lorentz-invariant theories (p-form gauge fields, higher spin free theories etc) and has the advantage of providing explicitly an action principle from which the electrically-contracted or magnetically-contracted dynamics follow (and not just the equations of motion). Even though not manifestly so, this Hamiltonian action principle is shown to be Carroll invariant. In the case of p-forms, we construct explicitly an equivalent manifestly Carroll-invariant action principle for each Carroll contraction. While the manifestly covariant variational description of the electric contraction is rather direct, the one for the magnetic contraction is more subtle and involves an additional pure gauge field, whose elimination modifies the Carroll transformations of the fields. We also treat gravity, which constitutes one of the main motivations of our study, and for which we provide the two different contractions in Hamiltonian form.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
J. M. Levy-Leblond, Une nouvelle limite non-relativiste du groupe de Poincaré (in French), Ann. Inst. Henri Poincaré 3 (1965) 1.
H. Bacry and J. Levy-Leblond, Possible kinematics, J. Math. Phys. 9 (1968) 1605 [INSPIRE].
C. J. Isham, Some quantum field theory aspects of the superspace quantization of general relativity, Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A 351 (1976) 209.
C. Teitelboim, Surface deformations, their square root and the signature of space-time, Print-78-1134 (Princeton), published in Austin Group Theor. (1978): 362; contribution to: 7th international group theory colloquium. The integrative conference on group theory and mathematical physics, (1978).
M. Henneaux, Geometry of zero signature space-times, Bull. Soc. Math. Belg. 31 (1979) 47.
C. Duval, G. W. Gibbons and P. A. Horvathy, Conformal Carroll groups and BMS symmetry, Class. Quant. Grav. 31 (2014) 092001 [arXiv:1402.5894] [INSPIRE].
D. Grumiller, W. Merbis and M. Riegler, Most general flat space boundary conditions in three-dimensional Einstein gravity, Class. Quant. Grav. 34 (2017) 184001 [arXiv:1704.07419] [INSPIRE].
L. Ciambelli, C. Marteau, A. C. Petkou, P. M. Petropoulos and K. Siampos, Flat holography and Carrollian fluids, JHEP 07 (2018) 165 [arXiv:1802.06809] [INSPIRE].
A. Bagchi, A. Mehra and P. Nandi, Field theories with conformal Carrollian symmetry, JHEP 05 (2019) 108 [arXiv:1901.10147] [INSPIRE].
L. Donnay and C. Marteau, Carrollian physics at the black hole horizon, Class. Quant. Grav. 36 (2019) 165002 [arXiv:1903.09654] [INSPIRE].
C. Duval, G. W. Gibbons, P. A. Horvathy and P. M. Zhang, Carroll symmetry of plane gravitational waves, Class. Quant. Grav. 34 (2017) 175003 [arXiv:1702.08284] [INSPIRE].
A. Bagchi, S. Chakrabortty, D. Grumiller, B. Radhakrishnan, M. Riegler and A. Sinha, Non-Lorentzian chaos and cosmological holography, arXiv:2106.07649 [INSPIRE].
R. Casalbuoni, J. Gomis and D. Hidalgo, World-line description of fractons, arXiv:2107.09010 [INSPIRE].
F. Peña-Benitez, Fractons, symmetric gauge fields and geometry, arXiv:2107.13884 [INSPIRE].
V. A. Belinsky, I. M. Khalatnikov and E. M. Lifshitz, Oscillatory approach to a singular point in the relativistic cosmology, Adv. Phys. 19 (1970) 525 [INSPIRE].
V. a. Belinsky, I. m. Khalatnikov and E. m. Lifshitz, A general solution of the Einstein equations with a time singularity, Adv. Phys. 31 (1982) 639 [INSPIRE].
M. Henneaux, Quantification hamiltonienne du champ de gravitation: une nouvelle approche (in French), Bull. Cl. Sci. Acad. Belg. 68 (1982) 940.
T. Damour, M. Henneaux and H. Nicolai, Cosmological billiards, Class. Quant. Grav. 20 (2003) R145 [hep-th/0212256] [INSPIRE].
V. Belinski and M. Henneaux, The cosmological singularity, Cambridge Univ. Pr., Cambridge, U.K. (2017) [INSPIRE].
C. Duval, G. W. Gibbons, P. A. Horvathy and P. M. Zhang, Carroll versus Newton and Galilei: two dual non-Einsteinian concepts of time, Class. Quant. Grav. 31 (2014) 085016 [arXiv:1402.0657] [INSPIRE].
M. Le Bellac and J.-M. Lévy-Leblond, Galilean electromagnetism, Nuovo Cim. B 14 (1973) 217.
C. Duval, G. W. Gibbons and P. Horvathy, Celestial mechanics, conformal structures and gravitational waves, Phys. Rev. D 43 (1991) 3907 [hep-th/0512188] [INSPIRE].
P. A. M. Dirac, The conditions for a quantum field theory to be relativistic, Rev. Mod. Phys. 34 (1962) 592.
J. Schwinger, Commutation relations and conservation laws, Phys. Rev. 130 (1963) 406 [INSPIRE].
C. Teitelboim, How commutators of constraints reflect the space-time structure, Annals Phys. 79 (1973) 542 [INSPIRE].
C. Bunster and M. Henneaux, Duality invariance implies Poincaré invariance, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 (2013) 011603 [arXiv:1208.6302] [INSPIRE].
L. Ciambelli, R. G. Leigh, C. Marteau and P. M. Petropoulos, Carroll structures, null geometry and conformal isometries, Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019) 046010 [arXiv:1905.02221] [INSPIRE].
W. O. Vogel, Über lineare Zusammenhänge in singulären Riemannschen Räumen (in German), Arch. Math. 16 (1965) 106
C. Jankiewicz, Sur les espaces riemanniens dégénérés, Bull. Acad. Polon. Sci. Cl. III 2 (1954) 301.
G. Dautcourt, Characteristic hypersurfaces in general relativity. I, J. Math. Phys. 8 (1967) 1492.
G. Dautcourt, On the ultrarelativistic limit of general relativity, Acta Phys. Polon. B 29 (1998) 1047 [gr-qc/9801093] [INSPIRE].
E. Bergshoeff, J. Gomis and G. Longhi, Dynamics of Carroll particles, Class. Quant. Grav. 31 (2014) 205009 [arXiv:1405.2264] [INSPIRE].
L. Baulieu and M. Henneaux, Hamiltonian analysis of gauge theories with interacting p forms, Nucl. Phys. B 277 (1986) 268 [INSPIRE].
C. Fronsdal, Massless fields with integer spin, Phys. Rev. D 18 (1978) 3624 [INSPIRE].
J. Hartong, Gauging the Carroll algebra and ultra-relativistic gravity, JHEP 08 (2015) 069 [arXiv:1505.05011] [INSPIRE].
E. Bergshoeff, J. Gomis, B. Rollier, J. Rosseel and T. ter Veldhuis, Carroll versus Galilei gravity, JHEP 03 (2017) 165 [arXiv:1701.06156] [INSPIRE].
E. Bergshoeff, D. Grumiller, S. Prohazka and J. Rosseel, Three-dimensional spin-3 theories based on general kinematical algebras, JHEP 01 (2017) 114 [arXiv:1612.02277] [INSPIRE].
L. Ravera, AdS Carroll Chern-Simons supergravity in 2 + 1 dimensions and its flat limit, Phys. Lett. B 795 (2019) 331 [arXiv:1905.00766] [INSPIRE].
J. Gomis, A. Kleinschmidt, J. Palmkvist and P. Salgado-ReboLledó, Newton-Hooke/Carrollian expansions of (A)dS and Chern-Simons gravity, JHEP 02 (2020) 009 [arXiv:1912.07564] [INSPIRE].
D. Grumiller, J. Hartong, S. Prohazka and J. Salzer, Limits of JT gravity, JHEP 02 (2021) 134 [arXiv:2011.13870] [INSPIRE].
J. Gomis, D. Hidalgo and P. Salgado-ReboLledó, Non-relativistic and Carrollian limits of Jackiw-Teitelboim gravity, JHEP 05 (2021) 162 [arXiv:2011.15053] [INSPIRE].
P. Concha, D. Peñafiel, L. Ravera and E. Rodríguez, Three-dimensional Maxwellian Carroll gravity theory and the cosmological constant, Phys. Lett. B 823 (2021) 136735 [arXiv:2107.05716] [INSPIRE].
A. Campoleoni and S. Pekar, to be published, (2021).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
ArXiv ePrint: 2109.06708
Rights and permissions
Open Access . This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
About this article
Cite this article
Henneaux, M., Salgado-Rebolledo, P. Carroll contractions of Lorentz-invariant theories. J. High Energ. Phys. 2021, 180 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP11(2021)180
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP11(2021)180