Skip to main content
Log in

Dirac-Born-Infeld-Volkov-Akulov and deformation of supersymmetry

  • Published:
Journal of High Energy Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We deform the action and the supersymmetry transformations of the d = 10 and d = 4 Maxwell supermultiplets so that at each order of the deformation the theory has 16 Maxwell multiplet deformed supersymmetries as well as 16 Volkov-Akulov type non-linear supersymmetries. The result agrees with the expansion in the string tension of the explicit action of the Dirac-Born-Infeld model and its supersymmetries, extracted from D9 and D3 superbranes, respectively. The half-maximal Dirac-Born-Infeld models with 8 Maxwell supermultiplet deformed supersymmetries and 8 Volkov-Akulov type supersymmetries are described by a new class of d = 6 vector branes related to chiral (2,0) supergravity, which we denote as ‘Vp-branes’. We use a space-filling V5 superbrane for the d = 6 model and a V3 superbrane for the d = 4 half-maximal Dirac-Born-Infeld (DBI) models. In this way we present a completion to all orders of the deformation of the Maxwell supermultiplets with maximal 16+16 supersymmetries in d = 10 and 4, and half-maximal 8+8 supersymmetries in d = 6 and 4.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. S. Ferrara, R. Kallosh and A. Van Proeyen, Conjecture on Hidden Superconformal Symmetry of N = 4 Supergravity, Phys. Rev. D 87 (2013) 025004 [arXiv:1209.0418] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. B. de Wit, S. Katmadas and M. van Zalk, New supersymmetric higher-derivative couplings: full N = 2 superspace does not count!, JHEP 01 (2011) 007 [arXiv:1010.2150] [INSPIRE].

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. W. Chemissany, S. Ferrara, R. Kallosh and C. Shahbazi, N = 2 Supergravity Counterterms, Off and On Shell, JHEP 12 (2012) 089 [arXiv:1208.4801] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. E. Bergshoeff, M. Rakowski and E. Sezgin, Higher derivative super Yang-Mills theories, Phys. Lett. B 185 (1987) 371 [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. M. Born and L. Infeld, Foundations of the new field theory, Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A 144 (1934) 425 [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. P.A. Dirac, An Extensible model of the electron, Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A 268 (1962) 57 [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. S. Deser and R. Puzalowski, Supersymmetric nonpolynomial vector multiplets and causal propagation, J. Phys. A 13 (1980) 2501 [INSPIRE].

    MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. S. Cecotti and S. Ferrara, Supersymmetric Born-Infeld lagrangians, Phys. Lett. B 187 (1987) 335 [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. R. Metsaev, M. Rakhmanov and A.A. Tseytlin, The Born-Infeld action as the effective action in the open superstring theory, Phys. Lett. B 193 (1987) 207 [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. J. Bagger and A. Galperin, A New Goldstone multiplet for partially broken supersymmetry, Phys. Rev. D 55 (1997) 1091 [hep-th/9608177] [INSPIRE].

    MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. M. Roček and A.A. Tseytlin, Partial breaking of global D = 4 supersymmetry, constrained superfields and three-brane actions, Phys. Rev. D 59 (1999) 106001 [hep-th/9811232] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. A.A. Tseytlin, Born-Infeld action, supersymmetry and string theory, hep-th/9908105 [INSPIRE].

  13. S.V. Ketov, A Manifestly N = 2 supersymmetric Born-Infeld action, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 14 (1999) 501 [hep-th/9809121] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. S. Bellucci, E. Ivanov and S. Krivonos, N = 2 and N = 4 supersymmetric Born-Infeld theories from nonlinear realizations, Phys. Lett. B 502 (2001) 279 [hep-th/0012236] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. S.V. Ketov, Many faces of Born-Infeld theory, hep-th/0108189 [INSPIRE].

  16. S.M. Kuzenko and S. Theisen, Supersymmetric duality rotations, JHEP 03 (2000) 034 [hep-th/0001068] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. S.M. Kuzenko and S. Theisen, Nonlinear selfduality and supersymmetry, Fortsch. Phys. 49 (2001) 273 [hep-th/0007231] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. S. Bellucci, E. Ivanov and S. Krivonos, Towards the complete N = 2 superfield Born-Infeld action with partially broken N = 4 supersymmetry, Phys. Rev. D 64 (2001) 025014 [hep-th/0101195] [INSPIRE].

    MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. S.F. Kerstan, Supersymmetric Born-Infeld from the D9-brane, Class. Quant. Grav. 19 (2002) 4525 [hep-th/0204225] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. E. Ivanov and B. Zupnik, New representation for Lagrangians of selfdual nonlinear electrodynamics, hep-th/0202203 [INSPIRE].

  21. N. Berkovits and V. Pershin, Supersymmetric Born-Infeld from the pure spinor formalism of the open superstring, JHEP 01 (2003) 023 [hep-th/0205154] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. E. Ivanov and B. Zupnik, New approach to nonlinear electrodynamics: dualities as symmetries of interaction, Phys. Atom. Nucl. 67 (2004) 2188 [hep-th/0303192] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. D.P. Sorokin, Superbranes and superembeddings, Phys. Rept. 329 (2000) 1 [hep-th/9906142] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  24. P. Pasti, D.P. Sorokin and M. Tonin, Superembeddings, partial supersymmetry breaking and superbranes, Nucl. Phys. B 591 (2000) 109 [hep-th/0007048] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  25. J.J.M. Carrasco, R. Kallosh and R. Roiban, Covariant procedures for perturbative non-linear deformation of duality-invariant theories, Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 025007 [arXiv:1108.4390] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  26. W. Chemissany, R. Kallosh and T. Ortín, Born-Infeld with Higher Derivatives, Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 046002 [arXiv:1112.0332] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  27. J. Broedel, J.J.M. Carrasco, S. Ferrara, R. Kallosh and R. Roiban, N = 2 Supersymmetry and U(1)-Duality, Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 125036 [arXiv:1202.0014] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  28. P. Pasti, D. Sorokin and M. Tonin, Covariant actions for models with non-linear twisted self-duality, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 045013 [arXiv:1205.4243] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  29. E. Ivanov and B. Zupnik, Bispinor Auxiliary Fields in Duality-Invariant Electrodynamics Revisited, Phys. Rev. D 87 (2013) 065023 [arXiv:1212.6637] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  30. S.M. Kuzenko, Duality rotations in supersymmetric nonlinear electrodynamics revisited, JHEP 03 (2013) 153 [arXiv:1301.5194] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  31. P. Aschieri and S. Ferrara, Constitutive relations and Schroedingers formulation of nonlinear electromagnetic theories, JHEP 05 (2013) 087 [arXiv:1302.4737] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  32. D. Volkov and V. Akulov, Is the Neutrino a Goldstone Particle?, Phys. Lett. B 46 (1973) 109 [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  33. M. Cederwall, A. von Gussich, B.E. Nilsson and A. Westerberg, The Dirichlet super three-brane in ten-dimensional type IIB supergravity, Nucl. Phys. B 490 (1997) 163 [hep-th/9610148] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  34. M. Cederwall, A. von Gussich, B.E. Nilsson, P. Sundell and A. Westerberg, The Dirichlet super p-branes in ten-dimensional type IIA and IIB supergravity, Nucl. Phys. B 490 (1997) 179 [hep-th/9611159] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  35. E. Bergshoeff and P. Townsend, Super D-branes, Nucl. Phys. B 490 (1997) 145 [hep-th/9611173] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  36. M. Aganagic, C. Popescu and J.H. Schwarz, Gauge invariant and gauge fixed D-brane actions, Nucl. Phys. B 495 (1997) 99 [hep-th/9612080] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  37. E. Bergshoeff, R. Kallosh, T. Ortín and G. Papadopoulos, Kappa symmetry, supersymmetry and intersecting branes, Nucl. Phys. B 502 (1997) 149 [hep-th/9705040] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  38. R. Kallosh, Volkov-Akulov theory and D-branes, hep-th/9705118 [INSPIRE].

  39. E.A. Bergshoeff and F. Riccioni, Heterotic wrapping rules, JHEP 01 (2013) 005 [arXiv:1210.1422] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  40. R. Casalbuoni, S. De Curtis, D. Dominici, F. Feruglio and R. Gatto, Nonlinear realization of supersymmetry algebra from supersymmetric constraint, Phys. Lett. B 220 (1989) 569 [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  41. Z. Komargodski and N. Seiberg, From Linear SUSY to Constrained Superfields, JHEP 09 (2009) 066 [arXiv:0907.2441] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  42. S.M. Kuzenko and S.J. Tyler, On the Goldstino actions and their symmetries, JHEP 05 (2011) 055 [arXiv:1102.3043] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  43. N. Beisert, H. Elvang, D.Z. Freedman, M. Kiermaier, A. Morales and S. Stieberger, E 7(7) constraints on counterterms in N = 8 supergravity, Phys. Lett. B 694 (2010) 265 [arXiv:1009.1643] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  44. L. Brink, J.H. Schwarz and J. Scherk, Supersymmetric Yang-Mills Theories, Nucl. Phys. B 121 (1977) 77 [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  45. F. Gliozzi, J. Scherk and D.I. Olive, Supersymmetry, Supergravity Theories and the Dual Spinor Model, Nucl. Phys. B 122 (1977) 253 [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  46. M. de Roo, Matter Coupling in N = 4 Supergravity, Nucl. Phys. B 255 (1985) 515 [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  47. K. Behrndt, E. Bergshoeff, D. Roest and P. Sundell, Massive dualities in six-dimensions, Class. Quant. Grav. 19 (2002) 2171 [hep-th/0112071] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  48. J.J.M. Carrasco and R. Kallosh, Hidden Supersymmetry May Imply Duality Invariance, arXiv:1303.5663 [INSPIRE].

  49. S.M. Kuzenko and S.A. McCarthy, On the component structure of N = 1 supersymmetric nonlinear electrodynamics, JHEP 05 (2005) 012 [hep-th/0501172] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  50. H. Liu, H. Lüo, M. Luo and L. Wang, Leading Order Actions of Goldstino Fields, Eur. Phys. J. C 71 (2011) 1793 [arXiv:1005.0231] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  51. A. Zheltukhin, On Equivalence of the Komargodski-Seiberg Action to the Volkov-Akulov Action, arXiv:1009.2166 [INSPIRE].

  52. S.M. Kuzenko and S.J. Tyler, Relating the Komargodski-Seiberg and Akulov-Volkov actions: exact nonlinear field redefinition, Phys. Lett. B 698 (2011) 319 [arXiv:1009.3298] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  53. D.Z. Freedman and A. Van Proeyen, Supergravity, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K. (2012).

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Antoine Van Proeyen.

Additional information

ArXiv ePrint: 1303.5662

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bergshoeff, E., Coomans, F., Kallosh, R. et al. Dirac-Born-Infeld-Volkov-Akulov and deformation of supersymmetry. J. High Energ. Phys. 2013, 100 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP08(2013)100

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP08(2013)100

Keywords

Navigation