Skip to main content
Log in

Ectoplasm with an edge

  • Published:
Journal of High Energy Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The construction of supersymmetric invariant actions on a spacetime manifold with a boundary is carried out using the “ectoplasm” formalism for the construction of closed forms in superspace. Non-trivial actions are obtained from the pull-backs to the bosonic bodies of closed but non-exact forms in superspace; finding supersymmetric invariants thus becomes a cohomology problem. For a spacetime with a boundary, the appropriate mathematical language changes to relative cohomology, which we use to give a general formulation of off-shell supersymmetric invariants in the presence of boundaries. We also relate this construction to the superembedding formalism for the construction of brane actions, and we give examples with bulk spacetimes of dimension 3, 4 and 5. The closed superform in the 5D example needs to be constructed as a Chern-Simons type of invariant, obtained from a closed 6-form displaying Weil triviality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. P. Hořava and E. Witten, Heterotic and type-I string dynamics from eleven dimensions, Nucl. Phys. B 460 (1996) 506 [hep-th/9510209] [SPIRES].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. P. Hořava and E. Witten, Eleven-dimensional supergravity on a manifold with boundary, Nucl. Phys. B 475 (1996) 94 [hep-th/9603142] [SPIRES].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. I.G. Moss, Boundary terms for supergravity and heterotic M-theory, Nucl. Phys. B 729 (2005) 179 [hep-th/0403106] [SPIRES].

    ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. I.G. Moss, Higher order terms in an improved heterotic M-theory, JHEP 11 (2008) 067 [arXiv:0810.1662] [SPIRES].

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. A. Lukas, B.A. Ovrut, K.S. Stelle and D. Waldram, The universe as a domain wall, Phys. Rev. D 59 (1999) 086001 [hep-th/9803235] [SPIRES].

    ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. A. Lukas, B.A. Ovrut, K.S. Stelle and D. Waldram, Heterotic M-theory in five dimensions, Nucl. Phys. B 552 (1999) 246 [hep-th/9806051] [SPIRES].

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. L. Randall and R. Sundrum, A large mass hierarchy from a small extra dimension, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83 (1999) 3370 [hep-ph/9905221] [SPIRES].

    Article  MATH  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. L. Randall and R. Sundrum, An alternative to compactification, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83 (1999) 4690 [hep-th/9906064] [SPIRES].

    Article  MATH  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. J. Khoury, B.A. Ovrut, P.J. Steinhardt and N. Turok, The ekpyrotic universe: colliding branes and the origin of the hot big bang, Phys. Rev. D 64 (2001) 123522 [hep-th/0103239] [SPIRES].

    ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. J.-L. Lehners, Ekpyrotic and cyclic cosmology, Phys. Rept. 465 (2008) 223 [arXiv:0806.1245] [SPIRES].

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. T.G. Pugh, E. Sezgin and K.S. Stelle, D = 7/D = 6 heterotic supergravity with gauged R-symmetry, JHEP 02 (2011) 115 [arXiv:1008.0726] [SPIRES].

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. J. Wess and B. Zumino, Supergauge invariant extension of quantum electrodynamics, Nucl. Phys. B 78 (1974) 1 [SPIRES].

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. S. Ferrara and P. van Nieuwenhuizen, Tensor calculus for supergravity, Phys. Lett. B 76 (1978) 404 [SPIRES].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. K.S. Stelle and P.C. West, Tensor calculus for the vector multiplet coupled to supergravity, Phys. Lett. B 77 (1978) 376 [SPIRES].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. S. Ferrara and P. Van Nieuwenhuizen, Structure of supergravity, Phys. Lett. B 78 (1978) 573 [SPIRES].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. K.S. Stelle and P.C. West, Relation between vector andl scalar multiplets and gauge invariance in supergravity, Nucl. Phys. B 145 (1978) 175 [SPIRES].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. D.V. Belyaev, Boundary conditions in the Mirabelli and Peskin model, JHEP 01 (2006) 046 [hep-th/0509171] [SPIRES].

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. D.V. Belyaev, Boundary conditions in supergravity on a manifold with boundary, JHEP 01 (2006) 047 [hep-th/0509172] [SPIRES].

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. D.V. Belyaev and P. van Nieuwenhuizen, Tensor calculus for supergravity on a manifold with boundary, JHEP 02 (2008) 047 [arXiv:0711.2272] [SPIRES].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. D.V. Belyaev and P. van Nieuwenhuizen, Rigid supersymmetry with boundaries, JHEP 04 (2008) 008 [arXiv:0801.2377] [SPIRES].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. D.V. Belyaev and P. van Nieuwenhuizen, Simple D = 4 supergravity with a boundary, JHEP 09 (2008) 069 [arXiv:0806.4723] [SPIRES].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. D. Grumiller and P. van Nieuwenhuizen, Holographic counterterms from local supersymmetry without boundary conditions, Phys. Lett. B 682 (2010) 462 [arXiv:0908.3486] [SPIRES].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. D.V. Belyaev and T.G. Pugh, The supermultiplet of boundary conditions in supergravity, JHEP 10 (2010) 031 [arXiv:1008.1574] [SPIRES].

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. T. Voronov, Geometric integration theory on supermanifolds, Sov. Sci. Rev. C 9 (1992) 1.

    Google Scholar 

  25. S.J. Gates,Jr., Super p-form gauge superfields, Nucl. Phys. B 184 (1981) 381 [SPIRES].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  26. S.J. Gates, Jr., Ectoplasm has no topology: the prelude, hep-th/9709104 [SPIRES].

  27. S.J. Gates Jr., M.T. Grisaru, M.E. Knutt-Wehlau and W. Siegel, Component actions from curved superspace: normal coordinates and ectoplasm, Phys. Lett. B 421 (1998) 203 [hep-th/9711151] [SPIRES].

    ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  28. N. Berkovits and P.S. Howe, The cohomology of superspace, pure spinors and invariant integrals, JHEP 06 (2008) 046 [arXiv:0803.3024] [SPIRES].

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  29. G. Bossard, P.S. Howe and K.S. Stelle, A note on the UV behaviour of maximally supersymmetric Yang-Mills theories, Phys. Lett. B 682 (2009) 137 [arXiv:0908.3883] [SPIRES].

    ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  30. G. Bossard, P.S. Howe and K.S. Stelle, On duality symmetries of supergravity invariants, JHEP 01 (2011) 020 [arXiv:1009.0743] [SPIRES].

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  31. G. Bossard, P.S. Howe, U. Lindström, K.S. Stelle and L. Wulff, Integral invariants in maximally supersymmetric Yang-Mills theories, JHEP 05 (2011) 021 [arXiv:1012.3142] [SPIRES].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  32. B.M. Zupnik and D.G. Pak, Superfield formulation of the simplest three-dimensional gauge theories and conformal supergravities, Theor. Math. Phys. 77 (1988) 1070 [SPIRES].

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  33. B.M. Zupnik and D.G. Pak, Differential and integral forms in supergauge theories and supergravity, Class. Quant. Grav. 6 (1989) 723 [SPIRES].

    Article  MATH  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  34. J. Kalkkinen and K.S. Stelle, Large gauge transformations in M-theory, J. Geom. Phys. 48 (2003) 100 [hep-th/0212081] [SPIRES].

    Article  MATH  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  35. I.A. Bandos, D.P. Sorokin, M. Tonin, P. Pasti and D.V. Volkov, Superstrings and supermembranes in the doubly supersymmetric geometrical approach, Nucl. Phys. B 446 (1995) 79 [hep-th/9501113] [SPIRES].

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  36. P.S. Howe and E. Sezgin, Superbranes, Phys. Lett. B 390 (1997) 133 [hep-th/9607227] [SPIRES].

    ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  37. P.S. Howe, E. Sezgin and P.C. West, Aspects of superembeddings, hep-th/9705093 [SPIRES].

  38. D.P. Sorokin, Superbranes and superembeddings, Phys. Rept. 329 (2000) 1 [hep-th/9906142] [SPIRES].

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  39. I.A. Bandos, D.P. Sorokin and D. Volkov, On the generalized action principle for superstrings and supermembranes, Phys. Lett. B 352 (1995) 269 [hep-th/9502141] [SPIRES].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  40. P.S. Howe, O. Raetzel and E. Sezgin, On brane actions and superembeddings, JHEP 08 (1998) 011 [hep-th/9804051] [SPIRES].

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  41. D.P. Sorokin, V.I. Tkach, D.V. Volkov and A.A. Zheltukhin, From the superparticle Siegel symmetry to the spinning particle proper time supersymmetry, Phys. Lett. B 216 (1989) 302 [SPIRES].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  42. D.P. Sorokin, V.I. Tkach and D.V. Volkov, Superparticles, twistors and Siegel symmetry, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 4 (1989) 901 [SPIRES].

    ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  43. L. Bonora, P. Pasti and M. Tonin, Chiral anomalies in higher dimensional supersymmetric theories, Nucl. Phys. B 286 (1987) 150 [SPIRES].

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  44. C. Albertsson, U. Lindström and M. Zabzine, N = 1 supersymmetric σ-model with boundaries. II, Nucl. Phys. B 678 (2004) 295 [hep-th/0202069] [SPIRES].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  45. C. Albertsson, U. Lindström and M. Zabzine, N = 1 supersymmetric σ-model with boundaries. I, Commun. Math. Phys. 233 (2003) 403 [hep-th/0111161] [SPIRES].

    MATH  ADS  Google Scholar 

  46. D.V. Belyaev, Supersymmetric bulk-brane coupling with odd gauge fields, JHEP 08 (2006) 032 [hep-th/0605282] [SPIRES].

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  47. S. Nevens, A. Sevrin, W. Troost and A. Wijns, Derivative corrections to the Born-Infeld action through β-function calculations in N = 2 boundary superspace, JHEP 08 (2006) 086 [hep-th/0606255] [SPIRES].

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  48. A. Galperin, E. Ivanov, S. Kalitsyn, V. Ogievetsky and E. Sokatchev, Unconstrained N = 2 matter, Yang-Mills and supergravity theories in harmonic superspace, Class. Quant. Grav. 1 (1984) 469 [SPIRES].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  49. P.S. Howe, K.S. Stelle and P.C. West, N = 1 D = 6 harmonic superspace, Class. Quant. Grav. 2 (1985) 815 [SPIRES].

    Article  MATH  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  50. T. Biswas and W. Siegel, N = 2 harmonic superforms, multiplets and actions, JHEP 11 (2001) 004 [hep-th/0105084] [SPIRES].

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  51. J.L. Lehners, P. Smyth and K.S. Stelle, Stability of Hořava-Witten spacetimes, Class. Quant. Grav. 22 (2005) 2589 [hep-th/0501212] [SPIRES].

    Article  MATH  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  52. J.-L. Lehners and K.S. Stelle, D = 5 M-theory radion supermultiplet dynamics, Nucl. Phys. B 661 (2003) 273 [hep-th/0210228] [SPIRES].

    ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to T. G. Pugh.

Additional information

ArXiv ePrint: 1104.4387v1

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Howe, P.S., Pugh, T.G., Stelle, K.S. et al. Ectoplasm with an edge. J. High Energ. Phys. 2011, 81 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP08(2011)081

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP08(2011)081

Keywords

Navigation