Skip to main content
Log in

More benefits of semileptonic rare B decays at low recoil: CP violation

  • Published:
Journal of High Energy Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We present a systematic analysis of the angular distribution of \( \overline B \to {\overline K^*}\left( { \to \overline K \pi } \right){l^{+} }{l^{-} } \) decays with l = e, μ in the low recoil region (i.e. at high dileptonin variant masses of the order of the mass of the b-quark) to account model-independently for CP violation beyond the Standard Model, working to next-to-leading order QCD. From the employed heavy quark effective theory framework we identify the key CP observables with reduced hadronic uncertainties. Since some of the CP asymmetries are CP-odd they can be measured without B -flavour tagging. This is particularly beneficial for \( {\overline B_s},{B_s} \to \phi \left( { \to {K^{+} }{K^{-} }} \right){l^{+} }{l^{-} } \) decays, which are not self-tagging, and we work out the corresponding time-integrated CP asymmetries. Presently available experimental constraints allow the proposed CP asymmetries to be sizeable, up to values of the order ~ 0.2, while the corresponding Standard Model values receive a strong parametric suppression at the level of \( \mathcal{O}\left( {{{10}^{ - 4}}} \right) \). Furthermore, we work out the allowed ranges of the short-distance (Wilson) coefficients \( {\mathcal{C}_{9,10}} \) in the presence of CP violation beyond the Standard Model but no further Dirac structures. We find the \( {\overline B_s} \to {\mu^{+} }{\mu^{-} } \) branching ratio to be below 10 × 10−9 (at 95% CL). Possibilities to check the performance of the theoretical low recoil framework are pointed out.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. F. Krüger, L.M. Sehgal, N. Sinha and R. Sinha, Angular distribution and CP asymmetries in the decays \( \overline B \to {K^{-} }{\pi^{+} }{e^{-} }{e^{+} } \) and \( \overline B \to {\pi^{-} }{\pi^{+} }{e^{-} }{e^{+} } \), Phys. Rev. D 61 (2000) 114028 [Erratum ibid D 63 (2001) 019901] [hep-ph/9907386] [SPIRES].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. M. Beneke, T. Feldmann and D. Seidel, Systematic approach to exclusive BV+ ,Vγ decays, Nucl. Phys. B 612 (2001) 25 [hep-ph/0106067] [SPIRES].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. M. Beneke, T. Feldmann and D. Seidel, Exclusive radiative and electroweak bd and bs penguin decays at NLO, Eur. Phys. J. C 41 (2005) 173 [hep-ph/0412400] [SPIRES].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. C. Bobeth, G. Hiller and G. Piranishvili, CP Asymmetries in \( \overline B \to {\overline K^*}\left( { \to \overline K \pi } \right)\overline \ell \ell \) Untagged \( {\overline B_s},{B_s} \to \phi \left( { \to {K^{+} }{K^{-} }} \right)\overline \ell \ell \) Decays at NLO, JHEP 07 (2008) 106 [arXiv:0805.2525] [SPIRES].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. U. Egede, T. Hurth, J. Matias, M. Ramon and W. Reece, New observables in the decay mode \( \overline B \to {\overline K^{*0}}{\ell^{+} }{\ell^{-} } \), JHEP 11 (2008) 032 [arXiv:0807.2589] [SPIRES].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. W. Altmannshofer et al., Symmetries and Asymmetries of B → K μ+μ Decays in the Standard Model and Beyond, JHEP 01 (2009) 019 [arXiv:0811.1214] [SPIRES].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. C. Bobeth, G. Hiller and G. Piranishvili, Theoretical Status of Rare B Decays with Muons, PoS(BEAUTY 2009)047 [arXiv:0911.4054] [SPIRES].

  8. U. Egede, T. Hurth, J. Matias, M. Ramon and W. Reece, New physics reach of the decay mode \( \overline B \to {\overline K^{*0}}{\ell^{+} }{\ell^{-} } \), JHEP 10 (2010) 056 [arXiv:1005.0571] [SPIRES].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. A. Khodjamirian, T. Mannel, A.A. Pivovarov and Y.M. Wang, Charm-loop effect in BK (*)+- and BK *γ, JHEP 09 (2010) 089 [arXiv:1006.4945] [SPIRES].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. B. Grinstein and D. Pirjol, Precise |V(ub)| determination from exclusive B decays: Controlling the long-distance effects, Phys. Rev. D 70 (2004) 114005 [hep-ph/0404250] [SPIRES].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. M. Beylich, G. Buchalla and T. Feldmann, Theory of B → K (∗)+- decays at high q 2 : OPE and quark-hadron duality, Eur. Phys. J. C 71 (2011) 1635 [arXiv:1101.5118] [SPIRES].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. B. Grinstein and D. Pirjol, Symmetry-breaking corrections to heavy meson form-factor relations, Phys. Lett. B 533 (2002) 8 [hep-ph/0201298] [SPIRES].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. J.L. Hewett, et al., The Discovery potential of a Super B Factory, proceedings of SLAC Workshops, Stanford U.S.A. (2003), hep-ph/0503261 [SPIRES].

  14. C. Bobeth, G. Hiller and D. van Dyk, The Benefits of B → K +- Decays at Low Recoil, JHEP 07 (2010) 098 [arXiv:1006. 013] [SPIRES].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. CKMfitter Group collaboration, J. Charles et al., CP violation and the CKM matrix: Assessing the impact of the asymmetric B factories, Eur. Phys. J. C 41 (2005) 1 [hep-ph/0406184] [SPIRES]. We use the numerical results as presented at ICHEP2010, Paris France, July 22–28, 2010.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. F. Krüger and L.M. Sehgal, Lepton Polarization in the Decays BX s μ+μ and BX s τ+τ, Phys. Lett. B 380 (1996) 199 [hep-ph/9603237] [SPIRES].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. Particle Data Group collaboration, K. Nakamura et al., Review of particle physics, J. Phys. G 37 (2010) 075021 [SPIRES].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. A. Ali, P. Ball, L.T. Handoko and G. Hiller, A Comparative study of the decays B → (K,K )ℓ+- in standard model and supersymmetric theories, Phys. Rev. D 61 (2000) 074024 [hep-ph/9910221] [SPIRES].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. G. Buchalla, G. Hiller and G. Isidori, Phenomenology of nonstandard Z couplings in exclusive semileptonic bs transitions, Phys. Rev. D 63 (2000) 014015 [hep-ph/0006136] [SPIRES].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. F. Krüger and E. Lunghi, Looking for novel CP-violating effects in \( \overline B \to {K^*}{\ell^{+} }{\ell^{-} } \), Phys. Rev. D 63 (2001) 014013 [hep-ph/0008210] [SPIRES].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. A.K. Alok et al., New Physics in b → sμ+μ : CP-Violating Observables, arXiv:1103.5344 [SPIRES].

  22. R. Fleischer and I. Dunietz, CP violation and CKM phases from angular distributions for B s decays into admixtures of CP eigenstates, Phys. Rev. D 55 (1997) 259 [hep-ph/9605220] [SPIRES].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. Heavy Flavor Averaging Group collaboration, E. Barberio et al., Averages of b − hadron and c − hadron Properties at the End of 2007, arXiv:0808.1297 [SPIRES], online from March 2010 http://www.slac.stanford.edu/xorg/hfag.

  24. M. Misiak et al., The first estimate of \( B\left( {\overline B \to {X_s}\gamma } \right) \) at O s 2), Phys. Rev. Lett. 98 (2007) 022002 [hep-ph/0609232] [SPIRES].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  25. T. Becher and M. Neubert, Analysis of \( B\left( {\overline B \to {X_s}\gamma } \right) \) at NNLO with a cut on photon energy, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98 (2007) 022003 [hep-ph/0610067] [SPIRES].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  26. D. van Dyk et al., online: http://project.het.physik.tu-dortmund.de/source/eos/tag/lowrecoil-cp.

  27. HPQCD collaboration, E. Gamiz, C.T.H. Davies, G.P. Lepage, J. Shigemitsu and M. Wingate, Neutral B Meson Mixing in Unquenched Lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. D 80 (2009) 014503 [arXiv:0902.1815] [SPIRES].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  28. Fermilab Lattice and MILC collaborations, J. Simone et al., T he decay constants f (D/s),f (D +),f (B/s) and f (B) from lattice QCD, PoS(Lattice 2010)317 [SPIRES].

  29. M. Palutan, Rare decays results and prospects with LHCb, on behalf of the LHCb collaboration at BEAUTY 2011, 13th International Conference on B-Physics at Hadron Machines, Amsterdam The Netherlands, April 4th–8th, 2011.

  30. BABAR collaboration, B. Aubert et al., Direct CP, Lepton Flavor and Isospin Asymmetries in the Decays BK (∗)+-, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102 (2009) 091803 [arXiv:0807.4119] [SPIRES].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  31. BELLE collaboration, J.T. Wei et al., Measurement of the Differential Branching Fraction and Forward-Backword Asymmetry for BK (∗)+-, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103 (2009) 171801 [arXiv:0904.0770] [SPIRES].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  32. CDF collaboration, T. Aaltonen et al., Measurement of the Forward-Backward Asymmetry in the BK (∗)μ+μ Decay and First Observation of the B s 0 → φμ+μ Decay, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106 (2011) 161801 [arXiv:1101.1028] [SPIRES].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  33. D. Seidel, Analytic two-loop virtual corrections to bd+-, Phys. Rev. D 70 (2004) 094038 [hep-ph/0403185] [SPIRES].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gudrun Hiller.

Additional information

ArXiv ePrint:1105.0376

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bobeth, C., Hiller, G. & van Dyk, D. More benefits of semileptonic rare B decays at low recoil: CP violation. J. High Energ. Phys. 2011, 67 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP07(2011)067

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP07(2011)067

Keywords

Navigation