Skip to main content
Log in

Comments on supercurrent multiplets, supersymmetric field theories and supergravity

  • Published:
Journal of High Energy Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We analyze various supersymmetry multiplets containing the supercurrent and the energy-momentum tensor. The most widely known such multiplet, the Ferrara-Zumino (FZ) multiplet, is not always well-defined. This can happen once Fayet-Iliopoulos (FI) terms are present or when the Kähler form of the target space is not exact. We present a new multiplet \( {\mathcal{S}_{\alpha \dot{\alpha }}} \) which always exists. This understanding of the supersymmetry current allows us to obtain new results about the possible IR behavior of supersymmetric theories. Next, we discuss the coupling of rigid supersymmetric theories to supergravity. When the theory has an FZ-multiplet or it has a global R-symmetry the standard formalism can be used. But when this is not the case such simple gauging is impossible. Then, we must gauge the current \( {\mathcal{S}_{\alpha \dot{\alpha }}} \). The resulting theory has, in addition to the graviton and the gravitino, another massless chiral superfield Φ which is essential for the consistency of the theory. Some of the moduli of various string models play the role of Φ. Our general considerations, which are based on the consistency of supergravity, show that such moduli cannot be easily lifted thus leading to constraints on gravity/string models.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. S. Ferrara and B. Zumino, Transformation properties of the supercurrent, Nucl. Phys. B 87 (1975) 207 [SPIRES].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. J. Wess and J. Bagger, Supersymmetry and supergravity, Princeton University Press, Princeton U.S.A. (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  3. S.J. Gates, M.T. Grisaru, M. Roček and W. Siegel, Superspace, or one thousand and one lessons in supersymmetry, Front. Phys. 58 (1983) 1 [hep-th/0108200] [SPIRES].

    Google Scholar 

  4. Z. Komargodski and N. Seiberg, Comments on the Fayet-Iliopoulos term in field theory and supergravity, JHEP 06 (2009) 007 [arXiv:0904.1159] [SPIRES].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. T.E. Clark, O. Piguet and K. Sibold, Supercurrents, renormalization and anomalies, Nucl. Phys. B 143 (1978) 445 [SPIRES].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. K.S. Stelle and P.C. West, Minimal auxiliary fields for supergravity, Phys. Lett. B 74 (1978) 330 [SPIRES].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. S. Ferrara and P. van Nieuwenhuizen, The auxiliary fields of supergravity, Phys. Lett. B 74 (1978) 333 [SPIRES].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. E.S. Fradkin and M.A. Vasiliev, S matrix for theories that admit closure of the algebra with the aid of auxiliary fields: the auxiliary fields in supergravity, Nuovo Cim. Lett. 22 (1978) 651 [SPIRES].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. V.P. Akulov, D.V. Volkov and V.A. Soroka, On the general covariant theory of calibrating poles in superspace, Theor. Math. Phys. 31 (1977) 285 [Teor. Mat. Fiz. 31 (1977) 12] [SPIRES].

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. M.F. Sohnius and P.C. West, An alternative minimal off-shell version of N = 1 supergravity, Phys. Lett. B 105 (1981) 353 [SPIRES].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. D.Z. Freedman, Supergravity with axial gauge invariance, Phys. Rev. D 15 (1977) 1173 [SPIRES].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. R. Barbieri, S. Ferrara, D.V. Nanopoulos and K.S. Stelle, Supergravity, R invariance and spontaneous supersymmetry breaking, Phys. Lett. B 113 (1982) 219 [SPIRES].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. R. Kallosh, L. Kofman, A.D. Linde and A. Van Proeyen, Superconformal symmetry, supergravity and cosmology, Class. Quant. Grav. 17 (2000) 4269 [Erratum ibid. 21 (2004) 5017] [hep-th/0006179] [SPIRES].

    Article  MATH  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. G. Dvali, R. Kallosh and A. Van Proeyen, D-term strings, JHEP 01 (2004) 035 [hep-th/0312005] [SPIRES].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. K.R. Dienes and B. Thomas, On the inconsistency of Fayet-Iliopoulos terms in supergravity theories, Phys. Rev. D 81 (2010) 065023 [arXiv:0911.0677] [SPIRES].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. S.M. Kuzenko, The Fayet-Iliopoulos term and nonlinear self-duality, Phys. Rev. D 81 (2010) 085036 [arXiv:0911.5190] [SPIRES].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. S. Ferrara, L. Girardello, T. Kugo and A. Van Proeyen, Relation between different auxiliary field formulations of N = 1 supergravity coupled to matter, Nucl. Phys. B 223 (1983) 191 [SPIRES].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. G. Girardi, R. Grimm, M. Muller and J. Wess, Antisymmetric tensor gauge potential in curved superspace and a (16 + 16) supergravity multiplet, Phys. Lett. B 147 (1984) 81 [SPIRES].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. W. Lang, J. Louis and B.A. Ovrut, (16 + 16) supergravity coupled to matter: the low-energy limit of the superstring, Phys. Lett. B 158 (1985) 40 [SPIRES].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. W. Siegel, 16/16 supergravity, Class. Quant. Grav. 3 (1986) L47 [SPIRES].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. E. Witten and J. Bagger, Quantization of Newton’s constant in certain supergravity theories, Phys. Lett. B 115 (1982) 202 [SPIRES].

    MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. M. Rocek, private communication.

  23. I. Affleck, M. Dine and N. Seiberg, Dynamical supersymmetry breaking in chiral theories, Phys. Lett. B 137 (1984) 187 [SPIRES].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  24. N. Seiberg, Exact results on the space of vacua of four-dimensional SUSY gauge theories, Phys. Rev. D 49 (1994) 6857 [hep-th/9402044] [SPIRES].

    MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  25. M. Dine, Supersymmetry phenomenology (with a broad brush), in Fields, strings and duality, TASI 1996, C. Efthimiou and B. Greene eds., World Scientific, Singapore (1997) [hep-ph/9612389] [SPIRES].

    Google Scholar 

  26. S. Weinberg, Non-renormalization theorems in non-renormalizable theories, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80 (1998) 3702 [hep-th/9803099] [SPIRES].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  27. N. Seiberg, Naturalness versus supersymmetric non-renormalization theorems, Phys. Lett. B 318 (1993) 469 [hep-ph/9309335] [SPIRES].

    MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  28. M.A. Shifman and A.I. Vainshtein, Solution of the anomaly puzzle in SUSY gauge theories and the Wilson operator expansion, Nucl. Phys. B 277 (1986) 456 [Sov. Phys. JETP 64 (1986) 428] [Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 91 (1986) 723] [SPIRES].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  29. Z. Komargodski and N. Seiberg, to appear.

  30. E. Witten, unpublished.

  31. D. Nemeschansky and A. Sen, Conformal invariance of supersymmetric σ-models on Calabi-Yau manifolds, Phys. Lett. B 178 (1986) 365 [SPIRES].

    MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  32. S. Weinberg, The quantum theory of fields. Volume 3: supersymmetry, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge U.K. (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  33. S. Ferrara and B. Zumino, Structure of conformal supergravity, Nucl. Phys. B 134 (1978) 301 [SPIRES].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  34. S.J. Gates Jr. and W. Siegel, Variant superfield representations, Nucl. Phys. B 187 (1981) 389 [SPIRES].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  35. M. Dine, N. Seiberg and E. Witten, Fayet-Iliopoulos terms in string theory, Nucl. Phys. B 289 (1987) 589 [SPIRES].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  36. N. Seiberg, Modifying the sum over topological sectors and constraints on supergravity, arXiv:1005.0002 [SPIRES].

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zohar Komargodski.

Additional information

ArXiv ePrint: 1002.2228

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Komargodski, Z., Seiberg, N. Comments on supercurrent multiplets, supersymmetric field theories and supergravity. J. High Energ. Phys. 2010, 17 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP07(2010)017

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP07(2010)017

Keywords

Navigation