Abstract
We construct a model of quantum gravity in which dimension, topology and geometry of spacetime are dynamical. The microscopic degree of freedom is a real rectangular matrix whose rows label internal flavours, and columns label spatial sites. In the limit that the size of the matrix is large, the sites can collectively form a spatial manifold. The manifold is determined from the pattern of entanglement present across local Hilbert spaces associated with column vectors of the matrix. With no structure of manifold fixed in the background, the spacetime gauge symmetry is generalized to a group that includes diffeomorphism in arbitrary dimensions. The momentum and Hamiltonian that generate the generalized diffeomorphism obey a first-class constraint algebra at the quantum level. In the classical limit, the constraint algebra of the general relativity is reproduced as a special case. The first-class nature of the algebra allows one to express the projection of a quantum state of the matrix to a gauge invariant state as a path integration of dynamical variables that describe collective fluctuations of the matrix. The collective variables describe dynamics of emergent spacetime, where multi-fingered times arise as Lagrangian multipliers that enforce the gauge constraints. If the quantum state has a local structure of entanglement, a smooth spacetime with well-defined dimension, topology, signature and geometry emerges at the saddle-point, and the spin two mode that determines the geometry can be identified. We find a saddle-point solution that describes a series of (3 + 1)-dimensional de Sitter-like spacetimes with the Lorentzian signature bridged by Euclidean spaces in between. The phase transitions between spacetimes with different signatures are caused by Lifshitz transitions in which the pattern of entanglement is rearranged across the system. Fluctuations of the collective variables are described by bi-local fields that propagate in the spacetime set up by the saddle-point solution.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
A. Einstein, Die Grundlage der allgemeinen Relativit¨atstheorie, Ann. Phys. 49 (1916) 769.
B.S. DeWitt, Quantum Theory of Gravity. 1. The Canonical Theory, Phys. Rev. 160 (1967) 1113 [INSPIRE].
T. Regge, General relativity without coordinates, Nuovo Cim. 19 (1961) 558.
S. Weinberg, Ultraviolet divergences in quantum theories of gravitation, in General Relativity: An Einstein Centenary Survey, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge U.K. (1980), pg. 790.
A. Ashtekar, New Variables for Classical and Quantum Gravity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 57 (1986) 2244 [INSPIRE].
P. Horava, Quantum Gravity at a Lifshitz Point, Phys. Rev. D 79 (2009) 084008 [arXiv:0901.3775] [INSPIRE].
P. Di Francesco, P.H. Ginsparg and J. Zinn-Justin, 2 − D Gravity and random matrices, Phys. Rept. 254 (1995) 1 [hep-th/9306153] [INSPIRE].
J.M. Maldacena, The Large N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 38 (1999) 1113 [hep-th/9711200] [INSPIRE].
E. Witten, Anti-de Sitter space and holography, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2 (1998) 253 [hep-th/9802150] [INSPIRE].
S.S. Gubser, I.R. Klebanov and A.M. Polyakov, Gauge theory correlators from noncritical string theory, Phys. Lett. B 428 (1998) 105 [hep-th/9802109] [INSPIRE].
T. Banks, W. Fischler, S.H. Shenker and L. Susskind, M theory as a matrix model: A Conjecture, Phys. Rev. D 55 (1997) 5112 [hep-th/9610043] [INSPIRE].
J. Polchinski, String Theory, Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge U.K. (1998).
D. Oriti, The microscopic dynamics of quantum space as a group field theory, in Proceedings of Foundations of Space and Time: Reflections on Quantum Gravity Cape Town South Africa (2011), pg. 257 [arXiv:1110.5606] [INSPIRE].
C. Rovelli and F. Vidotto, Covariant Loop Quantum Gravity, Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge U.K. (2014) [ISBN:9781107069626].
S. Carlip, Quantum gravity: A Progress report, Rept. Prog. Phys. 64 (2001) 885 [gr-qc/0108040] [INSPIRE].
H. Hamber, Quantum Gravitation: The Feynman Path Integral Approach, Springer, Berlin Germany (2009) [ISBN:978-3-540-85292-6].
R. Loll, Quantum Gravity from Causal Dynamical Triangulations: A Review, Class. Quant. Grav. 37 (2020) 013002 [arXiv:1905.08669] [INSPIRE].
G. ’t Hooft and M. Veltman, One-loop divergencies in the theory of gravitation, Ann. Henri Poincaré A 20 (1974) 69.
M.H. Goroff and A. Sagnotti, The Ultraviolet Behavior of Einstein Gravity, Nucl. Phys. B 266 (1986) 709 [INSPIRE].
N. Seiberg, Emergent spacetime, in The Quantum Structure of Space and Time: Proceedings of the 23rd Solvay Conference on Physics, Brussels Belgium (2005), pg. 163 [hep-th/0601234] [INSPIRE].
E.H. Wichmann and J.H. Crichton, Cluster Decomposition Properties of the S Matrix, Phys. Rev. 132 (1963) 2788 [INSPIRE].
D. Marolf, Emergent Gravity Requires Kinematic Nonlocality, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114 (2015) 031104 [arXiv:1409.2509] [INSPIRE].
J.F. Donoghue, Introduction to the effective field theory description of gravity, in Advanced School on Effective Theories, Almunecar Spain (1995) [gr-qc/9512024] [INSPIRE].
C.P. Burgess, Quantum gravity in everyday life: General relativity as an effective field theory, Living Rev. Rel. 7 (2004) 5 [gr-qc/0311082] [INSPIRE].
S.-S. Lee, Emergent gravity from relatively local Hamiltonians and a possible resolution of the black hole information puzzle, JHEP 10 (2018) 043 [arXiv:1803.00556] [INSPIRE].
S. Ryu and T. Takayanagi, Holographic derivation of entanglement entropy from AdS/CFT, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 (2006) 181602 [hep-th/0603001] [INSPIRE].
V.E. Hubeny, M. Rangamani and T. Takayanagi, A Covariant holographic entanglement entropy proposal, JHEP 07 (2007) 062 [arXiv:0705.0016] [INSPIRE].
M. Van Raamsdonk, Building up spacetime with quantum entanglement, Gen. Rel. Grav. 42 (2010) 2323 [arXiv:1005.3035] [INSPIRE].
H. Casini, M. Huerta and R.C. Myers, Towards a derivation of holographic entanglement entropy, JHEP 05 (2011) 036 [arXiv:1102.0440] [INSPIRE].
A. Lewkowycz and J. Maldacena, Generalized gravitational entropy, JHEP 08 (2013) 090 [arXiv:1304.4926] [INSPIRE].
J. Maldacena and L. Susskind, Cool horizons for entangled black holes, Fortsch. Phys. 61 (2013) 781 [arXiv:1306.0533] [INSPIRE].
T. Jacobson, Thermodynamics of space-time: The Einstein equation of state, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75 (1995) 1260 [gr-qc/9504004] [INSPIRE].
C. Cao, S.M. Carroll and S. Michalakis, Space from Hilbert Space: Recovering Geometry from Bulk Entanglement, Phys. Rev. D 95 (2017) 024031 [arXiv:1606.08444] [INSPIRE].
S.-S. Lee, State dependent spread of entanglement in relatively local Hamiltonians, JHEP 05 (2019) 215 [arXiv:1811.07241] [INSPIRE].
A. Chodos, Dynamical lattice theory, Phys. Rev. D 18 (1978) 3833 [INSPIRE].
T. Konopka, F. Markopoulou and S. Severini, Quantum Graphity: A Model of emergent locality, Phys. Rev. D 77 (2008) 104029 [arXiv:0801.0861] [INSPIRE].
T. Konopka, F. Markopoulou and L. Smolin, Quantum Graphity, hep-th/0611197 [INSPIRE].
T. Banks and W. Fischler, The holographic spacetime model of cosmology, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 27 (2018) 1846005 [arXiv:1806.01749] [INSPIRE].
S.-S. Lee, Horizon as critical phenomenon, JHEP 09 (2016) 044 [arXiv:1603.08509] [INSPIRE].
R.L. Arnowitt, S. Deser and C.W. Misner, Dynamical Structure and Definition of Energy in General Relativity, Phys. Rev. 116 (1959) 1322 [INSPIRE].
C. Teitelboim, How commutators of constraints reflect the space-time structure, Annals Phys. 79 (1973) 542 [INSPIRE].
M. Henneaux, A. Kleinschmidt and G. Lucena Gómez, A dynamical inconsistency of Horava gravity, Phys. Rev. D 81 (2010) 064002 [arXiv:0912.0399] [INSPIRE].
H. Weyl, Gravitation and electricity, Sitzungsber. Preuss. Akad. Wiss. Berlin (Math. Phys.) 1918 (1918) 465.
G. Amelino-Camelia, L. Freidel, J. Kowalski-Glikman and L. Smolin, The principle of relative locality, Phys. Rev. D 84 (2011) 084010 [arXiv:1101.0931] [INSPIRE].
P.A.M. Dirac, Generalized Hamiltonian dynamics, Can. J. Math. 2 (1950) 129 [INSPIRE].
C.J. Isham, Canonical quantum gravity and the problem of time, gr-qc/9210011 [INSPIRE].
K.V. Kuchar, Time and interpretations of quantum gravity, in 4th Canadian Conference on General Relativity and Relativistic Astrophysics, G. Kunstatter, D.E. Vincent and J.G. Williams eds., Winnipeg Canada (1992), pg. 211.
J.B. Hartle and S.W. Hawking, Wave Function of the Universe, Phys. Rev. D 28 (1983) 2960 [INSPIRE].
S.-S. Lee, Quantum renormalization group and holography, JHEP 01 (2014) 076 [arXiv:1305.3908] [INSPIRE].
E. Witten, Multitrace operators, boundary conditions and AdS/CFT correspondence, hep-th/0112258 [INSPIRE].
P. Lunts, S. Bhattacharjee, J. Miller, E. Schnetter, Y.B. Kim and S.-S. Lee, Ab initio holography, JHEP 08 (2015) 107 [arXiv:1503.06474] [INSPIRE].
A. Strominger, The dS/CFT correspondence, JHEP 10 (2001) 034 [hep-th/0106113] [INSPIRE].
S.R. Das and A. Jevicki, Large N collective fields and holography, Phys. Rev. D 68 (2003) 044011 [hep-th/0304093] [INSPIRE].
R. de Mello Koch, A. Jevicki, K. Jin and J.P. Rodrigues, AdS4 /CFT3 Construction from Collective Fields, Phys. Rev. D 83 (2011) 025006 [arXiv:1008.0633] [INSPIRE].
D. Marolf, Emergent Gravity Requires Kinematic Nonlocality, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114 (2015) 031104 [arXiv:1409.2509] [INSPIRE].
C. Hull, Timelike T-duality, de Sitter space, large N gauge theories and topological field theory, JHEP 07 (1998) 021 [hep-th/9806146] [INSPIRE].
R. Bousso, Holography in general space-times, JHEP 06 (1999) 028 [hep-th/9906022] [INSPIRE].
J.M. Isidro, Integrability, Seiberg-Witten models and Picard-Fuchs equations, JHEP 01 (2001) 043 [hep-th/0011253] [INSPIRE].
S. Nojiri and S.D. Odintsov, Conformal anomaly from dS/CFT correspondence, Phys. Lett. B 519 (2001) 145 [hep-th/0106191] [INSPIRE].
E. Abdalla, B. Wang, A. Lima-Santos and W.G. Qiu, Support of dS/CFT correspondence from perturbations of three-dimensional space-time, Phys. Lett. B 538 (2002) 435 [hep-th/0204030] [INSPIRE].
D. Anninos, T. Hartman and A. Strominger, Higher Spin Realization of the dS/CFT Correspondence, Class. Quant. Grav. 34 (2017) 015009 [arXiv:1108.5735] [INSPIRE].
J. Polchinski, Renormalization and Effective Lagrangians, Nucl. Phys. B 231 (1984) 269 [INSPIRE].
C. Rovelli, Partial observables, Phys. Rev. D 65 (2002) 124013 [gr-qc/0110035] [INSPIRE].
B. Dittrich, Partial and complete observables for Hamiltonian constrained systems, Gen. Rel. Grav. 39 (2007) 1891 [gr-qc/0411013] [INSPIRE].
I.R. Klebanov and A.M. Polyakov, AdS dual of the critical O(N) vector model, Phys. Lett. B 550 (2002) 213 [hep-th/0210114] [INSPIRE].
M.R. Douglas, L. Mazzucato and S.S. Razamat, Holographic dual of free field theory, Phys. Rev. D 83 (2011) 071701 [arXiv:1011.4926] [INSPIRE].
L.A. Pando Zayas and C. Peng, Toward a Higher-Spin Dual of Interacting Field Theories, JHEP 10 (2013) 023 [arXiv:1303.6641] [INSPIRE].
R.G. Leigh, O. Parrikar and A.B. Weiss, Holographic geometry of the renormalization group and higher spin symmetries, Phys. Rev. D 89 (2014) 106012 [arXiv:1402.1430] [INSPIRE].
R.G. Leigh, O. Parrikar and A.B. Weiss, Exact renormalization group and higher-spin holography, Phys. Rev. D 91 (2015) 026002 [arXiv:1407.4574] [INSPIRE].
E. Mintun and J. Polchinski, Higher Spin Holography, RG and the Light Cone, arXiv:1411.3151 [INSPIRE].
M.A. Vasiliev, Higher spin gauge theories in four-dimensions, three-dimensions and two-dimensions, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 5 (1996) 763 [hep-th/9611024] [INSPIRE].
M.A. Vasiliev, Higher spin gauge theories: Star product and AdS space, hep-th/9910096 [INSPIRE].
S. Giombi and X. Yin, Higher Spin Gauge Theory and Holography: The Three-Point Functions, JHEP 09 (2010) 115 [arXiv:0912.3462] [INSPIRE].
M.A. Vasiliev, Nonlinear equations for symmetric massless higher spin fields in (A)dS(d), Phys. Lett. B 567 (2003) 139 [hep-th/0304049] [INSPIRE].
J. Maldacena and A. Zhiboedov, Constraining Conformal Field Theories with A Higher Spin Symmetry, J. Phys. A 46 (2013) 214011 [arXiv:1112.1016] [INSPIRE].
J. Maldacena and A. Zhiboedov, Constraining conformal field theories with a slightly broken higher spin symmetry, Class. Quant. Grav. 30 (2013) 104003 [arXiv:1204.3882] [INSPIRE].
I. Sachs, Higher spin versus renormalization group equations, Phys. Rev. D 90 (2014) 085003 [arXiv:1306.6654] [INSPIRE].
J. Ambjørn, B. Durhuus and T. Jónsson, Three-dimensional simplicial quantum gravity and generalized matrix models, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 06 (1991) 1133.
N. Sasakura, Tensor model for gravity and orientability of manifold, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 06 (1991) 2613.
M. Gross, Tensor models and simplicial quantum gravity in > 2 − D, Nucl. Phys. Proc. Suppl. 25 (1992) 144.
R. Gurau, Colored Group Field Theory, Commun. Math. Phys. 304 (2011) 69 [arXiv:0907.2582] [INSPIRE].
X.-L. Qi, Exact holographic mapping and emergent space-time geometry, arXiv:1309.6282 [INSPIRE].
J. Maldacena, Non-gaussian features of primordial fluctuations in single field inflationary models, JHEP 05 (2003) 013 [astro-ph/0210603] [INSPIRE].
Open Access
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
ArXiv ePrint: 1912.12291
Rights and permissions
This article is published under an open access license. Please check the 'Copyright Information' section either on this page or in the PDF for details of this license and what re-use is permitted. If your intended use exceeds what is permitted by the license or if you are unable to locate the licence and re-use information, please contact the Rights and Permissions team.
About this article
Cite this article
Lee, SS. A model of quantum gravity with emergent spacetime. J. High Energ. Phys. 2020, 70 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP06(2020)070
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP06(2020)070