Abstract
The string theory swampland proposes that there is no UV-completion for an effective field theory with an exact (metastable) de Sitter vacua, thereby ruling out standard ΛCDM cosmology if the conjecture is taken seriously. The swampland criteria have also been shown to be in sharp tension with quintessence models under current and forthcoming observational bounds. As a logical next step, we introduce higher derivative self-interactions in the low-energy effective Lagrangian and show that one can satisfy observational constraints as well as the swampland criteria for some specific models. In particular, the cubic Galileon term, in the presence of an exponential potential, is examined to demonstrate that parts of the Horndeski parameter space survives the swampland and leads to viable cosmological histories.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
H. Ooguri and C. Vafa, On the geometry of the string landscape and the swampland, Nucl. Phys. B 766 (2007) 21 [hep-th/0605264] [INSPIRE].
G. Obied, H. Ooguri, L. Spodyneiko and C. Vafa, De Sitter space and the swampland, arXiv:1806.08362 [INSPIRE].
P. Agrawal, G. Obied, P.J. Steinhardt and C. Vafa, On the cosmological implications of the string swampland, Phys. Lett. B 784 (2018) 271 [arXiv:1806.09718] [INSPIRE].
H. Ooguri, E. Palti, G. Shiu and C. Vafa, Distance and de Sitter conjectures on the swampland, Phys. Lett. B 788 (2019) 180 [arXiv:1810.05506] [INSPIRE].
R. Blumenhagen, I. Valenzuela and F. Wolf, The swampland conjecture and F-term axion monodromy inflation, JHEP 07 (2017) 145 [arXiv:1703.05776] [INSPIRE].
A. Achúcarro and G.A. Palma, The string swampland constraints require multi-field inflation, JCAP 02 (2019) 041 [arXiv:1807.04390] [INSPIRE].
S.K. Garg and C. Krishnan, Bounds on slow roll and the de Sitter swampland, arXiv:1807.05193 [INSPIRE].
M. Dias, J. Frazer, A. Retolaza and A. Westphal, Primordial gravitational waves and the swampland, Fortsch. Phys. 67 (2019) 2 [arXiv:1807.06579] [INSPIRE].
A. Kehagias and A. Riotto, A note on inflation and the swampland, Fortsch. Phys. 66 (2018) 1800052 [arXiv:1807.05445] [INSPIRE].
J.-L. Lehners, Small-field and scale-free: inflation and ekpyrosis at their extremes, JCAP 11 (2018) 001 [arXiv:1807.05240] [INSPIRE].
F. Denef, A. Hebecker and T. Wrase, De Sitter swampland conjecture and the Higgs potential, Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018) 086004 [arXiv:1807.06581] [INSPIRE].
E. Ó Colgáin, M.H. P.M. van Putten and H. Yavartanoo, De Sitter swampland, H 0 tension & observation, Phys. Lett. B 793 (2019) 126 [arXiv:1807.07451] [INSPIRE].
L. Heisenberg, M. Bartelmann, R. Brandenberger and A. Refregier, Dark energy in the swampland, Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018) 123502 [arXiv:1808.02877] [INSPIRE].
Y. Akrami, R. Kallosh, A. Linde and V. Vardanyan, The landscape, the swampland and the era of precision cosmology, Fortsch. Phys. 67 (2019) 1800075 [arXiv:1808.09440] [INSPIRE].
L. Heisenberg, M. Bartelmann, R. Brandenberger and A. Refregier, Dark energy in the swampland II, Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron. 62 (2019) 990421 [arXiv:1809.00154] [INSPIRE].
W.H. Kinney, S. Vagnozzi and L. Visinelli, The zoo plot meets the swampland: mutual (in)consistency of single-field inflation, string conjectures and cosmological data, Class. Quant. Grav. 36 (2019) 117001 [arXiv:1808.06424] [INSPIRE].
S. Brahma and M. Wali Hossain, Avoiding the string swampland in single-field inflation: excited initial states, JHEP 03 (2019) 006 [arXiv:1809.01277] [INSPIRE].
S. Das, Note on single-field inflation and the swampland criteria, Phys. Rev. D 99 (2019) 083510 [arXiv:1809.03962] [INSPIRE].
D. Wang, The multi-feature universe: large parameter space cosmology and the swampland, arXiv:1809.04854 [INSPIRE].
U. Danielsson, The quantum swampland, JHEP 04 (2019) 095 [arXiv:1809.04512] [INSPIRE].
C. Han, S. Pi and M. Sasaki, Quintessence saves Higgs instability, Phys. Lett. B 791 (2019) 314 [arXiv:1809.05507] [INSPIRE].
L. Visinelli and S. Vagnozzi, Cosmological window onto the string axiverse and the supersymmetry breaking scale, Phys. Rev. D 99 (2019) 063517 [arXiv:1809.06382] [INSPIRE].
H. Matsui, F. Takahashi and M. Yamada, Isocurvature perturbations of dark energy and dark matter from the swampland conjecture, Phys. Lett. B 789 (2019) 387 [arXiv:1809.07286] [INSPIRE].
K. Hamaguchi, M. Ibe and T. Moroi, The swampland conjecture and the Higgs expectation value, JHEP 12 (2018) 023 [arXiv:1810.02095] [INSPIRE].
S. Das, Warm inflation in the light of swampland criteria, Phys. Rev. D 99 (2019) 063514 [arXiv:1810.05038] [INSPIRE].
C.-M. Lin, K.-W. Ng and K. Cheung, Chaotic inflation on the brane and the swampland criteria, arXiv:1810.01644 [INSPIRE].
M. Kawasaki and V. Takhistov, Primordial black holes and the string swampland, Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018) 123514 [arXiv:1810.02547] [INSPIRE].
K. Dimopoulos, Steep eternal inflation and the swampland, Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018) 123516 [arXiv:1810.03438] [INSPIRE].
M. Motaharfar, V. Kamali and R.O. Ramos, Warm inflation as a way out of the swampland, Phys. Rev. D 99 (2019) 063513 [arXiv:1810.02816] [INSPIRE].
A. Ashoorioon, Rescuing single field inflation from the swampland, Phys. Lett. B 790 (2019) 568 [arXiv:1810.04001] [INSPIRE].
S.-J. Wang, Electroweak relaxation of cosmological hierarchy, Phys. Rev. D 99 (2019) 023529 [arXiv:1810.06445] [INSPIRE].
H. Fukuda, R. Saito, S. Shirai and M. Yamazaki, Phenomenological consequences of the refined swampland conjecture, Phys. Rev. D 99 (2019) 083520 [arXiv:1810.06532] [INSPIRE].
S.K. Garg, C. Krishnan and M. Zaid Zaz, Bounds on slow roll at the boundary of the landscape, JHEP 03 (2019) 029 [arXiv:1810.09406] [INSPIRE].
S.C. Park, Minimal gauge inflation and the refined swampland conjecture, JCAP 01 (2019) 053 [arXiv:1810.11279] [INSPIRE].
C.-M. Lin, Type I hilltop inflation and the refined swampland criteria, Phys. Rev. D 99 (2019) 023519 [arXiv:1810.11992] [INSPIRE].
R. Schimmrigk, The swampland spectrum conjecture in inflation, arXiv:1810.11699 [INSPIRE].
P. Agrawal and G. Obied, Dark energy and the refined de Sitter conjecture, arXiv:1811.00554 [INSPIRE].
Z. Yi and Y. Gong, Gauss-Bonnet inflation and swampland, arXiv:1811.01625 [INSPIRE].
J.J. Heckman, C. Lawrie, L. Lin and G. Zoccarato, F-theory and dark energy, arXiv:1811.01959 [INSPIRE].
E. Elizalde and M. Khurshudyan, Swampland criteria for a dark energy dominated universe ensuing from Gaussian processes and H(z) data analysis, Phys. Rev. D 99 (2019) 103533 [arXiv:1811.03861] [INSPIRE].
D.Y. Cheong, S.M. Lee and S.C. Park, Higgs inflation and the refined dS conjecture, Phys. Lett. B 789 (2019) 336 [arXiv:1811.03622] [INSPIRE].
R. Holman and B. Richard, Spinodal solution to swampland inflationary constraints, Phys. Rev. D 99 (2019) 103508 [arXiv:1811.06021] [INSPIRE].
B.S. Acharya, A. Maharana and F. Muia, Hidden sectors in string theory: kinetic mixings, fifth forces and quintessence, JHEP 03 (2019) 048 [arXiv:1811.10633] [INSPIRE].
C.A.R. Herdeiro, E. Radu and K. Uzawa, Compact objects and the swampland, JHEP 01 (2019) 215 [arXiv:1811.10844] [INSPIRE].
W.H. Kinney, Eternal inflation and the refined swampland conjecture, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122 (2019) 081302 [arXiv:1811.11698] [INSPIRE].
M. Montero, A holographic derivation of the weak gravity conjecture, JHEP 03 (2019) 157 [arXiv:1812.03978] [INSPIRE].
W.-C. Lin and W.H. Kinney, Consistency of tachyacoustic cosmology with de Sitter swampland conjectures, arXiv:1812.04447 [INSPIRE].
R.-G. Cai, S. Khimphun, B.-H. Lee, S. Sun, G. Tumurtushaa and Y.-L. Zhang, Emergent dark universe and the swampland criteria, arXiv:1812.11105 [INSPIRE].
J.J. Heckman, C. Lawrie, L. Lin, J. Sakstein and G. Zoccarato, Pixelated dark energy, arXiv:1901.10489 [INSPIRE].
V. Kamali, Reheating after swampland conjecture, arXiv:1902.00701 [INSPIRE].
M.R. Haque and D. Maity, Reheating constraints on the inflaton and dark matter: swampland conjecture, Phys. Rev. D 99 (2019) 103534 [arXiv:1902.09491] [INSPIRE].
D. Andriot, On the de Sitter swampland criterion, Phys. Lett. B 785 (2018) 570 [arXiv:1806.10999] [INSPIRE].
M. Raveri, W. Hu and S. Sethi, Swampland conjectures and late-time cosmology, Phys. Rev. D 99 (2019) 083518 [arXiv:1812.10448] [INSPIRE].
H. Murayama, M. Yamazaki and T.T. Yanagida, Do we live in the swampland?, JHEP 12 (2018) 032 [arXiv:1809.00478] [INSPIRE].
S.D. Odintsov and V.K. Oikonomou, Finite-time singularities in swampland-related dark energy models, EPL 126 (2019) 20002 [arXiv:1810.03575] [INSPIRE].
L. Heisenberg, M. Bartelmann, R. Brandenberger and A. Refregier, Horndeski in the swampland, arXiv:1902.03939 [INSPIRE].
M. Cicoli, F.G. Pedro and G. Tasinato, Natural quintessence in string theory, JCAP 07 (2012) 044 [arXiv:1203.6655] [INSPIRE].
G. Gupta, S. Panda and A.A. Sen, Observational constraints on axions as quintessence in string theory, Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 023501 [arXiv:1108.1322] [INSPIRE].
S. Panda, Y. Sumitomo and S.P. Trivedi, Axions as quintessence in string theory, Phys. Rev. D 83 (2011) 083506 [arXiv:1011.5877] [INSPIRE].
S. Hellerman, N. Kaloper and L. Susskind, String theory and quintessence, JHEP 06 (2001) 003 [hep-th/0104180] [INSPIRE].
K. Choi, String or M-theory axion as a quintessence, Phys. Rev. D 62 (2000) 043509 [hep-ph/9902292] [INSPIRE].
A. Nicolis, R. Rattazzi and E. Trincherini, The Galileon as a local modification of gravity, Phys. Rev. D 79 (2009) 064036 [arXiv:0811.2197] [INSPIRE].
N. Chow and J. Khoury, Galileon cosmology, Phys. Rev. D 80 (2009) 024037 [arXiv:0905.1325] [INSPIRE].
F.P. Silva and K. Koyama, Self-accelerating universe in Galileon cosmology, Phys. Rev. D 80 (2009) 121301 [arXiv:0909.4538] [INSPIRE].
A. De Felice and S. Tsujikawa, Cosmology of a covariant Galileon field, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105 (2010) 111301 [arXiv:1007.2700] [INSPIRE].
A. De Felice and S. Tsujikawa, Generalized Galileon cosmology, Phys. Rev. D 84 (2011) 124029 [arXiv:1008.4236] [INSPIRE].
C. Deffayet, G. Esposito-Farese and A. Vikman, Covariant Galileon, Phys. Rev. D 79 (2009) 084003 [arXiv:0901.1314] [INSPIRE].
G.W. Horndeski, Second-order scalar-tensor field equations in a four-dimensional space, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 10 (1974) 363 [INSPIRE].
C. Deffayet, S. Deser and G. Esposito-Farese, Generalized Galileons: all scalar models whose curved background extensions maintain second-order field equations and stress-tensors, Phys. Rev. D 80 (2009) 064015 [arXiv:0906.1967] [INSPIRE].
C. Deffayet and D.A. Steer, A formal introduction to Horndeski and Galileon theories and their generalizations, Class. Quant. Grav. 30 (2013) 214006 [arXiv:1307.2450] [INSPIRE].
R. Kase and S. Tsujikawa, Dark energy in Horndeski theories after GW170817: a review, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 28 (2019) 1942005 [arXiv:1809.08735] [INSPIRE].
A. Ali, R. Gannouji, M.W. Hossain and M. Sami, Light mass Galileons: cosmological dynamics, mass screening and observational constraints, Phys. Lett. B 718 (2012) 5 [arXiv:1207.3959] [INSPIRE].
M.W. Hossain and A.A. Sen, Do observations favour Galileon over quintessence?, Phys. Lett. B 713 (2012) 140 [arXiv:1201.6192] [INSPIRE].
M.W. Hossain, First and second order cosmological perturbations in light mass Galileon models, Phys. Rev. D 96 (2017) 023506 [arXiv:1704.07956] [INSPIRE].
B.R. Dinda, M. Wali Hossain and A.A. Sen, Observed galaxy power spectrum in cubic Galileon model, JCAP 01 (2018) 045 [arXiv:1706.00567] [INSPIRE].
D. Pirtskhalava, L. Santoni, E. Trincherini and F. Vernizzi, Weakly broken Galileon symmetry, JCAP 09 (2015) 007 [arXiv:1505.00007] [INSPIRE].
A. Ali, R. Gannouji and M. Sami, Modified gravity à la Galileon: late time cosmic acceleration and observational constraints, Phys. Rev. D 82 (2010) 103015 [arXiv:1008.1588] [INSPIRE].
R. Gannouji and M. Sami, Galileon gravity and its relevance to late time cosmic acceleration, Phys. Rev. D 82 (2010) 024011 [arXiv:1004.2808] [INSPIRE].
J.M. Ezquiaga and M. Zumalacárregui, Dark energy after GW170817: dead ends and the road ahead, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119 (2017) 251304 [arXiv:1710.05901] [INSPIRE].
J. Sakstein and B. Jain, Implications of the neutron star merger GW170817 for cosmological scalar-tensor theories, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119 (2017) 251303 [arXiv:1710.05893] [INSPIRE].
L. Lombriser and A. Taylor, Breaking a dark degeneracy with gravitational waves, JCAP 03 (2016) 031 [arXiv:1509.08458] [INSPIRE].
R. McManus, L. Lombriser and J. Peñarrubia, Finding Horndeski theories with Einstein gravity limits, JCAP 11 (2016) 006 [arXiv:1606.03282] [INSPIRE].
J. Renk, M. Zumalacárregui, F. Montanari and A. Barreira, Galileon gravity in light of ISW, CMB, BAO and H 0 data, JCAP 10 (2017) 020 [arXiv:1707.02263] [INSPIRE].
R. Kimura, T. Kobayashi and K. Yamamoto, Observational constraints on kinetic gravity braiding from the integrated Sachs-Wolfe effect, Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 123503 [arXiv:1110.3598] [INSPIRE].
R. Kase, S. Tsujikawa and A. De Felice, Cosmology with a successful Vainshtein screening in theories beyond Horndeski, Phys. Rev. D 93 (2016) 024007 [arXiv:1510.06853] [INSPIRE].
E.J. Copeland, A.R. Liddle and D. Wands, Exponential potentials and cosmological scaling solutions, Phys. Rev. D 57 (1998) 4686 [gr-qc/9711068] [INSPIRE].
R.R. Caldwell and E.V. Linder, The limits of quintessence, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95 (2005) 141301 [astro-ph/0505494] [INSPIRE].
D.M. Scolnic et al., The complete light-curve sample of spectroscopically confirmed SNe Ia from Pan-STARRS1 and cosmological constraints from the combined pantheon sample, Astrophys. J. 859 (2018) 101 [arXiv:1710.00845] [INSPIRE].
M. Chevallier and D. Polarski, Accelerating universes with scaling dark matter, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 10 (2001) 213 [gr-qc/0009008] [INSPIRE].
E.V. Linder, Exploring the expansion history of the universe, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90 (2003) 091301 [astro-ph/0208512] [INSPIRE].
L. Heisenberg, A systematic approach to generalisations of general relativity and their cosmological implications, Phys. Rept. 796 (2019) 1 [arXiv:1807.01725] [INSPIRE].
Open Access
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
ArXiv ePrint: 1902.11014
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made.
The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.
To view a copy of this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Brahma, S., Hossain, M.W. Dark energy beyond quintessence: constraints from the swampland. J. High Energ. Phys. 2019, 70 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP06(2019)070
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP06(2019)070