Abstract
Using an effective field theory approach, we study coherent neutrino scattering on nuclei, in the setup pertinent to the COHERENT experiment. We include non-standard effects both in neutrino production and detection, with an arbitrary flavor structure, with all leading Wilson coefficients simultaneously present, and without assuming factorization in flux times cross section. A concise description of the COHERENT event rate is obtained by introducing three generalized weak charges, which can be associated (in a certain sense) to the production and scattering of νe, νμ and \( {\overline{\nu}}_{\mu } \) on the nuclear target. Our results are presented in a convenient form that can be trivially applied to specific New Physics scenarios. In particular, we find that existing COHERENT measurements provide percent level constraints on two combinations of Wilson coefficients. These constraints have a visible impact on the global SMEFT fit, even in the constrained flavor-blind setup. The improvement, which affects certain 4-fermion LLQQ operators, is significantly more important in a flavor-general SMEFT. Our work shows that COHERENT data should be included in electroweak precision studies from now on.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Find the latest articles, discoveries, and news in related topics.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
D.Z. Freedman, Coherent neutrino nucleus scattering as a probe of the weak neutral current, Phys. Rev. D 9 (1974) 1389 [INSPIRE].
A. Drukier and L. Stodolsky, Principles and applications of a neutral current detector for neutrino physics and astronomy, Phys. Rev. D 30 (1984) 2295 [INSPIRE].
COHERENT collaboration, Observation of coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering, Science 357 (2017) 1123 [arXiv:1708.01294] [INSPIRE].
S. Weinberg, Effective gauge theories, Phys. Lett. B 91 (1980) 51 [INSPIRE].
S. Weinberg, On the development of effective field theory, Eur. Phys. J. H 46 (2021) 6 [arXiv:2101.04241] [INSPIRE].
A. Pich, Effective field theory: course, in the proceedings of the Les Houches summer school in theoretical physics, session 68: probing the standard model of particle interactions, (1998), p. 949 [hep-ph/9806303] [INSPIRE].
A.V. Manohar and E. Nardoni, Renormalization group improvement of the effective potential: an EFT approach, JHEP 04 (2021) 093 [arXiv:2010.15806] [INSPIRE].
J. Erler and S. Su, The weak neutral current, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 71 (2013) 119 [arXiv:1303.5522] [INSPIRE].
K. Scholberg, Prospects for measuring coherent neutrino-nucleus elastic scattering at a stopped-pion neutrino source, Phys. Rev. D 73 (2006) 033005 [hep-ex/0511042] [INSPIRE].
J. Barranco, O.G. Miranda and T.I. Rashba, Probing new physics with coherent neutrino scattering off nuclei, JHEP 12 (2005) 021 [hep-ph/0508299] [INSPIRE].
E.E. Jenkins, A.V. Manohar and P. Stoffer, Low-energy effective field theory below the electroweak scale: operators and matching, JHEP 03 (2018) 016 [arXiv:1709.04486] [INSPIRE].
A.M. Gago et al., Probing flavor changing neutrino interactions using neutrino beams from a muon storage ring, Phys. Rev. D 64 (2001) 073003 [hep-ph/0105196] [INSPIRE].
M. Campanelli and A. Romanino, Effects of new physics in neutrino oscillations in matter, Phys. Rev. D 66 (2002) 113001 [hep-ph/0207350] [INSPIRE].
Y. Grossman, Nonstandard neutrino interactions and neutrino oscillation experiments, Phys. Lett. B 359 (1995) 141 [hep-ph/9507344] [INSPIRE].
A. Falkowski, M. González-Alonso and Z. Tabrizi, Consistent QFT description of non-standard neutrino interactions, JHEP 11 (2020) 048 [arXiv:1910.02971] [INSPIRE].
W. Buchmuller and D. Wyler, Effective Lagrangian analysis of new interactions and flavor conservation, Nucl. Phys. B 268 (1986) 621 [INSPIRE].
B. Grzadkowski, M. Iskrzynski, M. Misiak and J. Rosiek, Dimension-six terms in the standard model Lagrangian, JHEP 10 (2010) 085 [arXiv:1008.4884] [INSPIRE].
A. Carmona, A. Lazopoulos, P. Olgoso and J. Santiago, Matchmakereft: automated tree-level and one-loop matching, SciPost Phys. 12 (2022) 198 [arXiv:2112.10787] [INSPIRE].
P. Coloma, M.C. Gonzalez-Garcia, M. Maltoni and T. Schwetz, COHERENT enlightenment of the neutrino dark side, Phys. Rev. D 96 (2017) 115007 [arXiv:1708.02899] [INSPIRE].
D.K. Papoulias and T.S. Kosmas, COHERENT constraints to conventional and exotic neutrino physics, Phys. Rev. D 97 (2018) 033003 [arXiv:1711.09773] [INSPIRE].
I.M. Shoemaker, COHERENT search strategy for beyond standard model neutrino interactions, Phys. Rev. D 95 (2017) 115028 [arXiv:1703.05774] [INSPIRE].
J. Liao and D. Marfatia, COHERENT constraints on nonstandard neutrino interactions, Phys. Lett. B 775 (2017) 54 [arXiv:1708.04255] [INSPIRE].
D. Aristizabal Sierra, V. De Romeri and N. Rojas, COHERENT analysis of neutrino generalized interactions, Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018) 075018 [arXiv:1806.07424] [INSPIRE].
P.B. Denton, Y. Farzan and I.M. Shoemaker, Testing large non-standard neutrino interactions with arbitrary mediator mass after COHERENT data, JHEP 07 (2018) 037 [arXiv:1804.03660] [INSPIRE].
I. Esteban et al., Updated constraints on non-standard interactions from global analysis of oscillation data, JHEP 08 (2018) 180 [Addendum ibid. 12 (2020) 152] [arXiv:1805.04530] [INSPIRE].
A.N. Khan and W. Rodejohann, New physics from COHERENT data with an improved quenching factor, Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019) 113003 [arXiv:1907.12444] [INSPIRE].
C. Giunti, General COHERENT constraints on neutrino nonstandard interactions, Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020) 035039 [arXiv:1909.00466] [INSPIRE].
G. Arcadi, M. Lindner, J. Martins and F.S. Queiroz, New physics probes: atomic parity violation, polarized electron scattering and neutrino-nucleus coherent scattering, Nucl. Phys. B 959 (2020) 115158 [arXiv:1906.04755] [INSPIRE].
P. Coloma, I. Esteban, M.C. Gonzalez-Garcia and M. Maltoni, Improved global fit to non-standard neutrino interactions using COHERENT energy and timing data, JHEP 02 (2020) 023 [Addendum ibid. 12 (2020) 071] [arXiv:1911.09109] [INSPIRE].
P.B. Denton and J. Gehrlein, A statistical analysis of the COHERENT data and applications to new physics, JHEP 04 (2021) 266 [arXiv:2008.06062] [INSPIRE].
O.G. Miranda et al., Implications of the first detection of coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering (CEvNS) with liquid argon, JHEP 05 (2020) 130 [Erratum ibid. 01 (2021) 067] [arXiv:2003.12050] [INSPIRE].
P. Coloma et al., Bounds on new physics with data of the Dresden-II reactor experiment and COHERENT, JHEP 05 (2022) 037 [arXiv:2202.10829] [INSPIRE].
M. Atzori Corona et al., Impact of the Dresden-II and COHERENT neutrino scattering data on neutrino electromagnetic properties and electroweak physics, JHEP 09 (2022) 164 [arXiv:2205.09484] [INSPIRE].
V. De Romeri et al., Physics implications of a combined analysis of COHERENT CsI and LAr data, JHEP 04 (2023) 035 [arXiv:2211.11905] [INSPIRE].
COHERENT collaboration, First measurement of coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering on argon, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126 (2021) 012002 [arXiv:2003.10630] [INSPIRE].
COHERENT collaboration, Measurement of the coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering cross section on CsI by COHERENT, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129 (2022) 081801 [arXiv:2110.07730] [INSPIRE].
Particle Data Group collaboration, Review of particle physics, PTEP 2022 (2022) 083C01 [INSPIRE].
M. Hoferichter, J. Menéndez and A. Schwenk, Coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering: EFT analysis and nuclear responses, Phys. Rev. D 102 (2020) 074018 [arXiv:2007.08529] [INSPIRE].
V. Cirigliano, J. Jenkins and M. Gonzalez-Alonso, Semileptonic decays of light quarks beyond the standard model, Nucl. Phys. B 830 (2010) 95 [arXiv:0908.1754] [INSPIRE].
A. Falkowski, M. González-Alonso and K. Mimouni, Compilation of low-energy constraints on 4-fermion operators in the SMEFT, JHEP 08 (2017) 123 [arXiv:1706.03783] [INSPIRE].
M. González-Alonso, O. Naviliat-Cuncic and N. Severijns, New physics searches in nuclear and neutron β decay, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 104 (2019) 165 [arXiv:1803.08732] [INSPIRE].
A. Falkowski, M. González-Alonso and O. Naviliat-Cuncic, Comprehensive analysis of beta decays within and beyond the standard model, JHEP 04 (2021) 126 [arXiv:2010.13797] [INSPIRE].
M. González-Alonso, J. Martin Camalich and K. Mimouni, Renormalization-group evolution of new physics contributions to (semi)leptonic meson decays, Phys. Lett. B 772 (2017) 777 [arXiv:1706.00410] [INSPIRE].
O. Tomalak, P. Machado, V. Pandey and R. Plestid, Flavor-dependent radiative corrections in coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering, JHEP 02 (2021) 097 [arXiv:2011.05960] [INSPIRE].
A. Falkowski, M. González-Alonso, A. Palavrić and A. Rodríguez-Sánchez, Constraints on subleading interactions in beta decay Lagrangian, arXiv:2112.07688 [https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2112.07688].
C. Giunti, C.W. Kim, J.A. Lee and U.W. Lee, On the treatment of neutrino oscillations without resort to weak eigenstates, Phys. Rev. D 48 (1993) 4310 [hep-ph/9305276] [INSPIRE].
R.H. Helm, Inelastic and elastic scattering of 187 MeV electrons from selected even-even nuclei, Phys. Rev. 104 (1956) 1466 [INSPIRE].
M. Lindner, W. Rodejohann and X.-J. Xu, Coherent neutrino-nucleus scattering and new neutrino interactions, JHEP 03 (2017) 097 [arXiv:1612.04150] [INSPIRE].
B.C. Cañas, E.A. Garcés, O.G. Miranda and A. Parada, Future perspectives for a weak mixing angle measurement in coherent elastic neutrino nucleus scattering experiments, Phys. Lett. B 784 (2018) 159 [arXiv:1806.01310] [INSPIRE].
X.-R. Huang and L.-W. Chen, Neutron skin in CsI and low-energy effective weak mixing angle from COHERENT data, Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019) 071301 [arXiv:1902.07625] [INSPIRE].
A.N. Khan, D.W. McKay and W. Rodejohann, CP-violating and charged current neutrino nonstandard interactions in CEνNS, Phys. Rev. D 104 (2021) 015019 [arXiv:2104.00425] [INSPIRE].
COHERENT collaboration, COHERENT collaboration data release from the first detection of coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering on argon, arXiv:2006.12659 [https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3903810] [INSPIRE].
Y. Farzan and M. Tortola, Neutrino oscillations and non-standard interactions, Front. in Phys. 6 (2018) 10 [arXiv:1710.09360] [INSPIRE].
F.J. Escrihuela, M. Tortola, J.W.F. Valle and O.G. Miranda, Global constraints on muon-neutrino non-standard interactions, Phys. Rev. D 83 (2011) 093002 [arXiv:1103.1366] [INSPIRE].
S. Davidson, C. Pena-Garay, N. Rius and A. Santamaria, Present and future bounds on non-standard neutrino interactions, JHEP 03 (2003) 011 [hep-ph/0302093] [INSPIRE].
J. Colaresi et al., First results from a search for coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering at a reactor site, Phys. Rev. D 104 (2021) 072003 [arXiv:2108.02880] [INSPIRE].
J. Salvado, O. Mena, S. Palomares-Ruiz and N. Rius, Non-standard interactions with high-energy atmospheric neutrinos at IceCube, JHEP 01 (2017) 141 [arXiv:1609.03450] [INSPIRE].
A. Aguilar-Arevalo et al., Improved measurement of the π → eν branching ratio, arXiv:1506.05845 [https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1506.05845].
V. Cirigliano and I. Rosell, π/K → \( e{\overline{nu}}_e \) branching ratios to O(e2p4) in chiral perturbation theory, JHEP 10 (2007) 005 [arXiv:0707.4464] [INSPIRE].
J. Terol-Calvo, M. Tórtola and A. Vicente, High-energy constraints from low-energy neutrino nonstandard interactions, Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020) 095010 [arXiv:1912.09131] [INSPIRE].
W. Skiba and Q. Xia, Electroweak constraints from the COHERENT experiment, JHEP 10 (2022) 102 [arXiv:2007.15688] [INSPIRE].
A. Crivellin et al., First-generation new physics in simplified models: from low-energy parity violation to the LHC, JHEP 10 (2021) 221 [arXiv:2107.13569] [INSPIRE].
A. Azatov et al., Off-shell Higgs interpretations task force: models and effective field theories subgroup report, arXiv:2203.02418 [https://doi.org/10.17181/LHCHWG-2022-001] [INSPIRE].
A. Falkowski, M. Gonzalez-Alonso, A. Greljo and D. Marzocca, Global constraints on anomalous triple gauge couplings in effective field theory approach, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 (2016) 011801 [arXiv:1508.00581] [INSPIRE].
J.D. Lewin and P.F. Smith, Review of mathematics, numerical factors, and corrections for dark matter experiments based on elastic nuclear recoil, Astropart. Phys. 6 (1996) 87 [INSPIRE].
I. Angeli and K.P. Marinova, Table of experimental nuclear ground state charge radii: an update, Atom. Data Nucl. Data Tabl. 99 (2013) 69 [INSPIRE].
G. Fricke et al., Nuclear ground state charge radii from electromagnetic interactions, Atom. Data Nucl. Data Tabl. 60 (1995) 177 [INSPIRE].
E. Picciau, Low-energy signatures in DarkSide-50 experiment and neutrino scattering processes, Ph.D. thesis, Cagliari U., Cagliari, Italy (2022) [INSPIRE].
W. Creus, Light yield in liquid argon for dark matter detection, Ph.D. thesis, Zurich U., Zurich, Switzerland (2013) [INSPIRE].
LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group collaboration, Handbook of LHC Higgs cross sections: 4. Deciphering the nature of the Higgs sector, arXiv:1610.07922 [https://doi.org/10.23731/CYRM-2017-002] [INSPIRE].
LEP, ALEPH, DELPHI, L3, OPAL, LEP Electroweak Working Group, SLD Electroweak Group, SLD Heavy Flavor Group collaborations, A combination of preliminary electroweak measurements and constraints on the standard model, hep-ex/0312023 [https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.hep-ex/0312023].
ALEPH, DELPHI, L3, OPAL, LEP Electroweak collaborations, Electroweak measurements in electron-positron collisions at W-boson-pair energies at LEP, Phys. Rept. 532 (2013) 119 [arXiv:1302.3415] [INSPIRE].
ALEPH, DELPHI, L3, OPAL, SLD, LEP Electroweak Working Group, SLD Electroweak Group, SLD Heavy Flavour Group collaborations, Precision electroweak measurements on the Z resonance, hep-ex/0509008 [https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.hep-ex/0509008].
SLD collaboration, First direct measurement of the parity violating coupling of the Z0 to the s quark, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85 (2000) 5059 [hep-ex/0006019] [INSPIRE].
VENUS collaboration, A study of the charm and bottom quark production in e+e− annihilation at \( \sqrt{s} \) = 58 GeV using prompt electrons, Phys. Lett. B 313 (1993) 288 [INSPIRE].
VENUS collaboration, Measurement of τ polarization in e+e− annihilation at \( \sqrt{s} \) = 58 GeV, Phys. Lett. B 403 (1997) 155 [hep-ex/9703003] [INSPIRE].
TOPAZ collaboration, Measurement of the cross-section and forward-backward charge asymmetry for the b and c quark in e+e− annihilation with inclusive muons at \( \sqrt{s} \) = 58 GeV, Eur. Phys. J. C 18 (2000) 273 [hep-ex/0012033] [INSPIRE].
V. Bresó-Pla, A. Falkowski and M. González-Alonso, AFB in the SMEFT: precision Z physics at the LHC, JHEP 08 (2021) 021 [arXiv:2103.12074] [INSPIRE].
P. Janot and S. Jadach, Improved Bhabha cross section at LEP and the number of light neutrino species, Phys. Lett. B 803 (2020) 135319 [arXiv:1912.02067] [INSPIRE].
D. d’Enterria and C. Yan, Revised QCD effects on the Z → \( b\overline{b} \) forward-backward asymmetry, arXiv:2011.00530 [https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2011.00530].
D0 collaboration, A measurement of the W → τν production cross section in \( p\overline{p} \) collisions at \( \sqrt{s} \) = 1.8 TeV, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84 (2000) 5710 [hep-ex/9912065] [INSPIRE].
LHCb collaboration, Measurement of forward W → eν production in pp collisions at \( \sqrt{s} \) = 8 TeV, JHEP 10 (2016) 030 [arXiv:1608.01484] [INSPIRE].
ATLAS collaboration, Precision measurement and interpretation of inclusive W +, W − and Z/γ∗ production cross sections with the ATLAS detector, arXiv:1612.03016 [https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1612.03016].
ATLAS collaboration, Test of the universality of τ and μ lepton couplings in W -boson decays with the ATLAS detector, Nature Phys. 17 (2021) 813 [arXiv:2007.14040] [INSPIRE].
LHCb collaboration, Measurement of the W boson mass, JHEP 01 (2022) 036 [arXiv:2109.01113] [INSPIRE].
ATLAS collaboration, Measurement of the W-boson mass in pp collisions at \( \sqrt{s} \) = 7 TeV with the ATLAS detector, Eur. Phys. J. C 78 (2018) 110 [Erratum ibid. 78 (2018) 898] [arXiv:1701.07240] [INSPIRE].
CDF collaboration, Precise measurement of the W -boson mass with the CDF II detector, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 (2012) 151803 [arXiv:1203.0275] [INSPIRE].
D0 collaboration, Measurement of the W boson mass with the D0 detector, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 (2012) 151804 [arXiv:1203.0293] [INSPIRE].
CDF collaboration, High-precision measurement of the W boson mass with the CDF II detector, Science 376 (2022) 170.
CMS collaboration, Measurement of the t-channel single-top-quark production cross section and of the |Vtb| CKM matrix element in pp collisions at \( \sqrt{s} \) = 8 TeV, JHEP 06 (2014) 090 [arXiv:1403.7366] [INSPIRE].
ATLAS collaboration, Measurement of the effective leptonic weak mixing angle using electron and muon pairs from Z-boson decay in the ATLAS experiment at \( \sqrt{s} \) = 8 TeV, ATLAS-CONF-2018-037, CERN, Geneva, Switzerland (2018) [INSPIRE].
D0 collaboration, Measurement of \( {\sin}^2{\theta}_{\textrm{eff}}^{\ell } \) and Z-light quark couplings using the forward-backward charge asymmetry in \( p\overline{p} \) → Z/γ∗ → e+e− events with \( \mathcal{L} \) = 5.0 fb−1 at \( \sqrt{s} \) = 1.96 TeV, Phys. Rev. D 84 (2011) 012007 [arXiv:1104.4590] [INSPIRE].
CHARM collaboration, Experimental verification of the universality of νe and νμ coupling to the neutral weak current, Phys. Lett. B 180 (1986) 303 [INSPIRE].
CHARM collaboration, A precise determination of the electroweak mixing angle from semileptonic neutrino scattering, Z. Phys. C 36 (1987) 611 [INSPIRE].
A. Blondel et al., Electroweak parameters from a high statistics neutrino nucleon scattering experiment, Z. Phys. C 45 (1990) 361 [INSPIRE].
CCFR et al. collaborations, A precision measurement of electroweak parameters in neutrino-nucleon scattering, Eur. Phys. J. C 1 (1998) 509 [hep-ex/9701010] [INSPIRE].
C.S. Wood et al., Measurement of parity nonconservation and an anapole moment in cesium, Science 275 (1997) 1759 [INSPIRE].
N.H. Edwards, S.J. Phipp, P.E.G. Baird and S. Nakayama, Precise measurement of parity nonconserving optical rotation in atomic thallium, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74 (1995) 2654 [INSPIRE].
P.A. Vetter et al., Precise test of electroweak theory from a new measurement of parity nonconservation in atomic thallium, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74 (1995) 2658 [INSPIRE].
Qweak collaboration, Precision measurement of the weak charge of the proton, Nature 557 (2018) 207 [arXiv:1905.08283] [INSPIRE].
Jefferson Lab PVDIS collaboration, Measurement of parity violation in electron-quark scattering, Nature 506 (2014) 67.
E.J. Beise, M.L. Pitt and D.T. Spayde, The SAMPLE experiment and weak nucleon structure, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 54 (2005) 289 [nucl-ex/0412054] [INSPIRE].
A. Argento et al., Electroweak asymmetry in deep inelastic muon-nucleon scattering, Phys. Lett. B 120 (1983) 245 [INSPIRE].
M. González-Alonso and J. Martin Camalich, Global effective-field-theory analysis of new-physics effects in (semi)leptonic kaon decays, JHEP 12 (2016) 052 [arXiv:1605.07114] [INSPIRE].
V. Cirigliano et al., Semileptonic tau decays beyond the standard model, JHEP 04 (2022) 152 [arXiv:2112.02087] [INSPIRE].
UCNτ collaboration, Improved neutron lifetime measurement with UCNτ, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127 (2021) 162501 [arXiv:2106.10375] [INSPIRE].
UCNA collaboration, New result for the neutron β-asymmetry parameter A0 from UCNA, Phys. Rev. C 97 (2018) 035505 [arXiv:1712.00884] [INSPIRE].
B. Märkisch et al., Measurement of the weak axial-vector coupling constant in the decay of free neutrons using a pulsed cold neutron beam, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122 (2019) 242501 [arXiv:1812.04666] [INSPIRE].
CHARM collaboration, Experimental results on neutrino-electron scattering, Z. Phys. C 41 (1989) 567 [Erratum ibid. 51 (1991) 142] [INSPIRE].
L.A. Ahrens et al., Determination of electroweak parameters from the elastic scattering of muon-neutrinos and anti-neutrinos on electrons, Phys. Rev. D 41 (1990) 3297 [INSPIRE].
CHARM-II collaboration, Precision measurement of electroweak parameters from the scattering of muon-neutrinos on electrons, Phys. Lett. B 335 (1994) 246 [INSPIRE].
P.L. Anthony et al., Precision measurement of the weak mixing angle in Møller scattering, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95 (2005) 081601 [hep-ex/0504049].
CHARM-II collaboration, First observation of neutrino trident production, Phys. Lett. B 245 (1990) 271 [INSPIRE].
CCFR collaboration, Neutrino tridents and WZ interference, Phys. Rev. Lett. 66 (1991) 3117 [INSPIRE].
Particle Data Group collaboration, Review of particle physics, Chin. Phys. C 40 (2016) 100001 [INSPIRE].
Acknowledgments
We thank Luis Álvarez-Ruso and Valentina de Romeri for enlightening discussion, and IJCLab for hospitality. VB is supported by Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades, Spain [grant FPU18/01340]. AF has received funding from the Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) under grant ANR-19-CE31-0012 (project MORA) and from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant agreement No 860881-HIDDeN. MGA is supported by the Generalitat Valenciana (Spain) through the plan GenT program (CIDEGENT/2018/014). KMP is supported by PROMETEO/2017/053 and PROMETEO/2021/071 (GV). This work was supported by the MCIN with funding from the EU NextGenerationEU and Generalitat Valenciana in the PRTR 2022 call (Project QPheno, ASFAE/2022/009), and by MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 Grant No. PID2020-114473GB-I00.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
ArXiv ePrint: 2301.07036
Rights and permissions
Open Access . This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
About this article
Cite this article
Bresó-Pla, V., Falkowski, A., González-Alonso, M. et al. EFT analysis of New Physics at COHERENT. J. High Energ. Phys. 2023, 74 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP05(2023)074
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP05(2023)074