Abstract
We study the question of how reliably one can distinguish two quantum field theories (QFTs). Each QFT defines a probability distribution on the space of fields. The relative entropy provides a notion of proximity between these distributions and quantifies the number of measurements required to distinguish between them. In the case of nearby conformal field theories, this reduces to the Zamolodchikov metric on the space of couplings. Our formulation quantifies the information lost under renormalization group flow from the UV to the IR and leads us to a quantification of fine-tuning. This formalism also leads us to a criterion for distinguishability of low energy effective field theories generated by the string theory landscape.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
S. Kullback and R.A. Leibler, On Information and Sufficiency, Ann. Math. Statist. 22 (1951) 79.
V. Balasubramanian, Statistical inference, occam’s razor and statistical mechanics on the space of probability distributions, Neur. Comp. 9 (1997) 349 [cond-mat/9601030] [INSPIRE].
S.-I. Amari and H. Nagaoka, Translations of Mathematical Monographs. Vol. 191: Methods of Information Geometry, American Mathematical Society, Providence U.S.A. (2000).
T.M. Cover and J.A. Thomas, Elements of Information Theory, Wiley, New York U.S.A. (1991).
N.N. Chentsov, Translations of Mathematical Monographs. Vol. 53: Statistical Decision Rules and Optimal Inference, American Mathematical Society, Providence U.S.A. (1982).
J. Calmet and X. Calmet, Distance between physical theories based on information theory, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 26 (2011) 319 [INSPIRE].
V. Balasubramanian, M.B. McDermott and M. Van Raamsdonk, Momentum-space entanglement and renormalization in quantum field theory, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 045014 [arXiv:1108.3568] [INSPIRE].
H. Casini and M. Huerta, A c-theorem for the entanglement entropy, J. Phys. A 40 (2007) 7031 [cond-mat/0610375] [INSPIRE].
D.C. Brody and A. Ritz, On the symmetry of real space renormalization, Nucl. Phys. B 522 (1998) 588 [hep-th/9709175] [INSPIRE].
S.M. Apenko, Information theory and renormalization group flows, Physica A 391 (2012) 62 [arXiv:0910.2097] [INSPIRE].
J.C. Gaite and D. O’Connor, Field theory entropy and the renormalization group, Phys. Rev. D 54 (1996) 5163 [hep-th/9511090] [INSPIRE].
C. Beny and T.J. Osborne, Information geometric approach to the renormalisation group, arXiv:1206.7004 [INSPIRE].
C. Bény and T.J. Osborne, Renormalisation as an inference problem, arXiv:1310.3188 [INSPIRE].
M. Blau, K.S. Narain and G. Thompson, Instantons, the information metric and the AdS/CFT correspondence, hep-th/0108122 [INSPIRE].
S.-J. Rey and Y. Hikida, Black hole as emergent holographic geometry of weakly interacting hot Yang-Mills gas, JHEP 08 (2006) 051 [hep-th/0507082] [INSPIRE].
A.B. Zamolodchikov, “Irreversibility” of the Flux of the Renormalization Group in a 2D Field Theory, JETP Lett. 43 (1986) 730.
D. Kutasov, Geometry on the Space of Conformal Field Theories and Contact Terms, Phys. Lett. B 220 (1989) 153 [INSPIRE].
E. Gerchkovitz, J. Gomis and Z. Komargodski, Sphere Partition Functions and the Zamolodchikov Metric, JHEP 11 (2014) 001 [arXiv:1405.7271] [INSPIRE].
H. Osborn and A.C. Petkou, Implications of conformal invariance in field theories for general dimensions, Annals Phys. 231 (1994) 311 [hep-th/9307010] [INSPIRE].
E. Barnes, E. Gorbatov, K.A. Intriligator, M. Sudano and J. Wright, The Exact superconformal R-symmetry minimizes tau(RR), Nucl. Phys. B 730 (2005) 210 [hep-th/0507137] [INSPIRE].
M.R. Douglas and S. Kachru, Flux compactification, Rev. Mod. Phys. 79 (2007) 733 [hep-th/0610102] [INSPIRE].
M.R. Douglas, Spaces of Quantum Field Theories, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 462 (2013) 012011 [arXiv:1005.2779] [INSPIRE].
A.N. Schellekens and S. Yankielowicz, Extended Chiral Algebras and Modular Invariant Partition Functions, Nucl. Phys. B 327 (1989) 673 [INSPIRE].
J.O. Andersen, E. Braaten and M. Strickland, The Massive thermal basketball diagram, Phys. Rev. D 62 (2000) 045004 [hep-ph/0002048] [INSPIRE].
J.J. Heckman, Statistical Inference and String Theory, arXiv:1305.3621 [INSPIRE].
A. Hebecker, AdS/CFT for accelerator physics, Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013) 125025 [arXiv:1305.6311] [INSPIRE].
J. Heckman and H. Verlinde, Covariant non-commutative space-time, Nucl. Phys. B 894 (2015) 58 [arXiv:1401.1810] [INSPIRE].
Open Access
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
ArXiv ePrint: 1410.6809
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits use, duplication, adaptation, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
About this article
Cite this article
Balasubramanian, V., Heckman, J.J. & Maloney, A. Relative entropy and proximity of quantum field theories. J. High Energ. Phys. 2015, 104 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP05(2015)104
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP05(2015)104