Skip to main content
Log in

The fine-tuning price of the early LHC

  • Published:
Journal of High Energy Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

LHC already probed and excluded half of the parameter space of the Constrained Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model allowed by previous experiments. Only about 0.7% of the CMSSM parameter space survives. This fraction rises to about 2% if the bound on the Higgs mass can be circumvented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. L. Giusti, A. Romanino and A. Strumia, Natural ranges of supersymmetric signals, Nucl. Phys. B 550 (1999) 3 [hep-ph/9811386] [SPIRES].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. R. Barbieri and A. Strumia, The ‘LEP paradox’, hep-ph/0007265 [SPIRES].

  3. N. Jarosik et al., Seven-year Wilkinson microwave anisotropy probe (WMAP) observations: sky maps, systematic errors and basic results, Astrophys. J. Suppl. 192 (2011) 14 [arXiv:1001.4744] [SPIRES].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. CMS collaboration, V. Khachatryan et al., Search for supersymmetry in pp collisions at 7 TeV in events with jets and missing transverse energy, Phys. Lett. B 698 (2011) 196 [arXiv:1101.1628] [SPIRES].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. ATLAS collaboration, J.B.G. da Costa et al., Search for squarks and gluinos using final states with jets and missing transverse momentum with the ATLAS detector in \( \sqrt {s} = 7\;TeV \) proton-proton collisions, arXiv:1102.5290 [SPIRES].

  6. ATLAS collaboration, G. Aad et al., Search for supersymmetry using final states with one lepton, jets and missing transverse momentum with the ATLAS detector in \( \sqrt {s} = 7\;TeV \) pp, arXiv:1102.2357 [SPIRES].

  7. R. Barbieri and G.F. Giudice, Upper bounds on supersymmetric particle masses, Nucl. Phys. B 306 (1988) 63 [SPIRES].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. B. de Carlos and J.A. Casas, One loop analysis of the electroweak breaking in supersymmetric models and the fine tuning problem, Phys. Lett. B 309 (1993) 320 [hep-ph/9303291] [SPIRES].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. G.W. Anderson and D.J. Castano, Naturalness and superpartner masses or when to give up on weak scale supersymmetry, Phys. Rev. D 52 (1995) 1693 [hep-ph/9412322] [SPIRES].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. P. Ciafaloni and A. Strumia, Naturalness upper bounds on gauge mediated soft terms, Nucl. Phys. B 494 (1997) 41 [hep-ph/9611204] [SPIRES].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. P.H. Chankowski, J.R. Ellis and S. Pokorski, The fine-tuning price of LEP, Phys. Lett. B 423 (1998) 327 [hep-ph/9712234] [SPIRES].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. P.H. Chankowski, J.R. Ellis, M. Olechowski and S. Pokorski, Haggling over the fine-tuning price of LEP, Nucl. Phys. B 544 (1999) 39 [hep-ph/9808275] [SPIRES].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. Tevatron Electroweak Working Group and CDF and D0 collaboration, Combination of CDF and D0 results on the mass of the top quark, arXiv:0903.2503 [SPIRES].

  14. B.C. Allanach, SOFTSUSY:aprogram forcalculatingsupersymmetricspectra, Comput. Phys. Commun. 143 (2002) 305 [hep-ph/0104145] [SPIRES].

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. R. Barbieri, L.J. Hall, Y. Nomura and V.S. Rychkov, Supersymmetry without a light Higgs boson, Phys. Rev. D 75 (2007) 035007 [hep-ph/0607332] [SPIRES].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. ALEPH collaboration, S. Schael et al., Search for neutral Higgs bosons decaying into four taus at LEP2, JHEP 05 (2010) 049 [arXiv:1003.0705] [SPIRES].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. D. Wright, Naturally nonminimal supersymmetry, hep-ph/9801449 [SPIRES].

  18. G.L. Kane and S.F. King, Naturalness implications of LEP results, Phys. Lett. B 451 (1999) 113 [hep-ph/9810374] [SPIRES].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. Z. Berezhiani, P.H. Chankowski, A. Falkowski and S. Pokorski, Double protection of the Higgs potential, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 (2006) 031801 [hep-ph/0509311] [SPIRES].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. C. Csáki, G. Marandella, Y. Shirman and A. Strumia, The super-little Higgs, Phys. Rev. D 73 (2006) 035006 [hep-ph/0510294] [SPIRES].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. S. Chang, L.J. Hall and N. Weiner, A supersymmetric twin Higgs, Phys. Rev. D 75 (2007) 035009 [hep-ph/0604076] [SPIRES].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. B. Bellazzini, S. Pokorski, V.S. Rychkov and A. Varagnolo, Higgs doublet as a Goldstone boson in perturbative extensions of the Standard Model, JHEP 11 (2008) 027 [arXiv:0805.2107] [SPIRES].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. B. Bellazzini, C. Csáki, A. Delgado and A. Weiler, SUSY without the little hierarchy, Phys. Rev. D 79 (2009) 095003 [arXiv:0902.0015] [SPIRES].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  24. R. Barbieri and A. Strumia, Relating m(Higgs) to m(SUSY) by a loop factor, Phys. Lett. B 490 (2000) 247 [hep-ph/0005203] [SPIRES].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  25. G.F. Giudice and R. Rattazzi, Living dangerously with low-energy supersymmetry, Nucl. Phys. B 757 (2006) 19 [hep-ph/0606105] [SPIRES].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alessandro Strumia.

Additional information

ArXiv ePrint: 1101.2195

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Strumia, A. The fine-tuning price of the early LHC. J. High Energ. Phys. 2011, 73 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP04(2011)073

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP04(2011)073

Keywords

Navigation