Abstract
The idea of this work is to investigate the constraints on the dark matter (DM) allowed parameter space from high scale validity (absolute stability of Higgs vacuum and perturbativity) in presence of multi particle dark sector and heavy right handed neutrinos to address correct neutrino mass. We illustrate a simple two component DM model, consisting of one inert SU(2)L scalar doublet and a scalar singlet, both stabilised by additional \( {\mathcal{Z}}_2\times {\mathcal{Z}}_2^{\prime } \) symmetry, which also aid to vacuum stability. We demonstrate DM-DM interaction helps achieving a large allowed parameter space for both the DM components by evading direct search bound. High scale validity puts further constraints on the model, for example, on the mass splitting between the charged and neutral component of inert doublet, which has important implication to its leptonic signature(s) at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC).
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Find the latest articles, discoveries, and news in related topics.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
CMS collaboration, Observation of a New Boson at a Mass of 125 GeV with the CMS Experiment at the LHC, Phys. Lett. B 716 (2012) 30 [arXiv:1207.7235] [INSPIRE].
ATLAS collaboration, Observation of a new particle in the search for the Standard Model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC, Phys. Lett. B 716 (2012) 1 [arXiv:1207.7214] [INSPIRE].
S. Alekhin, A. Djouadi and S. Moch, The top quark and Higgs boson masses and the stability of the electroweak vacuum, Phys. Lett. B 716 (2012) 214 [arXiv:1207.0980] [INSPIRE].
D. Buttazzo et al., Investigating the near-criticality of the Higgs boson, JHEP 12 (2013) 089 [arXiv:1307.3536] [INSPIRE].
G. Isidori, G. Ridolfi and A. Strumia, On the metastability of the standard model vacuum, Nucl. Phys. B 609 (2001) 387 [hep-ph/0104016] [INSPIRE].
L.A. Anchordoqui et al., Vacuum Stability of Standard Model++ , JHEP 02 (2013) 074 [arXiv:1208.2821] [INSPIRE].
Y. Tang, Vacuum Stability in the Standard Model, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 28 (2013) 1330002 [arXiv:1301.5812] [INSPIRE].
J. Ellis, J.R. Espinosa, G.F. Giudice, A. Hoecker and A. Riotto, The Probable Fate of the Standard Model, Phys. Lett. B 679 (2009) 369 [arXiv:0906.0954] [INSPIRE].
J. Elias-Miro, J.R. Espinosa, G.F. Giudice, G. Isidori, A. Riotto and A. Strumia, Higgs mass implications on the stability of the electroweak vacuum, Phys. Lett. B 709 (2012) 222 [arXiv:1112.3022] [INSPIRE].
Particle Data Group collaboration, Review of Particle Physics, Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018) 030001 [INSPIRE].
J. Elias-Miro, J.R. Espinosa, G.F. Giudice, H.M. Lee and A. Strumia, Stabilization of the Electroweak Vacuum by a Scalar Threshold Effect, JHEP 06 (2012) 031 [arXiv:1203.0237] [INSPIRE].
O. Lebedev, On stability of the Electroweak Vacuum and the Higgs Portal, Eur. Phys. J. C 72 (2012) 2058 [arXiv:1203.0156] [INSPIRE].
WMAP collaboration, Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) three year results: implications for cosmology, Astrophys. J. Suppl. 170 (2007) 377 [astro-ph/0603449] [INSPIRE].
Planck collaboration, Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters, arXiv:1807.06209 [INSPIRE].
L. Roszkowski, E.M. Sessolo and S. Trojanowski, WIMP dark matter candidates and searches — current status and future prospects, Rept. Prog. Phys. 81 (2018) 066201 [arXiv:1707.06277] [INSPIRE].
V. Silveira and A. Zee, Scalar phantoms, Phys. Lett. 161B (1985) 136 [INSPIRE].
J. McDonald, Gauge singlet scalars as cold dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 50 (1994) 3637 [hep-ph/0702143] [INSPIRE].
J.M. Cline, K. Kainulainen, P. Scott and C. Weniger, Update on scalar singlet dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013) 055025 [Erratum ibid. D 92 (2015) 039906] [arXiv:1306.4710] [INSPIRE].
W.-L. Guo and Y.-L. Wu, The real singlet scalar dark matter model, JHEP 10 (2010) 083 [arXiv:1006.2518] [INSPIRE].
L. Feng, S. Profumo and L. Ubaldi, Closing in on singlet scalar dark matter: LUX, invisible Higgs decays and gamma-ray lines, JHEP 03 (2015) 045 [arXiv:1412.1105] [INSPIRE].
S. Bhattacharya, S. Jana and S. Nandi, Neutrino Masses and Scalar Singlet Dark Matter, Phys. Rev. D 95 (2017) 055003 [arXiv:1609.03274] [INSPIRE].
J.A. Casas, D.G. Cerdeño, J.M. Moreno and J. Quilis, Reopening the Higgs portal for single scalar dark matter, JHEP 05 (2017) 036 [arXiv:1701.08134] [INSPIRE].
S. Bhattacharya, P. Ghosh, T.N. Maity and T.S. Ray, Mitigating Direct Detection Bounds in Non-minimal Higgs Portal Scalar Dark Matter Models, JHEP 10 (2017) 088 [arXiv:1706.04699] [INSPIRE].
S. Bhattacharya, P. Ghosh and S. Verma, SIMPler realisation of Scalar Dark Matter, JCAP 01 (2020) 040 [arXiv:1904.07562] [INSPIRE].
LUX collaboration, Results from a search for dark matter in the complete LUX exposure, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118 (2017) 021303 [arXiv:1608.07648] [INSPIRE].
XENON collaboration, First Dark Matter Search Results from the XENON1T Experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119 (2017) 181301 [arXiv:1705.06655] [INSPIRE].
XENON collaboration, Latest results of 1 tonne × year Dark Matter Search with XENON1T, PoS(EDSU2018)017.
PandaX collaboration, Dark matter direct search sensitivity of the PandaX-4T experiment, Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron. 62 (2019) 31011 [arXiv:1806.02229] [INSPIRE].
S. Bhattacharya, A. Drozd, B. Grzadkowski and J. Wudka, Two-Component Dark Matter, JHEP 10 (2013) 158 [arXiv:1309.2986] [INSPIRE].
L. Bian, R. Ding and B. Zhu, Two Component Higgs-Portal Dark Matter, Phys. Lett. B 728 (2014) 105 [arXiv:1308.3851] [INSPIRE].
S. Esch, M. Klasen and C.E. Yaguna, A minimal model for two-component dark matter, JHEP 09 (2014) 108 [arXiv:1406.0617] [INSPIRE].
A. Karam and K. Tamvakis, Dark matter and neutrino masses from a scale-invariant multi-Higgs portal, Phys. Rev. D 92 (2015) 075010 [arXiv:1508.03031] [INSPIRE].
A. Karam and K. Tamvakis, Dark Matter from a Classically Scale-Invariant SU(3)X , Phys. Rev. D 94 (2016) 055004 [arXiv:1607.01001] [INSPIRE].
A. Ahmed, M. Duch, B. Grzadkowski and M. Iglicki, Multi-Component Dark Matter: the vector and fermion case, Eur. Phys. J. C 78 (2018) 905 [arXiv:1710.01853] [INSPIRE].
J. Herrero-Garcia, A. Scaffidi, M. White and A.G. Williams, On the direct detection of multi-component dark matter: implications of the relic abundance, JCAP 01 (2019) 008 [arXiv:1809.06881] [INSPIRE].
A. Poulin and S. Godfrey, Multicomponent dark matter from a hidden gauged SU(3), Phys. Rev. D 99 (2019) 076008 [arXiv:1808.04901] [INSPIRE].
M. Aoki and T. Toma, Boosted Self-interacting Dark Matter in a Multi-component Dark Matter Model, JCAP 10 (2018) 020 [arXiv:1806.09154] [INSPIRE].
M. Aoki, D. Kaneko and J. Kubo, Multicomponent Dark Matter in Radiative Seesaw Models, Front. in Phys. 5 (2017) 53 [arXiv:1711.03765] [INSPIRE].
S. Bhattacharya, P. Poulose and P. Ghosh, Multipartite Interacting Scalar Dark Matter in the light of updated LUX data, JCAP 04 (2017) 043 [arXiv:1607.08461] [INSPIRE].
S. Bhattacharya, P. Ghosh and N. Sahu, Multipartite Dark Matter with Scalars, Fermions and signatures at LHC, JHEP 02 (2019) 059 [arXiv:1809.07474] [INSPIRE].
A. Biswas, D. Majumdar, A. Sil and P. Bhattacharjee, Two Component Dark Matter: A Possible Explanation of 130 GeV γ− Ray Line from the Galactic Centre, JCAP 12 (2013) 049 [arXiv:1301.3668] [INSPIRE].
D. Borah, R. Roshan and A. Sil, Minimal two-component scalar doublet dark matter with radiative neutrino mass, Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019) 055027 [arXiv:1904.04837] [INSPIRE].
S. Chakraborti and P. Poulose, Interplay of Scalar and Fermionic Components in a Multi-component Dark Matter Scenario, Eur. Phys. J. C 79 (2019) 420 [arXiv:1808.01979] [INSPIRE].
S. Chakraborti, A. Dutta Banik and R. Islam, Probing Multicomponent Extension of Inert Doublet Model with a Vector Dark Matter, Eur. Phys. J. C 79 (2019) 662 [arXiv:1810.05595] [INSPIRE].
B. Barman, S. Bhattacharya and M. Zakeri, Multipartite Dark Matter in SU(2)N extension of Standard Model and signatures at the LHC, JCAP 09 (2018) 023 [arXiv:1806.01129] [INSPIRE].
A. Dutta Banik, M. Pandey, D. Majumdar and A. Biswas, Two component WIMP-FImP dark matter model with singlet fermion, scalar and pseudo scalar, Eur. Phys. J. C 77 (2017) 657 [arXiv:1612.08621] [INSPIRE].
S. Bhattacharya, A.K. Saha, A. Sil and J. Wudka, Dark Matter as a remnant of SQCD Inflation, JHEP 10 (2018) 124 [arXiv:1805.03621] [INSPIRE].
S. Yaser Ayazi and A. Mohamadnejad, Scale-Invariant Two Component Dark Matter, Eur. Phys. J. C 79 (2019) 140 [arXiv:1808.08706] [INSPIRE].
J. Abdallah et al., Simplified Models for Dark Matter Searches at the LHC, Phys. Dark Univ. 9-10 (2015) 8.
D. Abercrombie et al., Dark Matter Benchmark Models for Early LHC Run-2 Searches: Report of the ATLAS/CMS Dark Matter Forum, Phys. Dark Univ. 26 (2019) 100371 [arXiv:1507.00966] [INSPIRE].
H. Han, J.M. Yang, Y. Zhang and S. Zheng, Collider Signatures of Higgs-portal Scalar Dark Matter, Phys. Lett. B 756 (2016) 109 [arXiv:1601.06232] [INSPIRE].
M. Gustafsson, S. Rydbeck, L. Lopez-Honorez and E. Lundstrom, Status of the Inert Doublet Model and the Role of multileptons at the LHC, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 075019 [arXiv:1206.6316] [INSPIRE].
A. Bhardwaj, P. Konar, T. Mandal and S. Sadhukhan, Probing the inert doublet model using jet substructure with a multivariate analysis, Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019) 055040 [arXiv:1905.04195] [INSPIRE].
R.N. Mohapatra and G. Senjanović, Neutrino Mass and Spontaneous Parity Nonconservation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 44 (1980) 912 [INSPIRE].
J. Schechter and J.W.F. Valle, Neutrino Masses in SU(2) × U(1) Theories, Phys. Rev. D 22 (1980) 2227 [INSPIRE].
E. Gabrielli, M. Heikinheimo, K. Kannike, A. Racioppi, M. Raidal and C. Spethmann, Towards Completing the Standard Model: Vacuum Stability, EWSB and Dark Matter, Phys. Rev. D 89 (2014) 015017 [arXiv:1309.6632] [INSPIRE].
C.-S. Chen and Y. Tang, Vacuum stability, neutrinos and dark matter, JHEP 04 (2012) 019 [arXiv:1202.5717] [INSPIRE].
W. Rodejohann and H. Zhang, Impact of massive neutrinos on the Higgs self-coupling and electroweak vacuum stability, JHEP 06 (2012) 022 [arXiv:1203.3825] [INSPIRE].
L. Delle Rose, C. Marzo and A. Urbano, On the stability of the electroweak vacuum in the presence of low-scale seesaw models, JHEP 12 (2015) 050 [arXiv:1506.03360] [INSPIRE].
M. Lindner, H.H. Patel and B. Radov̌cíc, Electroweak Absolute, Meta- and Thermal Stability in Neutrino Mass Models, Phys. Rev. D 93 (2016) 073005 [arXiv:1511.06215] [INSPIRE].
J. Chakrabortty, M. Das and S. Mohanty, Constraints on TeV scale Majorana neutrino phenomenology from the Vacuum Stability of the Higgs, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 28 (2013) 1350032 [arXiv:1207.2027] [INSPIRE].
C. Corian`o, L. Delle Rose and C. Marzo, Vacuum Stability in U(1)-Prime Extensions of the Standard Model with TeV Scale Right Handed Neutrinos, Phys. Lett. B 738 (2014) 13 [arXiv:1407.8539] [INSPIRE].
J.N. Ng and A. de la Puente, Electroweak Vacuum Stability and the Seesaw Mechanism Revisited, Eur. Phys. J. C 76 (2016) 122 [arXiv:1510.00742] [INSPIRE].
C. Bonilla, R.M. Fonseca and J.W.F. Valle, Vacuum stability with spontaneous violation of lepton number, Phys. Lett. B 756 (2016) 345 [arXiv:1506.04031] [INSPIRE].
S. Khan, S. Goswami and S. Roy, Vacuum Stability constraints on the minimal singlet TeV Seesaw Model, Phys. Rev. D 89 (2014) 073021 [arXiv:1212.3694] [INSPIRE].
I. Garg, S. Goswami, K.N. Vishnudath and N. Khan, Electroweak vacuum stability in presence of singlet scalar dark matter in TeV scale seesaw models, Phys. Rev. D 96 (2017) 055020 [arXiv:1706.08851] [INSPIRE].
N. Chakrabarty, D.K. Ghosh, B. Mukhopadhyaya and I. Saha, Dark matter, neutrino masses and high scale validity of an inert Higgs doublet model, Phys. Rev. D 92 (2015) 015002 [arXiv:1501.03700] [INSPIRE].
D.K. Ghosh, N. Ghosh, I. Saha and A. Shaw, Revisiting the high-scale validity of the type-II seesaw model with novel LHC signature, Phys. Rev. D 97 (2018) 115022 [arXiv:1711.06062] [INSPIRE].
E. Ma, Verifiable radiative seesaw mechanism of neutrino mass and dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 73 (2006) 077301 [hep-ph/0601225] [INSPIRE].
K. Kannike, Vacuum Stability Conditions From Copositivity Criteria, Eur. Phys. J. C 72 (2012) 2093 [arXiv:1205.3781] [INSPIRE].
J. Chakrabortty, P. Konar and T. Mondal, Copositive Criteria and Boundedness of the Scalar Potential, Phys. Rev. D 89 (2014) 095008 [arXiv:1311.5666] [INSPIRE].
J. Horejsi and M. Kladiva, Tree-unitarity bounds for THDM Higgs masses revisited, Eur. Phys. J. C 46 (2006) 81 [hep-ph/0510154] [INSPIRE].
G. Bhattacharyya and D. Das, Scalar sector of two-Higgs-doublet models: A minireview, Pramana 87 (2016) 40 [arXiv:1507.06424] [INSPIRE].
M.E. Peskin and T. Takeuchi, Estimation of oblique electroweak corrections, Phys. Rev. D 46 (1992) 381 [INSPIRE].
A. Arhrib, R. Benbrik and N. Gaur, H → γγ in Inert Higgs Doublet Model, Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 095021 [arXiv:1201.2644] [INSPIRE].
R. Barbieri, L.J. Hall and V.S. Rychkov, Improved naturalness with a heavy Higgs: An alternative road to LHC physics, Phys. Rev. D 74 (2006) 015007 [hep-ph/0603188] [INSPIRE].
Gfitter Group collaboration, The global electroweak fit at NNLO and prospects for the LHC and ILC, Eur. Phys. J. C 74 (2014) 3046 [arXiv:1407.3792] [INSPIRE].
E. Lundstrom, M. Gustafsson and J. Edsjo, The Inert Doublet Model and LEP II Limits, Phys. Rev. D 79 (2009) 035013 [arXiv:0810.3924] [INSPIRE].
A. Pierce and J. Thaler, Natural Dark Matter from an Unnatural Higgs Boson and New Colored Particles at the TeV Scale, JHEP 08 (2007) 026 [hep-ph/0703056] [INSPIRE].
Q.-H. Cao, E. Ma and G. Rajasekaran, Observing the Dark Scalar Doublet and its Impact on the Standard-Model Higgs Boson at Colliders, Phys. Rev. D 76 (2007) 095011 [arXiv:0708.2939] [INSPIRE].
A. Djouadi, The anatomy of electro-weak symmetry breaking. II. The Higgs bosons in the minimal supersymmetric model, Phys. Rept. 459 (2008) 1 [hep-ph/0503173] [INSPIRE].
B. Swiezewska and M. Krawczyk, Diphoton rate in the inert doublet model with a 125 GeV Higgs boson, Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013) 035019 [arXiv:1212.4100] [INSPIRE].
M. Krawczyk, D. Sokolowska, P. Swaczyna and B. Swiezewska, Constraining Inert Dark Matter by Rγγ and WMAP data, JHEP 09 (2013) 055 [arXiv:1305.6266] [INSPIRE].
ATLAS collaboration, Measurement of Higgs boson production in the diphoton decay channel in pp collisions at center-of-mass energies of 7 and 8 TeV with the ATLAS detector, Phys. Rev. D 90 (2014) 112015 [arXiv:1408.7084] [INSPIRE].
CMS collaboration, Observation of the Diphoton Decay of the Higgs Boson and Measurement of Its Properties, Eur. Phys. J. C 74 (2014) 3076 [arXiv:1407.0558] [INSPIRE].
S. Vagnozzi et al., Unveiling ν secrets with cosmological data: neutrino masses and mass hierarchy, Phys. Rev. D 96 (2017) 123503 [arXiv:1701.08172] [INSPIRE].
P.F. de Salas, D.V. Forero, C.A. Ternes, M. Tortola and J.W.F. Valle, Status of neutrino oscillations 2018: 3σ hint for normal mass ordering and improved CP sensitivity, Phys. Lett. B 782 (2018) 633 [arXiv:1708.01186] [INSPIRE].
I. Esteban, M.C. Gonzalez-Garcia, M. Maltoni, I. Martinez-Soler and T. Schwetz, Updated fit to three neutrino mixing: exploring the accelerator-reactor complementarity, JHEP 01 (2017) 087 [arXiv:1611.01514] [INSPIRE].
A. Ilakovac and A. Pilaftsis, Flavor violating charged lepton decays in seesaw-type models, Nucl. Phys. B 437 (1995) 491 [hep-ph/9403398] [INSPIRE].
D. Tommasini, G. Barenboim, J. Bernabeu and C. Jarlskog, Nondecoupling of heavy neutrinos and lepton flavor violation, Nucl. Phys. B 444 (1995) 451 [hep-ph/9503228] [INSPIRE].
D.N. Dinh, A. Ibarra, E. Molinaro and S.T. Petcov, The μ − e Conversion in Nuclei, μ → eγ, μ → 3e Decays and TeV Scale See-Saw Scenarios of Neutrino Mass Generation, JHEP 08 (2012) 125 [Erratum ibid. 09 (2013) 023] [arXiv:1205.4671] [INSPIRE].
G. Bambhaniya, P.S. Bhupal Dev, S. Goswami, S. Khan and W. Rodejohann, Naturalness, Vacuum Stability and Leptogenesis in the Minimal Seesaw Model, Phys. Rev. D 95 (2017) 095016 [arXiv:1611.03827] [INSPIRE].
P. Ghosh, A.K. Saha and A. Sil, Study of Electroweak Vacuum Stability from Extended Higgs Portal of Dark Matter and Neutrinos, Phys. Rev. D 97 (2018) 075034 [arXiv:1706.04931] [INSPIRE].
L. Lopez Honorez, E. Nezri, J.F. Oliver and M.H.G. Tytgat, The Inert Doublet Model: An Archetype for Dark Matter, JCAP 02 (2007) 028 [hep-ph/0612275] [INSPIRE].
J.M. Alarcon, J. Martin Camalich and J.A. Oller, The chiral representation of the πN scattering amplitude and the pion-nucleon sigma term, Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 051503 [arXiv:1110.3797] [INSPIRE].
J.M. Alarcon, L.S. Geng, J. Martin Camalich and J.A. Oller, The strangeness content of the nucleon from effective field theory and phenomenology, Phys. Lett. B 730 (2014) 342 [arXiv:1209.2870] [INSPIRE].
J. Herrero-Garcia, A. Scaffidi, M. White and A.G. Williams, On the direct detection of multi-component dark matter: sensitivity studies and parameter estimation, JCAP 11 (2017) 021 [arXiv:1709.01945] [INSPIRE].
M. Klasen, C.E. Yaguna and J.D. Ruiz-Alvarez, Electroweak corrections to the direct detection cross section of inert Higgs dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 87 (2013) 075025 [arXiv:1302.1657] [INSPIRE].
T. Abe and R. Sato, Quantum corrections to the spin-independent cross section of the inert doublet dark matter, JHEP 03 (2015) 109 [arXiv:1501.04161] [INSPIRE].
D. Barducci et al., Collider limits on new physics within MicrOMEGAs 4.3, Comput. Phys. Commun. 222 (2018) 327 [arXiv:1606.03834] [INSPIRE].
A. Semenov, LanHEP: A package for the automatic generation of Feynman rules in field theory. Version 3.0, Comput. Phys. Commun. 180 (2009) 431 [arXiv:0805.0555] [INSPIRE].
E.W. Kolb and M.S. Turner, The Early Universe, Front. Phys. 69 (1990) 1 [INSPIRE].
XENON collaboration, First results on the scalar WIMP-pion coupling, using the XENON1T experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122 (2019) 071301 [arXiv:1811.12482] [INSPIRE].
MAGIC and Fermi-LAT collaborations, Limits to Dark Matter Annihilation Cross-Section from a Combined Analysis of MAGIC and Fermi-LAT Observations of Dwarf Satellite Galaxies, JCAP 02 (2016) 039 [arXiv:1601.06590] [INSPIRE].
M. Gustafsson, E. Lundstrom, L. Bergstrom and J. Edsjo, Significant Gamma Lines from Inert Higgs Dark Matter, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99 (2007) 041301 [astro-ph/0703512] [INSPIRE].
C. Garcia-Cely, M. Gustafsson and A. Ibarra, Probing the Inert Doublet Dark Matter Model with Cherenkov Telescopes, JCAP 02 (2016) 043 [arXiv:1512.02801] [INSPIRE].
B. Eiteneuer, A. Goudelis and J. Heisig, The inert doublet model in the light of Fermi-LAT gamma-ray data: a global fit analysis, Eur. Phys. J. C 77 (2017) 624 [arXiv:1705.01458] [INSPIRE].
F.S. Queiroz and C.E. Yaguna, The CTA aims at the Inert Doublet Model, JCAP 02 (2016) 038 [arXiv:1511.05967] [INSPIRE].
C. Garcia-Cely and A. Ibarra, Novel Gamma-ray Spectral Features in the Inert Doublet Model, JCAP 09 (2013) 025 [arXiv:1306.4681] [INSPIRE].
J.A. Casas and A. Ibarra, Oscillating neutrinos and μ → e, γ, Nucl. Phys. B 618 (2001) 171 [hep-ph/0103065] [INSPIRE].
G.C. Branco, P.M. Ferreira, L. Lavoura, M.N. Rebelo, M. Sher and J.P. Silva, Theory and phenomenology of two-Higgs-doublet models, Phys. Rept. 516 (2012) 1 [arXiv:1106.0034] [INSPIRE].
Yu.F. Pirogov and O.V. Zenin, Two loop renormalization group restrictions on the standard model and the fourth chiral family, Eur. Phys. J. C 10 (1999) 629 [hep-ph/9808396] [INSPIRE].
F. Staub, SARAH 4: A tool for (not only SUSY) model builders, Comput. Phys. Commun. 185 (2014) 1773 [arXiv:1309.7223] [INSPIRE].
W.-l. Guo, Z.-z. Xing and S. Zhou, Neutrino Masses, Lepton Flavor Mixing and Leptogenesis in the Minimal Seesaw Model, Int. J. Mod. Phys. E 16 (2007) 1 [hep-ph/0612033] [INSPIRE].
N. Khan and S. Rakshit, Constraints on inert dark matter from the metastability of the electroweak vacuum, Phys. Rev. D 92 (2015) 055006 [arXiv:1503.03085] [INSPIRE].
J. Kalinowski, W. Kotlarski, T. Robens, D. Sokolowska and A.F. Zarnecki, Benchmarking the Inert Doublet Model for e+ e− colliders, JHEP 12 (2018) 081 [arXiv:1809.07712] [INSPIRE].
A. Alloul, N.D. Christensen, C. Degrande, C. Duhr and B. Fuks, FeynRules 2.0 — A complete toolbox for tree-level phenomenology, Comput. Phys. Commun. 185 (2014) 2250 [arXiv:1310.1921] [INSPIRE].
J. Alwall, M. Herquet, F. Maltoni, O. Mattelaer and T. Stelzer, MadGraph 5: Going Beyond, JHEP 06 (2011) 128 [arXiv:1106.0522] [INSPIRE].
T. Sjöstrand, S. Mrenna and P.Z. Skands, PYTHIA 6.4 Physics and Manual, JHEP 05 (2006) 026 [hep-ph/0603175] [INSPIRE].
H1and for the ZEUS collaboration, Parton Distribution Functions, in Proceedings, 31st International Conference on Physics in collisions (PIC 2011): Vancouver, Canada, August 28 – September 1, 2011, arXiv:1111.5452 [INSPIRE].
J. Alwall et al., The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections and their matching to parton shower simulations, JHEP 07 (2014) 079 [arXiv:1405.0301] [INSPIRE].
B.W. Lee, C. Quigg and H.B. Thacker, Weak Interactions at Very High-Energies: The Role of the Higgs Boson Mass, Phys. Rev. D 16 (1977) 1519 [INSPIRE].
Open Access
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
ArXiv ePrint: 1905.12583
Rights and permissions
Open Access . This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
About this article
Cite this article
Bhattacharya, S., Ghosh, P., Saha, A.K. et al. Two component dark matter with inert Higgs doublet: neutrino mass, high scale validity and collider searches. J. High Energ. Phys. 2020, 90 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP03(2020)090
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP03(2020)090